| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#20
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Jul 13, 7:45Â*am, Beam Me Up Scotty Then-Destroy-
wrote: On 7/13/2010 4:41 AM, Christopher Helms wrote: On Jul 12, 5:58 pm, ∅baMa∅ Tse Dung wrote: … In the name of conservation, a federal law limits the amount of water that can pass through a nozzle to 2.5 gallons per minute. The law was designed to limit both water and energy use related to pumping the water. Until recently, a loophole that allowed multi-nozzled showerheads (with each individual nozzle meeting the flow-capacity limit) put this personal choice where it belongs: in the hands of consumers. Showerheads with three or even eight nozzles could be purchased by homebuilders to equip luxury bathrooms as long as the per-nozzle water- flow limit was followed. Regrettably, the DOE decided that alternatives to the standard showerhead could no longer be allowed and, in May, sought to close the legal gap. A redefinition of showerheads is expected. Dictating the amount of water that is to be used in a shower has little bearing on energy policy and opens the door to far more invasive measures. If the DOE can limit the energy used in showering, it could just as easily involve itself in legislating how much energy any appliance can use, how long it can be used each day, or what kind of electronics can be sold. [...] In involving itself so closely in the American household, the DOE has overstepped its bounds. Showerheads simply don’t fit under electricity, fuel, or energy on a national scale. Which showerhead to use should be a personal choice made by individual households, not by a commission or national organization. http://therealbarackobama.wordpress....will-be-the-sh.... That's Fascism! You do know the government has Banned your old 3 gallon flush toilets didn't you..... What's more is that to save that little bit of water in the flush, they force you to use the New toilets and they never updated the Waste lines and many older homes couldn't have pipes upgraded anyways. But that lower amount of water with each flush(and the 1/8 drop per foot) will create many more stoppages.... Â*Stoppages mean a plumber being called and that costs many times the water and gas and money...... When computing the water saved, the cost is NOT just a new toilet with 1.5gal flush. That's Fascism/Socialism..... Â*Thank you Leftists, for micromanaging my life. Next they will be smuggling 5-Gal Toilets across the Border like Freon http://www.nytimes.com/1996/11/10/us...pagewanted=all Putting the Low-Flush Toilets Water Tank on/in the Wall with a 4~6 Foot Drop can make for a very effective Flushing Action. http://starcraftcustombuilders.com/i...TankToilet.jpg A Gallon of Water that only Drops a Foot has very little Energy {Mechanical Force} : Where as that same Gallon of Water that now Drops a 4 Feet has 4 Times the Energy and 4 Times the Mechanical Force to completely Flush the Toilet. Installing a Urinal with a Pint-Size Flushing Action can reduce the overall amount of Water used to Flush Toilets by ~25%. http://www.zurn.com/operations/ecova...pages/home.asp Dual Flush Toilets are another alternative that uses the existing space and hook-up. http://home.howstuffworks.com/dual-flush-toilet.htm |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|