On 4/28/11 07:35 , Iarnrod wrote:
On Apr 27, 4:33 pm, "D. Peter wrote:
On 4/27/11 17:03 , Lamont Cranston wrote:



On 4/27/2011 10:35 AM, D Peter Maus wrote:
On 4/27/11 12:24 , John Smith wrote:
On 4/27/2011 10:05 AM, w spilman wrote:

...
The first document was all that is required to prove
American citizenship. Nobody lied, loser.

Confabulated and lying to the very end ... you go on record ...

With the real birth certificate (supposedly) we now can properly
have
this issue examined. If a valid document, this fulfills the
requirement
demanded by the Constitution, but only as far as birth proof.

The parents nationality, whether he ever surrendered citizenship, to
assume citizenship of another country, the legal questions of the
influence of his parents citizenship, etc. will all need to be
examined
also, after this document has had time to be properly vetted ...

Just ending the lies of the false certification being proper has
ended
... those nutjobs are now on record ...

Regards,
JS

The questions raised by the statement by the Governor of Hawaii
stating
that the long form certificate did not exist

LIE.

It was widely reported in all the mainstream press.

How come you cannot cite it then, LOON?

I heard it first on ABC Radio news in the car. Sorry, I wasn't
recording.

It made the Trib and the Sun-Times. Look it up.

It made CBS evening news, as well. Katie Couric presented the story,
herself.

For two days, it was everywhere.

I'm not surprised you missed it.

On Apr 28, 5:26*am, Iarnrod wrote:
On Apr 27, 11:10*am, Alfred stomacker
wrote:
Hawaii officials also stated that no long form existed . They it was
missing .

They said no such thing, loon. No Hawaiian official said it was
missing or did not exist.
The Donald said it many times. Don't you consider that an even higher
authority than a mere governor of Hawaii (actually, two governors)?

http://www.libertypost.org/cgi-bin/r...?ArtNum=306883

It is a Phoney Fraud Fake Forgery.PFFF.FAIL!
What's all those Layers? Is it a Layer Cake?
Oh, I Lobster, then I Flounder, Oh, I Layed her,,,,
cuhulin

His name is Donald Trump, (full name, Donald John Trump), not The
Donald.
I betcha his Birth Certificate isn't Layerd.
cuhulin

Solid Proof 'Birth Certificate' Is A Fraud.Watch.Vid
http://www.rense.com

Solid Proof.I Likes Dat.
cuhulin, a Solid Proofer

http://www.devilfinder.com/find.php?...th+Certificate

Also at,
http://www.standeyo.com
cuhulin

In article ,
says...

http://www.rense.com/general93/ob1.htm
Phoney Fraud Fake Birth Certificate.
cuhulin

If it's on Rense, it rarely makes sense.

--
BDK- Top of the government shill heap for over 10 years running!

On Apr 28, 7:40*am, D Peter Maus wrote:
On 4/28/11 07:35 , Iarnrod wrote:



On Apr 27, 4:33 pm, "D. Peter *wrote:
On 4/27/11 17:03 , Lamont Cranston wrote:

On 4/27/2011 10:35 AM, D Peter Maus wrote:
On 4/27/11 12:24 , John Smith wrote:
On 4/27/2011 10:05 AM, w spilman wrote:

...
The first document was all that is required to prove
American citizenship. Nobody lied, loser.

Confabulated and lying to the very end ... you go on record ...

With the real birth certificate (supposedly) we now can properly
have
this issue examined. If a valid document, this fulfills the
requirement
demanded by the Constitution, but only as far as birth proof.

The parents nationality, whether he ever surrendered citizenship, to
assume citizenship of another country, the legal questions of the
influence of his parents citizenship, etc. will all need to be
examined
also, after this document has had time to be properly vetted ...

Just ending the lies of the false certification being proper has
ended
... those nutjobs are now on record ...

Regards,
JS

The questions raised by the statement by the Governor of Hawaii
stating
that the long form certificate did not exist

LIE.

* *It was widely reported in all the mainstream press.

How come you cannot cite it then, LOON?

* *I heard it first on ABC Radio news in the car.

No you didn't. It didn't happen. You're lying. we know you're lying
because here is what Abercrombia actually did say: "It actually
exists." This of course is the complete opposite of your claim that he
said it did not exist. So, long story short, you're just another
rightarded liar. nothing new there.

Sorry, I wasn't
recording.

But you are, of course, lying.

* *It made the Trib and the Sun-Times.

No, it did not. It was not in either paper.

Look it up.

No, dip****, YOU are the one who claims it exists; it is YOUR job to
fetch it. I know it does NOT exist. Therefore, liar, onus is on you.

* *It made CBS evening news, as well.

No, it didn't. Present the cite if you think so.

But once again, you'll run away since you KNOW you've been caught
lying.

Katie Couric presented the story,
herself.

No she didn't, kook.

* *For two days, it was everywhere.

No it wasn't as it is indisputable FACT that it never happened. Here
is Abercrombie's actual quote: "It actually exists." How you manage to
twist your lie out of that, well, only a truly delusional rightard can
come up with such bull****.

* *I'm not surprised you missed it.

I missed nothing.

I'll give you a hand, compassionate as I am: You are twisting what
really happened into your lie by adding a false claim that Abercrombia
said it didn't exist, when in fact he said "It actually exists."

What REALLY happened was that Abercrombie vowed to release Obama's
birth certificate when he became governor. Upon trying to do so, he
discovered this little thing called "THE LAW." Not even governors or
presidents can violate it. THE LAW prohibited Hawaii from releasing
someone's birth records to anyone not entitled, and the governor
didn't qualify to release Obama's records, or anyone else's for that
matter except his own.

So what Abercrombie said was that although he promised to release it,
he discovered it was not legal for him to do so but that he verified
"it actually exists."

PS: For Obama to be able to obtain his long form, he had to petition
Hawaii for an exception to its standing rule that originals are not
released.

On Apr 28, 7:51*am, " wrote:
On Apr 28, 5:26*am, Iarnrod wrote: On Apr 27, 11:10*am, Alfred stomacker
wrote:
Hawaii officials also stated that no long form existed . They it was
missing .

They said no such thing, loon. No Hawaiian official said it was
missing or did not exist.

The Donald said it many times. *Don't you consider that an even higher
authority than a mere governor of Hawaii (actually, two governors)?

I consider him a multiple-bankruptcy teevee host and brainless moron
-- highly qualified to be a Republican contender, in other words.

On Apr 28, 9:40*am, Alfred stomacker
wrote:
On Wed, 27 Apr 2011 15:03:01 -0700, Lamont Cranston



wrote:
On 4/27/2011 10:35 AM, D Peter Maus wrote:
On 4/27/11 12:24 , John Smith wrote:
On 4/27/2011 10:05 AM, w spilman wrote:

...
The first document was all that is required to prove
American citizenship. Nobody lied, loser.

Confabulated and lying to the very end ... you go on record ...

With the real birth certificate (supposedly) we now can properly have
this issue examined. If a valid document, this fulfills the requirement
demanded by the Constitution, but only as far as birth proof.

The parents nationality, whether he ever surrendered citizenship, to
assume citizenship of another country, the legal questions of the
influence of his parents citizenship, etc. will all need to be examined
also, after this document has had time to be properly vetted ...

Just ending the lies of the false certification being proper has ended
... those nutjobs are now on record ...

Regards,
JS

The questions raised by the statement by the Governor of Hawaii stating
that the long form certificate did not exist

LIE.

truth

Nope, it's a lie, kooktard. As your complete inability to post a cite
PROVES.

HERE is what Abercrombie said: "It actually exists." tell us, dearie,
what is confusing to you about this?