On Oct 18, 5:37*pm, "Brenda Ann"
wrote:
On Oct 18, 6:09 pm, RHF wrote:
- - JS,
- - There should be NO Jury .
- - There should be NO Trial .
- - There should be NO Charge .
- - There should be NO Crime .
- - IT WAS SELF-DEFENSE [.]
- -
- - We need an Initiative in the State of California
- - "The Individual's Right to Self-Defense of Self,
- - Family and Home"
- - http://www.sos.ca.gov/elections/ball...qualify-an-ini....
- -
- - * Criminal comes in your Home : It's Self-Defense
- - and No Criminal Charges can be brought by the DA.
- -
- - * Criminal threatens Your-Self : It's Self-Defense and
- - No Criminal Charges can be brought by the DA.
- -
- - * Criminal threatens Your-Family : It's Self-Defense
- - and No Criminal Charges can be brought by the DA.
- -
- - + Plus NO Civil Actions Either by the Criminal, Their
- - Family; Their Agents and/or 'others'.
- -
- - CRIMINAL = Someone Committing a Criminal Act on
- - Your Person {Self}; Your Family/Love-One/Neighbor;
- - Home/Neighborhood; Business/Property.
- -
- - Note - Self-Defense Is NOT A Crime as Defined-by-Law.
- -
- - DA = Any and all Attorneys representing City/County/State.
- -
- - -example-
- - Someone 'Smokes' in your House and You Shoot Them :
- - It's Self-Defense Against Poisonous Second-Hand Smoke.
- -
- - yes it is that simple 'self-defense' is 'self-defense'
- - and 'self-defense' is a basic "human-right" ~ RHF
- - .

- Roy,
-
- Aside from the fact that you're nuts....

BAD - That's California . . . the so-called :
Land of Fruits and Nuts ! ;;-}}

- If such a law existed (minus the lunacy about
- shooting someone who smokes in your house..

BAD - So all the crap-o-la about Second-Hand-Smoke*
KILLS is just crap-o-la . . .
* Poisonous Toxic Gas
* * Second-Hand-Smoke a Public Health Hazard
* * Second-Hand-Smoke an Assault On Your Lungs
* * Second-Hand-Smoke Dangerous to New Babies,
Young Children, the Elderly and Infirmed , etc etc etc.

- that would never in a million years fly..),

BAD - Only tales 500K Signatures at 25 Cents to
a $1 per Signature is needed to get it On-the-Ballot.
-and- 'If' it were On-the-Ballot : I would expect that
way-more-than 55% would Vote For It and make it
a California State Human-Right and CA State LAW.

- it would be too easy to abuse it,

BAD
that it would,,,
That It Would...
THAT IT WOULD ! ! !
But It would also give Peace-of-Mind to a Home
Owner {Apartment Renter} that is being broken
into by a 3-Strikes Convicted Burglar/Robber.

- ie if you wanted to kill someone and get away
- with it, all you would have to do is make sure
- they were in your house under any pretense
- and blow them away.

BAD - Bang ! you got that right - band bang ~ RHF