Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jun 1, 7:00*pm, Joe from Kokomo wrote:
On 6/1/2010 5:52 PM, bpnjensen wrote: When I see crap from Gregg, I'll let him know it isn't appreciated... If you will permit me a small comment... ...every time you see a post from nurk_the_jerk and LarbGay, you ARE "seeing crap from Gregg". Joe, are you trying to say we are all one in the same? We're not, err let me clarify that a little more. My name is Gregg, that is the only screen name I post under. I learned a lesson from the "real pro troublemakers" on that see...lol. I mean heaven forbid someone have a google account and use a different monicker THAT HAS TO DO WITH THE GROUP THEY ARE IN. That is what I did. The two troublemakers made a big deal about it. If I wanted to "trick" for lack of a better word or create sock puppets like both of them do - though they vehemently deny it. Why would I use google?? This topic is so simple a fourth grader can understand it but apparently those were the two that thought "ohhhhh- we caught Gregg - Ohhhhhh - he's busted."rolling my eyes If you post from google like I do, you can have thirty different monickers for thirty different groups and if a person googles just one of those monickers - it will show ALL OF THEM. So why would someone do that, already knowing that before hand? I could use one of numerous free anonymous usenet providers if I wanted to be all "cloak and dagger?" ****DRUM ROLL**** Here is the answer. THEY WOULDN"T!! They keep spouting this crap about IP address like it makes them sound smart or something, I knew about reading headers the first year I was on the internet. You don't have to read my IP address because google would show you all my monickers I use - screw the IP addy.rolling my eyes |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jun 1, 10:23*pm, Gregg wrote:
Joe, are you trying to say we are all one in the same? We're not, err let me clarify that a little more. My name is Gregg, that is the only screen name I post under. No, Gregg is not saying you are the same people. He's simply saying, as you have admitted, that they came here at your invitation to do your bidding. I learned a lesson from the "real pro troublemakers" on that see...lol. I mean heaven forbid someone have a google account and use a different monicker THAT HAS TO DO WITH THE GROUP THEY ARE IN. That is what I did. The two troublemakers made a big deal about it. If I wanted to "trick" for lack of a better word or create sock puppets like both of them do - though they vehemently deny it. No proof. I have the courage to use my real name. If I was going to use anonymous screennames, I would, and avoid your threats to bother my employers. Why would I use google?? This topic is so simple a fourth grader can understand it but apparently those were the two that thought "ohhhhh- we caught Gregg - Ohhhhhh - he's busted."rolling my eyes If you post from google like I do, you can have thirty different monickers for thirty different groups and if a person googles just one of those monickers - it will show ALL OF THEM. So why would someone do that, already knowing that before hand? I could use one of numerous free anonymous usenet providers if I wanted to be all "cloak and dagger?" To believe what you are suggesting we would have to ignore that you posted under all the names in this newsgroup, actually having conversations with yourself. Also, why did you become so vociferous and threatening when I exposed that all of you were the same person? You claimed it was wrong to expose screennames. I really think that you failed to realize that all of the screennames showed in your google posting history. Why did you fail to stop bringing me up every few days when I left like you promised you would? The simple fact is that you are no more morally righteous than anyone else in here. You don't have the guts or the intelligence to defend yourself, so you resorted to bringing the locust from rec.knives to protect you. But don't pretend that you haven't lied or done your own share of hard work to destroy the atmosphere of this NG. I'm still willing to meet you face-to-face. I live exactly 104 miles from your front door. You've said in the past, that you're in Louisville several days a week. You've even threatened to meet me in a field with your favorite weapon strapped to your back. Big words from a guy that runs to his friends for protection. You know where I work. Are you a man or not? I'm tired of your cowardly sniveling. Put up or shut up. Your choice. Mike |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jun 1, 10:48*pm, Mike wrote:
On Jun 1, 10:23*pm, Gregg wrote: Joe, are you trying to say we are all one in the same? We're not, err let me clarify that a little more. My name is Gregg, that is the only screen name I post under. No, Gregg is not saying you are the same people. He's simply saying, as you have admitted, that they came here at your invitation to do your bidding. I learned a lesson from the "real pro troublemakers" on that see...lol. I mean heaven forbid someone have a google account and use a different monicker THAT HAS TO DO WITH THE GROUP THEY ARE IN. That is what I did. The two troublemakers made a big deal about it. If I wanted to "trick" for lack of a better word or create sock puppets like both of them do - though they vehemently deny it. No proof. I have the courage to use my real name. If I was going to use anonymous screennames, I would, and avoid your threats to bother my employers. *Why would I use google?? This topic is so simple a fourth grader can understand it but apparently those were the two that thought "ohhhhh- we caught Gregg - Ohhhhhh - he's busted."rolling my eyes If you post from google like I do, you can have thirty different monickers for thirty different groups and if a person googles just one of those monickers - it will show ALL OF THEM. So why would someone do that, already knowing that before hand? I could use one of numerous free anonymous usenet providers if I wanted to be all "cloak and dagger?" To believe what you are suggesting we would have to ignore that you posted under all the names in this newsgroup, actually having conversations with yourself. Also, why did you become so vociferous and threatening when I exposed that all of you were the same person? You claimed it was wrong to expose screennames. I really think that you failed to realize that all of the screennames showed in your google posting history. Why did you fail to stop bringing me up every few days when I left like you promised you would? The simple fact is that you are no more morally righteous than anyone else in here. You don't have the guts or the intelligence to defend yourself, so you resorted to bringing the locust from rec.knives to protect you. But don't pretend that you haven't lied or done your own share of hard work to destroy the atmosphere of this NG. I'm still willing to meet you face-to-face. I live exactly 104 miles from your front door. You've said in the past, that you're in Louisville several days a week. You've even threatened to meet me in a field with your favorite weapon strapped to your back. Big words from a guy that runs to his friends for protection. You know where I work. Are you a man or not? I'm tired of your cowardly sniveling. Put up or shut up. Your choice. OK, I'll play this once with you. You DO KNOW you have serious mental problems don't you? You need to be honest with your health care provider and have him send you somewhere where you can get the help you need Michael and I'm being serious because your physician prescribing you anti depressants apparently isn't working......you need "real help" - where they have a couch and you can lay down and get to the core issues as too why you are the way you are. Why would I need a weapon with you? Are you trying to scare me, I'll play the reverse bullcrap you do OK and then tell me how it feels. Are you threatening me Michael? I KNOW FOR A FACT you were driving by my house three days ago. I'll quit....lol...I can't even do it - you're not worth it. It kills you that this group was going smooth because YOU left with your tail between your legs and everyone in here knows it. As of April 28th I have no need to go to Louisville. You are more than welcome though to come to Cincinnati, are you going to beat me up Michael? Is this how you're going to play it now? All the sudden the machismo is dripping through your every pore and you're going to give ole' Gregg the lickin' he (in your baked mind) deserves? LOLOLOL - Oh quit it Michael, just quit it....you are embarrasing yourself. You would have a bowel movement if you met me and tried to get all hard with me.rolling my eyes Keep it right here where I am safe from the thumping you would dish out. Now put up or shut up...lol....you're killing me MB - you haven't changed a bit but this group sure did till you and your partner in crime had to rile things up. I can hear you two now (hands raised in the air) "What? We didn't do anything." You guys are sick and I don't need the moral highground to say that either. |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Oil leads to first closure of Mississippi waters.
http://www.clarionledger.com The Territory of Mississippi. Huge fire and auto wreaks in Jackson.That is four miles East behind doggy's couch. Doggy, you wants to go see that fire? ///Hell NO!/// cuhulin |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() On Jun 1, 7:00 pm, Joe from wrote: On 6/1/2010 5:52 PM, bpnjensen wrote: When I see crap from Gregg, I'll let him know it isn't appreciated... If you will permit me a small comment... ...every time you see a post from nurk_the_jerk and LarbGay, you ARE "seeing crap from Gregg". On 6/1/2010 10:23 PM, Gregg wrote: Joe, are you trying to say we are all one in the same? Let me explain it real slow. I was not implying that you are one and the same as the thugs you brought over. The point that I was trying to make is that you originally invited the goons over and that those turds are -still- here *AS -YOUR- PROXIES* and that every time Bruce saw a post from one of the turd twins, he was [indirectly] getting crap from you (as you were responsible for bringing them over). Nothing to do with me saying that you and the turds are one and the same. Get it now? Sorry for your confusion. let me clarify that a little more. My name is Gregg, that is the only screen name I post under. Oh, really? Whatever happened to BCBLazySusan, Bushcraft Gregg and all the others? (or did you really mean to say "that is the only screen name I -CURRENTLY- post under"?) |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2/06/2010 11:36 PM, Joe from Kokomo wrote:
On Jun 1, 7:00 pm, Joe from wrote: On 6/1/2010 5:52 PM, bpnjensen wrote: When I see crap from Gregg, I'll let him know it isn't appreciated... If you will permit me a small comment... ...every time you see a post from nurk_the_jerk and LarbGay, you ARE "seeing crap from Gregg". On 6/1/2010 10:23 PM, Gregg wrote: Joe, are you trying to say we are all one in the same? Let me explain it real slow. I was not implying that you are one and the same as the thugs you brought over. The point that I was trying to make is that you originally invited the goons over and that those turds are -still- here *AS -YOUR- PROXIES* and that every time Bruce saw a post from one of the turd twins, he was [indirectly] getting crap from you (as you were responsible for bringing them over). Nothing to do with me saying that you and the turds are one and the same. Get it now? Sorry for your confusion. let me clarify that a little more. My name is Gregg, that is the only screen name I post under. Oh, really? Whatever happened to BCBLazySusan, Bushcraft Gregg and all the others? (or did you really mean to say "that is the only screen name I -CURRENTLY- post under"?) His new screen name, it would seem, is Anonymous. Krypsis |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jun 2, 9:39*am, Krypsis wrote:
On 2/06/2010 11:36 PM, Joe from Kokomo wrote: On Jun 1, 7:00 pm, Joe from wrote: On 6/1/2010 5:52 PM, bpnjensen wrote: When I see crap from Gregg, I'll let him know it isn't appreciated... If you will permit me a small comment... ...every time you see a post from nurk_the_jerk and LarbGay, you ARE "seeing crap from Gregg". On 6/1/2010 10:23 PM, Gregg wrote: Joe, are you trying to say we are all one in the same? Let me explain it real slow. I was not implying that you are one and the same as the thugs you brought over. The point that I was trying to make is that you originally invited the goons over and that those turds are -still- here *AS -YOUR- PROXIES* and that every time Bruce saw a post from one of the turd twins, he was [indirectly] getting crap from you (as you were responsible for bringing them over). Nothing to do with me saying that you and the turds are one and the same. Get it now? Sorry for your confusion. let me clarify that a little more. My name is Gregg, that is the only screen name I post under. Oh, really? Whatever happened to BCBLazySusan, Bushcraft Gregg and all the others? (or did you really mean to say "that is the only screen name I -CURRENTLY- post under"?) His new screen name, it would seem, is Anonymous. Krypsis- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Your busted, enjoy the three new threads you ding dong headed liar!!! :-D Like shooting fish in a barrel. |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jun 2, 9:36*am, Joe from Kokomo wrote:
On Jun 1, 7:00 pm, Joe from *wrote: On 6/1/2010 5:52 PM, bpnjensen wrote: When I see crap from Gregg, I'll let him know it isn't appreciated... If you will permit me a small comment... ...every time you see a post from nurk_the_jerk and LarbGay, you ARE "seeing crap from Gregg". On 6/1/2010 10:23 PM, Gregg wrote: Joe, are you trying to say we are all one in the same? Let me explain it real slow. I was not implying that you are one and the same as the thugs you brought over. The point that I was trying to make is that you originally invited the goons over and that those turds are -still- here *AS -YOUR- PROXIES* and that every time Bruce saw a post from one of the turd twins, he was [indirectly] getting crap from you (as you were responsible for bringing them over). Nothing to do with me saying that you and the turds are one and the same. Get it now? Sorry for your confusion. let me clarify that a little more. My name is Gregg, that is the only screen name I post under. Oh, really? Whatever happened to BCBLazySusan, Bushcraft Gregg and all the others? (or did you really mean to say "that is the only screen name I -CURRENTLY- post under"?) Damn dude, I know you aren't that slow. It has been explained over and over again - you don't have to hit me over the head for me to know you just want to play along with your troublemaker friends. Have at it. Hope you enjoy the threads I provided that show how it REALLY started (like I said all along) and make sure to read it v-e-r-y s-l-o-w-l-y because I'm not reposting this drivel again. |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 6/2/2010 7:52 PM, Gregg wrote:
Damn dude, I know you aren't that slow. It has been explained over and over again - you don't have to hit me over the head for me to know you just want to play along with your troublemaker friends. Have at it. Hope you enjoy the threads I provided that show how it REALLY started (like I said all along) and make sure to read it v-e-r-y s-l-o-w-l-y because I'm not reposting this drivel again. How it "started"? Sorry, that's a non-issue. I don't care "how it started". YOU admitted YOU brought over the thugs. No need to go any further than that. Period. End of story. Let me give you a final (and very apt) analogy... Al Capone was a swell fella, never hurt a fly. But he brought in out-of-town thugs to do his dirty work. Is he just as guilty as the trigger men he brought in? According to American jurisprudence, yes, he is just as guilty. Nothing at all to do with "how it started" or are you and the turds the same person. I hope you finally see the parallel with you bringing over the turds and why I consider YOU the root of the trouble for bringing them over; I can't make it any simpler than the analogy above. "...make sure to read it v-e-r-y s-l-o-w-l-y" Yes, please do. |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jun 2, 8:39*pm, Joe from Kokomo wrote:
On 6/2/2010 7:52 PM, Gregg wrote: Damn dude, I know you aren't that slow. It has been explained over and over again - you don't have to hit me over the head for me to know you just want to play along with your troublemaker friends. Have at it. Hope you enjoy the threads I provided that show how it REALLY started (like I said all along) and make sure to read it v-e-r-y s-l-o-w-l-y because I'm not reposting this drivel again. How it "started"? Sorry, that's a non-issue. I don't care "how it started". YOU admitted YOU brought over the thugs. No need to go any further than that. Period. End of story. Let me give you a final (and very apt) analogy... Al Capone was a swell fella, never hurt a fly. But he brought in out-of-town thugs to do his dirty work. Is he just as guilty as the trigger men he brought in? According to American jurisprudence, yes, he is just as guilty. Nothing at all to do with "how it started" or are you and the turds the same person. I hope you finally see the parallel with you bringing over the turds and why I consider YOU the root of the trouble for bringing them over; I can't make it any simpler than the analogy above. "...make sure to read it v-e-r-y s-l-o-w-l-y" Yes, please do. When I got to Al Capone - Joe I have to be honest with you, I stopped reading. Have fun and remember radio!!! ;-) |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Bruce Williams on BCB ? | Shortwave | |||
Bruce and me | Shortwave | |||
Bruce Bradley | Broadcasting | |||
Will PCTA Censure Bruce? | Policy |