Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Oct 27, 6:15Â*pm, RHF wrote:
On Oct 27, 2:33Â*pm, Kevin Cunningham wrote: On Oct 27, 1:14Â*pm, N∅ ∅baMa∅ wrote: Just one year ago, would you have believed that an unelected government official, not even a Cabinet member confirmed by the Senate but simply one of the many "czars" appointed by the President, could arbitrarily cut the pay of executives in private businesses by 50 percent or 90 percent? Did you think that another "czar" would be talking about restricting talk radio? That there would be plans afloat to subsidize newspapers-- that is, to create a situation where some newspapers' survival would depend on the government liking what they publish? http://townhall.com/columnists/Thoma...dismantling_am.... - The majority stock holders wanted the executive pay cut. At which meeting and what was the 'vote' -Â*When it's put that way any good free market person - would think that cutting pay is the way to go. "put that way" is a Lie not a Fact -Â*Now throw in that the majority stock holder is the - evil government The US Government Did Not Take 'Stock' in these Companies. Â*- that's another Lie and the repugs think that pay should go up. NO but a Legal Mechanism "US Law" Passed by the US Congress and Signed by the US Prez should be the Means of Action NOT THE WHIM OF SOME OBAMA-CZAR©. "unelected government official, not even a Cabinet member confirmed by the Senate but simply one of the many "czars" appointed by the President, could arbitrarily cut the pay of executives in private businesses" That is how moronic the repugs are. -Â*We, the people of America, are the majority - share holders in a bunch of financial companies. No "We, the people of America" did not take a Share Holder right in these Companies; all we did was make them a Loan. - If we want pay cut, pay should be cut. "we" OK When Did 'WE' Vote To Do So ? -ps- Never Happen and that's another Lie. - No further need for discussion. Right Because you make-up Facts and Lie. "unelected government official, not even a Cabinet member confirmed by the Senate but simply one of the many "czars" appointed by the President, could arbitrarily cut the pay of executives in private businesses" Once Again a Legal Mechanism "US Law" Passed by the US Congress and Signed by the US Prez should be the Means of Action : NOT THE WHIM OF SOME OBAMA-CZAR©. Â*. Obama-Czars© = NO Checks-and-Balances that's Un-Accountable {Bad} Government ~ RHF Â*. We own financial companies, we as Americans. We own a the majority stake in banks and Wall Street financial groups. We own Fanny and Freddie. We own AIG, a nationalized company. That's own, moron, they were nationalized. From what drivel came from your mouth I doubt that you have ever gotten a loan. Do you know that when you have a line of credit, a type of loan, the holder of the line can just walk in and take a look around! Wow, never heard of that did you? Even the companies we loaned money to had to agree to certain things like what payments they would make and business they would and wouldn't conduct. The biggest loan you ever got came from the Bank of the Back Pocket. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
TS520 dismantling.... | Homebrew | |||
Lowe HF-250 dismantling | Shortwave | |||
Sony 6800w dismantling | Shortwave | |||
Report: tsa Slated For Dismantling. | Shortwave | |||
Headline: Government considering dismantling BBC | Shortwave |