Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jan 22, 3:40*am, wy wrote:
You imbecilic moron, Yeah, because kindergarten insults do so much to persuade others to your point of view, right? why don't you read up on some good old-fashioned American history and learn why the restrictions were put there in the first place. *In fact, the justices could brush up on history as well. * They did: "Congress shall make no law...abridging the freedom of speech, ..." Free political speech is not free if the government can dictate when and where you exercise it. in 2010. *This is going to lead to political shambles, just like repealing the Glass Steagall Act a decade ago allowed Wall St. to run amock and get the country in the mess it's in today. So you blame Bill Clinton for the mess the country is in today? Go on, do go on. |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Stevie Nichts wrote:
So you blame Bill Clinton for the mess the country is in today? Go on, do go on. Well, to the extent that the Glass-Stegal Act was repealed on his watch, yes. However, I would respectfully suggest that you do not overlook the fact that George W. had EIGHT years to do something about it -- and did NOTHING. In any event, partisanship has nothing to do with it. Corporatocracy has EVERYTHING to do with it. |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jan 22, 7:34*am, Joe from Kokomo wrote:
Stevie Nichts wrote: So you blame Bill Clinton for the mess the country is in today? Go on, do go on. Well, to the extent that the Glass-Stegal Act was repealed on his watch, yes. Wikipedia: "The final bill resolving the differences was passed in the Senate 90–8 (one not voting) and in the House: 362–57 (15 not voting). The legislation was signed into law by President Bill Clinton on November 12, 1999." Sounds rather... bipartisan to me. However, I would respectfully suggest that you do not overlook the fact that George W. had EIGHT years to do something about it -- and did NOTHING. Um, perhaps because he agreed with it? In any event, partisanship has nothing to do with it. Corporatocracy has EVERYTHING to do with it. So your implicit assertion is that Americans are too stupid to know when they're being fed a line of crap? Though given that Obama was elected, I just might have to give you that one. I'm apalled that you believe that Big Brother should have, the right to dictate how and when Americans -- remember, this SCOTUS opinion expressly included those bastions of individual thought known as 'unions' -- are permitted to express their opinion about political candidates. Free political speech is not free if the government can dictate when and where you exercise it. |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Stevie Nichts wrote:
So you blame Bill Clinton for the mess the country is in today? Go on, do go on. Johnson, Ford, Carter, Reagan, H.W., Clinton, W. have all been disasters of one kind of another. Clinton was a DLC Democrat, which is the same as a Republican. |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jan 22, 8:39*am, dave wrote:
Stevie Nichts wrote: So you blame Bill Clinton for the mess the country is in today? Go on, do go on. Johnson, Ford, Carter, Reagan, H.W., Clinton, W. have all been disasters of one kind of another. *Clinton was a DLC Democrat, which is the same as a Republican. ø ROTFLMAO The worst presidents of the past 100 years Carter Clinton Kennedy FDR Woodrow Wilson In one year, Obama is the worst of them all. ––**–– Political correctness is destroying Europe. America will be the next down the PC tube greased by academic idiots like Scott Erb, Noam Chumpsky, and Ward Churchill, and Slick Willy & Hilly, Algore & Pelosi, and Barak Hussein Muhammad Obama, too. |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Joe from Kokomo" wrote in message ... wrote: ø ROTFLMAO The worst presidents of the past 100 years Carter Clinton Kennedy FDR Woodrow Wilson IMHO, you are a real simpleton because you just happened to "overlook" G.W. Bush as one of the worst presidents. Want proof? It is generally accepted (even by Obama) that people were NOT voting -for- Obama; rather that they were voting AGAINST Bush -- and Obama won by a landslide. Now try again, and see if that tells you anything about W. Bwahahahahahah There might have been some of the votes that were anti-Bush votes, but you must admit that Obama was very popular. To say that it was, to a large extent, a vote for Obama was a vote against Bush is lessening Obama's real popularity in the election. Its similar to the Dems that voted for Reagan. In one year, Obama is the worst of them all. Again, you seem to overlook a simple fact: Obama INHERITED not just one but TWO expensive so-called wars with no exit strategy and INHERITED a major Depression -- that started on Bush's watch. Bush inherited a military that had been downsized ... the military had to be spooled up because of the war ... remember all the complaints against Bush's not worrying about the troops ... hummers were not properly armored etc ... remember Rumsfeld said you go to war with what you have and not what you wished you had. You also must remember that Bush can only spend the money that is oked by Congress. The economic downturned started in the last year of the Bush administration ... Congress was taken over by the Dem in two years before Bush's term was up. At that time the economy was purring along with an unemployment rate of about 4.6%. True Obama has been in office only one year, but the two previous years there was a Democratic Congress ... are they responsible for any of the economic downturn? Rather than picking on Obama, please realize that even if McCain won, we would still be in exactly the same fix, maybe even worse, due to "Quitter" Palin the Brain. No one, repeat, NO ONE, could clean up in only one year as big of a mess as Bush left. This is an assumption; there is no way of knowing what the outcome would have been if McCain/Palin would have been elected ... we do know that a whole year wouldn't have been wasted trying to fool with the US healthcare system ... there probably wouldn't have been a cap n trade bill ... there wouldn't have been a stimulus (pork) package of this magnitude either. |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jan 22, 2:57�pm, Joe from Kokomo wrote:
IMHO, you are a real simpleton because you just happened to "overlook" G.W. Bush as one of the worst presidents. WTF is with you liberals that you blithely insult anyone who disagrees with you? You kids are seriously whacked. |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() On Jan 22, 2:57�pm, Joe from Kokomo wrote: IMHO, you are a real simpleton because you just happened to "overlook" G.W. Bush as one of the worst presidents. Stevie Nichts wrote: WTF is with you liberals that you blithely insult anyone who disagrees with you? You kids are seriously whacked. Stevie, Stevie, Stevie, you seriously disappoint me. I list ONE person that I think should be added to the list of bad presidents and I'm "seriously whacked"? The OP listed FIVE people on his bad president list and apparently you think that's just fine and that he is a fine fellow. And yes, I truly and legitimately feel the OP is being naive at best or a simpleton at worst for not saving a spot on his list for W. How hypocritical of you... |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
FCC Diversity Chief Asked Liberal Fascists to Copy FDR, Take onLimbaugh, Murdoch, Supreme Court | Shortwave | |||
FAUX's First Amendment rights | Shortwave | |||
O/T OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE CHALLENGE TURNED DOWN BY SUPREME COURT | Shortwave | |||
Ham Takes Fight for Tower to the U.S. Supreme Court | Policy | |||
US senator backs amendment to bar gay marriage..Get rid of him | General |