wrote in message
...
On Sun, 24 Jan 2010 19:55:44 -0500, Mr.B1ack wrote:

How about the owner of the FAUX network, who is Australian and has most
of his investments in Asia. He has allot to gain from the failure of
america. Where does the $400M for Ru$h come from when his advert sales do
not support this money?

Murdoch ? He makes a lot of money selling product
in America. He doesn't want us to go broke.

BWE--HAHAHAHA

He makes money servicing dingbat conservatives who have NO fundamental
history of helping Americans.


Now certain ultra-'liberal' interests - long-time
America-haters ... would LOVE to see us crippled
so we couldn't afford any more 'imperialism'.

By "liberal american haters"---do you mean the ones who supplied the
intellectual basis for this nation, who fought conservative racism and
Segregation, abuse of the elderly, children and women for generations?

You need to read history and you'll find out that conservatism and
loonytarian bull**** has the historical onus of being the cause of our
American problems

It is you you have to read history ... todays so called liberal is in no way
comparable to the classical liberal of the Framers of the US Constitution.
I'll agree that the Framers were liberals at the time, but if you want to
compare them to todays liberals you have to compare the American Revolution
with another revolution during the same time period ... the French
Revolution. This makes the American revolution very conservative compared
to French Revolution.

Using the conservative/liberal comparison is to try and hide the
racism/segrgation of the Democratic party ... it wasn't the Repulican
presidential candidate who sat in a church with a bigot preacher for 20
years and tried to bail himself out with his 'more perfect union' speech
which he still tried to defend Rev Wright ... "I can no more disown him than
I can disown the black community. I can no more disown him than I can my
white grandmother" ... eventully Obama did chuck him under the bus ...
todays liberalism advocates dependence on the central govt, hardly the
classical liberals position of the framers of the US Constitution who
believed in limited govt with enumerated powers.