On Oct 15, 7:20*pm, Lamont Cranston
wrote:
On 10/14/2010 5:46 PM, Chas. Chan wrote:

"Liberal Fascist" is an oxymoron, kooker.

"Liberal Fascist" is redundant, you ignorant-****-eater.

"Bareback Insane O'bungler" wrote in
message
...
On Oct 15, 7:20 pm, Lamont Cranston
wrote:
On 10/14/2010 5:46 PM, Chas. Chan wrote:

"Liberal Fascist" is an oxymoron, kooker.

"Liberal Fascist" is redundant, you ignorant-****-eater.

Wow.

Let's hear it for the Average Teabagger, ladies and germs!!! Able to
swallow seemingly INCREDIBLE amounts of Republican pig****, while
simultaneously puking it out other orifices and expecting those splashed to
think it's Rainbow Sherbet and say Please Sir May I Have Some More, just
like they do.

Incredible.

Jim
--
Well, ****, you confused me. More than normal
-- Beldin

On Oct 23, 10:01*pm, "Clave" wrote:
"Bareback Insane O'bungler" wrote in
...

On Oct 15, 7:20 pm, Lamont Cranston
wrote:

- - - - On 10/14/2010 5:46 PM, Chas. Chan wrote:
- - - - BUSTED! ON VIDEO
- - - - Liberal Fascist John CONYERS, Jr. (D-Mich.)
- - - - MEETS WITH MARXISTS!
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.r...1d32654444824c

- - - "Liberal Fascist" is an oxymoron, kooker.

Is It 'Liberal Fascist' ? -or- Is It "Liberal-Fascist" ?

The Two Words When -Hyphenated- Are Not an Oxymoron :
Because the -Hyphenated- between Joins them Together into
a New Evolved Meaning and Relevance for the Present Day.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hyphen
http://www.grammarmudge.cityslide.co...26348/2805.htm
Not simply 'Liberal' . . . and All That Means -circa- 1900s+
Not simply 'Fascist' . . . and All That Means -circa- 1920/30/40s
But a New Evolved Concept* "Liberal-Fascist" -circa- 2000s+
* That is -Hyphenated- "Joined-Together" Having New Meaning

liberal-fascist,,, Liberal-Fascist... LIBERAL-FASCIST ! ! !

liberal-fascism,,, Liberal-Fascism... LIBERAL-FASCISM ! ! !

On Oct 24, 5:54*am, dave wrote:
Bareback Insane O'bungler wrote:
On Oct 15, 7:20 pm, Lamont
wrote:
On 10/14/2010 5:46 PM, Chas. Chan wrote:

"Liberal Fascist" is an oxymoron, kooker.

"Liberal Fascist" is redundant, you ignorant-****-eater.

Real fascists (aka Republicans) have no problem supporting Sharia law as
long as there's some money in it for them.

- To an L.I.V. I suppose.

OK 'Special Dave' I will bite... What's a "L.I.V." ?

Bareback Insane O'bungler wrote:
On Oct 15, 7:20 pm, Lamont
wrote:
On 10/14/2010 5:46 PM, Chas. Chan wrote:

"Liberal Fascist" is an oxymoron, kooker.

"Liberal Fascist" is redundant, you ignorant-****-eater.

Real fascists (aka Republicans) have no problem supporting Sharia law as
long as there's some money in it for them.

"RHF" wrote in message
...

...snip unreadable mess...

You don't need to keep proving my point for me, moron, but thanks I guess.

Jim

On Oct 24, 1:50*pm, "Clave" wrote:
"RHF" wrote in message

...

- ...snip unreadable mess...

UN-SNIP {UN-DELETE}

"RHF" wrote in message
...
On Oct 24, 1:50 pm, "Clave" wrote:
"RHF" wrote in message

...

...re-snip unreadable mess...

Posting it again doesn't make you look any smarter, Sparky.

Kinda the contrary even.

Jim

On Oct 24, 5:31*am, RHF wrote:
On Oct 24, 5:54*am, dave wrote:

Bareback Insane O'bungler wrote:
On Oct 15, 7:20 pm, Lamont
wrote:
On 10/14/2010 5:46 PM, Chas. Chan wrote:

"Liberal Fascist" is an oxymoron, kooker.

"Liberal Fascist" is redundant, you ignorant-****-eater.

Real fascists (aka Republicans) have no problem supporting Sharia law as
long as there's some money in it for them.

- - To an L.I.V. I suppose.

- OK 'Special Dave' I will bite... What's a "L.I.V." ?

'Special Dave'

Still waiting for your answer to :

What's a "L.I.V." ?

On Oct 24, 1:01*am, "Clave" wrote:
"Bareback Insane O'bungler" wrote in
...

On Oct 15, 7:20 pm, Lamont Cranston
wrote:
On 10/14/2010 5:46 PM, Chas. Chan wrote:

"Liberal Fascist" is an oxymoron, kooker.

"Liberal Fascist" is redundant, you ignorant-****-eater.

Wow.

Yep.
"Liberal Fascist" is redundant, you ignorant-****-eater.

[drool]