If you'd like to actually address my point, we can return to something
that begins to resemble a discussion, again.

I addressed your point. You just weren't happy with the way they were
addressed.


No, actually you deleted the point.

If I deleted it, it was a point that I didn't feel needed addressing.

You addressed items that weren't being argued.

Then why are you responding. Oh, that's right! Your Maus...who has to get
in the last word and argue insigniifcant things ad nauseum....

So, again, you want to address the point...we can return this to a
meaningful discussion.

I addressed the points I felt needed addressing. If you want to continue
this thread to infinity and beyond...it's up to you.

On 12/18/09 14:29 , fdgdfgfdg wrote:
If you'd like to actually address my point, we can return to something
that begins to resemble a discussion, again.

I addressed your point. You just weren't happy with the way they were
addressed.


No, actually you deleted the point.

If I deleted it, it was a point that I didn't feel needed addressing.


It was the point of the conversation. You deleted it and took the
conversation way from IBOC and made it about AM Stereo. I made a an
AM stereo reference as a comparartive. My point was about IBOC. You
deleted it. And addressed items that weren't being argued.




Then why are you responding. Oh, that's right! Your Maus...who has to get
in the last word and argue insigniifcant things ad nauseum....


Yeah....I"m the problem. You were so attentive to details you
failed to miss that I was actually on your side of the issue. Go
back and re-read. When you get to my actual point, let me know.

"D. Peter Maus" wrote in message
...
On 12/18/09 14:29 , fdgdfgfdg wrote:
If you'd like to actually address my point, we can return to something
that begins to resemble a discussion, again.

I addressed your point. You just weren't happy with the way they were
addressed.


No, actually you deleted the point.

If I deleted it, it was a point that I didn't feel needed addressing.


It was the point of the conversation. You deleted it and took the
conversation way from IBOC and made it about AM Stereo. I made a an AM
stereo reference as a comparartive. My point was about IBOC. You deleted
it. And addressed items that weren't being argued.

Then I made my points. Why do you keep responding. (Oh, I know...your are
trying to find a way to keep this thread going...)

Then why are you responding. Oh, that's right! Your Maus...who has to
get
in the last word and argue insigniifcant things ad nauseum....


Yeah....I"m the problem. You were so attentive to details you failed to
miss that I was actually on your side of the issue.

Again, then why are you responding.

When you get to my actual point, let me know.

I dont care about your actual point.

On 12/19/09 24:26 , fdgdfgfdg wrote:
"D. Peter wrote in message
...
On 12/18/09 14:29 , fdgdfgfdg wrote:
If you'd like to actually address my point, we can return to something
that begins to resemble a discussion, again.

I addressed your point. You just weren't happy with the way they were
addressed.


No, actually you deleted the point.

If I deleted it, it was a point that I didn't feel needed addressing.


It was the point of the conversation. You deleted it and took the
conversation way from IBOC and made it about AM Stereo. I made a an AM
stereo reference as a comparartive. My point was about IBOC. You deleted
it. And addressed items that weren't being argued.

Then I made my points. Why do you keep responding. (Oh, I know...your are
trying to find a way to keep this thread going...)

Then why are you responding. Oh, that's right! Your Maus...who has to
get
in the last word and argue insigniifcant things ad nauseum....


Yeah....I"m the problem. You were so attentive to details you failed to
miss that I was actually on your side of the issue.

Again, then why are you responding.

When you get to my actual point, let me know.

I dont care about your actual point.




And THAT, my dear boy is the real point of your message.

Thank you.

And have a Merry Christmas.


D. Peter Maus

I have an old FM converter, for hooking up to an AM car radio to receive
AM/FM.Many years ago, I used to use it too.
cuhulin

"D. Peter Maus" wrote in message
...
On 12/19/09 24:26 , fdgdfgfdg wrote:
"D. Peter wrote in message
...
On 12/18/09 14:29 , fdgdfgfdg wrote:
If you'd like to actually address my point, we can return to
something
that begins to resemble a discussion, again.

I addressed your point. You just weren't happy with the way they
were
addressed.


No, actually you deleted the point.

If I deleted it, it was a point that I didn't feel needed addressing.


It was the point of the conversation. You deleted it and took the
conversation way from IBOC and made it about AM Stereo. I made a an AM
stereo reference as a comparartive. My point was about IBOC. You deleted
it. And addressed items that weren't being argued.

Then I made my points. Why do you keep responding. (Oh, I know...your
are
trying to find a way to keep this thread going...)

Then why are you responding. Oh, that's right! Your Maus...who has to
get
in the last word and argue insigniifcant things ad nauseum....


Yeah....I"m the problem. You were so attentive to details you failed
to
miss that I was actually on your side of the issue.

Again, then why are you responding.

When you get to my actual point, let me know.

I dont care about your actual point.




And THAT, my dear boy is the real point of your message.

Right...I am agreeing with you, yet you want to keep this thread going
trying to find something to fight over.

Thank you.

Welcome

And have a Merry Christmas.

You as well.