"dave" wrote in message
. ..
On 03/04/2011 03:02 PM, MNMikew wrote:
wrote in message
. ..
On 03/04/2011 07:27 AM, MNMikew wrote:


-----------
There is a reason the Repubs swept the Dems out of ALL offices in Wisc.



Outside money?

No, unions give exclusively to the Dems.


You live in the bubble!

You live in the bubble!

You live in denial.

"Joe from Kokomo" wrote in message
...

On 03/04/2011 07:27 AM, MNMikew wrote:

There is a reason the Repubs swept the Dems out of ALL offices in Wisc.

wrote:

Outside money?

On 3/4/2011 6:02 PM, MNMikew wrote:

No, unions give exclusively to the Dems.

Um, you seem to be overlooking something quite obvious. There -is- other
"outside money" than from the unions, you know.

Yes and of course, that is evil money. Whereas union money is all good.

"Joe from wrote in message
...

On 03/04/2011 07:27 AM, MNMikew wrote:

There is a reason the Repubs swept the Dems out of ALL
offices in Wisc.

wrote:

Outside money?

On 3/4/2011 6:02 PM, MNMikew wrote:

No, unions give exclusively to the Dems.

Um, you seem to be overlooking something quite obvious. There -is-
other "outside money" than from the unions, you know.

On 3/7/2011 10:45 AM, MNMikew wrote:

Yes and of course, that is evil money. Whereas union money is all
good.

I don't recall saying anything about "good" or "evil" money; it's -all-
about HOW MUCH money.

And I do recall saying in my previous post, Big Business (read Repubs)
have a LOT more money than the unions.

The quote you seemed to have 'overlooked' again:

Have you forgotten that the Supreme Court ruled that Big Business can
give an infinite amount money to political parties and candidates.
And that Big Business has waaay deeper pockets than the unions could
ever hope to have. That Big Business money might go a long way
towards explaining why "the Repubs swept the Dems out of ALL offices
in Wisc".

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 11-03-07 09:53 AM, Joe from Kokomo wrote:

I don't recall saying anything about "good" or "evil" money; it's -all-
about HOW MUCH money.


A partial solution could be implemented by banning ALL corporate and
union contributions to political parties.

A cap of 1000 dollars maximum contribution per year per person levels
things out even better. It would be tax deductible, of course. No
contributions in another person's name either.

Not too surprisingly, the recipients of all the present day
contributions think this is a bad idea. Graft and corruption will do
that to people.



mike
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJNdRWLAAoJEJXfKw5kUPt7Q18H/2fiPzOANIbdFq+Gyn7IHM6I
p5rBIPe+3Y6rBxc0IxaW8PCAsj9auJMFIySZNrYCmhED5L1kIi YNd50KGV5q/6sn
JMgVjLrYACSGsTKyxGXKY4CFJWJ09O9FhKzgTK0hLQehnom4zC yL4343117RhFWN
0lzqTXczDtijGDagSIqVaEKZ4pNEGcyd5WyqPTo8idLmtuViLv +AvDJ6XNK0v7Zh
dahSNXkldvlDFxxuROkwRh/FWGL2IV5X9DvM+NgUZX/g5FhSo0aOgGA6u8VLVE58
kjHf4Gv7PoLVyBR5jioz+RR1+YdXy7ccF0ZDcOTymsdPzvPO0W 1ij3MCsoO8LGU=
=CGE4
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

"Joe from Kokomo" wrote in message
...

"Joe from wrote in message
...

On 03/04/2011 07:27 AM, MNMikew wrote:

There is a reason the Repubs swept the Dems out of ALL
offices in Wisc.

wrote:

Outside money?

On 3/4/2011 6:02 PM, MNMikew wrote:

No, unions give exclusively to the Dems.

Um, you seem to be overlooking something quite obvious. There -is-
other "outside money" than from the unions, you know.

On 3/7/2011 10:45 AM, MNMikew wrote:

Yes and of course, that is evil money. Whereas union money is all
good.

I don't recall saying anything about "good" or "evil" money; it's -all-
about HOW MUCH money.

And I do recall saying in my previous post, Big Business (read Repubs)
have a LOT more money than the unions.

Actually if you check OpenSecrets you will find "big business" gives far
more equally to Dems and Repubs than unions do. To say only Rebubs are the
recipients of "big business" money is quite wrong.

The Big Gun
http://www.rense.com/general93/big.htm

I saw 'Puff the Magic Dragon' when I was over there.I Guarantee you did
NOT want to mess with 'Puff' either!
cuhulin

On 03/07/2011 09:36 AM, MNMikew wrote:
"Joe from wrote in message

And I do recall saying in my previous post, Big Business (read Repubs)
have a LOT more money than the unions.

Actually if you check OpenSecrets you will find "big business" gives far
more equally to Dems and Repubs than unions do. To say only Rebubs are the
recipients of "big business" money is quite wrong.



Pointlessly irrelevant. Money is not speech, for either side. We need
election reform, or at least a passing of the "disclose" act, right now!

I saw an article at http://www.libertypost.org
BED BUGS have HIT the UN.

Yeeeee Hawwwww,,,,,, I Likes that,,, I Likes That,,,,,, I LIKES THAT!
SIC em BED BUGS, SIC EM!,,,,,,,

NO Bed Bugs here.
cuhulin

"dave" wrote in message
. ..
On 03/07/2011 09:36 AM, MNMikew wrote:
"Joe from wrote in message

And I do recall saying in my previous post, Big Business (read Repubs)
have a LOT more money than the unions.

Actually if you check OpenSecrets you will find "big business" gives far
more equally to Dems and Repubs than unions do. To say only Rebubs are
the
recipients of "big business" money is quite wrong.



Pointlessly irrelevant. Money is not speech, for either side. We need
election reform, or at least a passing of the "disclose" act, right now!

It was completely relevant to JoeKoko's post.

Bob Dobbs wrote:

wrote:
I saw an article at http://www.libertypost.org
BED BUGS have HIT the UN.

Is it any wonder with the last two secretaries general
having names like; coffee banana and monkey boom?

I, Karl Mauritania, hope to achieve some sort of posting with the UN.

If you can help, I have a relative who has a bank account in Nigeria with 20
Billion dollars in it, and we'll help you out.