On 12/30/10 17:43 , Daniel wrote:


Oops, looks like you're lying.
http://www.carbuyersnotebook.com/pet...l-for-engines/


Interesting. BMW disagrees with you.

Ask the people who sell and service/repair small engines/equipment,
about ethanol.Pick up your phone and ask them.
cuhulin

I remember that Texaco commercial back in the 1950's.

http://www.devilfinder.com
You can trust your car to the Texaco Star

Texaco ethanol Star.
cuhulin

On Dec 30, 4:18*pm, "D. Peter Maus" wrote:
On 12/30/10 17:43 , Daniel wrote:



Oops, looks like you're lying.
http://www.carbuyersnotebook.com/pet...thanol-gas-har...

-*Interesting. BMW disagrees with you.

Since the 1980's when it was evident that Ethanol was
going to be part of the Fuel Mixture of many Countries
the 'composite' of the Materials in many/most Automobile
Engines has changed ever so slightly to improve their
Ethanol Wear & Endurance {Resistance} Tolerance.

it simply ain't an engine problem anymore ~ RHF

On 12/30/2010 07:24 PM, RHF wrote:
On Dec 30, 4:18 pm, "D. Peter wrote:
On 12/30/10 17:43 , Daniel wrote:

Twice this hour they have talked about deadly tornadoes on the ground in
Arkansas. In fact, these were official tornado warnings, yet Fox teased
:further info later" in the program It's quite possible people were hurt
while they strictly adhered to their propaganda formula.










.
.

On Mon, 27 Dec 2010 16:48:19 -0800 (PST), ?baMa? Tse Dung
wrote:

The California Energy Commission in September 2010 published its 226-
page Appliance Efficiency Regulations, whereby the 100-watt
incandescent light bulb will be outlawed at midnight on December 31,
2010.

Imagine 100-watt incandescent light bulbs as contraband in California
-- persona non gratis -- but illegal immigrants get free tuition --
amigo de bienvenida.

Smuggling bootleg light bulbs into California would be a piece of
cake. Just stuff them inside bales of marijuana. Or line up eight
packs in the cargo bays of Greyhound buses carrying illegals on the
express lane from Tijuana to any of two dozen sanctuary cities. Hey,
wave 'em on in, there's nothing to check there! Ten-four!

http://www.americanthinker.com/2010/...ming_to_c.html

I tried to buy 100 watt bulbs at WalMart yesterday. They had none.

However, I did get six 95 watt bulbs. It appears that the regulations
set standards for bulb naming. Have we been getting cheated by
"100 watt" bulbs that only consume 95 watts? Another proof of the
inherent dishonesty of free-trade capitalism?

(and the "95"s claim to produce 100 watts of light)

--
masonc

On Dec 27 2010, 11:48*pm, Ered China Luin
wrote:
In article ,
*Sheldon Cooper wrote:



On Dec 27, 7:55*pm, Ered China Luin wrote:
In article ,

*"Wayne" wrote:
"Neoconis_Ignoramus" wrote in message
...
On Dec 27, 4:48 pm, ?baMa? Tse Dung wrote:
The California Energy Commission in September 2010 published its 226-
page Appliance Efficiency Regulations, whereby the 100-watt
incandescent light bulb will be outlawed at midnight on December 31,
2010.

Imagine 100-watt incandescent light bulbs as contraband in California
-- persona non gratis -- but illegal immigrants get free tuition --
amigo de bienvenida.

Smuggling bootleg light bulbs into California would be a piece of
cake. Just stuff them inside bales of marijuana. Or line up eight
packs in the cargo bays of Greyhound buses carrying illegals on the
express lane from Tijuana to any of two dozen sanctuary cities. Hey,
wave 'em on in, there's nothing to check there! Ten-four!

http://www.americanthinker.com/2010/...bs_coming_to_c...

I see no diff in incandescent vs. flourescent. *The latter lasts a lot
longer, too. *Bunch of whining by poor mothe****ers who apparently
can't afford to splurge the extra 2 bones for the better bulb.

Quit whining and go get a job that pays more, losers.
-
Every one of those "high efficiency" bulbs I have bought have been pieces
of
crap....sensitive to direction of mounting, and limited life. *There is
no
way that a pile of those crappy bulbs in the trash bin is more efficient
than a single incandescent.

Do you have cite in California law that incandescent bulbs will be sold? I
mean
other than one lone wingnut.

http://www.energy.ca.gov/2010publica...012/CEC-400-20...
F

That's nice. Can't you refine it to a single paragraph?

You wanted the raw data, I gave it to you. Here's the single
paragraph.

http://www.mercurynews.com/science/c...nclick_check=1

Kiss your 100-watt lightbulb goodbye

By Tracy Seipel

Californians can start saying goodbye to traditional 100-watt
incandescent light bulbs now that the state has become the first in
the country to require a new standard for the screw-base bulbs.

Experts say the new rules, which took effect New Year's Day, will save
residents money and energy. California is already the nation's leader
in energy-efficiency standards.

As of Saturday, what used to be a 100-watt light bulb manufactured and
sold in California will have to use 72 watts or less. The 72-watt
replacement bulb, also called an energy-saving halogen light, will
provide the same amount of light, called lumens, for lower energy cost.

On Dec 28 2010, 6:03*am, Ered China Luin wrote:
In article ,
*Joe from Kokomo wrote:



On 12/28/2010 2:48 AM, Ered China Luin wrote:

Do you have cite in California law that incandescent bulbs will be sold?
I
mean
other than one lone wingnut.

Sheldon *wrote:

http://www.energy.ca.gov/2010publica...012/CEC-400-20....
.PDF

On 12/28/2010 2:48 AM, Ered China Luin wrote:

That's nice. Can't you refine it to a single paragraph?

a) He answered your request

b) The citation DOES have a Table of Contents

I would respectfully suggest that you do a -little- of your own homework.

So it follows this is another wingnut pile of crap. A made up crisis to let you
rant.

http://www.contracostatimes.com/news...nclick_check=1
http://www.mercurynews.com/science/c...nclick_check=1
http://blogs.kqed.org/climatewatch/
http://cubachi.com/2010/12/27/more-d...t-light-bulbs/

Want more? I can produce literally hundreds of articles.

How is it possible that a story this widely distributed went unnoticed
by you, someone who imagines himself to be politically involved?

Oh, right, you've willed yourself stupid.

On Dec 27 2010, 9:56Â*pm, RHF wrote:
On Dec 27, 9:32Â*pm, Sheldon Cooper wrote:

On Dec 27, 5:14Â*pm, Neoconis_Ignoramus
wrote:

On Dec 27, 4:48Â*pm, ∅baMa∅ Tse Dung wrote:

The California Energy Commission in September 2010 published its 226-
page Appliance Efficiency Regulations, whereby the 100-watt
incandescent light bulb will be outlawed at midnight on December 31,
2010.

Imagine 100-watt incandescent light bulbs as contraband in California
-- persona non gratis -- but illegal immigrants get free tuition --
amigo de bienvenida.

Smuggling bootleg light bulbs into California would be a piece of
cake. Â*Just stuff them inside bales of marijuana. Â*Or line up eight
packs in the cargo bays of Greyhound buses carrying illegals on the
express lane from Tijuana to any of two dozen sanctuary cities. Â*Hey,
wave 'em on in, there's nothing to check there! Â*Ten-four!

http://www.americanthinker.com/2010/...bs_coming_to_c...

I see no diff in incandescent vs. flourescent. Â*The latter lasts a lot
longer, too. Â*Bunch of whining by poor mothe****ers who apparently
can't afford to splurge the extra 2 bones for the better bulb.

- Yeah, I remember when you assholes said the same sort of thing about
- Ethonal. Â*It was going to be better for the environment, it was
going
- to make America energy independent. Â*It was going to be great.

At 5% Ethanol a 20 Gallon Tank of Gas has
19 Gals of Imported Oil and 1 Gal of Domestic
Ethanol : That One Less Gal of Imported Oil
and I am OK with that. Â*IMHO - The USA
should be moving to 85% Gas-A-Hol to reduce
Imported Oil by another 10%. ~ RHF

It takes 21 pounds of corn to make a gallon of Ethanol, which needs
imported oil to be grown and harvested. Imported oil is also needed
to convert corn into Ethanol. I've linked a site which explains the
numbers, but the end result is that Ethanol consumes more imported oil
than it saves. Oh, and it also causes world starvation.

http://www.carbohydrateeconomy.org/l...Gallon_.htm l

There's a reason that even Al Gore has turned against this:

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2010...vious-support/

On Dec 28 2010, 5:51*am, "Sid9" wrote:
"John Smith" wrote in message

... On 12/27/2010 9:56 PM, RHF wrote:
... IMHO - The USA
should be moving to 85% Gas-A-Hol to reduce
Imported Oil by another 10%. ~ RHF
...

When anyone speaks of running their, or anothers', food though a gas
tank, you will have to excuse me, but I think FOOL!

Now, if they find a way to use sewage as a base to make alcohol out of,
I will accept that ...

Regards,
JS

Is the shortage of food making Americans fat?

No, but it is killing Mexicans. Seems that American corn WAS their
food staple.