On Sat, 03 Apr 2010 21:50:43 -0700, bpnjensen wrote:

On Apr 3, 6:31Â*pm, AzzMazta wrote:
On Wed, 31 Mar 2010 19:38:49 -0700, bpnjensen wrote:
the term is "climate change" or "climate
forcing," "global warming" is a misnomer that is perpetuated by
people for whom it pays to cause misinformation to persist.


As evidenced by the newsgroup I CC'ed the reply to.


That's not the point, cement-head. You have no clue what you're talking
about, as proven by your totally outdated jargon that even the
knowledgeable naysayers left behind years ago.

So the name of the newsgroup is a dated term? From what I understand the
word "global warming" is still used by the media, even by believers. Most
people are finally admitting it's not-warming-everywhere "climate change"
now?

Also, you in the group keep referring to the effect of CFCs on the ozone
as "dated", I know they are banned now, but I was referring to how only
using the word "warm" could link the climate change issue to holes
created by greenhouse gases in the minds of non-intellectuals (such as
politicians). Thus "Global Warming" becomes a platform plank where we
need to (de)regulate business activity based on more than just short-term
health problems. "Climate Change" is harder to prove.

--

AzzMazta's Political Institute
Verbal Diarrhea & More
Washington, DC
(http://www.xcopfly.com/)

On Apr 6, 1:46*pm, AzzMazta wrote:
On Sat, 03 Apr 2010 21:50:43 -0700, bpnjensen wrote:
On Apr 3, 6:31*pm, AzzMazta wrote:
On Wed, 31 Mar 2010 19:38:49 -0700, bpnjensen wrote:
the term is "climate change" or "climate
forcing," "global warming" is a misnomer that is perpetuated by
people for whom it pays to cause misinformation to persist.

As evidenced by the newsgroup I CC'ed the reply to.

That's not the point, cement-head. *You have no clue what you're talking
about, as proven by your totally outdated jargon that even the
knowledgeable naysayers left behind years ago.

So the name of the newsgroup is a dated term? From what I understand the
word "global warming" is still used by the media, even by believers. Most
people are finally admitting it's not-warming-everywhere "climate change"
now?

Also, you in the group keep referring to the effect of CFCs on the ozone
as "dated", I know they are banned now, but I was referring to how only
using the word "warm" could link the climate change issue to holes
created by greenhouse gases in the minds of non-intellectuals (such as
politicians). Thus "Global Warming" becomes a platform plank where we
need to (de)regulate business activity based on more than just short-term
health problems. "Climate Change" is harder to prove.

--

AzzMazta's Political Institute
Verbal Diarrhea & More
Washington, DC
(http://www.xcopfly.com/)

Now I know why your signature has "verbal diarrhea" in it.

Prayers for the West Virginia coal Miners.
cuhulin

On 4/6/2010 6:02 PM, wrote:
Prayers for the West Virginia coal Miners.
cuhulin



And prayers will do what exactly?

O Store Gud
http://rosemck1.tripod.com/how-great...-and-choir.wav

Have a little Homily.
cuhulin

On Apr 6, 5:11*pm, BobS wrote:
On 4/6/2010 6:02 PM, wrote:

Prayers for the West Virginia coal Miners.
cuhulin

And prayers will do what exactly?

I do think it's pretty terrible that in the USA, in the year 2010, it
is possible for this kind of preventable accident to happen again.
That company ought to pay a lifetime of restitution to the families
whose breadwinners they recklessly employed.

Here is what doofus-in-charge Blankenship said:

"I think every accident should be prevented, that's what the
definition of an accident is," said Blankenship. "Once we know what
happened, we'll know whether it was preventable by someone or not."

This guy is a walking oxymoron. EVERY accident is preventable unless
it is deliberate sabotage. Period. No explosions occur where the
ventilation reduces the volatile gas level to low enough amounts, and
this company did not make the appropriate effort to ensure adequate
ventilation.

Bruce Jensen

Schoolcraft,Michigan, in and around Kalamazoo.Six inches of hail, some
overturned vehicles, some of them are Big vehicles too.Yes, I just now
saw it on WJTV 10:00 PM tv news.

Ahh reckymembers ah old Kalamazoo song frum wayyyyyy bak enna dee 1950s
at ooosed tah bee onna dee radio oncet enna ah wyle.

K A L A M A Z O Ohhhhhhhhh,,,,, I have a gal in
Kalamazoooo,,,,,,,,

Heh,,, Ahh reckons y'all dunce nose dat old Kalamazoo song thangy.Ahh
noes dee Big Noise From Winetka song tuu.Winetka izza en Illynoise, knot
tuu furr frum Shecargo.
cuhulin

On 4/6/10 20:51 , bpnjensen wrote:
On Apr 6, 5:11 pm, wrote:
On 4/6/2010 6:02 PM, wrote:

Prayers for the West Virginia coal Miners.
cuhulin

And prayers will do what exactly?

I do think it's pretty terrible that in the USA, in the year 2010, it
is possible for this kind of preventable accident to happen again.
That company ought to pay a lifetime of restitution to the families
whose breadwinners they recklessly employed.

Here is what doofus-in-charge Blankenship said:

"I think every accident should be prevented, that's what the
definition of an accident is," said Blankenship. "Once we know what
happened, we'll know whether it was preventable by someone or not."

This guy is a walking oxymoron. EVERY accident is preventable unless
it is deliberate sabotage. Period. No explosions occur where the
ventilation reduces the volatile gas level to low enough amounts, and
this company did not make the appropriate effort to ensure adequate
ventilation.

Bruce Jensen


Actually, coal dust is nearly as explosive as gas in the mines.

On 4/6/10 20:51 , bpnjensen wrote:
On Apr 6, 5:11 pm, wrote:
On 4/6/2010 6:02 PM, wrote:

Prayers for the West Virginia coal Miners.
cuhulin

And prayers will do what exactly?

I do think it's pretty terrible that in the USA, in the year 2010, it
is possible for this kind of preventable accident to happen again.
That company ought to pay a lifetime of restitution to the families
whose breadwinners they recklessly employed.

Here is what doofus-in-charge Blankenship said:

"I think every accident should be prevented, that's what the
definition of an accident is," said Blankenship. "Once we know what
happened, we'll know whether it was preventable by someone or not."

This guy is a walking oxymoron. EVERY accident is preventable unless
it is deliberate sabotage. Period. No explosions occur where the
ventilation reduces the volatile gas level to low enough amounts, and
this company did not make the appropriate effort to ensure adequate
ventilation.

Bruce Jensen

On 4/7/2010 12:33 AM, D. Peter Maus wrote:

Actually, coal dust is nearly as explosive as gas in the mines.

Yes it is -- and they were fined for that too, in addition to being
fined for not clearing the methane.

In any event and however you slice it (and as demonstrted by film clips
of the guy's own words), the guy seems to be a real slime ball. Another
example of greed run amok.

I wonder if the fine townsfolk of Montcoal will decide to tar and
feather Blankenship or at least run him out of town on a rail.

D. Peter Maus wrote:


Actually, coal dust is nearly as explosive as gas in the mines.



Or grain dust or sawdust or etc.