Obama Is Colluding with a New Fascist Imperialism

By James Lewis

Nothing is more like the fascist Axis of the 1930s than Islamist
expansionism today. Like the Hitler-Tojo-Mussolini Axis of the 1930s,
Islamic fascists are fundamentally imperialistic, with an explicit
order from on High to subjugate civilized people or turn them to
ashes. Mohammed himself famously threatened the cultured Persian and
Byzantine Emperors of his time, and in the following years, his
followers knocked those empires over like devouring army ants.

The peace-loving Buddhist monasteries of India were consumed by
invading Muslim armies, with the result that there are no Buddhist
monasteries left in India today. Not a single one. Only Hinduism
survived the Muslim invasions, because Hindus are not pacifists. You
can ask any Sikh about that; they are a huge warrior religion that
arose as a buffer between Hindu India and its many Muslim invaders,
who now hold Pakistan and Afghanistan. In India, the Buddhist monks
just died or fled to Tibet. So much for the glorious results of
peaceful resistance against Muslim armies.

Wherever Islamic fascists go, they first like to frighten and
intimidate less warlike peoples -- as in London today, where any BBC
criticism of Islamic fascists is streng verboten. That's what the
Ground Zero Mosque and the Mohammed cartoon uproar have in common:
They are purposeful agitprop campaigns to scare and intimidate all the
weak-willed liberals in the West, a standard Islamist tactic to
conquer by intimidation, just as Muslim conquerors have always done.
Why bother to wage war when you can win by terror? Putin understands
that, the Chinese understand it, and it's clear enough around the
Middle East. Only American liberals and European socialists are in
denial. That's why they are the biggest round-heels in the world. They
will happily collude in their own subjection and degradation.

Islamic practice has always required mosques to have the highest
towers in any subjugated city. No Jews or Christians were ever allowed
to build higher places of worship, to ride higher (on horses or
mules), or even to raise their heads higher while walking the streets
than any Muslim. If you were a Jew or a Christian, you would duck your
head deep down as you passed a Muslim, who was allowed to spit on you
at will. As recently as the Ottoman Empire (crumbled in 1917), all
dhimmis were unceremoniously beaten to the ground if they dared to
raise their heads higher than a passing Muslim. Modern Westerners deny
the obvious, but that is because they are wishful idiots, self-
inflicted ignorami, and dead meat to all the predators of this world.
It's Little Red Riding Hood skipping into the dark forest again, but
this time nobody told her about the Big Bad Wolf.

Islamic fascism is committing African genocides here and now, as in
the Sudan, where a radical Muslim murder regime has been enabled by
the "international community" to persecute and kill animist and
Christian Africans since the 1990s. Rather than stopping the horrors
by simply arming Africans who are killed for Allah, the Sudan has been
gloriously elected to the Human Rights Commission of the U.N. General
Assembly with the active connivance of the Left. That is just another
fact that is understood by anybody who cares to open their eyes. The
U.N. has been conquered without a shot by the new fascists, so that
U.N. "peacekeeping" forces are rendered impotent in the face of
genocide.

Kofi Annan stood by during the Rwandan genocides in the 1990s and then
was elected Secretary General of the U.N. partly as a reward; Islamic
regimes and the Euro-Left knew he wouldn't make trouble for them.
Annan earned his by using the Food for Oil conspiracy to skim billions
off "humanitarian" Iraqi oil sales to help Saddam Hussein, in criminal
collusion with French President Jacques Chirac and Foreign Minister
Dominique de Villepin. The U.S. press, filled to the brim with useless
idiots and suckers, celebrated the bad guys and attacked the good
guys. The biggest liberals always fall for the worst tyrants.

You think that evil is safely dead and in the past? You must be a
liberal and self-deluded. But I repeat myself, as Mark Twain said in
similar circumstances.

Islamofascists constantly threaten genocide against the Jews, as in
the daily fulminations of that little Twelver freak Ahmadinejad -- but
also in the words just reported by our good friend the Saudi King of
the Arabian desert: "There are two nations that do not deserve to
live: Israel and Iran."

This is the 7th-century king of the camel-raiders that the President
of the United States, Barack Hussein Obama, publicly bowed down to --
in a universal gesture of submission that was instantly understood
throughout the Muslim world.

Neville Chamberlain gave Adolf Hitler only a half-bow after the Munich
appeasement summit of 1938. Liberals are forever thus.

To complete the bleak parallels to the horrible 1930s, we see the Left-
Fascist alliance together again. If you think Bill Ayers and Jodie
Evans were just accidentally whipping up a PR stunt with the Turkish
suiciders off the coast of Gaza a few months ago, then you, too, were
taken in by classic agitprop collusion between the radical Left and
Islamic fascists. Those were Muslim Bro suiciders (Turkish allies of
Hamas) on board the tourist ship Mavi Marmara, under the direct
command of the new Islamist fascist regime in Turkey. Like the recent
Lebanese border assassination ambush of a senior Israeli military
leader, this was a murderous setup. The assassination team in Lebanon
Army uniforms had their snipers all set up with 50-caliber long-
distance weapons, conveniently provided by U.S. military trainers.

But don't expect any JournoListers to grok those facts any time soon.
They are too busy looking for evil among American conservatives. The
Left is half-deluded and half-Machiavellian, and each half constantly
lies to the other. The lefty media desperately want to be deluded, of
course, like the abused wife of a violent alcoholic. It's a sort of
token of love.

Socialist Europeans are knocking each other out like bowling pins
today in their hurry to kowtow to the rising Fascist powers, who have
bought all three British Parliamentary parties with their oil
billions. Tony Blair is working for Libya's Muammar Khadafi today,
which tells you where the Labour Party's heart really is.
Eurosocialists have for decades imported hundreds of thousands of
fundamentalist Muslims from the badlands of Pakistan with promises of
lifelong welfare and four wives apiece, a promise that an ambitious
young Islamofascist from Peshawar can hardly be expected to resist. As
a result, Muslim fundamentalists now virtually control parts of
Europe's major cities, including Rotterdam, Hamburg, and Paris.
Socialist Europeans know that their countries are coming to an end as
Western states. They are not as idiotic as they constantly pretend to
be. But they are drunk on the perks of power -- and let tomorrow be
damned. After us, the deluge.

Like the demonic 1930s, the Left is again a lot more interested in
sabotaging freely elected governments than in fighting rising fascist
tyrannies that delight in oppressing millions of women, in persecuting
and hanging homosexuals, and in practicing sadistic violence toward a
host of other victim groups. Sadistic violence -- an intense delight
in inflicting pain on innocent people -- was a huge and now-forgotten
feature of the three big Fascist powers of the 1930s: the Nazis, the
Japanese Imperial Army, and even Mussolini's Italians in North
Africa.

Some people define Fascism as a corporatist economic system, like
Obama Motors today. It could just as well be defined as the public
celebration and practice of massive sadism against enslaved peoples.
Mussolini practiced massive sadism in Africa. Hitler practiced
systematic sadism against inferior peoples wherever he could --
against Russians, Poles, Jews, Gypsies, German social democrats, on
and on. Imperial Japan was horrific in its sadistic treatment of non-
Japanese -- American and European prisoners, Chinese people as a
whole, black Americans, Filipinos and other Malay peoples in Asia, on
and on. Even the Soviets did not celebrate sadistic torture of its
enemies in public, as far as I remember, though they certainly
practiced it in private, as the Russians still do today in Chechnya.

Ideologically rationalized sadism and cruelty is not even acknowledged
today by such lowlife organs as the New York Times. The Times mostly
ignored and thereby colluded in Hitler's and Stalin's industrialized
sadism in the 1930s. Some things change, but the New York Times always
enables the very worst regimes in the world. It is one of those
constants that give one faith in the basic stability of things.
Tyrannies change names, but the Times always kowtows to the most
bloodstained nastocrats it can find. They may even teach it in
Journalism 101 at Columbia.

The historic fact is that the Left always enables fascist monsters. I
don't claim to understand that fact, but it's easy enough to see it
over and over again. It seems to be part of their deep moral cowardice
and weakness of character. The prophet Jeremiah saw it in the sixth
century BCE and roundly attacked those who pretended to heal "the
broken daughter of my people, saying Peace, Peace, but there is no
Peace." Listen to our liberal friends, and they are constantly saying
it over and over again, a mantra that makes them feel better even if
it is a flagrant lie.

Liberalism is just the self-delusion of moral cowards throughout
history. It is not a modern ideology, as it always claims to be -- now
it's "progressive" again. They can't even think of new labels. It's is
just a form of denial, a pop fantasy that allows them to avoid
thinking scary thoughts. That is why liberalism can be found over and
over again in human history, under a thousand different labels.

We can see that delusional thinking right now in Barack Hussein Obama
and in Hillary, just as we saw it in the Carter administration --
which gave Islamic fascism its first taste of real power in 1979. It's
important to remember that reactionary Islamic fascism was mostly gone
after the Ottoman Empire crumbled in 1917. A number of Muslim
countries desperately tried to modernize for sixty years -- until
Jimmy Carter gave the pre-medieval throwback Ayatollah Khomeini his
first big chance in 1979. That started a race among all the suppressed
Islamofascists in Sunni and Shiite countries. Nobel Peace Prize-winner
Jimmy Carter's dysfunctional politics was not an accident, nor his
love affair with Hamas and Khomeini; it is an obsessive-compulsive
psychopathology, and it happens over and over again in human history.

That's why the Norwegian politicians keep handing out that the Nobel
Appeasement Prize. It's why Obama got it just for getting elected. The
Left and the Islamic fascists figured out who Obama was long before
the people of America were told. After all, he's one of them.

http://www.americanthinker.com/2010/...ith_a_new.html

Liberal Fascism: The Secret History of the American Left, from
Mussolini to the Politics of Meaning

“Fascists,” “Brownshirts,” “jackbooted stormtroopers”—such are the
insults typically hurled at conservatives by their liberal opponents.
Calling someone a fascist is the fastest way to shut them up, defining
their views as beyond the political pale. But who are the real
fascists in our midst?Liberal Fascism offers a startling new
perspective on the theories and practices that define fascist
politics. Replacing conveniently manufactured myths with surprising
and enlightening research, Jonah Goldberg reminds us that the original
fascists were really on the left, and that liberals from Woodrow
Wilson to FDR to Hillary Clinton have advocated policies and
principles remarkably similar to those of Hitler's National Socialism
and Mussolini's Fascism.Contrary to what most people think, the Nazis
were ardent socialists (hence the term “National socialism”). They
believed in free health care and guaranteed jobs. They confiscated
inherited wealth and spent vast sums on public education. They purged
the church from public policy, promoted a new form of pagan
spirituality, and inserted the authority of the state into every nook
and cranny of daily life. The Nazis declared war on smoking, supported
abortion, euthanasia, and gun control. They loathed the free market,
provided generous pensions for the elderly, and maintained a strict
racial quota system in their universities—where campus speech codes
were all the rage. The Nazis led the world in organic farming and
alternative medicine. Hitler was a strict vegetarian, and Himmler was
an animal rights activist.Do these striking parallels mean that
today’s liberals are genocidal maniacs, intent on conquering the world
and imposing a new racial order? Not at all. Yet it is hard to deny
that modern progressivism and classical fascism shared the same
intellectual roots. We often forget, for example, that Mussolini and
Hitler had many admirers in the United States. W.E.B. Du Bois was
inspired by Hitler's Germany, and Irving Berlin praised Mussolini in
song. Many fascist tenets were espoused by American progressives like
John Dewey and Woodrow Wilson, and FDR incorporated fascist policies
in the New Deal.Fascism was an international movement that appeared in
different forms in different countries, depending on the vagaries of
national culture and temperament. In Germany, fascism appeared as
genocidal racist nationalism. In America, it took a “friendlier,” more
liberal form. The modern heirs of this “friendly fascist” tradition
include the New York Times, the Democratic Party, the Ivy League
professoriate, and the liberals of Hollywood. The quintessential
Liberal Fascist isn't an SS storm trooper; it is a female grade school
teacher with an education degree from Brown or Swarthmore.These
assertions may sound strange to modern ears, but that is because we
have forgotten what fascism is. In this angry, funny, smart,
contentious book, Jonah Goldberg turns our preconceptions inside out
and shows us the true meaning of Liberal Fascism.

http://search.barnesandnoble.com/Lib...9780385511841/

http://www.discoverthenetworks.org

http://www.americanthinker.com/2010/...ith_a_new.html

http://search.barnesandnoble.com/Lib...9780385511841/


By the early 1930s, Shah of Iran Mohammad Reza Pahlavi's close ties
with Nazi Germany began worrying the Allied states. Germany's modern
state and economy highly impressed the Shah, and there were hundreds
of Germans involved in every aspect of the state, from setting up
factories to building roads, railroads and bridges.

The Shah went on to ask the international community to use the native
name of "Iran" in 1935 to address to his country, which in Persian
means 'Land of the Aryans' and refers to Airyanem Vaejah, the Avestan
name of the original homeland of the Aryans. Although the country has
been known as Iran to the native people themselves for many centuries,
Westerners came to know the nation as Persia through Ancient Greek
accounts. Iranians were immune to the racial Nuremberg Laws on the
grounds that they were pure blooded Aryans. In 1939, Nazi Germany
provided Iran with what they called a Germany Scientific Library. The
library contained over 7500 books selected "to convince Iranian
readers...of the kinship between the National Socialist Reich and the
Aryan culture of Iran"(Lenczowski. 1944, p. 161). In various pro-Nazi
publications, lectures, speeches, and ceremonies, parallels were drawn
between the Shah of Iran and Hitler, and praise the charisma and
virtue of the Fuhrerprinzip (Rezun. 1982, p. 29).

From 1939 to 1941 Iran's top foreign trade partner (nearly 50% of its
total trade) was Germany, which helped Iran open modern sea and air
communications with the rest of the world.

In 1941, the Allies forced Reza Shah to abdicate the throne to his
son, Mohammad Reza Pahlavi. His pro-Nazi followers in the Iranian
government such as Fazlollah Zahedi and Mohammad Hosein Airom shared
similar fates.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iE0fL4t6snQ

On 8/17/2010 6:19 PM, Chas. Chan wrote:

"Liberal Fascist" is an oxymoron. Fascism is at the extreme right of
the political spectrum.

"...Fascism [is] the complete opposite of…Marxian Socialism..." --
Benito Mussolini, the Father of Fascism

On 8/18/10 14:29 , Lamont Cranston wrote:
On 8/17/2010 6:19 PM, Chas. Chan wrote:

"Liberal Fascist" is an oxymoron. Fascism is at the extreme right of the
political spectrum.

"...Fascism [is] the complete opposite of…Marxian Socialism..." --
Benito Mussolini, the Father of Fascism


Fascism: a form of political behavior marked by obsessive
preoccupation with community decline, humiliation or victimhood and
in which a mass-based party of committed nationalist militants,
working in uneasy, but effective collaboration with traditional
elites, abandons democratic liberties and pursues with redemptive
violence and without ethical or legal restraints goals of internal
cleansing and external expansion.


-- Robert O. Paxton.



So, Obama is a Conservative?

On 8/18/2010 3:44 PM, D. Peter Maus wrote:
On 8/18/10 14:29 , Lamont Cranston wrote:
On 8/17/2010 6:19 PM, Chas. Chan wrote:

"Liberal Fascist" is an oxymoron. Fascism is at the extreme right of the
political spectrum.

"...Fascism [is] the complete opposite of…Marxian Socialism..." --
Benito Mussolini, the Father of Fascism


Fascism: a form of political behavior marked by obsessive
preoccupation with community decline, humiliation or victimhood and in
which a mass-based party of committed nationalist militants, working in
uneasy, but effective collaboration with traditional elites, abandons
democratic liberties and pursues with redemptive violence and without
ethical or legal restraints goals of internal cleansing and external
expansion.


-- Robert O. Paxton.



So, Obama is a Conservative?



I kept seeing Obama as I read each part of Fascism.

On Aug 18, 2:44*pm, "D. Peter Maus" wrote:
On 8/18/10 14:29 , Lamont Cranston wrote:

On 8/17/2010 6:19 PM, Chas. Chan wrote:

"Liberal Fascist" is an oxymoron. Fascism is at the extreme right of the
political spectrum.

"...Fascism [is] the complete opposite of…Marxian Socialism..." --
Benito Mussolini, the Father of Fascism

* * Fascism: *a form of political behavior marked by obsessive
preoccupation with community decline, humiliation or victimhood and
in which a mass-based party of committed nationalist militants,
working in uneasy, but effective collaboration with traditional
elites, abandons democratic liberties and pursues with redemptive
violence and without ethical or legal restraints goals of internal
cleansing and external expansion.

* * * * * * * * * * * * -- Robert O. Paxton.

* * *So, Obama is a Conservative

Yet another Liberal ignorant of historical facts.
http://search.barnesandnoble.com/Lib...9780385511841/
Do you enjoy embarrassing yourself or are you truely ignorant?

On 8/18/2010 12:44 PM, D. Peter Maus wrote:
On 8/18/10 14:29 , Lamont Cranston wrote:
On 8/17/2010 6:19 PM, Chas. Chan wrote:

"Liberal Fascist" is an oxymoron. Fascism is at the extreme right of the
political spectrum.

"...Fascism [is] the complete opposite of…Marxian Socialism..." --
Benito Mussolini, the Father of Fascism


Fascism: a form of political behavior marked by obsessive preoccupation
with community decline, humiliation or victimhood and in which a
mass-based party of committed nationalist militants, working in uneasy,
but effective collaboration with traditional elites, abandons democratic
liberties and pursues with redemptive violence and without ethical or
legal restraints goals of internal cleansing and external expansion.


-- Robert O. Paxton.



So, Obama is a Conservative?

Your definition just confirmed that he's a center-left liberal.

On 8/18/2010 3:29 PM, Lamont Cranston wrote:
On 8/17/2010 6:19 PM, Chas. Chan wrote:

"Liberal Fascist" is an oxymoron. Fascism is at the extreme right of
the political spectrum.

NO that would be theocracy... or Dictator.

"...Fascism [is] the complete opposite of…Marxian Socialism..." --
Benito Mussolini, the Father of Fascism

Fascism is Socialism, without using the word comrade to identify your
counterpart.

On Aug 18, 12:56Â*pm, Beam Me Up Scotty Then-Destroy-
wrote:
On 8/18/2010 3:29 PM, Lamont Cranston wrote:

On 8/17/2010 6:19 PM, Chas. Chan wrote:

- - "Liberal Fascist" is an oxymoron.
- - Â*Fascism is at the extreme right of
- - the political spectrum.

- NO that would be theocracy... Â*or Dictator.
-
- - "...Fascism [is] the complete opposite of…
- - Marxian Socialism..." --
- - Benito Mussolini, the Father of Fascism

- Fascism is Socialism, without using the
- word comrade to identify your counterpart.

Fascism = National Socialism for 'The State'

Communism = International Socialism for 'The World'

Both are One Party Controlled Socialism and view
the Masses {Subjugated Peoples} as Elements
{Useful Productive Tools*} of the State/World.
* The People Serve the State

Both have : a Party Elite*, The Party and the Masses.
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.r...34856ca9c66489
* Plus a Strong Ruthless Leader like : Stalin,
Hitler, Mao, Tito, Ho Chi Ming, Mussolini,
Pol Pot, Franco, Kim Il-sung, Erich Honecker
CeauÅŸescu, Castro, etc

? Does it matter where the Boot on you Neck
is a Fascist Boot or a Communist Boot ? ~ RHF
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.r...34856ca9c66489

On Aug 18, 4:37*pm, RHF wrote:
Fascism = National Socialism for 'The State'

Communism = International Socialism for 'The World'

Both are One Party Controlled Socialism and view

Liberal Fascism = http://search.barnesandnoble.com/Lib...9780385511841/