Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jan 8, 10:12*pm, "D. Peter Maus" wrote:
On 1/8/11 18:08 , Steve wrote: I'm not a contester either and I personally wouldn't spring for a rig as pricey as the Yaesu FTDX-5000. At one time I might have been convinced to take the plunge, but I've played with high end rigs and the real world difference in performance between a 5K rig and a $1500 rig is not what the price difference might lead you to expect. I say this not to disparage the high end rigs, but to celebrate the lower end rigs and what they're capable of! * *Once you reach a certain level, the difference is going to be a function of your antenna performance. * *But then, that's always true at any level. * *During the heyday, Zenith T/Os were known for their exceptional sensitivity and deep reach on crowded bands. With the built-in whip. * *Truth is, that T/0's were good, but nothing special. With a hand alignment, they could be made to be reasonably selective, but that legendary sensitivity was merely a perception, and artifically contrived, at that. * *With Zenith's lowered threshold, increasing the operating range, of the AGC, and reduced recovery time, T/O's would seem to be more sensitive than the average receiver, when sitting side by side. The deeper reach made quieter signals pop more lively on the T/O than rigs in the same class. And most owners didn't realize that increase in noise along with the signal was not a sign of increased sensitivity. * *Even so, T/O's were often $75-100 more than similar radios in the same class. * *Real world...they were usually more radio than most listeners would ever need. * *Today, a modern rig can easily reach within striking distance of that $5k rig for far less. The difference is often at the very limits of performance, if not the limits of credibility. And the number of features most users will never touch. * * For a few thousand, you can improve your radio and improve your performance by a few percent. * * For a few hundred you can improve your antenna and improve your performance tenfold. The first two elements are very necessary : # 1 the Radio # 2 the Antenna But without the third element : There may be nothing for the first two to pick-up and hear. # 3 the Location + The Right Location can make #1 & #2 a Joy to Use. - The Wrong Location can make #1 & #2 a Frustrating Fruitless Endeavor. imho ~ RHF |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Sherwood Engineering updates receiver performance list | Shortwave | |||
Sherwood Engineering updates receiver performance list | Shortwave | |||
Shortwave (HF) Receiver Test Data -by- Sherwood Engineering Inc. - Updated 23 April 2007 | Shortwave | |||
Sherwood Engineering Inc | Shortwave |