nobody wrote:


Nice attempt at spin. When asked about the specific bill, the
majority in every poll, was against it.

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epo...plan-1130.html

Here's some "spin" from the web page you directed us to.

Add the people who oppose because the bill is not liberal enough (13%),
and the people who support the bill (39%), then you get 52%, which is
more than half.

On Wed, 24 Mar 2010 05:23:02 -0800, dave wrote:

nobody wrote:


Nice attempt at spin. When asked about the specific bill, the
majority in every poll, was against it.

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epo...plan-1130.html

Here's some "spin" from the web page you directed us to.

Add the people who oppose because the bill is not liberal enough (13%),
and the people who support the bill (39%), then you get 52%, which is
more than half.

Please cite the specific poll that says this. Also it's odd that you
include those who don't support the bill because it's not liberal
enough as supporting the bill.

fed govt is a corporation, the Most CROOKED ASS corporation in the
WORLD!!!
They (''They'') think they are ''special'' and They (''They'') don't
have to follow the ''Rules'' They (''They'') set forth for everybody
else!

Now, just who/whom do y'all believe our WORST ENEMIES ARE???
cuhulin

wrote:
fed govt is a corporation, the Most CROOKED ASS corporation in the
WORLD!!!
They (''They'') think they are ''special'' and They (''They'') don't
have to follow the ''Rules'' They (''They'') set forth for everybody
else!

Now, just who/whom do y'all believe our WORST ENEMIES ARE???
cuhulin


Them is us.

"nobody" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 24 Mar 2010 05:23:02 -0800, dave wrote:

nobody wrote:


Nice attempt at spin. When asked about the specific bill, the
majority in every poll, was against it.

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epo...plan-1130.html

Here's some "spin" from the web page you directed us to.

Add the people who oppose because the bill is not liberal enough (13%),
and the people who support the bill (39%), then you get 52%, which is
more than half.

Please cite the specific poll that says this. Also it's odd that you
include those who don't support the bill because it's not liberal
enough as supporting the bill.

From the CNN/Opinion Research Poll:

21. (IF OPPOSE) Do you oppose that legislation because you think its
approach toward health care is

too liberal, or because you think it is not liberal enough?

QUESTIONS 20 AND 21 COMBINED

Mar 19-21

2010

Favor (from Question 20) 39%

Oppose, too liberal 43%

Oppose, not liberal enough 13%

No opinion 5%

On Thu, 25 Mar 2010 10:47:11 +0900, "Brenda Ann"
wrote:


"nobody" wrote in message
.. .
On Wed, 24 Mar 2010 05:23:02 -0800, dave wrote:

nobody wrote:


Nice attempt at spin. When asked about the specific bill, the
majority in every poll, was against it.

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epo...plan-1130.html

Here's some "spin" from the web page you directed us to.

Add the people who oppose because the bill is not liberal enough (13%),
and the people who support the bill (39%), then you get 52%, which is
more than half.

Please cite the specific poll that says this. Also it's odd that you
include those who don't support the bill because it's not liberal
enough as supporting the bill.

From the CNN/Opinion Research Poll:

21. (IF OPPOSE) Do you oppose that legislation because you think its
approach toward health care is

too liberal, or because you think it is not liberal enough?

QUESTIONS 20 AND 21 COMBINED

Mar 19-21

2010

Favor (from Question 20) 39%

Oppose, too liberal 43%

Oppose, not liberal enough 13%

No opinion 5%


You mean the poll that doesn't state the political afiliation
breakdown of those surveyed in its methodology? They do for most of
their polls.

wrote:
On Wed, 24 Mar 2010 18:42:45 -0400, wrote:

On Wed, 24 Mar 2010 05:23:02 -0800, wrote:

nobody wrote:


Nice attempt at spin. When asked about the specific bill, the
majority in every poll, was against it.

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epo...plan-1130.html

Here's some "spin" from the web page you directed us to.

Add the people who oppose because the bill is not liberal enough (13%),
and the people who support the bill (39%), then you get 52%, which is
more than half.

Please cite the specific poll that says this.

The polls didn't ask it that way

THe polls only indicate the opposition based on a sampling response
for favorability.

It's the public sentiment from politicians, grass roots that clearly
pointed to the progressive wing being in that "opposing group"

It requires a little cogent thought to put 2 and 2 together

If Dennis Kucinich's vocal opposition isn't enough to suggest it, what
better evidence?


Kucinich supports the bill.

On Mar 25, 6:09*am, dave wrote:
wrote:
On Wed, 24 Mar 2010 18:42:45 -0400, *wrote:

On Wed, 24 Mar 2010 05:23:02 -0800, *wrote:

nobody wrote:

Nice attempt at spin. *When asked about the specific bill, the
majority in every poll, was against it.

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epo..._democrats_hea....

Here's some "spin" from the web page you directed us to.

Add the people who oppose because the bill is not liberal enough (13%),
and the people who support the bill (39%), then you get 52%, which is
more than half.

Please cite the specific poll that says this.

The polls didn't ask it that way

THe polls only indicate the opposition based on a sampling response
for favorability.

It's the public sentiment from politicians, grass roots that clearly
pointed to the progressive wing being in that "opposing group"

It requires a little cogent thought to put 2 and 2 together

If Dennis Kucinich's vocal opposition isn't enough to suggest it, what
better evidence?

Kucinich supports the bill.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

He GRUDGINGLY supports it. What he REALLY supports is SINGLE PAYER!

Nissan gears up for new vehicles.(I-55 Gluckstadt exit, about fifteen -
twenty something miles North of doggy's couch)
http://www.clarionledger.com
Business section.

Ahh told that married Irish woman wayyyyyyy over yonder across the big
pond in Bognor Regis,England, someday she might be driving a Made in
Mississippi U.S.A. Nissan vehicle.That Nissian factory does export some
of those Nissan vehicles to some foreign countrys.
Note: U K is NOT a Country, it is a kingdom.I Despise kings and queens
and princes and princesses! I Despise royalty, PERIOD!
cuhulin