On Mar 8, 2:31*pm, Bob Dobbs wrote:
bpnjensen wrote:

Our NWS meterologists here in California get it right about 90% of the
time, I'd guess. *Based on their record I go to them, and trust them,
more than I trust any private weather service I watch (which includes
local TV, Weather Channel and Weather Underground). *Their website
gives me everything I need to check the stats, the forecast, and to
assess on my own whether I think they're on the money.

That percentage drops when it gets down to this area of SoCal,
something about the effect of Point Conception on weather fronts
that defies the computer projections.

--

Operator Bob
Echo Charlie 42

Could be. You guys get a decidely different weather regime than we
get here near SF...it seems to be more related to something chaotic
and not present here; our weather is boring and highly predictable,
yours is more interesting and difficult to gauge. I don't know -
might be the ocean currents (I think we get a stronger and more
persistent upwelled cold water influence here) or maybe SoCal climate
is more heavily affected by the polar/subtropical boundary (frontal
zone) or maybe a degree of continentality brought on by the desert.
This is all sheer guesswork - but I agree, it's different down thar.

So far, this has been the Coldest Winter in Mississippi in about forty
years.In 1966, the temperture in Corinth,Mississippi got down to
nineteen degrees below zero.
I mowed my yard this afternoon, it Really needed mowing too.
Suppose to get up to seventy one degrees in Jackson on Wednesday and
Thursday this week.
http://www.wxusa.com/wx1/Jackson-MS.htm
(7 Day View thingy)
Right now, fifty nine degrees inside of my flower box on doggy's front
porch, seventy four degrees inside of mine and doggy's house.Doggy, you
wants me to tarn teh heet down? ///WOO WOO WOOF! I don't care, give me a
cookie!///

WHOOP! WOOP! WHOOP! Global warming! Global warming! WHOOP! WHOOP! WHOOP!

No it isn't! Global warming is NOT happening!
cuhulin

wrote:


Some of those meteoroligist out there have to tell lies as mandated by
fed govt, or else they don't get any more fed govt grant money.


http://fas.org/search/index.html?cx=....org%2F #1630

On Mar 8, 8:13*am, dave wrote:
wrote:

Some of those meteoroligist out there have to tell lies as mandated by
fed govt, or else they don't get any more fed govt grant money.

http://fas.org/search/index.html?cx=...91%3Alx1cammk6....

Dave, I am shocked! You put your faith in SCIENCE? Why, those guys
are scoundrels!

Breaking: Lockdown at Sheppard Air Force Base.
http://www.libertypost.org/readart.cgi?ArtNum=285162
cuhulin

Wellcome to Jackson,,, Wellcome to Hell.
cuhulin

On Mar 8, 6:39*am, Bob Dobbs wrote:
dave wrote:
Bob Dobbs wrote:
dave wrote:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/8550090.stm

How about that old geezer in San Diego at KUSI?
http://www.kusi.com/home/78477082.html?video=pop&t=a

Gosh. *I guess the UK Meteorlogical Office is wrong, and some old dude
on a right wing TV station in an uber-right-wing Navy town has all the
answers.

I'd like to see him have a real meteorologist on for a live debate.
I think he dismisses too much information in a casual way.

--

Operator Bob
Echo Charlie 42

I am a meteorologist by education. What they actually need is a
climatologist, not a meterologist. A climatologist would have the guy
stammering to find a word to say.