Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jan 22, 7:20*am, Stevie Nichts wrote:
On Jan 22, wrote: You imbecilic moron, Yeah, because kindergarten insults do so much to persuade others to your point of view, right? Well, if who I'm dealing with is the equivalent of 5-year-old idiot, then yeah, I'll speak in a language he can understand, because he certainly won't have the capacity to understand anything much beyond that. why don't you read up on some good old-fashioned American history and learn why the restrictions were put there in the first place. *In fact, the justices could brush up on history as well. * They did: "Congress shall make no law...abridging the freedom of speech, ..." Free political speech is not free if the government can dictate when and where you exercise it. That's not history, it's just mumbo-jumbo that fails to take into account the easy corruption of free speech in the form of campaign finance by wealthy entities, as happened in the latter half of the 1800s and early 1900s which necessitated the Tillman Act passed under Roosevelt's administration after Roosevelt himself was accused of receiving large sums of cash from fat cat bigwigs in exchange for favors. in 2010. *This is going to lead to political shambles, just like repealing the Glass Steagall Act a decade ago allowed Wall St. to run amock and get the country in the mess it's in today. So you blame Bill Clinton for the mess the country is in today? Go on, do go on. You're short on history with that too, huh? Ultimately if he had exercised his veto over it, it still would've been overriden by the Republican-dominated Congress, so he knew there was no point in not signing it. Recognizing it was a no-win situation for him, he nevertheless still did what he could to ensure certain aspects of the Act were made a bit more palatable for him to be able to sign it. |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jan 26, 9:14*am, wrote:
On Mon, 25 Jan 2010 23:55:48 -0800 (PST), wy wrote: So you blame Bill Clinton for the mess the country is in today? Go on, do go on. You're short on history with that too, huh? *Ultimately if he had exercised his veto over it, it still would've been overriden by the Republican-dominated Congress, so he knew there was no point in not signing it. * Exactly In other words, he tossed his principles overboard to preserve his political viability. Besides, he extracted from republicans many of the reforms and things he wanted. It's called "compromise" -- something The One needs to learn. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
FCC Diversity Chief Asked Liberal Fascists to Copy FDR, Take onLimbaugh, Murdoch, Supreme Court | Shortwave | |||
FAUX's First Amendment rights | Shortwave | |||
O/T OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE CHALLENGE TURNED DOWN BY SUPREME COURT | Shortwave | |||
Ham Takes Fight for Tower to the U.S. Supreme Court | Policy | |||
US senator backs amendment to bar gay marriage..Get rid of him | General |