RadioBanter - We are spys

RadioBanter (https://www.radiobanter.com/)

- Shortwave (https://www.radiobanter.com/shortwave/)

- - We are spys (https://www.radiobanter.com/shortwave/152229-we-spys.html)

Joe from Kokomo wrote:

On 7/3/2010 9:13 AM, Gregg wrote:

I don't like to tell much of my personal history, because -
well....that is my personal history. I did seven years in college (not
in a row)...

SEVEN years???

Did you ever get a degree...or is this just a back handed admission that
you IQ might not be up to snuff? :D

What the heck, Bryant, our clown 'tard homeboy, spent a lot of time trying to
obtain a PhD, but, he could not. However, he certainly felt compelled to lie
about having one.

Ain't that right, Brybaby?

dxAce
Michigan
USA

On 3/07/2010 11:13 PM, Gregg wrote:
On Jul 3, 5:20 am, wrote:
Gregg,

Mike,

I will absolutely guarantee you that I don't smoke dope.

You can "absolutely guarantee" me nothing pal. I can PROMISE you this
Mike, if you had the info of what I KNOW -

So I take it you saw it? That my dear fellow is about the only way you
could "know" with any certainty that which you profess to know. When you
hear it from others it is "hearsay"! Hearsay is not proven fact!

- not only of what went down "out there" -
- but other pertininent info on you - -if it was
all reversed around you would have said something longgggg
ago.....just be careful. And I will admit this much, when I was new to
the computer you "scared me" - not in the "you are going to whoop my
ass" - because that....how do I say it? Me on my worst day and you on
your best....ain't happening. But I was new and was warned of lunatics
and spiteful people and in some cases - things got "literally"
personal on usenet from what I was told/warned at times and I knew
enough about your writing and style (through my years of studying said

You?? Years of studying? Just how many years did they have you repeat
kindergarten???
Really Gregg, your writing style is that of someone quite uneducated!

things) that I wanted to know what I may be dealing with. Of course, I
found out what a nut you are from your own vitriol, not the dangerous
kind - but simply someone who wants to be even bigger than they really
are - like I guess most of us do at times in all honesty. And my

So, that makes Mike a nut and, quite obviously you as well. Hmmmm

checking started before, not right before.....but close to five months
before your last fiasco with me when I decided enough was enough and
Krypsie was introduced into the crotch of your pants and vice versa.

Have you got a fetish going about the crotch of Mike's pants?? That
would explain a lot! Jilted lovers do get quite nasty!

Because I know MY character in comparison towards yours. If you knew
about me what I know about you.....you would be changing screen names
and going through an anonymous newsgroup and "dumping it" for everyone
to see.

The mere fact that Mike hasn't dumped his standard screen name says more
positive things about him than it does about you!

Like I have said over five times ( I think ) - it is just your nature.
It isn't mine. But I know nothing is slander if it's the truth. That
IS the bottom LEGAL line and trust me....please if you haven't ever
listened to anyone on usenet before.....trust me....I am the wrong one
to mess with when it comes to getting info. Now if you want to employ

Ah, usenet threats now eh?

the ole' challenge you did to Ace a while back - I will accept that
challenge on my own timetable and "dump it" when I see fit and how I
see fit and to who I see fit. Kinda like my fake "Premium RX' ;-) This
isn't me "getting with friends to find out info" or a "49.99 Info
Check" or all the stupid kinds of background checks on the internet.
Those are childs play and show nothing to me that I can't find out on
my own in one hour to an hour an a half of my own time. Those kinds of
checks only scratch the surface and in some cases - if someone was
busted for something years back - that doesn't mean that is how they
are today and I don't hold that against them. EVERYONE (including me)
has skeletons in their closet. EVERYONE (including me) try an "show
their best face" in meeting someone for the first time. But I learned
a while back that people aren't always what they appear to be (burned-
not since though) and I find it fascinating.....and I'll even go as
far as to say (like I said with The Bankok Banger and don't get a big
head) that I find you fascinating also. I really do.

Yes, Confirmed! A jilted lover! Gregg, move on man! Mike's not the only
man you could love!

I let you do it to me for yearssss and took your pot shots at not just
me (I can handle that) but you took them at my faith and you took them
at my God and yours -

Ah, your "belief system" has been placed under siege and that you see as
a personal attack upon yourself!

- and I'm not even including the political crap
which in a way.....neither poster or postee is going to change anyones

Another "belief system"

mind. No one changes anyones mind on usenet, there may be a few - my
mind was changed on one subject matter some years back - but it
doesn't happen much in regards to anyones thought process.

I'm tired
of your lies suggesting I do.

Watch it. ;-) And it depends on what you mean "suggesting" means.

Personally, I don't think there's
anything wrong with doing so

Of course. We all know that by your actions where you had no choice
BUT to admit it. But why was it that - for years before you got busted
out at Weber St. with the male student (Danny) in your hotel room that
you railed and railed on anyone that did drugs in RRS and other
groups? Now, I don't know THAT for a fact, but I know it was said time
and time again that you spoke up against drugs till you got busted and

It was "said time and time again"!
Did you SEE it or was it hearsay?

that's why many reveled in your bust and called you a hypocrite (I
could waste more of my time to find it- if you say otherwise though)
If I am wrong or slightly mistaken about that....I expect you to
correct me and I will apologize, because I don't like when things are
said about meheh that aren't true and posted by 'someone' that is
attempting to make the group feel it is someone else. ;-)

So when are you putting your new sockpuppet into action?

but I make sure my students know
that if they do, they need to stop.

Huh? Either you are FLAT OUT LYING AGAIN or one or more of your
students questioned you about the facts they know about you from Weber
St. in Utah where you were arrested on a school sponsored event and
found to be in possesion of pot and paraphenalia in a hotel room with
a male student.

You were the arresting officer??

I don't like to tell much of my personal history, because -

You don't have much of a personal history!

well....that is my personal history. I did seven years in college (not
in a row) and NOT ONE TIME did I ever have a teacher ......or know of
one who had a teacher (and I would have known-bank on it) that said "I
make sure my students know if they do (drugs)....they need to stop".

Seven years in college? Gregg, those remedial literacy classes did you
no good. I'd ask for my enrolment fees back if I were you!

Why is it that in my short time of knowing you - that I reach a lot of
"firsts"? Like I said a couple of days ago, I have NEVER heard of a
teacher....and I will add....or know of someone that knows someone
that is a PROVEN teacher.....on usenet that spouts off about
awards.....or even that they are a college teacher and ESPECIALLY with
your history on usenet and the personal vendettas and outright mean
and spiteful things you say about ANYONE that does not agree with you
or questions you and you don't like it.

Between you and steve, you both really have a history of personal
vendettas against anyone who does not agree with you!

95% of my students will be
starting professional careers after graduating - they need to
be prepared for substance abuse testing as a condition of
employment and random drug tests on the technological jobs
they'll be starting in.

Huh? ROTF - why was it that my teacher/teachers ******NEVER********
said anything to anyone (that I know of) about substance abuse or
randoms? And the advantage I have over you in saying this - is that I

Gregg, that was because they didn't expect a kindergarten dropout to be
aware of such things and deemed it unnecessary!

DO KNOW what you do for a living and you DON'T know what I do. I'm in

What does it matter? It would be a low wage, low skill requirement job
anyway!

one of MANY fields (from my schooling) that deal with liars everyday -
it's just part of the job, from itty bitty white lies -- --too lying

"too lying"????

by omission - - too looking you square in the eyes and lying to your

"too looking"???

face". Nothing was ever said to anyone of us about randoms/testing
because it's freeking common sense UNLESS the one telling you is
"giving you the low down" so too speak from personal experience
because they don't want to happen to you what happened to
them....lol.

Man, this is one hell of a convoluted sentence Gregg! Did you not learn
anything about sentence structure in your remedial literacy classes?
Certainly you learnt naught of punctuation!

If you send me your address, I'll be happy to send you copies
of my quarterly blood tests from my physician.

Do you really think for a minute Michael, that I would send you my
address? I mean, really do you? Of course not.rolling my eyes This

Because you're scared of Michael???

is simply another ploy or head game to try an convince people in this
group and "others" that "may be" reading your mumbo jumbo to buy what
you're trying to sell. I know what you're capable of if push came to
shove.....just via internet - (I see what you have said to and about
Steve/Peter/Kevin and countless others over the years- worse in
vitriol than Kramer). You made fun of Peter losing use of a leg and
you made fun of someones family member commiting suicide - not face to
face though - no matter how skilled you feel you are in debating. I
don't debate. I deal with facts and there is no debate or grey area
when dealing with me when it comes to someone such as yourself. There
is NO WAY POSSIBLE *anyone* could EVER bring a defamation case against
me via usenet through my ISP or in real life face to face dealings -
because I go overboard in showing what I know and it makes it very
easy for a judge if the idiot is unrepresented and/or if he/she is
represented and their attorney takes a look in the "discovery" process
- it will stop right there unless I then want to flip things around.

Definitely didn't do any legal studies in kinder!

These tests
have to be certified and will prove to you that you ought to
shut your mouth before I actually take a slander action
against you.

Number one buddy (and I don't mean it literally FWIW) - you better
watch that fresh mouth of yours. You aren't scaring me with that type
of talk. Know what the legal definition of slander is in both states
and in both states via internet. And not to get all technical with
you...lol....but the tests (drugs) aren't "certified" either - and
I'll go even further (not that it's that big a deal) in saying that I
don't buy that they draw blood either. It's just a urine. I mean, did
you just make a mistake in using that word (certified) or did you

Drug tests are "certified" if they are carried out by qualified and
licensed medical practitioners in an approved manner!

think by using that word that it was going to make it that more
believable? I'll be honest AGAIN with you Michael, I don't know if you
get high. I really don't. It's not "up there" on my "thing to do
list". But I could. Ohhhhh believe me - when I say I could. :-) That
isn't a threat either, because I have no reason or inclination to find
out if you do, to be quite frank I could freeking care less. If you

If you could "freeking care less", why then make such a big deal of the
drug issue?

didn't learn your lesson from the time you were caught till
now.....and be honest with ALL OF US IN HERE ......it's not like that
was the first time you ever got high while teaching at Weber St. was
it? I mean, lets get all our "honesty cards" out on the table, I
smoked pot before - I will be honest about it. I had to not only
submit a blood test but also a polygraph test with a follow up after
that. I think the last time I got high was when I was between nineteen
and twenty years old. I know I wasn't twenty one, I know that for a
fact. Because I grew up and came to the consensus THAT IT IS
ILLEGAL!!! But you just don't turn off at your age that "I am going to

Oh I get it. When you are under 21, it is legal to smoke dope in your
country. Once you turn 21, it becomes illegal. That's why you felt
compelled to stop smoking dope!

stop because this is illegal or my livelihood". Studies actually show
that it entrenches that person EVEN MORE into it (if they get busted),

You really don't have much of an idea of psychology, do you?

with the thinking of "no one is going to tell me what to do" - - - and
they make efforts to "work around it".....not saying you're doing that
either.....but most do. I am sure you are the ones that gave it up. I
truly hope you did.

If you truly hope Mike gave it up, why do you continually lambast him
about it?

You still awaiting that "Premium RX", Gregg? How long does
it take? Is it being shipped from Mars? I have several of
my top receivers being repaired by a tech in Michigan, for
free. I bet I get my radios back before you "claim" to
receive your's.

Ha! Damn, you've brought it up more than I have. You'd think you were
getting it. I know the list of your "top receivers" and NOT ONE is
considered a "Premium RX" - - again - - that there is the facts.
Forget my receiver Michael, this is all about you. :-)

No Gregg, this response says a whole lot more about you than it says
about anyone else!

Had my pictures taken today by a professional photo-
grapher for the award I'm receiving as the state's Most
Dramatic Lecturer.

Yeah, Kramer maybe?snort Michael, do you "really" think any of us
care....I mean "really"? LOL - I know I don't....lol...I see enough of
your "dramatics" and shuck and jive in here. Like I said before, you
could win ***Ky. Teacher Of The Century*** award and I wouldn't look
at you any different than I do now. That is a fact and I am sorry
(truly I am - really) if it hurts your feelings or doesn't give you
the lift or emotional jolt you were looking for when you typed that
and hit the send buttom.

Yes Gregg, they didn't do class pictures showing you graduating from
kindergarten. That's because you dropped out!

But I couldn't help thinking about you.

I have got to ask you this....lol.sigh Do you "really" think about
Steve and myself like you say you do in many of your posts? I'm being
serious. I mean, when you're out in your world - do you HONESTLY think
of me? I don't feel flattered if the answer is yes, it really kinda
creeps me out, not in a scary way.....but I guess in a sad way. Please
Michael, when you get all these awards that you have worked so hard
for and finally attained - please don't think of me. Just think of how
many......errr never mind. But I can PROMISE YOU that I won't think
about you again till I log on and check my lists emails and two other
sites AND THEN I will log onto google. But this is the third group I
check, there are two others that take priority over this. ***THEN*** -
I will think of you when I am reading your crap.

But Gregg, it wasn't that long ago that you were lamenting that Mike
didn't post any more. You missed him! Admit it!

You deserve an award as the Most Dramatic Nit-Wit in
Radio History!

Blah Blah Blah - that's it?shaking my head

Now, don't forget to suck up to Lare, today! You need to
impress your troll sock puppets...

Like you did your Weber St. students that you got high with more than
once / more than twice/ more than three etc. etc. etc. that kind of
"sucking up....errr sucking in - oh never mind you know what I mean"?
Or do you mean "another" kind of sucking up?

[Yawn...]

Open that pouty little lower lip wide open, uh huh.snicker

Freekin' hell!!! He is right there in YOUR DREAMS! It's far worse than
I thought! You've slipped into toal and utter obsession. No hope of
redemption for you now!

None so spiteful as a lover scorned!!!

Krypsis

Michael W. "I'm a college professor with a PhD" Bryant wrote:

On Jul 3, 9:13 am, Gregg wrote:
On Jul 3, 5:20 am, Mike wrote:

Gregg,

Mike,

I will absolutely guarantee you that I don't smoke dope.

You can "absolutely guarantee" me nothing pal. I can PROMISE you this
Mike, if you had the info of what I KNOW - - not only of what went
down "out there" - - but other pertininent info on you - -if it was
all reversed around you would have said something longgggg
ago.....just be careful. And I will admit this much, when I was new to
the computer you "scared me" - not in the "you are going to whoop my
ass" - because that....how do I say it? Me on my worst day and you on
your best....ain't happening. But I was new and was warned of lunatics
and spiteful people and in some cases - things got "literally"
personal on usenet from what I was told/warned at times and I knew
enough about your writing and style (through my years of studying said
things) that I wanted to know what I may be dealing with. Of course, I
found out what a nut you are from your own vitriol, not the dangerous
kind - but simply someone who wants to be even bigger than they really
are - like I guess most of us do at times in all honesty. And my
checking started before, not right before.....but close to five months
before your last fiasco with me when I decided enough was enough and
Krypsie was introduced into the crotch of your pants and vice versa.

Because I know MY character in comparison towards yours. If you knew
about me what I know about you.....you would be changing screen names
and going through an anonymous newsgroup and "dumping it" for everyone
to see.

Like I have said over five times ( I think ) - it is just your nature.
It isn't mine. But I know nothing is slander if it's the truth. That
IS the bottom LEGAL line and trust me....please if you haven't ever
listened to anyone on usenet before.....trust me....I am the wrong one
to mess with when it comes to getting info. Now if you want to employ
the ole' challenge you did to Ace a while back - I will accept that
challenge on my own timetable and "dump it" when I see fit and how I
see fit and to who I see fit. Kinda like my fake "Premium RX' ;-) This
isn't me "getting with friends to find out info" or a "49.99 Info
Check" or all the stupid kinds of background checks on the internet.
Those are childs play and show nothing to me that I can't find out on
my own in one hour to an hour an a half of my own time. Those kinds of
checks only scratch the surface and in some cases - if someone was
busted for something years back - that doesn't mean that is how they
are today and I don't hold that against them. EVERYONE (including me)
has skeletons in their closet. EVERYONE (including me) try an "show
their best face" in meeting someone for the first time. But I learned
a while back that people aren't always what they appear to be (burned-
not since though) and I find it fascinating.....and I'll even go as
far as to say (like I said with The Bankok Banger and don't get a big
head) that I find you fascinating also. I really do.

I let you do it to me for yearssss and took your pot shots at not just
me (I can handle that) but you took them at my faith and you took them
at my God and yours - - and I'm not even including the political crap
which in a way.....neither poster or postee is going to change anyones
mind. No one changes anyones mind on usenet, there may be a few - my
mind was changed on one subject matter some years back - but it
doesn't happen much in regards to anyones thought process.

I'm tired
of your lies suggesting I do.

Watch it. ;-) And it depends on what you mean "suggesting" means.

Personally, I don't think there's
anything wrong with doing so

Of course. We all know that by your actions where you had no choice
BUT to admit it. But why was it that - for years before you got busted
out at Weber St. with the male student (Danny) in your hotel room that
you railed and railed on anyone that did drugs in RRS and other
groups? Now, I don't know THAT for a fact, but I know it was said time
and time again that you spoke up against drugs till you got busted and
that's why many reveled in your bust and called you a hypocrite (I
could waste more of my time to find it- if you say otherwise though)
If I am wrong or slightly mistaken about that....I expect you to
correct me and I will apologize, because I don't like when things are
said about me heh that aren't true and posted by 'someone' that is
attempting to make the group feel it is someone else. ;-)

but I make sure my students know
that if they do, they need to stop.

Huh? Either you are FLAT OUT LYING AGAIN or one or more of your
students questioned you about the facts they know about you from Weber
St. in Utah where you were arrested on a school sponsored event and
found to be in possesion of pot and paraphenalia in a hotel room with
a male student.

I don't like to tell much of my personal history, because -
well....that is my personal history. I did seven years in college (not
in a row) and NOT ONE TIME did I ever have a teacher ......or know of
one who had a teacher (and I would have known-bank on it) that said "I
make sure my students know if they do (drugs)....they need to stop".

Why is it that in my short time of knowing you - that I reach a lot of
"firsts"? Like I said a couple of days ago, I have NEVER heard of a
teacher....and I will add....or know of someone that knows someone
that is a PROVEN teacher.....on usenet that spouts off about
awards.....or even that they are a college teacher and ESPECIALLY with
your history on usenet and the personal vendettas and outright mean
and spiteful things you say about ANYONE that does not agree with you
or questions you and you don't like it.

95% of my students will be
starting professional careers after graduating - they need to
be prepared for substance abuse testing as a condition of
employment and random drug tests on the technological jobs
they'll be starting in.

Huh? ROTF - why was it that my teacher/teachers ******NEVER********
said anything to anyone (that I know of) about substance abuse or
randoms? And the advantage I have over you in saying this - is that I
DO KNOW what you do for a living and you DON'T know what I do. I'm in
one of MANY fields (from my schooling) that deal with liars everyday -
it's just part of the job, from itty bitty white lies -- --too lying
by omission - - too looking you square in the eyes and lying to your
face". Nothing was ever said to anyone of us about randoms/testing
because it's freeking common sense UNLESS the one telling you is
"giving you the low down" so too speak from personal experience
because they don't want to happen to you what happened to
them....lol.

If you send me your address, I'll be happy to send you copies
of my quarterly blood tests from my physician.

Do you really think for a minute Michael, that I would send you my
address? I mean, really do you? Of course not.rolling my eyes This
is simply another ploy or head game to try an convince people in this
group and "others" that "may be" reading your mumbo jumbo to buy what
you're trying to sell. I know what you're capable of if push came to
shove.....just via internet - (I see what you have said to and about
Steve/Peter/Kevin and countless others over the years- worse in
vitriol than Kramer). You made fun of Peter losing use of a leg and
you made fun of someones family member commiting suicide - not face to
face though - no matter how skilled you feel you are in debating. I
don't debate. I deal with facts and there is no debate or grey area
when dealing with me when it comes to someone such as yourself. There
is NO WAY POSSIBLE *anyone* could EVER bring a defamation case against
me via usenet through my ISP or in real life face to face dealings -
because I go overboard in showing what I know and it makes it very
easy for a judge if the idiot is unrepresented and/or if he/she is
represented and their attorney takes a look in the "discovery" process
- it will stop right there unless I then want to flip things around.

These tests
have to be certified and will prove to you that you ought to
shut your mouth before I actually take a slander action
against you.

Number one buddy (and I don't mean it literally FWIW) - you better
watch that fresh mouth of yours. You aren't scaring me with that type
of talk. Know what the legal definition of slander is in both states
and in both states via internet. And not to get all technical with
you...lol....but the tests (drugs) aren't "certified" either - and
I'll go even further (not that it's that big a deal) in saying that I
don't buy that they draw blood either. It's just a urine. I mean, did
you just make a mistake in using that word (certified) or did you
think by using that word that it was going to make it that more
believable? I'll be honest AGAIN with you Michael, I don't know if you
get high. I really don't. It's not "up there" on my "thing to do
list". But I could. Ohhhhh believe me - when I say I could. :-) That
isn't a threat either, because I have no reason or inclination to find
out if you do, to be quite frank I could freeking care less. If you
didn't learn your lesson from the time you were caught till
now.....and be honest with ALL OF US IN HERE ......it's not like that
was the first time you ever got high while teaching at Weber St. was
it? I mean, lets get all our "honesty cards" out on the table, I
smoked pot before - I will be honest about it. I had to not only
submit a blood test but also a polygraph test with a follow up after
that. I think the last time I got high was when I was between nineteen
and twenty years old. I know I wasn't twenty one, I know that for a
fact. Because I grew up and came to the consensus THAT IT IS
ILLEGAL!!! But you just don't turn off at your age that "I am going to
stop because this is illegal or my livelihood". Studies actually show
that it entrenches that person EVEN MORE into it (if they get busted),
with the thinking of "no one is going to tell me what to do" - - - and
they make efforts to "work around it".....not saying you're doing that
either.....but most do. I am sure you are the ones that gave it up. I
truly hope you did.

You still awaiting that "Premium RX", Gregg? How long does
it take? Is it being shipped from Mars? I have several of
my top receivers being repaired by a tech in Michigan, for
free. I bet I get my radios back before you "claim" to
receive your's.

Ha! Damn, you've brought it up more than I have. You'd think you were
getting it. I know the list of your "top receivers" and NOT ONE is
considered a "Premium RX" - - again - - that there is the facts.
Forget my receiver Michael, this is all about you. :-)

Had my pictures taken today by a professional photo-
grapher for the award I'm receiving as the state's Most
Dramatic Lecturer.

Yeah, Kramer maybe? snort Michael, do you "really" think any of us
care....I mean "really"? LOL - I know I don't....lol...I see enough of
your "dramatics" and shuck and jive in here. Like I said before, you
could win ***Ky. Teacher Of The Century*** award and I wouldn't look
at you any different than I do now. That is a fact and I am sorry
(truly I am - really) if it hurts your feelings or doesn't give you
the lift or emotional jolt you were looking for when you typed that
and hit the send buttom.

But I couldn't help thinking about you.

I have got to ask you this....lol.sigh Do you "really" think about
Steve and myself like you say you do in many of your posts? I'm being
serious. I mean, when you're out in your world - do you HONESTLY think
of me? I don't feel flattered if the answer is yes, it really kinda
creeps me out, not in a scary way.....but I guess in a sad way. Please
Michael, when you get all these awards that you have worked so hard
for and finally attained - please don't think of me. Just think of how
many......errr never mind. But I can PROMISE YOU that I won't think
about you again till I log on and check my lists emails and two other
sites AND THEN I will log onto google. But this is the third group I
check, there are two others that take priority over this. ***THEN*** -
I will think of you when I am reading your crap.

You deserve an award as the Most Dramatic Nit-Wit in
Radio History!

Blah Blah Blah - that's it? shaking my head

Now, don't forget to suck up to Lare, today! You need to
impress your troll sock puppets...

Like you did your Weber St. students that you got high with more than
once / more than twice/ more than three etc. etc. etc. that kind of
"sucking up....errr sucking in - oh never mind you know what I mean"?
Or do you mean "another" kind of sucking up?

[Yawn...]

Open that pouty little lower lip wide open, uh huh.snicker

- Show quoted text -

I knew it wouldn't take long for your knife-wielding "Rambo"
alter-ego to emerge! Here's another thing I teach students:
conciseness. Never take five thousand words to say what
you mean. It conveys uncertainty and outright deception.

I'll try to keep this response short. It should be easy.

1. You're an idiot. You might be an idiot with bluster, but
you're an idiot.

2. You should know that they can detect THC via either urine
or blood. Both of mine are checked every two months by
my doctor for the last five years. Remember, I had a
stroke five years ago. Use your super-sleuth powers,
Greggbo. My insurance company requires certification
of the results. The offer stands. Give me a post office box
if you don't want to give out your address.

3. I'm also tired of your inferences that I'm gay. While
there is nothing wrong with being gay, I am not. None
of your awesome detection has produced any evidence
to the contrary. My daughter still lives at home.

Heck, that's nothing to brag about, had your 'daughter' attended the Sullivan
College of Technology & Design she'd now be gainfully employed like the other
'95%' of the graduates and she'd have had her own place to live!

dxAce
Michigan
USA

dave wrote:

RHF wrote:
Dave Your The Best ! :o) ~ RHF
.

My The Best what?

he's possessed...

mike

So many Countries are spying on U.S.A.If we are spys, they are Spys
too.I Spy, you Spy, we all Spy.

Ahh shud hav nown bitter dan tu mow mah yard thi mawnin, sew werly en
dee mawnin wyly it's su damp.Dat thar wet/damp dam grass dun woiked me
haf tu death!
cuhulin

On Jul 3, 10:23*am, dxAce wrote:

What the heck, Bryant, our clown 'tard homeboy, spent a lot of time trying to
obtain a PhD, but, he could not.

No, unlike you, I wanted to get out there and start working.
It might be old-fashioned about me, but I feel that earning
my wages is the right thing to do. And, I never found the
lack of a doctorate degree to get in the way of academic
jobs.

But, of course, you can't understand that.

Mike

Mike wrote:

If you send me your address, I'll be happy to send you copies
of my quarterly blood tests from my physician. These tests
have to be certified and will prove to you that you ought to
shut your mouth before I actually take a slander action
against you.

Not to pick nits, I make the same mistake regularly. I'll get this out
while while it's still fresh in my mind ....A slander is committed in
spoken form. Libel happens when the same lie or defamation is done in
print. You would be launching a Libel action against him.

mike

Michael W. "I'm a college professor with a PhD" Bryant wrote:

On Jul 3, 9:13 am, Gregg wrote:
On Jul 3, 5:20 am, Mike wrote:

Gregg,

Mike,

I will absolutely guarantee you that I don't smoke dope.

You can "absolutely guarantee" me nothing pal. I can PROMISE you this
Mike, if you had the info of what I KNOW - - not only of what went
down "out there" - - but other pertininent info on you - -if it was
all reversed around you would have said something longgggg
ago.....just be careful. And I will admit this much, when I was new to
the computer you "scared me" - not in the "you are going to whoop my
ass" - because that....how do I say it? Me on my worst day and you on
your best....ain't happening. But I was new and was warned of lunatics
and spiteful people and in some cases - things got "literally"
personal on usenet from what I was told/warned at times and I knew
enough about your writing and style (through my years of studying said
things) that I wanted to know what I may be dealing with. Of course, I
found out what a nut you are from your own vitriol, not the dangerous
kind - but simply someone who wants to be even bigger than they really
are - like I guess most of us do at times in all honesty. And my
checking started before, not right before.....but close to five months
before your last fiasco with me when I decided enough was enough and
Krypsie was introduced into the crotch of your pants and vice versa.

Because I know MY character in comparison towards yours. If you knew
about me what I know about you.....you would be changing screen names
and going through an anonymous newsgroup and "dumping it" for everyone
to see.

Like I have said over five times ( I think ) - it is just your nature.
It isn't mine. But I know nothing is slander if it's the truth. That
IS the bottom LEGAL line and trust me....please if you haven't ever
listened to anyone on usenet before.....trust me....I am the wrong one
to mess with when it comes to getting info. Now if you want to employ
the ole' challenge you did to Ace a while back - I will accept that
challenge on my own timetable and "dump it" when I see fit and how I
see fit and to who I see fit. Kinda like my fake "Premium RX' ;-) This
isn't me "getting with friends to find out info" or a "49.99 Info
Check" or all the stupid kinds of background checks on the internet.
Those are childs play and show nothing to me that I can't find out on
my own in one hour to an hour an a half of my own time. Those kinds of
checks only scratch the surface and in some cases - if someone was
busted for something years back - that doesn't mean that is how they
are today and I don't hold that against them. EVERYONE (including me)
has skeletons in their closet. EVERYONE (including me) try an "show
their best face" in meeting someone for the first time. But I learned
a while back that people aren't always what they appear to be (burned-
not since though) and I find it fascinating.....and I'll even go as
far as to say (like I said with The Bankok Banger and don't get a big
head) that I find you fascinating also. I really do.

I let you do it to me for yearssss and took your pot shots at not just
me (I can handle that) but you took them at my faith and you took them
at my God and yours - - and I'm not even including the political crap
which in a way.....neither poster or postee is going to change anyones
mind. No one changes anyones mind on usenet, there may be a few - my
mind was changed on one subject matter some years back - but it
doesn't happen much in regards to anyones thought process.

I'm tired
of your lies suggesting I do.

Watch it. ;-) And it depends on what you mean "suggesting" means.

Personally, I don't think there's
anything wrong with doing so

Of course. We all know that by your actions where you had no choice
BUT to admit it. But why was it that - for years before you got busted
out at Weber St. with the male student (Danny) in your hotel room that
you railed and railed on anyone that did drugs in RRS and other
groups? Now, I don't know THAT for a fact, but I know it was said time
and time again that you spoke up against drugs till you got busted and
that's why many reveled in your bust and called you a hypocrite (I
could waste more of my time to find it- if you say otherwise though)
If I am wrong or slightly mistaken about that....I expect you to
correct me and I will apologize, because I don't like when things are
said about me heh that aren't true and posted by 'someone' that is
attempting to make the group feel it is someone else. ;-)

but I make sure my students know
that if they do, they need to stop.

Huh? Either you are FLAT OUT LYING AGAIN or one or more of your
students questioned you about the facts they know about you from Weber
St. in Utah where you were arrested on a school sponsored event and
found to be in possesion of pot and paraphenalia in a hotel room with
a male student.

I don't like to tell much of my personal history, because -
well....that is my personal history. I did seven years in college (not
in a row) and NOT ONE TIME did I ever have a teacher ......or know of
one who had a teacher (and I would have known-bank on it) that said "I
make sure my students know if they do (drugs)....they need to stop".

Why is it that in my short time of knowing you - that I reach a lot of
"firsts"? Like I said a couple of days ago, I have NEVER heard of a
teacher....and I will add....or know of someone that knows someone
that is a PROVEN teacher.....on usenet that spouts off about
awards.....or even that they are a college teacher and ESPECIALLY with
your history on usenet and the personal vendettas and outright mean
and spiteful things you say about ANYONE that does not agree with you
or questions you and you don't like it.

95% of my students will be
starting professional careers after graduating - they need to
be prepared for substance abuse testing as a condition of
employment and random drug tests on the technological jobs
they'll be starting in.

Huh? ROTF - why was it that my teacher/teachers ******NEVER********
said anything to anyone (that I know of) about substance abuse or
randoms? And the advantage I have over you in saying this - is that I
DO KNOW what you do for a living and you DON'T know what I do. I'm in
one of MANY fields (from my schooling) that deal with liars everyday -
it's just part of the job, from itty bitty white lies -- --too lying
by omission - - too looking you square in the eyes and lying to your
face". Nothing was ever said to anyone of us about randoms/testing
because it's freeking common sense UNLESS the one telling you is
"giving you the low down" so too speak from personal experience
because they don't want to happen to you what happened to
them....lol.

If you send me your address, I'll be happy to send you copies
of my quarterly blood tests from my physician.

Do you really think for a minute Michael, that I would send you my
address? I mean, really do you? Of course not.rolling my eyes This
is simply another ploy or head game to try an convince people in this
group and "others" that "may be" reading your mumbo jumbo to buy what
you're trying to sell. I know what you're capable of if push came to
shove.....just via internet - (I see what you have said to and about
Steve/Peter/Kevin and countless others over the years- worse in
vitriol than Kramer). You made fun of Peter losing use of a leg and
you made fun of someones family member commiting suicide - not face to
face though - no matter how skilled you feel you are in debating. I
don't debate. I deal with facts and there is no debate or grey area
when dealing with me when it comes to someone such as yourself. There
is NO WAY POSSIBLE *anyone* could EVER bring a defamation case against
me via usenet through my ISP or in real life face to face dealings -
because I go overboard in showing what I know and it makes it very
easy for a judge if the idiot is unrepresented and/or if he/she is
represented and their attorney takes a look in the "discovery" process
- it will stop right there unless I then want to flip things around.

These tests
have to be certified and will prove to you that you ought to
shut your mouth before I actually take a slander action
against you.

Number one buddy (and I don't mean it literally FWIW) - you better
watch that fresh mouth of yours. You aren't scaring me with that type
of talk. Know what the legal definition of slander is in both states
and in both states via internet. And not to get all technical with
you...lol....but the tests (drugs) aren't "certified" either - and
I'll go even further (not that it's that big a deal) in saying that I
don't buy that they draw blood either. It's just a urine. I mean, did
you just make a mistake in using that word (certified) or did you
think by using that word that it was going to make it that more
believable? I'll be honest AGAIN with you Michael, I don't know if you
get high. I really don't. It's not "up there" on my "thing to do
list". But I could. Ohhhhh believe me - when I say I could. :-) That
isn't a threat either, because I have no reason or inclination to find
out if you do, to be quite frank I could freeking care less. If you
didn't learn your lesson from the time you were caught till
now.....and be honest with ALL OF US IN HERE ......it's not like that
was the first time you ever got high while teaching at Weber St. was
it? I mean, lets get all our "honesty cards" out on the table, I
smoked pot before - I will be honest about it. I had to not only
submit a blood test but also a polygraph test with a follow up after
that. I think the last time I got high was when I was between nineteen
and twenty years old. I know I wasn't twenty one, I know that for a
fact. Because I grew up and came to the consensus THAT IT IS
ILLEGAL!!! But you just don't turn off at your age that "I am going to
stop because this is illegal or my livelihood". Studies actually show
that it entrenches that person EVEN MORE into it (if they get busted),
with the thinking of "no one is going to tell me what to do" - - - and
they make efforts to "work around it".....not saying you're doing that
either.....but most do. I am sure you are the ones that gave it up. I
truly hope you did.

You still awaiting that "Premium RX", Gregg? How long does
it take? Is it being shipped from Mars? I have several of
my top receivers being repaired by a tech in Michigan, for
free. I bet I get my radios back before you "claim" to
receive your's.

Ha! Damn, you've brought it up more than I have. You'd think you were
getting it. I know the list of your "top receivers" and NOT ONE is
considered a "Premium RX" - - again - - that there is the facts.
Forget my receiver Michael, this is all about you. :-)

Had my pictures taken today by a professional photo-
grapher for the award I'm receiving as the state's Most
Dramatic Lecturer.

Yeah, Kramer maybe? snort Michael, do you "really" think any of us
care....I mean "really"? LOL - I know I don't....lol...I see enough of
your "dramatics" and shuck and jive in here. Like I said before, you
could win ***Ky. Teacher Of The Century*** award and I wouldn't look
at you any different than I do now. That is a fact and I am sorry
(truly I am - really) if it hurts your feelings or doesn't give you
the lift or emotional jolt you were looking for when you typed that
and hit the send buttom.

But I couldn't help thinking about you.

I have got to ask you this....lol.sigh Do you "really" think about
Steve and myself like you say you do in many of your posts? I'm being
serious. I mean, when you're out in your world - do you HONESTLY think
of me? I don't feel flattered if the answer is yes, it really kinda
creeps me out, not in a scary way.....but I guess in a sad way. Please
Michael, when you get all these awards that you have worked so hard
for and finally attained - please don't think of me. Just think of how
many......errr never mind. But I can PROMISE YOU that I won't think
about you again till I log on and check my lists emails and two other
sites AND THEN I will log onto google. But this is the third group I
check, there are two others that take priority over this. ***THEN*** -
I will think of you when I am reading your crap.

You deserve an award as the Most Dramatic Nit-Wit in
Radio History!

Blah Blah Blah - that's it? shaking my head

Now, don't forget to suck up to Lare, today! You need to
impress your troll sock puppets...

Like you did your Weber St. students that you got high with more than
once / more than twice/ more than three etc. etc. etc. that kind of
"sucking up....errr sucking in - oh never mind you know what I mean"?
Or do you mean "another" kind of sucking up?

[Yawn...]

Open that pouty little lower lip wide open, uh huh.snicker

- Show quoted text -

I knew it wouldn't take long for your knife-wielding "Rambo"
alter-ego to emerge! Here's another thing I teach students:
conciseness. Never take five thousand words to say what
you mean. It conveys uncertainty and outright deception.

I'll try to keep this response short. It should be easy.

1. You're an idiot. You might be an idiot with bluster, but
you're an idiot.

2. You should know that they can detect THC via either urine
or blood. Both of mine are checked every two months by
my doctor for the last five years. Remember, I had a
stroke five years ago.

OK, so you claim to have had a 'stroke' five years ago. Just how does that
explain the fact that you claimed to have had a PhD c. ten years ago?

dxAce
Michigan
USA

Michael W. "I'm a college professor with a PhD" Bryant wrote:

On Jul 3, 10:23 am, dxAce wrote:

What the heck, Bryant, our clown 'tard homeboy, spent a lot of time trying to
obtain a PhD, but, he could not.

No, unlike you, I wanted to get out there and start working.
It might be old-fashioned about me, but I feel that earning
my wages is the right thing to do. And, I never found the
lack of a doctorate degree to get in the way of academic
jobs.

But, of course, you can't understand that.

OK, but that still doesn't explain why you 'claimed' to have that PhD, Mr. Debate!

Other than the absolute fact that you are a pathological liar.

dxAce
Michigan
USA

On Jul 3, 11:39*am, dxAce wrote:

OK, so you claim to have had a 'stroke' five years ago. Just how does that
explain the fact that you claimed to have had a PhD c. ten years ago?

I really did have a stroke five years ago that left me unable to
walk, talk, or even swallow. Took a while to come back, but since
then I have gone through extensive therapy and medical
monitoring. Ask your cousin, Burr. I explained it all to him
during my rehab, when he was asking me to return to posting
on RRS. I disagree strongly with Burr's politics, but he does
have a heart. I respect him in a way that I don't think I could
ever respect you. He's always made the effort to check on me,
whether I was posting to RRS or not.

But my stroke and my level of educational attainment have
absolutely no connection. Why should they? Even your insults
are nonsensical, Steve.

Mike