wrote:
Was Timothy McVeigh set up to be a patsy? Metinks so!

There are hours of tapes of Mr. McVeigh bragging about the deed.

Timothy McVeigh was there, but that truck bomb didn't cause all that
damage.It couldn't have.That building in Oklahoma City blew up from the
inside out.
cuhulin

In article ,
says...
Timothy McVeigh was there, but that truck bomb didn't cause all that
damage.It couldn't have.That building in Oklahoma City blew up from the
inside out.
cuhulin



Wow, you've drunk so much you've gone almost blind?

Sad.

--
BDK, leader of the non-jew, non-existant jew paid shills!

NUTS! ~ General McAullife - Battle of the Bulge.

The Nazi dude said, Nitz?
cuhulin

In article ,
says...
NUTS! ~ General McAullife - Battle of the Bulge.

The Nazi dude said, Nitz?
cuhulin



At least you show some self awareness. In your own odd way.
--
BDK, leader of the non-jew, non-existant jew paid shills!

General McAullife said NUTS! not me.

Mandatory Organ Donations for All New Yorkers.
http://www.worldnetdaily.com

What do You say about that? Are you a New Yorker?
cuhulin

In article ,
says...
General McAullife said NUTS! not me.

Mandatory Organ Donations for All New Yorkers.
http://www.worldnetdaily.com

What do You say about that? Are you a New Yorker?
cuhulin



No, I'm not a New Yorker, but why would anyone care about donating
organs/tissue, since you're DEAD.
--
BDK, leader of the non-jew, non-existant jew paid shills!

You going over to MacDonalds now and get your free Chicken MacNuggets?
cuhulin

dave wrote:
wrote:
Was Timothy McVeigh set up to be a patsy? Metinks so!

There are hours of tapes of Mr. McVeigh bragging about the deed.


One does not preclude the other.

McVeigh may have been followed, encouraged, guided, and then taken
advantage of -- with extra explosives as "insurance," as the
efficacy of a truck bomb some considerable distance from the
building was naturally doubted by the experts involved.

I was listening to the radio in the minutes and hours immediately
after the event, and there were definitely reports of additional
bombs inside the building -- which stands to reason, considering the
massive damage.

It was also extremely suspicious that McVeigh, shortly before the
attack, placed a number of apparently pointless telephone calls.

He (if indeed it _was_ he and not a helpful "associate") did this
using a phone card sold by Liberty Lobby, a right-wing populist
group. He called a long list of right-wing and pro-White racial
organizations a few days before the bombing, typically leaving
messages and asking -- almost begging -- to be contacted. The tally
of organizations he tried to contact is very similar to those on the
SPLC's alleged "hate group" list.

It would be as if Lee Harvey Oswald had sat down during the first
weeks of November, 1963, and made dozens of telephone calls
attempting to set up meetings with every left-wing group on the
House Un-American Activities Committee list -- and did so from the
lobby phone at Americans for Democratic Action.

McVeigh's association with Nichols was probably not part of his
handlers' plans, since it vitiated their claim that the bombing was
the work of "racists." (Nichols was in an interracial marriage.) So
McVeigh clearly had a considerable degree of freedom of action, and
was not operating under direct orders.

But a patsy nonetheless? I say that is very likely.

Cui bono? Those who wanted increased government power to monitor,
infiltrate, and stifle dissenters. (Legislation that presaged the
Patriot Act -- itself triggered by a later, possibly false flag,
event -- was pushed through after OKC.) Those who wanted to demonize
radicals who question the Empire. Those who wanted -- and still want
-- to demonize groups that demand self-determination.


With all good wishes,


Kevin Alfred Strom.
--
http://kevinalfredstrom.com/

Kevin Alfred Strom wrote:
dave wrote:
wrote:
Was Timothy McVeigh set up to be a patsy? Metinks so!

There are hours of tapes of Mr. McVeigh bragging about the deed.


One does not preclude the other.

McVeigh may have been followed, encouraged, guided, and then taken
advantage of -- with extra explosives as "insurance," as the efficacy
of a truck bomb some considerable distance from the building was
naturally doubted by the experts involved.

ANFO has occasionally been used in terrorist bombings. First used in
1970 by student protesters at the University of Wisconsin–Madison, who
learned how to make and use ANFO from a Wisconsin Conservation
Department booklet entitled Pothole Blasting for Wildlife,[2][5] the
ANFO car bomb was soon adopted by the IRA, such as in the 1993
Bishopsgate bombing. It has also seen use by groups such as the FARC,
ETA, and various terrorists when they first tried to destroy the World
Trade Center in 1993. A more sophisticated variant of ANFO (with
nitromethane ammonium nitrate as the fuel called ANNM) was used in the
more successful 1995 Oklahoma City bombing. Improvised bombs made with
agricultural-grade AN are less sensitive and less efficient than the
explosive-grade variety.

In November 2009, a ban on ammonium sulfate, ammonium nitrate and
calcium ammonium nitrate fertilizers was imposed in the Malakand
Division - comprising the Dir, Swat, Chitral and Malakand districts of
the North West Frontier Province (NWFP) of Pakistan, by the NWFP
government, following reports that those chemicals were used by
militants to make explosives.

In April 2010, police in Greece confiscated 180 kilograms of ANFO and
other related material stashed in a hideaway in the Athens suburb of
Kareas. The material was believed to be linked to attacks previously
carried out by the "Revolutionary Struggle" terrorist group

In January 2010, President Karzai from Afghanistan also issued a decree
banning the use, production, storage, purchase or sale of ammonium
nitrate, after an investigation showed that militants in the Taliban
insurgency had used the substance in bomb attacks [6] [7] [8].

wikipedia