Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Feb 14, 7:34*am, dave wrote:
On 02/14/2011 06:51 AM, dave wrote: On 02/13/2011 08:26 PM, RHF wrote: -but- I still use Antenna Insulators between the 'Poly' Why? If you use insulating rope there is no need to buy insulators. I use them for strain relief. Wrapping a wire or a rope around an insulator with a 3/4 inch radius puts less wear and tear on either material per square mm of contact surface than tying the rope directly to the wire. I cannot prove (off the top o' my head) this quantitatively, but intuitively it seems right. Having said that. I am sure there is nothing to gain electrically from omitting the insulator. |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 02/14/2011 07:49 AM, bpnjensen wrote:
On Feb 14, 7:34 am, wrote: On 02/14/2011 06:51 AM, dave wrote: On 02/13/2011 08:26 PM, RHF wrote: -but- I still use Antenna Insulators between the 'Poly' Why? If you use insulating rope there is no need to buy insulators. I use them for strain relief. Wrapping a wire or a rope around an insulator with a 3/4 inch radius puts less wear and tear on either material per square mm of contact surface than tying the rope directly to the wire. I cannot prove (off the top o' my head) this quantitatively, but intuitively it seems right. Having said that. I am sure there is nothing to gain electrically from omitting the insulator. http://www.westmarine.com/1/1/81866-...mbles-1-4.html |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Feb 14, 8:27*am, dave wrote:
On 02/14/2011 07:49 AM, bpnjensen wrote: On Feb 14, 7:34 am, *wrote: On 02/14/2011 06:51 AM, dave wrote: On 02/13/2011 08:26 PM, RHF wrote: -but- I still use Antenna Insulators between the 'Poly' Why? If you use insulating rope there is no need to buy insulators. I use them for strain relief. *Wrapping a wire or a rope around an insulator with a 3/4 inch radius puts less wear and tear on either material per square mm of contact surface than tying the rope directly to the wire. *I cannot prove (off the top o' my head) this quantitatively, but intuitively it seems right. Having said that. I am sure there is nothing to gain electrically from omitting the insulator. http://www.westmarine.com/1/1/81866-...bles-1-4.html- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Yepp, those should work too :-) |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Feb 14, 7:49*am, bpnjensen wrote:
On Feb 14, 7:34*am, dave wrote: On 02/14/2011 06:51 AM, dave wrote: On 02/13/2011 08:26 PM, RHF wrote: -but- I still use Antenna Insulators between the 'Poly' Why? Dave -changing-the-subject-line-to-read- "Kiss It Stupid Simple" Says more about "YOU" then 'me' ~ RHF Dave -where-as-'i'-say- Keep It Simple and Practical ! : [KISAP!] Wire SWL Antennas : ? The Question Is . . . Are Your SWL Antennas Fit-To-Be-Tied ! http://groups.google.com/group/rec.r...1cdeb93902f3d3 |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
keeping wire antennas up | Antenna | |||
FA: HV ceramic insulators for wire antennas | Antenna | |||
Where to by random wire (longwire) antennas | Antenna | |||
Two questions about random wire antennas | Shortwave | |||
Stainless Steel Wire - OK for antennas? | Antenna |