Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 11, 9:09*am, Michael Black wrote:
On Thu, 11 Mar 2010, notbob wrote: Another question. *Being a big usenet user, but new to amateur radio, I've been looking at all the groups available. *This one appeared to have the least noise for a general discussion group, so I posted here. Is this type of question ok, here, or is there a more appropriate group for rank newbie questions I'm sure to be pestering the ham community with? * ![]() Well you're really confused, because this newsgroup has nothing to do with amateur radio. *There's a whole hierarchy, rec.radio.amateur.* that's intended for that. *They cover a wide variety of topics, and there's even a moderated one. This newsgroup is about listening. *"Shortwave" is in the title since it sort of defined what the newsgroup was supposed to be about, the same way that back forty years "SWL" meant "shortwave listening" but often the same people also did BCB DXing and monitoring the public service bands. *It's a description of the type of person, not the spectrum to be covered. That confuses a lot of people, they think this is for amateur radio because it's "shortwave". But it was never meant to be a place to discuss amateur radio, beyond discussing monitoring the ham bands (which has always had some followers). *The charter defines that, and the fact that there is a whole hierarchy intended for amateur radio should also reinforce that. *Besides. *amateur radio isn't just about shortwave, indeed while once you couldn't really get a ham license without starting out on the shortwave bands, now I suspect there are a good percentage, maybe even a small majority, who have never operated on the shortwave bands. * * Michael My thanks to both Mark H. and Michael for their reponses. Both informative, and this one philosophically worthy as well. I am currently thinking of getting an amateur license actually, even if I never get on the air. Not sure why - I used to have one decades ago (WB1GAL), and never got it off the ground due to inherent limitations in manual dexterity (back then, code was de rigueur; now it is optional for most all classes)...the theory and regs were more or less a snap, even though I am not an electronics guy... Maybe just for the cachet - we Californians are all about superficial appearance and keeping up, after all ;-) SWL is still my first love when it comes to radio. Bruce |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|