Gunner Asch wrote:

Ricky old fag...thats typical behavior from a .
Fantasy followed up by personal attack.

Huh? "Ricky old fag"?

"followed up by personal attack"?

YOU just used a personal attack. By YOUR OWN "logic", that must mean
that YOU are a "Leftwing Extremist"...or that the Gunner just shot
himself in the foot!

BWAHAHAHAhahaha...

On Tue, 09 Mar 2010 08:31:04 -0500, Joe from Kokomo
wrote:

Gunner Asch wrote:

Ricky old fag...thats typical behavior from a .
Fantasy followed up by personal attack.

Huh? "Ricky old fag"?

"followed up by personal attack"?

YOU just used a personal attack. By YOUR OWN "logic", that must mean
that YOU are a "Leftwing Extremist"...or that the Gunner just shot
himself in the foot!

BWAHAHAHAhahaha...

So you know that Ricky isnt an old fag? How well do you know him?
Bosom buddies are you? Share the same bathhouse?

Or are you simply blowing smoke out your ass?

Gunner


"First Law of Leftist Debate
The more you present a leftist with factual evidence
that is counter to his preconceived world view and the
more difficult it becomes for him to refute it without
losing face the chance of him calling you a racist, bigot,
homophobe approaches infinity.

This is despite the thread you are in having not mentioned
race or sexual preference in any way that is relevant to
the subject." Grey Ghost

On Tue, 09 Mar 2010 08:31:04 -0500, Joe from Kokomo
wrote:

Gunner Asch wrote:

Ricky old fag...thats typical behavior from a .
Fantasy followed up by personal attack.
Huh? "Ricky old fag"?

"followed up by personal attack"?

YOU just used a personal attack. By YOUR OWN "logic", that must mean
that YOU are a "Leftwing Extremist"...or that the Gunner just shot
himself in the foot!

BWAHAHAHAhahaha...

Gunner Asch wrote:

So you know that Ricky isnt an old fag? How well do you know him?
Bosom buddies are you? Share the same bathhouse?

Or are you simply blowing smoke out your ass?

Well, once again, you totally missed the main point.

MAIN POINT:

In one single sentence, you *insult* someone about "personal attacks",
and then you make...a personal attack. Very hypocritical of you.

It's a simple point. What part of it didn't you understand?

Instead of blathering and whining about it, why don't you just man up
and admit you put your foot in it?

P.S. If you want carry on an intelligent debate, it would greatly
improve your credibility if you would lose the name calling, personal
attacks and vulgarity. If your behavior here is any indication at all,
it would go a long way towards explaining why you are an EX-cop.

On Tue, 09 Mar 2010 16:08:50 -0500, Joe from Kokomo
wrote:


On Tue, 09 Mar 2010 08:31:04 -0500, Joe from Kokomo
wrote:

Gunner Asch wrote:

Ricky old fag...thats typical behavior from a .
Fantasy followed up by personal attack.
Huh? "Ricky old fag"?

"followed up by personal attack"?

YOU just used a personal attack. By YOUR OWN "logic", that must mean
that YOU are a "Leftwing Extremist"...or that the Gunner just shot
himself in the foot!

BWAHAHAHAhahaha...

Gunner Asch wrote:

So you know that Ricky isnt an old fag? How well do you know him?
Bosom buddies are you? Share the same bathhouse?

Or are you simply blowing smoke out your ass?

Well, once again, you totally missed the main point.

MAIN POINT:

In one single sentence, you *insult* someone about "personal attacks",
and then you make...a personal attack. Very hypocritical of you.

An observation is a personal attack? Thats mighty buffoonish of you.

It's a simple point. What part of it didn't you understand?

Why are you upset about an observation?

Instead of blathering and whining about it, why don't you just man up
and admit you put your foot in it?

By making an observation???????

P.S. If you want carry on an intelligent debate, it would greatly
improve your credibility if you would lose the name calling, personal
attacks and vulgarity. If your behavior here is any indication at all,
it would go a long way towards explaining why you are an EX-cop.

So son...how well DO you know the fellow? Are you really really close?
Bathhouse close perhaps?

Gunner


"First Law of Leftist Debate
The more you present a leftist with factual evidence
that is counter to his preconceived world view and the
more difficult it becomes for him to refute it without
losing face the chance of him calling you a racist, bigot,
homophobe approaches infinity.

This is despite the thread you are in having not mentioned
race or sexual preference in any way that is relevant to
the subject." Grey Ghost

On Tue, 09 Mar 2010 16:08:50 -0500, Joe from Kokomo
wrote:

On Tue, 09 Mar 2010 08:31:04 -0500, Joe from Kokomo
wrote:

Gunner Asch wrote:

Ricky old fag...thats typical behavior from a .
Fantasy followed up by personal attack.
Huh? "Ricky old fag"?

"followed up by personal attack"?

YOU just used a personal attack. By YOUR OWN "logic", that must mean
that YOU are a "Leftwing Extremist"...or that the Gunner just shot
himself in the foot!

BWAHAHAHAhahaha...
Gunner Asch wrote:

So you know that Ricky isnt an old fag? How well do you know him?
Bosom buddies are you? Share the same bathhouse?

Or are you simply blowing smoke out your ass?
Well, once again, you totally missed the main point.

MAIN POINT:

In one single sentence, you *insult* someone about "personal attacks",
and then you make...a personal attack. Very hypocritical of you.

Gunner Asch wrote:

An observation is a personal attack? Thats mighty buffoonish of you.

An OBSERVATION?

1) *You* called Rick a "fag".

2) You then stated this was an "observation".

3) This can lead to only one of 3 possible conclusions:
a) You were in the room with Rick
b) You were a Peeping Tom, looking through his window
c) You are flat-out lying and really made no 'observation' at all.

My money is on lying.

Why are you upset about an observation?

See above

Instead of blathering and whining about it, why don't you just man up
and admit you put your foot in it?

By making an observation???????

See above

P.S. If you want carry on an intelligent debate, it would greatly
improve your credibility if you would lose the name calling, personal
attacks and vulgarity. If your behavior here is any indication at all,
it would go a long way towards explaining why you are an EX-cop.

On Tue, 09 Mar 2010 18:45:23 -0500, Joe from Kokomo
wrote:


On Tue, 09 Mar 2010 16:08:50 -0500, Joe from Kokomo
wrote:

On Tue, 09 Mar 2010 08:31:04 -0500, Joe from Kokomo
wrote:

Gunner Asch wrote:

Ricky old fag...thats typical behavior from a .
Fantasy followed up by personal attack.
Huh? "Ricky old fag"?

"followed up by personal attack"?

YOU just used a personal attack. By YOUR OWN "logic", that must mean
that YOU are a "Leftwing Extremist"...or that the Gunner just shot
himself in the foot!

BWAHAHAHAhahaha...
Gunner Asch wrote:

So you know that Ricky isnt an old fag? How well do you know him?
Bosom buddies are you? Share the same bathhouse?

Or are you simply blowing smoke out your ass?
Well, once again, you totally missed the main point.

MAIN POINT:

In one single sentence, you *insult* someone about "personal attacks",
and then you make...a personal attack. Very hypocritical of you.

Gunner Asch wrote:

An observation is a personal attack? Thats mighty buffoonish of you.

An OBSERVATION?

1) *You* called Rick a "fag".

2) You then stated this was an "observation".

3) This can lead to only one of 3 possible conclusions:
a) You were in the room with Rick
b) You were a Peeping Tom, looking through his window
c) You are flat-out lying and really made no 'observation' at all.

You missed D.

I as a 56 yr old male in California, an ex cop and general man about
town, can or cannot determine if a man is gay or not?

Interesting.

My money is on lying.

Your money would be better spent on Condoms. HIV is a terrible thing.

Why are you upset about an observation?

See above

Im looking, but simply see you blithering in a panic. Why?


Instead of blathering and whining about it, why don't you just man up
and admit you put your foot in it?

By making an observation???????

See above

Seems that you, with no knowledge of me whatsoever..are making up lies.
You dont have a clue if Im gay or not, do you?

Not all gays are light in the loafer swishes. Guy I was in the Rangers
with..was black, 6'9", 275lbs, buff, trim, hard core killer and queer as
a 3 dollar bill. We used to go to the bar together, Id score a hot
chick, he would score a hot dude..shrug..no big deal. We killed a lot
of NVA together. Hell..I could have started walking on the other side
of the street since then.

But you will never know one way or another. Im not a big fan of whiney,
buffoonish little retards of any gender preference. Deal with it Bruce..

Gunner Asch


"First Law of Leftist Debate
The more you present a leftist with factual evidence
that is counter to his preconceived world view and the
more difficult it becomes for him to refute it without
losing face the chance of him calling you a racist, bigot,
homophobe approaches infinity.

This is despite the thread you are in having not mentioned
race or sexual preference in any way that is relevant to
the subject." Grey Ghost