Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#23
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jul 13, 4:37*pm, Beam Me Up Scotty Then-Destroy-
wrote: On 7/13/2010 4:26 PM, Joe from Kokomo wrote: On 7/13/2010 12:50 PM, Beam Me Up Scotty wrote: Why not install a maceration unit and make it all a slurry and flush 1/2 gal of water? or use a storage tank/maceration and a pump to push the sewage rather than allowing "gravity and water" to drag the sh!t to the sewer? Why not install a maceration unit? Probably because gravity is a lot cheaper than the electricity required to run tens of millions maceration units. Furthermore, in a previous post about the government requiring the use of 1 gallon flush toilets, you (Beam Me Up Scotty) said of the government: That's Fascism/Socialism..... *Thank you Leftists, for micromanaging my life. Let me see if I've got this right... If the government says use a 1 gallon flush toilet, "That's Fascism/Socialism". Yes I was calling into question their decision, why not use a different method as long as they are forcing you to buy "something" for "environmental" reasons like saving water, why not choose a plan to save 2 and 1/2 gallons rather than just 1 1/2gallons? You see they are environmentalists and not plumbers so they don't know **** about ****. Their solution was to create more problems than they solved whereas a maceration lift station would have saved more water and probably cost you the same in service calls as all the backed up sewer lines. If BMU Scotty (or the government) dictates a maceration unit, then that's OK? Pot/Kettle/Black it would seem. The point being that I watched Government telegraph their ignorance. Bwahahahaha... You are a bit slow but that's what we like about you. Let Us Gather Around The Toilet The Beautiful Beautiful Low Flush Toilet Let Us Gather Around The Toilet The Beautiful Beautiful Low Flush Toilet and give this obama-nation the flush sh sh ~ RHF |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|