From:

http://www.radiotalkingpoints.com/ar...fm anWon.html

Doug Hoffman won the Election (in my opinion)!

If a Democrat had lost in a fashion where over 5 percent of the vote
went to someone that had dropped out the race, the Justice Department
would be getting an ear full about the need for re-run? In my opinion,
Mr. Hoffman would have gotten those votes if Mrs. Scozzafava had not
been on the ballet. Dropping out of the race only two days before the
election is enough to confuse voters who do not keep up to date with
daily events.

So to watch Mr. Axlerod claim the race was some kind of microcosm for
the country only proves just how desperate these people in charge are
willing to go to lie straight to our faces about the facts on the
ground. They understand what is going on and what happened, but choose
to try to paint a picture that alters the appearance of what happened.
Other positions in New York State that were up for election went to
Republicans, so it is very deceptive to claim this race was some kind
of microcosm, unless you like watching soap operas.

But what really burned me up today was listening to Mr. Gingrich
explain his actions regarding this race. Many of us are volunteering
our time and energy behind the scenes to lend our support to the rise
of Conservatism that does not exclude other people. The simple facts
of the matter are that the ambitious plans of the left are imploding
their political party, and the Republicans do not have to gear
themselves to be more like them, we can simply paint a picture over
time that accurately describes what their policies are, and why they
will fail.

That might not sit well with politicians that may like Mr. Gingrich,
who think that politics is a code word for an alternative economy
which is a never ending process of the looting of tax payers. I'll
give Mr. Gingrich the benefit of the doubt regarding the spur of the
moment vacancy of the position, but Mr. Obama may have done the
Republican Party the greatest favor that it has done thus far, expose
Newt Gingrich for the obstacle to the good of the country that many of
us are beginning to realize that he is. If he did not select the
candidate, or could not imagine himself doing so, he had no real
business lending an endorsement in my opinion.

This is why the Republicans are out of power, because people like Newt
Gingrich convince people that Republican Liberals are necessary to the
party, when in fact all most of us can remember is that Congress was
in grid lock more often than not. The United States simply can not
afford to play such kind of juvenile games when we have the Chinese
citizens wanting to emulate Democracy represented by Conservatism, or
other countries that will look at the foolish spending habits of
liberals and declare the kind of Democracy that the United States
represents is neither welcome, or easy to replicate.

And the reason that I am so furious with Newt Gingrich is that he
makes these audacious conclusions without any discovery of the
candidates that are running next year for office or their citizens, he
is just making the assumptions? Many business leaders, scientists, and
other educated citizens are dropping what they are doing to bring
about the complete power of the media to expose why these North
Eastern states are suffering, and how the Democrats are using mental
warfare games to not make our lives better, but to win elections?

But it doesn't stop there does it? What do you call examining large
corporations in order to possibly break them up to pose less risk to
the financial sector? I read that today in the local non-neutral
newspaper, who did not seem to mind that such concepts violate the 5th
Amendment? It took decades to build Walmart, and you want to give some
elected officials who only hold office for a few years at most a say
in their future, and the future of the employees or investors (who
lately have been told tough luck, you loose?), all in the name of
ignoring bankruptcy laws?

We are not talking about protecting helpless old people, but the
actual rebuilding of American society into a tyrannical structure that
will regulate your every thought and action?

Guess what Newt? You want me to go knocking door to door, don't expect
me to explain how our moderate liberal will be the radical left
liberal, even though a moderate liberal will infuriate the
international community or the interests of the United States
overseas. This is bigger than Newt Gingrich, and Newt Gingrich had his
opportunity to make the fine adjustments. Those adjustments did not
work, and Democracy means we give the best qualified candidates the
opportunity to crush the egg shell minds of liberals that resort to
deception in order to further their agenda. Mr. Obama did a lot of
painting and a lot of money was spent, to no avail in New Jersey and
Virginia.

Let me be clear Mr. Gingrich, if you expect to change the minds of
liberals in power now, from turning away from dumb decisions, you
don't offer the position of dumber version 1.2. I sincerely hold that
belief, that people in power are sometimes there because they do
actually change their minds and positions when God moves them that
way. And I believe we send mixed messages by trying to endorse
candidates that hold similar views, there is no incentive to change
your mind, you only think that deep down inside, Newt Gingrich
validates your ideas and opinions. Which makes me wonder, why is he
trying to influence the Republican Party, if deep down he is a
Democrat?

Quote: He was standing in the hole waiting for something to
develop....and WHAP! He got developed? (John Earl Maddon, unrelated
conversational quote, a scenario however that applied to a football
player who thought he knew what was going on in the game, and got
schooled, seemed like an appropriate metaphoric epiphany at this point
in the conversation?)

Since President Obama brags about the challenge of debate, when will
he challenge the black youth of the United States to listen to the
Rush Limbaugh show for six weeks? Will Rush put one hour a day, on the
free side of his web site if they agree to this? Do you want a
challenge, do you want a virtual steel cage match where you must
battle each other with no way out unless one side can declare victory?
Or are you just firing up the banana peels as usual?

If Rush was a rascist, why don't they say, listen to his show and see
for yourself?

Resistance if futile, you must comply.......with the truth!

Can you smell el el el el el el el el el .........what the Rock of
Truth, who has the smartest eyebrow in the Universe, and the whitest
teeth known to man, is ............................cooking?

Being that this is the most exciting, most entertaining, fact finding,
brain busting, fun loving, liberal egg shell mind crunching,
invincible smacketh downeth erectus amongus, you can't see the truth
coming, but you know it is anyway, sonic boom of Conservatism, and,
most powerful keyboard in the world,

Quote: He was standing in the hole waiting for something to
develop....and WHAP! He got developed? (John Earl Maddon, unrelated
conversational quote, a scenario however that applied to a football
player who thought he knew what was going on in the game, and got
schooled, seemed like an appropriate metaphoric epiphany at this point
in the conversation?)

Since President Obama brags about the challenge of debate, when will
he challenge the black youth of the United States to listen to the
Rush Limbaugh show for six weeks? Will Rush put one hour a day, on the
free side of his web site if they agree to this? Do you want a
challenge, do you want a virtual steel cage match where you must
battle each other with no way out unless one side can declare victory?
Or are you just firing up the banana peels as usual?

If Rush was a rascist, why don't they say, listen to his show and see
for yourself?

Resistance if futile, you must comply.......with the truth!

Can you smell el el el el el el el el el .........what the Rock of
Truth, who has the smartest eyebrow in the Universe, and the whitest
teeth known to man, is ............................cooking?

Being that this is the most exciting, most entertaining, fact finding,
brain busting, fun loving, liberal egg shell mind crunching,
invincible smacketh downeth erectus amongus, you can't see the truth
coming, but you know it is anyway, sonic boom of Conservatism, and,
most powerful keyboard in the world,

do you feel lucky?

Universal Disclaimer for the Public Domain, Version 1.4, dated Oct
10th, 2009

a) The views expressed by this website and the author to include all
electronic forms of communication are not representative of
advertisers, or other third parties that may store and or transmit the
messages from this private computer, which you may observe at your own
risk, with no liability to the authors, or any party related to
transmitting, storing, or any other aspect of the material involved,
including email correspondence, which is not necessary to the function
of the website, and may or may not be archived. No personal
information exchanged will be shared without your consent, or provided
to third parties with out the express permission of the parties and,
or, individuals concerned.

b) The author(s) of this content and those who may interact with it in
various known or unknown electronic methods do not give permission to
any third parties to share or provide private personal information who
may operate as part of the internet communications system, including
all parties, who may technically intercept communications due to the
nature of network conditions beyond both the author's legal and
physical control, unless those communications represent violations of
the law, upon which the author, and or web site will cooperate to
pursue any legal remedies.

c) The views expressed by the author or website may or may not contain
factual information, due to the use of sarcasm or parody. The views
may or may not be complete, either by design, to pre-empt being called
a liar even if telling the truth, or by error due to typographical,
grammer, or other technical communication problems not realized or
imagined, or the possibility of views based on false or missing
information, or with the intention of being used for entertainment
purposes only, and not as a definitive judgement on the actions,
character, or reputation of an organization, individual, or groups of
individuals, with the intent of communicating with a limited group of
people, and not the general public, however no distribution
restrictions apply for fair use purposes described by the US Copyright
Office, if no other restrictions are present or communicated, with all
commercial proceeds associated with the distribution of the content to
remain the sole possesion of the original author.

d) Any humor if used, is not intended to offend people, and may be
designed to apply the principals of peer pressure through reverse
examination to accomplish the communication of principals or ideas
that consist of traditional or proposed social values that are proven
to advance the common good, and are not meant to discredit, disparage
or demean any person or entities in any professional or personal
manner, by attempting to share through the eyes or opinion of the
author, for which it is expected that you read at your own risk, with
no liability held to the author or any third parties who may store,
transfer, or forward this message to others, in the traditions of free
speech, fair use, and to play a positive role in a society that
believes that graphically depicting male homosexuals having sex, and
other unusual sex acts is considered free speech or that the use of
abortion to limit Negros, Latinos, and other races from "spreading the
wealth around" as a "matter of privacy" (which the author does not
condone).

e)The use of humor is a known ingredient in providing teachable
moments, and to validate and even demonstrate artistic expressions
that are not shared by others, as demonstrated by many valuable
scientific observations that were scoffed at in the past, yet proven
to be quite valid decades later, upon which the humor used in all
electronic communications by the author are based, in the principals
and traditions of free speech and pursuit of happiness, and may not be
a representation of others, including God.

f) Additional use of automated anonymous page use tracking computer
scripts (web page programs) may be licensed by www.google.com, for
bandwidth verification or potential advertisement opportunities or
incorporation of web master tools in the future.

g) Advertisements that may appear are not necessarily endorsed by the
author, either by admission, or by silence, nor are related links,
that may be provided for all or any of the following known or unknown
purposes, but not limited to, informational, educational, and for the
purpose of giving copy right credit referal information under the
terms outlined in the conditions applied to the term "fair use"
regarding conversations and print under US Copy Right Law.

h) It is the opinion of the author that effective 1 December, 2009,
the proposed regulations from the FTC violate the first and fifth
amendments of the United States Constitution, by infringing through
economic affliction the burden without compensation all financial
details concerning the communications of both free enterprise and
opinion, and other civil rights such as "punishment must be fair" and
not at the "discretion" of public officials, or that advertisers are
assumed to be guilty of deception when United States law provides that
you are innocent before being proven guilty, and are in fact
demonstrations that there are current members of Congress that neither
understand the spirit of the law our founding fathers made for the
United States of America, or understand how they work in the opinion
of the author, as of October 10th, 2009, especially in light of
anticipated, and hopefully defeated, legislative taxes relating to
energy use and the burden of publishers and advertisers to comply with
the law and manage the environment, and in light that there are
various consumer protection agencies, including the Better Business
Bureau, which has free consumer information.

i)Although the content provided meets or exceeds those new
requirements to the knowledge of the author, and modifications to
version 1.3 of this disclaimer is a result of the opinion of the
author that blogging is another definition for a potentially infinite
number or forms of electronic communication, as such the author will
retroactively apply this version, 1.4 to all forms of previous
communications, when and wherever possible, as time allows, in order
to properly convey the intention of the author and to demonstrate an
enthusiasm to comply with the law, and not enthusiastically pursue
getting high on cocaine as often as possible as Barack Hussein Obama
has admitted in his book (paraphrase, synopsis), according to (mmm,
mmm, mmm (sonic emphasis)) Rush Hudson Limbaugh, (mmm mmm mmm (sonic
emphasis)).

j) Use of this disclaimer for either personal or professional use is
permitted with no restrictions. These restrictions or disclaimers do
not prohibit the author from pursuing or communicating in a truthful
manner, or guarantee that the audience will understand all things as
intended, and, or result in being called incoherent, or even a Chicken
Chaser!