… In the name of conservation, a federal law limits the amount of
water that can pass through a nozzle to 2.5 gallons per minute. The
law was designed to limit both water and energy use related to pumping
the water.

Until recently, a loophole that allowed multi-nozzled showerheads
(with each individual nozzle meeting the flow-capacity limit) put this
personal choice where it belongs: in the hands of consumers.
Showerheads with three or even eight nozzles could be purchased by
homebuilders to equip luxury bathrooms as long as the per-nozzle water-
flow limit was followed. Regrettably, the DOE decided that
alternatives to the standard showerhead could no longer be allowed
and, in May, sought to close the legal gap. A redefinition of
showerheads is expected.

Dictating the amount of water that is to be used in a shower has
little bearing on energy policy and opens the door to far more
invasive measures. If the DOE can limit the energy used in showering,
it could just as easily involve itself in legislating how much energy
any appliance can use, how long it can be used each day, or what kind
of electronics can be sold.

[...]

In involving itself so closely in the American household, the DOE has
overstepped its bounds. Showerheads simply don’t fit under
electricity, fuel, or energy on a national scale. Which showerhead to
use should be a personal choice made by individual households, not by
a commission or national organization.

http://therealbarackobama.wordpress....owerhead-czar/

That's Fascism!

On Jul 12, 5:58Â*pm, ∅baMa∅ Tse Dung wrote:
… In the name of conservation, a federal law limits the amount of
water that can pass through a nozzle to 2.5 gallons per minute. The
law was designed to limit both water and energy use related to pumping
the water.

(SNIPPED).

http://therealbarackobama.wordpress....will-be-the-sh...

That's Fascism!
..
..
Your post makes it sound as if Obama is responsible for the 16 year
old Federal restriction on new showerheads. Some dozen STATES as long
ago as 1992 (that's 18 years ago) had put restrictions on new
showerhead manufacture. Don't worry, you will not need to rip out
your old showerhead and purchase a new one.

http://snipurl.com/zah4d

BTW.......Obama is not responsible for the crabgrass growing in your
lawn.

RO

"ØbaMaØ Tse Dung" wrote in message
...

Recently unearthed letterl
“Dear Texas Senators,

How dare you try to put my babies in classes with tards. My babies ain’t
tarded, they are Gob’s special angels!11!! yOU IS the tard. Keep youre
gubment hands out of my public education you Messican faggots!
Youres in HIS name,
Babs Bush”







__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 5273 (20100712) __________

The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.

http://www.eset.com

On 7/12/2010 7:38 PM, Ron wrote:
On Jul 12, 5:58 pm, ∅baMa∅ Tse Dung wrote:
… In the name of conservation, a federal law limits the amount of
water that can pass through a nozzle to 2.5 gallons per minute. The
law was designed to limit both water and energy use related to pumping
the water.

(SNIPPED).

http://therealbarackobama.wordpress....will-be-the-sh...

That's Fascism!
.
.
Your post makes it sound as if Obama is responsible for the 16 year
old Federal restriction on new showerheads. Some dozen STATES as long
ago as 1992 (that's 18 years ago) had put restrictions on new
showerhead manufacture. Don't worry, you will not need to rip out
your old showerhead and purchase a new one.

http://snipurl.com/zah4d

BTW.......Obama is not responsible for the crabgrass growing in your
lawn.

RO


Well... Obama did **** all over America.


Fertilizer makes crabgrass grow.

In article 116b3468-be85-4b58-9823-96626698cf10
@i31g2000yqm.googlegroups.com, says...
On Jul 12, 5:58Â*pm, â=3F=3FbaMaâ=3F=3F Tse Dung wrote:
â¤=3F In the name of conservation, a federal law limits the amount of
water that can pass through a nozzle to 2.5 gallons per minute. The
law was designed to limit both water and energy use related to pumping
the water.

(SNIPPED).

http://therealbarackobama.wordpress....will-be-the-sh....

That's Fascism!
.
.
Your post makes it sound as if Obama is responsible for the 16 year
old Federal restriction on new showerheads. Some dozen STATES as long
ago as 1992 (that's 18 years ago) had put restrictions on new
showerhead manufacture. Don't worry, you will not need to rip out
your old showerhead and purchase a new one.

http://snipurl.com/zah4d

BTW.......Obama is not responsible for the crabgrass growing in your
lawn.

RO


It's sad when people are so desperate to say something bad about Obama
that they have to stoop to claiming he's responsible for making
showerheads "low flow". That's been happening, like you said, since
REAGAN was in office.

And it's apparently too difficult for some of these people to drill the
hole out and make your new showehead flow just like an old one.

--
BDK, non-jew leader of the non-existant paid jew shills!

On Jul 12, 10:55*pm, BDK wrote:
In article 116b3468-be85-4b58-9823-96626698cf10
@i31g2000yqm.googlegroups.com, says...



On Jul 12, 5:58Â*pm, â=3F=3FbaMaâ=3F=3F Tse Dung wrote:
â¤=3F In the name of conservation, a federal law limits the amount of
water that can pass through a nozzle to 2.5 gallons per minute. The
law was designed to limit both water and energy use related to pumping
the water.

(SNIPPED).

http://therealbarackobama.wordpress....will-be-the-sh....

That's Fascism!
.
.
Your post makes it sound as if Obama is responsible for the 16 year
old Federal restriction on new showerheads. *Some dozen STATES as long
ago as 1992 (that's 18 years ago) had put restrictions on new
showerhead manufacture. *Don't worry, you will not need to rip out
your old showerhead and purchase a new one.

http://snipurl.com/zah4d

BTW.......Obama is not responsible for the crabgrass growing in your
lawn.

RO

It's sad when people are so desperate to say something bad about Obama
that they have to stoop to claiming he's responsible for making
showerheads "low flow". That's been happening, like you said, since
REAGAN was in office.

- And it's apparently too difficult for some
- of these people to drill the hole out and
- make your new showehead flow just like
- an old one.

Such anti-environmental espionage directed
at shower heads shall not be tolerated.

Agents of the Federal Bathroom Investigations
-aka- FBI will soon be out to your house to
Test and Inspect each and every 'orifice' that
emits H2O from your plumbing.

All contraband IBD Plumbing Fixtures will be
confiscated and a Total Flow Restrictor will be
place at the Water service entry of your house.

-note- IBD Improved Bathroom Devices

Any further violations will be meant with the
imposition of 5-Litre Solar Showers and
Composting Toilets.

we are the obama - you will conserve
or be conserved ~ RHF

On 7/12/2010 7:38 PM, Ron wrote:

Your post makes it sound as if Obama is responsible for the 16 year
old Federal restriction on new showerheads.

BTW.......Obama is not responsible for the crabgrass growing in your
lawn.

Earlier this year I met a person who did not like the design of American
cars. He, in all seriousness, blamed it on Obama.

Only one problem...

Cars have a *two to three* year design cycle...but Obama has only been
in office a little over -one- year.

Bottom line:

These racist, idiot, morons will blame anything, literally ANYTHING, on
Obama -- yes, even their crabgrass.

Oh, did I mention that they were knee-jerk racists and morons?

On 7/13/2010 1:55 AM, BDK wrote:

It's sad when people are so desperate to say something bad about
Obama that they have to stoop to claiming he's responsible for making
showerheads "low flow". That's been happening, like you said, since
REAGAN was in office.

Congratulations! You've just discovered another characteristic of these
knee-jerk, racist morons -- they have a *very* short memory.

On 7/13/2010 4:41 AM, Christopher Helms wrote:

Was it "Fascism" in Hawaii when the state demanded public water use
restrictions because the Dole plant was using huge amounts of water to
process pineapples?

Well, you bring up a complex issue...

Without taking sides, let me point out that, although it "sounds bad"
that they are asking the 'public' to reduce water usage for Dole, please
remember that Dole is a MAJOR employer that provides jobs to the...PUBLIC.

Finally, please realize that Dole or no Dole, Hawaii has virtually no
natural resources and that they have to bring in EVERY DROP of oil to
make the electricity to run the municipal water processing plants -- so
water conservation, Dole or not, is probably a good idea.

On 7/13/10 07:54 , Joe from Kokomo wrote:


Finally, please realize that Dole or no Dole, Hawaii has virtually no
natural resources and that they have to bring in EVERY DROP of oil to
make the electricity to run the municipal water processing plants



Interesting point, given that, being a volcanic archipeligo,
geothermal energy is readily available, and easily tapped, as a
source for power generation in virtually unlimited supply.