| Page 1 of 2 | 1 | 2 |
|
|
Just say no to advanced scanning machines at air ports?
The following is the personal opinion of the author, who reserves the
right to republish this piece for profit, which you may read at your own risk, without any legal liabilities to the author or anyone who may publish or share this article (which must include this disclaimer) for which you here by waive the ability to sue for any reason in whole or in part in or outside of a court of law, if you do not agree, the entire article is to be considered a work of fiction, since you apparently want to live in an imaginary world. Why waste the money? Just show up in a bathrobe? Hey, if we are going to spend that kind of money, why not skip the machine, we get inspected totally naked, by a TSA employee who is also totally naked and must have at least two years experience as a stripper? I mean, why not have fun with it? If you are going to have to wait four hours to check in, what on Earth are you going to do? Why all the talk of gloom and doom? You should make me the CEO of American Airlines, I'll make billions! I think Mark Stein has rubbed his ideological sense of humor on my way of thinking now? You see what you've done Rush, now I'm having fun again? Thanks Mark! Happy New Year! |
Just say no to advanced scanning machines at air ports?
Kind of clever huh? You could shut down all the strip clubs in the
United States and give them all jobs at the TSA? I wonder what that acronym will then stand for? Terrible Security Associates? Hmmm, guess I'll have to work on that one? You realize of course you'll have to install poles at the inspection stations? LOL. OMG! I hope they have toilet paper on the air plane, last I heard those evironmental retards want to ban the stuff? Can you imagine? I better get a beer, my mind is wandering now? |
Just say no to advanced scanning machines at air ports?
Editor RadioTalkingPoints wrote:
The following is the personal opinion of the author, who reserves the right to republish this piece for profit, which you may read at your own risk, without any legal liabilities to the author or anyone who may publish or share this article (which must include this disclaimer) for which you here by waive the ability to sue for any reason in whole or in part in or outside of a court of law, if you do not agree, the entire article is to be considered a work of fiction, since you apparently want to live in an imaginary world. Why waste the money? Just show up in a bathrobe? Hey, if we are going to spend that kind of money, why not skip the machine, we get inspected totally naked, by a TSA employee who is also totally naked and must have at least two years experience as a stripper? I mean, why not have fun with it? If you are going to have to wait four hours to check in, what on Earth are you going to do? Why all the talk of gloom and doom? You should make me the CEO of American Airlines, I'll make billions! I think Mark Stein has rubbed his ideological sense of humor on my way of thinking now? You see what you've done Rush, now I'm having fun again? Thanks Mark! Happy New Year! Esp since THz radiation might cause DNA damage. -- Dirk http://www.transcendence.me.uk/ - Transcendence UK http://www.theconsensus.org/ - A UK political party http://www.blogtalkradio.com/onetribe - Occult Talk Show |
Just say no to advanced scanning machines at air ports?
"Dirk Bruere at NeoPax" wrote in message ... Editor RadioTalkingPoints wrote: The following is the personal opinion of the author, who reserves the right to republish this piece for profit, which you may read at your own risk, without any legal liabilities to the author or anyone who may publish or share this article (which must include this disclaimer) for which you here by waive the ability to sue for any reason in whole or in part in or outside of a court of law, if you do not agree, the entire article is to be considered a work of fiction, since you apparently want to live in an imaginary world. Why waste the money? Just show up in a bathrobe? Hey, if we are going to spend that kind of money, why not skip the machine, we get inspected totally naked, by a TSA employee who is also totally naked and must have at least two years experience as a stripper? I mean, why not have fun with it? If you are going to have to wait four hours to check in, what on Earth are you going to do? Why all the talk of gloom and doom? You should make me the CEO of American Airlines, I'll make billions! I think Mark Stein has rubbed his ideological sense of humor on my way of thinking now? You see what you've done Rush, now I'm having fun again? Thanks Mark! Happy New Year! Esp since THz radiation might cause DNA damage. -- Dirk How long is it going to be before we have to fly in four point restraints in our underware? This is bull**** by degrees. Now we can't have so much as a blanket or pillow, let alone our laptop or anything else for at least the last hour of the flight (on many domestic flights, this will mean not at all, since we can't have anything before being at cruising altitude already). They just keep punishing law abiding travelers, meanwhile, the ones that are intent upon carnage will only figure another way around it. This has been shown time and time again. Someone needs to do their friggin' job and stop these yahoos BEFORE they get on the plane. This one could have been stopped any of SEVERAL times before ever embarking! If I ever come home, I'll take a friggin' BOAT, it's not so much more expensive anymore, and you get your own room and don't have to eat nasty airline food (or deal with a lack of it). |
Just say no to advanced scanning machines at air ports?
Brenda Ann wrote:
"Dirk Bruere at NeoPax" wrote in message ... Editor RadioTalkingPoints wrote: The following is the personal opinion of the author, who reserves the right to republish this piece for profit, which you may read at your own risk, without any legal liabilities to the author or anyone who may publish or share this article (which must include this disclaimer) for which you here by waive the ability to sue for any reason in whole or in part in or outside of a court of law, if you do not agree, the entire article is to be considered a work of fiction, since you apparently want to live in an imaginary world. Why waste the money? Just show up in a bathrobe? Hey, if we are going to spend that kind of money, why not skip the machine, we get inspected totally naked, by a TSA employee who is also totally naked and must have at least two years experience as a stripper? I mean, why not have fun with it? If you are going to have to wait four hours to check in, what on Earth are you going to do? Why all the talk of gloom and doom? You should make me the CEO of American Airlines, I'll make billions! I think Mark Stein has rubbed his ideological sense of humor on my way of thinking now? You see what you've done Rush, now I'm having fun again? Thanks Mark! Happy New Year! Esp since THz radiation might cause DNA damage. -- Dirk How long is it going to be before we have to fly in four point restraints in our underware? This is bull**** by degrees. Now we can't have so much as a blanket or pillow, let alone our laptop or anything else for at least the last hour of the flight (on many domestic flights, this will mean not at all, since we can't have anything before being at cruising altitude already). They just keep punishing law abiding travelers, meanwhile, the ones that are intent upon carnage will only figure another way around it. This has been shown time and time again. Someone needs to do their friggin' job and stop these yahoos BEFORE they get on the plane. This one could have been stopped any of SEVERAL times before ever embarking! If I ever come home, I'll take a friggin' BOAT, it's not so much more expensive anymore, and you get your own room and don't have to eat nasty airline food (or deal with a lack of it). If enough people do that terrorists will start sinking ships and you will be back to body searches etc again. -- Dirk http://www.transcendence.me.uk/ - Transcendence UK http://www.theconsensus.org/ - A UK political party http://www.blogtalkradio.com/onetribe - Occult Talk Show |
Just say no to advanced scanning machines at air ports?
"Dirk Bruere at NeoPax" wrote in message ... Brenda Ann wrote: "Dirk Bruere at NeoPax" wrote in message ... Editor RadioTalkingPoints wrote: The following is the personal opinion of the author, who reserves the right to republish this piece for profit, which you may read at your own risk, without any legal liabilities to the author or anyone who may publish or share this article (which must include this disclaimer) for which you here by waive the ability to sue for any reason in whole or in part in or outside of a court of law, if you do not agree, the entire article is to be considered a work of fiction, since you apparently want to live in an imaginary world. Why waste the money? Just show up in a bathrobe? Hey, if we are going to spend that kind of money, why not skip the machine, we get inspected totally naked, by a TSA employee who is also totally naked and must have at least two years experience as a stripper? I mean, why not have fun with it? If you are going to have to wait four hours to check in, what on Earth are you going to do? Why all the talk of gloom and doom? You should make me the CEO of American Airlines, I'll make billions! I think Mark Stein has rubbed his ideological sense of humor on my way of thinking now? You see what you've done Rush, now I'm having fun again? Thanks Mark! Happy New Year! Esp since THz radiation might cause DNA damage. -- Dirk How long is it going to be before we have to fly in four point restraints in our underware? This is bull**** by degrees. Now we can't have so much as a blanket or pillow, let alone our laptop or anything else for at least the last hour of the flight (on many domestic flights, this will mean not at all, since we can't have anything before being at cruising altitude already). They just keep punishing law abiding travelers, meanwhile, the ones that are intent upon carnage will only figure another way around it. This has been shown time and time again. Someone needs to do their friggin' job and stop these yahoos BEFORE they get on the plane. This one could have been stopped any of SEVERAL times before ever embarking! If I ever come home, I'll take a friggin' BOAT, it's not so much more expensive anymore, and you get your own room and don't have to eat nasty airline food (or deal with a lack of it). If enough people do that terrorists will start sinking ships and you will be back to body searches etc again. -- Dirk While it may not be impossible to sink a ship, it's a damn site harder than dropping a plane. They'd have to have something significantly larger than they could carry on their person to get through that hull. This is not to say, of course, that they couldn't do some damage to whatever room they happened to be in. |
Just say no to advanced scanning machines at air ports?
Brenda Ann wrote:
[...] How long is it going to be before we have to fly in four point restraints in our underware? This is bull**** by degrees. Now we can't have so much as a blanket or pillow, let alone our laptop or anything else for at least the last hour of the flight (on many domestic flights, this will mean not at all, since we can't have anything before being at cruising altitude already). They just keep punishing law abiding travelers, meanwhile, the ones that are intent upon carnage will only figure another way around it. This has been shown time and time again. Someone needs to do their friggin' job and stop these yahoos BEFORE they get on the plane. This one could have been stopped any of SEVERAL times before ever embarking! If I ever come home, I'll take a friggin' BOAT, it's not so much more expensive anymore, and you get your own room and don't have to eat nasty airline food (or deal with a lack of it). Far better technique than converting our societies into ever-tightening "national security" states: 1) Stop invading and occupying other people's countries or fomenting revolution in them, and 2) stop supporting those who do; if we did so, 90 per cent. of the hatred of the West would disappear in time. At the same time we need to 3) take steps to prevent the invasion and occupation of our own lands. With all good wishes, Kevin Alfred Strom. -- http://kevinalfredstrom.com/ |
Just say no to advanced scanning machines at air ports?
On Thu, 31 Dec 2009 at 05:17:27, Kevin Alfred Strom
wrote in uk.politics.misc : Far better technique than converting our societies into ever-tightening "national security" states: 1) Stop invading and occupying other people's countries or fomenting revolution in them, and 2) stop supporting those who do; if we did so, 90 per cent. of the hatred of the West would disappear in time. At the same time we need to 3) take steps to prevent the invasion and occupation of our own lands. If they stopped carrying out terrorist attacks on the West, *we'd* stop hassling *them*... -- Paul Hyett, Cheltenham |
Just say no to advanced scanning machines at air ports?
On 31 Dec, 07:29, Paul Hyett wrote:
On Thu, 31 Dec 2009 at 05:17:27, Kevin Alfred Strom wrote in uk.politics.misc : Far better technique than converting our societies into ever-tightening "national security" states: 1) Stop invading and occupying other people's countries or fomenting revolution in them, and 2) stop supporting those who do; if we did so, 90 per cent. of the hatred of the West would disappear in time. At the same time we need to 3) take steps to prevent the invasion and occupation of our own lands. If they stopped carrying out terrorist attacks on the West, *we'd* stop hassling *them*... -- Paul Hyett, Cheltenham Chicken and the egg...... America has long tried to change the world into it's own vision. The UK has been its Poodle, certainly since Thatchers time, and probably before.The 'Special relationship' IMHO is something which exists only in the minds of some British politicians. I do feel however, that the time has come for 'profiling' at airport security. The Authorities know who is a 'probable, and who certainly isn't, based on the intelligence information which they possess - why aren't they using it? |
Just say no to advanced scanning machines at air ports?
"Editor RadioTalkingPoints" wrote in message ... The following is the personal opinion of the author, Good, you are legally responsible for the message. who reserves the right to republish this piece for profit, I doubt anyone would pay you, but I do not give permission for you to republish anythinh I type for profit or gain. which you may read at your own risk, Why, will my cat explode? without any legal liabilities to the author You said above you were responsible for the post, so that includes legally. or anyone who may publish or share this article At that point they would be jointly liable for the message. (which must include this disclaimer) Which disclaimer? for which you here by waive the ability to sue for any reason in whole or in part in or outside of a court of law, You are legally responsible for what you post, if you do not agree or recognise this point, do not post. if you do not agree, the entire article is to be considered a work of fiction, It can't be as you are legally responsible for your message. since you apparently want to live in an imaginary world. Are you talking about yourself? What you are displaying is a classic symptom of mental illness. Why waste the money? Just show up in a bathrobe? Hey, if we are going to spend that kind of money, why not skip the machine, we get inspected totally naked, by a TSA employee who is also totally naked and must have at least two years experience as a stripper? I mean, why not have fun with it? If you are going to have to wait four hours to check in, what on Earth are you going to do? Why all the talk of gloom and doom? You should make me the CEO of American Airlines, I'll make billions! I think Mark Stein has rubbed his ideological sense of humor on my way of thinking now? You see what you've done Rush, now I'm having fun again? Thanks Mark! Happy New Year! What a boring pointless message you posted. Why spam newsgroups? |
Just say no to advanced scanning machines at air ports?
On Dec 30, 7:02*pm, Editor RadioTalkingPoints
wrote: The following is the personal opinion of the author, who reserves the right to republish this piece for profit, which you may read at your own risk, without any legal liabilities to the author or anyone who may publish or share this article (which must include this disclaimer) for which you here by waive the ability to sue for any reason in whole or in part in or outside of a court of law, if you do not agree, the entire article is to be considered a work of fiction, since you apparently want to live in an imaginary world. Why waste the money? *Just show up in a bathrobe? *Hey, if we are going to spend that kind of money, why not skip the machine, we get inspected totally naked, by a TSA employee who is also totally naked and must have at least two years experience as a stripper? *I mean, why not have fun with it? *If you are going to have to wait four hours to check in, what on Earth are you going to do? Why all the talk of gloom and doom? *You should make me the CEO of American Airlines, I'll make billions! I think Mark Stein has rubbed his ideological sense of humor *on my way of thinking now? *You see what you've done Rush, now I'm having fun again? *Thanks Mark! Happy New Year! Say No all you want. You have already been overruled. This will be implemented because even though it wouldn't have stopped the underpants bomber, it's a cool new way for government employees to seize more control over private citizens, and isn't that what freedom is all about? The leering and jeering parts are just neat little bonuses for them, on top of the very generous package of bonuses and goodies they already enjoy. |
Just say no to advanced scanning machines at air ports?
On Thu, 31 Dec 2009 07:29:58 GMT, Paul Hyett
wrote: On Thu, 31 Dec 2009 at 05:17:27, Kevin Alfred Strom wrote in uk.politics.misc : Far better technique than converting our societies into ever-tightening "national security" states: 1) Stop invading and occupying other people's countries or fomenting revolution in them, and 2) stop supporting those who do; if we did so, 90 per cent. of the hatred of the West would disappear in time. At the same time we need to 3) take steps to prevent the invasion and occupation of our own lands. If they stopped carrying out terrorist attacks on the West, *we'd* stop hassling *them*... The first arab terrorist attacks against western interests were in 1970. Palestinians hijacking jets. Nobody except Israel was hassling them but Israel did and still does get a lot of backing from both USA and UK. The elephant in the room is still there and it's Israel and Palestine. Sort that and much of the problem will vanish. The current wave was sparked by the invasion of Iraq. Quite why that was done I can't work out. If they wanted a villain then the obvious choice was the country where the Sept 11 hijackers originated. Plus at the time the same country was holding britons as prisoners and allegations of torture were being made. We had a real excuse to invade not like the phony one made for Iraq. The place is a hotbed of religious fundamentalism. Invading and stamping it out should have been a prime objective. Perhaps the reason the Saudis were left alone is because the ruling families are pals with the ruling families in the west. |
Just say no to advanced scanning machines at air ports?
On Dec 31, 11:59*am, Alang wrote:
On Thu, 31 Dec 2009 07:29:58 GMT, Paul Hyett wrote: On Thu, 31 Dec 2009 at 05:17:27, Kevin Alfred Strom wrote in uk.politics.misc : Far better technique than converting our societies into ever-tightening "national security" states: 1) Stop invading and occupying other people's countries or fomenting revolution in them, and 2) stop supporting those who do; if we did so, 90 per cent. of the hatred of the West would disappear in time. At the same time we need to 3) take steps to prevent the invasion and occupation of our own lands. If they stopped carrying out terrorist attacks on the West, *we'd* stop hassling *them*... The first arab terrorist attacks against western interests were in 1970. Palestinians hijacking jets. *Nobody except Israel was hassling them but Israel did and still does get a lot of backing from both USA and UK. The elephant in the room is still there and it's Israel and Palestine. Sort that and much of the problem will vanish. The current wave was sparked by the invasion of Iraq. Quite why that was done I can't work out. If they wanted a villain then the obvious choice was the country where the Sept 11 hijackers originated. Plus at the time the same country was holding britons as prisoners and allegations of torture were being made. We had a real excuse to invade not like the phony one made for Iraq. The place is a hotbed of religious fundamentalism. Invading and stamping it out should have been a prime objective. *Perhaps the reason the Saudis were left alone is because the ruling families are pals with the ruling families in the west. .....and they have their own private plane....;-) |
Just say no to advanced scanning machines at air ports?
aracari wrote:
That assumes terrorists are responding to something the West has done to them. This may be the excuse used by a tiny minority of nutcases, but overwhelmingly the reason is hatred and jealousy, ie they're varieties of socialists who want to destroy the current global social order by imposing their ideology onto the rest of us through intimidation and fear. Well the old Islamic caliphate they wish to restore was a lot of things, but never Socialist... -- William Black "Any number under six" The answer given by Englishman Richard Peeke when asked by the Duke of Medina Sidonia how many Spanish sword and buckler men he could beat single handed with a quarterstaff. |
Just say no to advanced scanning machines at air ports?
On 31 Dec, 08:59, broadssailor wrote:
On 31 Dec, 07:29, Paul Hyett wrote: On Thu, 31 Dec 2009 at 05:17:27, Kevin Alfred Strom wrote in uk.politics.misc : Far better technique than converting our societies into ever-tightening "national security" states: 1) Stop invading and occupying other people's countries or fomenting revolution in them, and 2) stop supporting those who do; if we did so, 90 per cent. of the hatred of the West would disappear in time. At the same time we need to 3) take steps to prevent the invasion and occupation of our own lands. If they stopped carrying out terrorist attacks on the West, *we'd* stop hassling *them*... -- Paul Hyett, Cheltenham Chicken and the egg...... America has long tried to change the world into it's own vision. The UK has been its Poodle, certainly since Thatchers time, and probably before.The 'Special relationship' IMHO is something which exists only in the minds of some British politicians. I do feel however, that the time has come for 'profiling' at airport security. The Authorities know who is a 'probable, and who certainly isn't, based on the intelligence information which they possess - why aren't they using it? Because it's politically incorrect. I heard a live interview on You and Yours just after that nutter. The security rep said right away that the airports and security services need to start observing the likely people by body language and by using common sense instead of imposing restrictions upon everyone. Let's face it, if you had two guys at the checkout desk - one of them is a ginger haired Scot in a kilt and the other is a middle-eastern looking guy with shifty eyes and a slightly nervous disposition, then which one do you think is out to drop the plane? By the lack of our politicians actions we are all suffering by having our liberties constantly restriced. The terrorists are certainly winning. McKevvy |
Just say no to advanced scanning machines at air ports?
Brenda Ann wrote:
Someone needs to do their friggin' job and stop these yahoos BEFORE they get on the plane. This one could have been stopped any of SEVERAL times before ever embarking! If I ever come home, I'll take a friggin' BOAT, it's not so much more expensive anymore, and you get your own room and don't have to eat nasty airline food (or deal with a lack of it). I suggest we get the **** out of their territory, let the Israelis level the place, and be done with it. |
Just say no to advanced scanning machines at air ports?
Paul Hyett wrote:
On Thu, 31 Dec 2009 at 05:17:27, Kevin Alfred Strom wrote in uk.politics.misc : Far better technique than converting our societies into ever-tightening "national security" states: 1) Stop invading and occupying other people's countries or fomenting revolution in them, and 2) stop supporting those who do; if we did so, 90 per cent. of the hatred of the West would disappear in time. At the same time we need to 3) take steps to prevent the invasion and occupation of our own lands. If they stopped carrying out terrorist attacks on the West, *we'd* stop hassling *them*... You go first. |
Just say no to advanced scanning machines at air ports?
Chicken and the egg...... America has long tried to change the world into it's own vision. The UK has been its Poodle, certainly since Thatchers time, and probably before.The 'Special relationship' IMHO is something which exists only in the minds of some British politicians. I do feel however, that the time has come for 'profiling' at airport security. The Authorities know who is a 'probable, and who certainly isn't, based on the intelligence information which they possess - why aren't they using it? Ask the Dutch. They're the ones who let the NUB* onto the plane. *Nigerian Underwear Bomber |
Just say no to advanced scanning machines at air ports?
dave wrote:
Chicken and the egg...... America has long tried to change the world into it's own vision. The UK has been its Poodle, certainly since Thatchers time, and probably before.The 'Special relationship' IMHO is something which exists only in the minds of some British politicians. I do feel however, that the time has come for 'profiling' at airport security. The Authorities know who is a 'probable, and who certainly isn't, based on the intelligence information which they possess - why aren't they using it? Ask the Dutch. They're the ones who let the NUB* onto the plane. Ask the Nigerians, they're the ones who gave him the boarding card. Ask the US State Department, they're the ones who gave him a US visa. -- William Black "Any number under six" The answer given by Englishman Richard Peeke when asked by the Duke of Medina Sidonia how many Spanish sword and buckler men he could beat single handed with a quarterstaff. |
Just say no to advanced scanning machines at air ports?
On 31 Dec, 13:19, dave wrote:
.. I suggest we get the **** out of their territory, let the Israelis level the place, and be done with it. I fear that Israel is the problem , not the solution. There were no Arab terrorist attacks on western interests until 1970. Make of that what you will |
Just say no to advanced scanning machines at air ports?
aracari wrote:
'William Black' wrote thus: aracari wrote: That assumes terrorists are responding to something the West has done to them. This may be the excuse used by a tiny minority of nutcases, but overwhelmingly the reason is hatred and jealousy, ie they're varieties of socialists who want to destroy the current global social order by imposing their ideology onto the rest of us through intimidation and fear. Well the old Islamic caliphate they wish to restore was a lot of things, but never Socialist... Why not? Because they never ever wanted the people to have control of the means of production, distribution and exchange. All were in the hands of the Caliph. Despotism and tyranny are not Socialist. Although some Socialists are despots and run tyrannies... -- William Black "Any number under six" The answer given by Englishman Richard Peeke when asked by the Duke of Medina Sidonia how many Spanish sword and buckler men he could beat single handed with a quarterstaff. |
Just say no to advanced scanning machines at air ports?
On Thu, 31 Dec 2009 16:48:02 +0000, William Black
wrote: aracari wrote: 'William Black' wrote thus: aracari wrote: That assumes terrorists are responding to something the West has done to them. This may be the excuse used by a tiny minority of nutcases, but overwhelmingly the reason is hatred and jealousy, ie they're varieties of socialists who want to destroy the current global social order by imposing their ideology onto the rest of us through intimidation and fear. Well the old Islamic caliphate they wish to restore was a lot of things, but never Socialist... Why not? Because they never ever wanted the people to have control of the means of production, distribution and exchange. All were in the hands of the Caliph. Despotism and tyranny are not Socialist. Of course they are. Everybody is the property of the state. That's socialism Although some Socialists are despots and run tyrannies... |
Just say no to advanced scanning machines at air ports?
On Dec 31, 1:22*pm, dave wrote:
Ask the Dutch. *They're the ones who let the NUB* onto the plane. *Nigerian Underwear Bomber Under instruction from the US Feds......... |
Just say no to advanced scanning machines at air ports?
Alang wrote:
On Thu, 31 Dec 2009 16:48:02 +0000, William Black wrote: aracari wrote: 'William Black' wrote thus: aracari wrote: That assumes terrorists are responding to something the West has done to them. This may be the excuse used by a tiny minority of nutcases, but overwhelmingly the reason is hatred and jealousy, ie they're varieties of socialists who want to destroy the current global social order by imposing their ideology onto the rest of us through intimidation and fear. Well the old Islamic caliphate they wish to restore was a lot of things, but never Socialist... Why not? Because they never ever wanted the people to have control of the means of production, distribution and exchange. All were in the hands of the Caliph. Despotism and tyranny are not Socialist. Of course they are. Everybody is the property of the state. That's socialism But everyone wasn't. The satraps were quasi independent rulers. A society with formalised slavery isn't going to treat everyone in the same way. -- William Black "Any number under six" The answer given by Englishman Richard Peeke when asked by the Duke of Medina Sidonia how many Spanish sword and buckler men he could beat single handed with a quarterstaff. |
Just say no to advanced scanning machines at air ports?
aracari wrote:
'William Black' wrote thus: aracari wrote: 'William Black' wrote thus: aracari wrote: That assumes terrorists are responding to something the West has done to them. This may be the excuse used by a tiny minority of nutcases, but overwhelmingly the reason is hatred and jealousy, ie they're varieties of socialists who want to destroy the current global social order by imposing their ideology onto the rest of us through intimidation and fear. Well the old Islamic caliphate they wish to restore was a lot of things, but never Socialist... Why not? Because they never ever wanted the people to have control of the means of production, distribution and exchange. Only a small number of the socialist snakeheads want this. No It's pretty fundamental to all Socialists, which is why we know Tony Blair isn't one... I describe socialism as a snake with many heads which spend their time hissing and snapping at each other and only come together to fight their eternal enemy: freedom and liberty. We all already know that you define words to mean what you want them to mean. So did Humpty Dumpty... -- William Black "Any number under six" The answer given by Englishman Richard Peeke when asked by the Duke of Medina Sidonia how many Spanish sword and buckler men he could beat single handed with a quarterstaff. |
Just say no to advanced scanning machines at air ports?
"McKevvy" wrote in message ... .. The security rep said right away that the airports and security services need to start observing the likely people by body language and by using common sense instead of imposing restrictions upon everyone. Let's face it, if you had two guys at the checkout desk - one of them is a ginger haired Scot in a kilt and the other is a middle-eastern looking guy with shifty eyes and a slightly nervous disposition, then which one do you think is out to drop the plane? It might be pointed out that in this case racial profiling based upon "a middle eastern looking guy with shifty eyes" would not have been fruitful in this case. What SHOULD have kept this guy off a plane was his own father notifying authorities that he could be trouble.. |
Just say no to advanced scanning machines at air ports?
Bob Dobbs wrote:
Brenda Ann wrote: What SHOULD have kept this guy off a plane was his own father notifying authorities that he could be trouble.. Their spam detector probably deleted the warning, thinking it was just another Nigerian 419 message.g Exactly. They got as far as "Nigerian banker"... |
Just say no to advanced scanning machines at air ports?
"broadssailor" wrote in message ... On 31 Dec, 07:29, Paul Hyett wrote: On Thu, 31 Dec 2009 at 05:17:27, Kevin Alfred Strom wrote in uk.politics.misc : Far better technique than converting our societies into ever-tightening "national security" states: 1) Stop invading and occupying other people's countries or fomenting revolution in them, and 2) stop supporting those who do; if we did so, 90 per cent. of the hatred of the West would disappear in time. At the same time we need to 3) take steps to prevent the invasion and occupation of our own lands. If they stopped carrying out terrorist attacks on the West, *we'd* stop hassling *them*... -- Paul Hyett, Cheltenham Chicken and the egg...... America has long tried to change the world into it's own vision. The UK has been its Poodle, certainly since Thatchers time, and probably before.The 'Special relationship' IMHO is something which exists only in the minds of some British politicians. I do feel however, that the time has come for 'profiling' at airport security. The Authorities know who is a 'probable, and who certainly isn't, based on the intelligence information which they possess - why aren't they using it? Don't confuse the arch "useful idiot" Paul Hyett with your inconvenient cold, hard facts :-) It's New Years Day - show some "compassion", man ! LOL ! |
Just say no to advanced scanning machines at air ports?
http://www.devilfinder.com
NASA's confirmed 2012 prediction NASA is FULL of Sheeeeeeeeit! and I am ever so Happy to Say that Again,,,, NASA is Full of Sheeeeeeeeeeit! Looka here, head on over to your local libraries, look up that article in Popular Science magazine which dates on back around eight or nine or ten sumpin years ago.On the front cover and also in an article inside that magazine, a former NASA employee, or retired NASA employee/whatever, Mrs.Green said, NASA! YOU ARE BROKEN! Yeah, go read that article in that Popular Science magazine. cuhulin |
Just say no to advanced scanning machines at air ports?
Keystone Kops = F.umbling B.umbling I.diots.
http://www.libertypost.org/cgi-bin/r...?ArtNum=280445 Who do you believe our Real Enemies are? cuhulin |
Just say no to advanced scanning machines at air ports?
|
Just say no to advanced scanning machines at air ports?
On 1/2/10 04:30 , dxAce wrote:
wrote: Keystone Kops = F.umbling B.umbling I.diots. http://www.libertypost.org/cgi-bin/r...?ArtNum=280445 Who do you believe our Real Enemies are? The Canucks. We should send a "Thank You" e-mail to Obiteme...if ObitemeCare gets signed into law there will be virtually no medical reasons for the border to remain open. And then maybe we can send Shatner back. |
Just say no to advanced scanning machines at air ports?
"D. Peter Maus" wrote: On 1/2/10 04:30 , dxAce wrote: wrote: Keystone Kops = F.umbling B.umbling I.diots. http://www.libertypost.org/cgi-bin/r...?ArtNum=280445 Who do you believe our Real Enemies are? The Canucks. We should send a "Thank You" e-mail to Obiteme...if ObitemeCare gets signed into law there will be virtually no medical reasons for the border to remain open. And then maybe we can send Shatner back. I'll be happy when we can send Governor Granholm back! |
Just say no to advanced scanning machines at air ports?
On 1/2/10 10:38 , dxAce wrote:
"D. Peter Maus" wrote: On 1/2/10 04:30 , dxAce wrote: wrote: Keystone Kops = F.umbling B.umbling I.diots. http://www.libertypost.org/cgi-bin/r...?ArtNum=280445 Who do you believe our Real Enemies are? The Canucks. We should send a "Thank You" e-mail to Obiteme...if ObitemeCare gets signed into law there will be virtually no medical reasons for the border to remain open. And then maybe we can send Shatner back. I'll be happy when we can send Governor Granholm back! LOL! There's a lot of that going around. Word around here is that Quinn will be gone in the next cycle, and a good number of governors will be joining the ranks of the double digit unemployed. |
Just say no to advanced scanning machines at air ports?
Nawww, not the Canucks, they are Patsies, (I mean that in Good humor, of
course) all they have is one Canoe and one Bow and Arrow. Hey, Mississippi does a lot of trading/business with Canada. cuhulin |
Just say no to advanced scanning machines at air ports?
http://www.devilfinder.com
WMPN: Farmweek Veterans Honor Flight I saw it on local tv, Mississippi Farmweek about twenty minutes ago Honor the VETERANS. Ahh haz tu waytch Mrs.Bucket on tee vee at ate pee emm thi ebeenin. cuhulin |
Just say no to advanced scanning machines at air ports?
On Thu, 31 Dec 2009 04:07:28 -0800 (PST), McKevvy
wrote: I would be happy to appear bare naked if I would need to fly to any place if it would prevent any more fanatics that would destroy many people for fanatics that kill for their Islamic views. |
Just say no to advanced scanning machines at air ports?
Mississippi World War Two Veteran to get Medal.
http://www.clarionledger.com Backwater hick, you think so!? GOOD on yer, World War Two Veteran, GOOD on yer. http://www.devilfinder.com D-Day Museum New Orleans,Louisiana cuhulin |
Just say no to advanced scanning machines at air ports?
I won't fly naked, Period! In Fact, I do NOT like to fly at all, I Never
have liked to fly and I Never Ever will fly again.F... that Sh.t!!! y'all can have it!!! DUMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMB ASSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS RISKS A MILITARY COUP. http://www.rense.com/general89/obam.htm GOOD! a U.S.Military Coup would/will be a damn sight Better that what is in place now! Rock On, U.S.Military, ROCKKKKKKKKKKKK ONNNNNNNN,,,,,, When the Caissons Go Rollinggggg alonggggg,,,,,,,, Oath Keepers. cuhulin |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:00 AM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com