Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old January 14th 10, 07:40 PM posted to rec.radio.shortwave
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jan 2010
Posts: 9
Default AM 3 Mhz ?

Here is a much better record:
http://exvacuo.free.fr/div/Radio/Arc...%203093Khz.mp3


  #2   Report Post  
Old January 14th 10, 08:08 PM posted to rec.radio.shortwave
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jun 2007
Posts: 32
Default AM 3 Mhz ?

"François Guillet" wrote in message
...
Here is a much better record:
http://exvacuo.free.fr/div/Radio/Arc...%203093Khz.mp3


Are they definitely double sideband AM and not SSB with a carrier?

--

Brian Gregory. (In the UK)

To email me remove the letter vee.


  #3   Report Post  
Old January 15th 10, 08:42 AM posted to rec.radio.shortwave
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,095
Default AM 3 Mhz ?

On Jan 14, 2:08*pm, "Brian Gregory [UK]" wrote:
"François Guillet" wrote in message

...

Here is a much better record:
http://exvacuo.free.fr/div/Radio/Arc...Divers/AM%2030...


Are they definitely double sideband AM and not SSB with a carrier?

--

Brian Gregory. (In the UK)

To email me remove the letter vee.


Well, this not pure traditional AM. And as far as I can discern
it is not regular SSB either ! Is this DSB-AM with reduced or
suppressed carrierier , or is this SSB plus+ a reduced carrier?
Signal is not very stable, modulation seems to jump up and down
constantly. Need to switch to another agc setting,if possible. This
last recording is much better than the first and second. May be, if I
hear a longer transmission they will accidentally give away who the
hell they are. Judging from one party being much, much louder the
other fellow may be situated very far away. This is not your standard
literary language,either. Lots of uncensored expressions. Frequencies
are really baffling me. Still think it is an intermodulation product.
What receiver is being used?
  #4   Report Post  
Old January 15th 10, 10:10 PM posted to rec.radio.shortwave
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jan 2010
Posts: 9
Default AM 3 Mhz ?


a écrit dans le message de news:
...
On Jan 14, 2:08 pm, "Brian Gregory [UK]" wrote:
"François Guillet" wrote in message

...

Here is a much better record:
http://exvacuo.free.fr/div/Radio/Arc...Divers/AM%2030...

Are they definitely double sideband AM and not SSB with a carrier?

--

Brian Gregory. (In the UK)

To email me remove the letter vee.


| Well, this not pure traditional AM. And as far as I can discern
| it is not regular SSB either ! Is this DSB-AM with reduced or
| suppressed carrierier , or is this SSB plus+ a reduced carrier?
| Signal is not very stable, modulation seems to jump up and down
| constantly. Need to switch to another agc setting,if possible. This
| last recording is much better than the first and second. May be, if I
| hear a longer transmission they will accidentally give away who the
| hell they are. Judging from one party being much, much louder the
| other fellow may be situated very far away. This is not your standard
| literary language,either. Lots of uncensored expressions. Frequencies
| are really baffling me. Still think it is an intermodulation product.
| What receiver is being used?

The receiver is an old transceiver Icom IC751.
I have added an interface that converts IF signal at 455 Khz down to 12 Khz
then the 12 Khz signal is connected to my PC sound card (band pass is around
15-20 Khz).
I use Dream software for demodulating the signal. Dream was firstly intended
to decode DRM but its last version can also handle AM, SSB, CW and FM.
In Dream one can adjust a filter to match the received signal. I choose the
band pass for the best subjective audio. Dream records the demodulated
signal in .wav files.

After recording the russian stations, I used Adobe Audition for processing
operations for noise reduction, clics removing and MP3 conversion.

It is not DSB AM or SSB+carrier. It is real AM with the two side bands. Some
stations have not a frequency shifted by the modulation. It looks like old
TX with VFO pilot (not synthetized). QSB is probably the cause of carrier
fading and modulation distorsion.

Some other samples but not good, the band is very noisy, transmissions are
not very long (1mn max), with long pauses so it is difficult to monitor
them:
http://exvacuo.free.fr/div/Radio/Arc...ussian%201.mp3
http://exvacuo.free.fr/div/Radio/Arc...ussian%202.mp3
http://exvacuo.free.fr/div/Radio/Arc...ussian%203.mp3








  #5   Report Post  
Old January 15th 10, 10:13 PM posted to rec.radio.shortwave
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jan 2010
Posts: 9
Default AM 3 Mhz ?

a écrit dans le message de news:
...
On Jan 14, 2:08 pm, "Brian Gregory [UK]" wrote:
"François Guillet" wrote in message

...

Here is a much better record:
http://exvacuo.free.fr/div/Radio/Arc...Divers/AM%2030...

Are they definitely double sideband AM and not SSB with a carrier?

--

Brian Gregory. (In the UK)

To email me remove the letter vee.


| Well, this not pure traditional AM. And as far as I can discern
| it is not regular SSB either ! Is this DSB-AM with reduced or
| suppressed carrierier , or is this SSB plus+ a reduced carrier?
| Signal is not very stable, modulation seems to jump up and down
| constantly. Need to switch to another agc setting,if possible. This
| last recording is much better than the first and second. May be, if I
| hear a longer transmission they will accidentally give away who the
| hell they are. Judging from one party being much, much louder the
| other fellow may be situated very far away. This is not your standard
| literary language,either. Lots of uncensored expressions. Frequencies
| are really baffling me. Still think it is an intermodulation product.
| What receiver is being used?

The receiver is an old transceiver Icom IC751.
I have added an interface that converts IF signal at 455 Khz down to 12 Khz
then the 12 Khz signal is connected to my PC sound card (band pass is around
15-20 Khz).
I use Dream software for demodulating the signal. Dream was firstly intended
to decode DRM but its last version can also handle AM, SSB, CW and FM.
In Dream one can adjust a filter to match the received signal. I choose the
band pass for the best subjective audio. Dream records the demodulated
signal in .wav files.

After recording the russian stations, I used Adobe Audition for processing
operations of noise reduction, clics removing and MP3 conversion.

It is not DSB AM or SSB+carrier. It is real AM with the two side bands. Some
stations have a frequency shifted by the modulation. It looks like old TX
with VFO pilot (not synthetized). QSB is probably the cause of carrier
fading and modulation distorsion.

Some other samples but not good, band is very noisy, transmissions are
not very long (1mn max), with long pauses so it is difficult to monitor
them:
http://exvacuo.free.fr/div/Radio/Arc...ussian%201.mp3
http://exvacuo.free.fr/div/Radio/Arc...ussian%202.mp3
http://exvacuo.free.fr/div/Radio/Arc...ussian%203.mp3




  #6   Report Post  
Old January 16th 10, 08:37 AM posted to rec.radio.shortwave
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,095
Default AM 3 Mhz ?

On Jan 15, 4:13*pm, "François Guillet"
wrote:
a écrit dans le message de news:
...
On Jan 14, 2:08 pm, "Brian Gregory [UK]" wrote:

"François Guillet" wrote in message


...


Here is a much better record:
http://exvacuo.free.fr/div/Radio/Arc...Divers/AM%2030....


Are they definitely double sideband AM and not SSB with a carrier?


--


Brian Gregory. (In the UK)

To email me remove the letter vee.


| * Well, this not pure traditional AM. And *as far as I can discern
| it is not regular SSB either ! * Is this DSB-AM *with reduced or
| suppressed carrierier , or is this SSB plus+ a reduced carrier?
| Signal is not very stable, modulation seems to jump up and down
| constantly. Need to switch to another agc setting,if possible. *This
| last recording is much better than the first and second. May be, if I
| hear a longer transmission they will *accidentally give away *who the
| hell they are. Judging from one party being much, much louder the
| other fellow may be situated very far away. This is not your standard
| literary language,either. *Lots of uncensored expressions. Frequencies
| are really baffling me. Still think it is an intermodulation product.
| What receiver is being used?

The receiver is an old transceiver Icom IC751.
I have added an interface that converts IF signal at 455 Khz down to 12 Khz
then the 12 Khz signal is connected to my PC sound card (band pass is around
15-20 Khz).
I use Dream software for demodulating the signal. Dream was firstly intended
to decode DRM but its last version can also handle AM, SSB, CW and FM.
In Dream one can adjust a filter to match the received signal. I choose the
band pass for the best subjective audio. Dream records the demodulated
signal in .wav files.

After recording the russian stations, I used Adobe Audition for processing
operations of noise reduction, clics removing and MP3 conversion.

It is not DSB AM or SSB+carrier. It is real AM with the two side bands. Some
stations have a frequency shifted by the modulation. It looks like old TX
with VFO pilot (not synthetized). QSB is probably the cause of carrier
fading and modulation distorsion.

Some other samples but not good, band is very noisy, transmissions are
not very long (1mn max), with long pauses so it is difficult to monitor
them:http://exvacuo.free.fr/div/Radio/Arc...Divers/AM%20Ru...


If this was back 20+ years ago, I would say it could be
some sort of high seas radiotelephone transmissions. Only one side of
the conversation is heard in general. But, majority of them,
(practically all) were in USB as a rule. The other party has almost
always used another frequency. None of the offical radiotelephone
transmissions were so brief. None of the official operators spoke with
such a hurry. The s/n ratio is very poor. Power levels seem to be very
low and transmitters don't sound stable enough for reliable
communication . If it is not maritime traffic, it may be something
different. Bootleggers, pirates, or traffickers of some sort
probably. May be we can use D/F them,or establish some pattern .What
time of day or night do they pop- up?
  #7   Report Post  
Old January 16th 10, 04:38 PM posted to rec.radio.shortwave
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jan 2010
Posts: 9
Default AM 3 Mhz ?


a écrit dans le message de news:
...
On Jan 15, 4:13 pm, "François Guillet"
wrote:
....
It is not DSB AM or SSB+carrier. It is real AM with the two side bands.
Some
stations have a frequency shifted by the modulation. It looks like old TX
with VFO pilot (not synthetized). QSB is probably the cause of carrier
fading and modulation distorsion.

Some other samples but not good, band is very noisy, transmissions are
not very long (1mn max), with long pauses so it is difficult to monitor
them:
http://exvacuo.free.fr/div/Radio/Arc...les/Divers/AM%
20Ru...http://exvacuo.free.fr/div/Radio/Arc...les/Divers/AM%
20Ru...http://exvacuo.free.fr/div/Radio/Arc...Divers/AM%20Ru...



| If this was back 20+ years ago, I would say it could be
| some sort of high seas radiotelephone transmissions. Only one side of
| the conversation is heard in general. But, majority of them,
| (practically all) were in USB as a rule. The other party has almost
| always used another frequency. None of the offical radiotelephone
| transmissions were so brief. None of the official operators spoke with
| such a hurry. The s/n ratio is very poor. Power levels seem to be very
| low and transmitters don't sound stable enough for reliable
| communication .

Yes it sounds like transmissions in the 60's. Nevertheless I don't think
they come from break in space-time :-)
My location is possibly at 4000-8000 kms from these stations. This explains
the weak signals.
Signals from russian ham stations are not much stronger here on 80 mtrs (but
SBB modulation is much better and also 3.6 Mhz is less noisy).

| If it is not maritime traffic, it may be something
| different. Bootleggers, pirates, or traffickers of some sort
| probably. May be we can use D/F them,or establish some pattern .What
| time of day or night do they pop- up?

I receive them weekdays and weekend every evening from around 17h-18h to 23h
UTC (not tried later, time to sleep). It is probably not their full period
of activity but the time at which the 3 Mhz band is open between France and
Russia.





  #8   Report Post  
Old January 17th 10, 06:03 AM posted to rec.radio.shortwave
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,095
Default AM 3 Mhz ?

On Jan 16, 10:38*am, "François Guillet"
wrote:
a écrit dans le message de news:
...
On Jan 15, 4:13 pm, "François Guillet"
wrote:
...

It is not DSB AM or SSB+carrier. It is real AM with the two side bands.
Some
stations have a frequency shifted by the modulation. It looks like old TX
with VFO pilot (not synthetized). QSB is probably the cause of carrier
fading and modulation distorsion.


Some other samples but not good, band is very noisy, transmissions are
not very long (1mn max), with long pauses so it is difficult to monitor
them:http://exvacuo.free.fr/div/Radio/Arc...les/Divers/AM%
20Ru...http://exvacuo.free.fr/div/Radio/Arc...les/Divers/AM%
20Ru...http://exvacuo.free.fr/div/Radio/Arc...Divers/AM%20Ru...


| * * * * * * * If this was back 20+ years ago, I would say it could be
| some sort of high seas radiotelephone transmissions. Only one side of
| the conversation is heard in general. But, majority of them,
| (practically all) were in USB as a rule. The other *party has almost
| always used another frequency. None of the offical radiotelephone
| transmissions were so brief. None of the official operators spoke with
| such a hurry. The s/n ratio is very poor. Power levels seem to be very
| low and transmitters don't sound stable enough *for reliable
| communication .

Yes it sounds like transmissions in the 60's. Nevertheless I don't think
they come from break in space-time :-)
My location is possibly at 4000-8000 kms from these stations. This explains
the weak signals.
Signals from russian ham stations are not much stronger here on 80 mtrs (but
SBB modulation is much better and also 3.6 Mhz is less noisy).

| If it is not maritime traffic, it may be something
| different. Bootleggers, pirates, or traffickers of some sort
| probably. *May be we can use D/F them,or establish some pattern .What
| time of day or night do they pop- up?

I receive them weekdays and weekend every evening from around 17h-18h to 23h
UTC (not tried later, time to sleep). It is probably not their full period
of activity but the time at which the 3 Mhz band is open between France and
Russia.


For some reason I still have doubts of using of 3MHz band as a
reliable long distance 2-way choice . Ex navy /merchant marine
personnel turned into pirates/smugglers, perhaps. Low budget = poor
radio equipment. Lots of fowl language. Cannot be official business,
as far as I am concerned. Their transmissions a way too short. 3 MHz
band has not been used by anyone in years (on a regular basis). It was
never stable even at night,and especially now, with such minimal
sunspot number. The operating frequencies seem to be floating, this is
not typical of any regular business I can think of. And they ALL
transmit only in AM? Big mystery.
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:02 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017