dave wrote:

pyjamarama wrote:


Think how proud Chairman Mao would be...

Hell, Chavez and Castro are already on the record praising Obama's
Authoritarian moves.

You bow to the Saudis, but shun Chavez, who is much less evil.

It was your boy Obama who bowed to the Saudi!

Please, drop the hookah and try to pay attention, Rickmers!

dxAce wrote:

It was your boy Obama who bowed to the Saudi!

....and it was YOUR boy Bush who walked hand-in-hand with the Saudi King
and kissed him. (and we have the pictures to prove it!)

Nick Danger wrote:

dxAce wrote:

It was your boy Obama who bowed to the Saudi!

...and it was YOUR boy Bush who walked hand-in-hand with the Saudi King
and kissed him. (and we have the pictures to prove it!)

BUT, he didn't bow, did he, boy?

dxAce wrote:

dave wrote:

pyjamarama wrote:

Think how proud Chairman Mao would be...

Hell, Chavez and Castro are already on the record praising Obama's
Authoritarian moves.
You bow to the Saudis, but shun Chavez, who is much less evil.

It was your boy Obama who bowed to the Saudi!

Please, drop the hookah and try to pay attention, Rickmers!


I wasn't talking to you, Popeye.

dave wrote:

dxAce wrote:

dave wrote:

pyjamarama wrote:

Think how proud Chairman Mao would be...

Hell, Chavez and Castro are already on the record praising Obama's
Authoritarian moves.
You bow to the Saudis, but shun Chavez, who is much less evil.

It was your boy Obama who bowed to the Saudi!

Please, drop the hookah and try to pay attention, Rickmers!


I wasn't talking to you, Popeye.

I heard you. If you don't want others to hear you I suggest you just whisper
in your boyfriend's ear.

dxAce
Michigan
USA

On Oct 28, 5:10*am, dave wrote:
You bow to the Saudis, but shun Chavez, who is much less evil.
Didn't W show his true devotion by kissing Saudi @$$?

On Oct 27, 5:35Â*pm, pyjamarama wrote:
On Oct 27, 10:14Â*am, N∅ ∅baMa∅ wrote:

Just one year ago, would you have believed that an unelected
government official, not even a Cabinet member confirmed by the Senate
but simply one of the many "czars" appointed by the President, could
arbitrarily cut the pay of executives in private businesses by 50
percent or 90 percent?

Did you think that another "czar" would be talking about restricting
talk radio? That there would be plans afloat to subsidize newspapers--
that is, to create a situation where some newspapers' survival would
depend on the government liking what they publish?

http://townhall.com/columnists/Thoma...dismantling_am...

Think how proud Chairman Mao would be...

Hell, Chavez and Castro are already on the record praising Obama's
Authoritarian moves.

So what's important to a conservative is that what ever you do Castro
and Chavez have to hate it. Doesn't matter how it hurts this county,
the evil commies have to hate it. Well not all the evil commies, the
Chinese hold far to many of our bonds. Thanks Pres. Bush!

So what Obama should do is randomly invade other countries, kill
thousands of our troops for no reason and lower taxes and have another
depression. That's what Bush did and look at the results.....if being
sick makes you happy.

N? ?baMa? wrote:
Just one year ago, would you have believed that an unelected
government official, not even a Cabinet member confirmed by the Senate
but simply one of the many "czars" appointed by the President, could
arbitrarily cut the pay of executives in private businesses by 50
percent or 90 percent?

You can't accuse Obama of seizing these business to prove one point;
then claim they are "private" to prove another point. Your lack of
original thought is obvious.