On May 6, 4:37*pm, George Plimpton wrote:
On 5/6/2011 1:58 PM,Iarnrodwrote:



On May 6, 1:19 am, George *wrote:
On 5/5/2011 5:27 AM,Iarnrodwrote:

On May 3, 11:51 pm, George * *wrote:
On 5/3/2011 8:12 PM, Brenda Ann wrote:

"Iarnrod" wrote in message
...

None the less if there is no marriage Certifricate still means he was
fatherless,

And that, dearie, is what would make him a US natural born citizen
EVEN IF his mom had him in kenya, which it's been proven she did not.

On 5/7/2011 11:53 AM, Iarnrod wrote:
On May 6, 4:37 pm, George wrote:
On 5/6/2011 1:58 PM,Iarnrodwrote:



On May 6, 1:19 am, George wrote:
On 5/5/2011 5:27 AM,Iarnrodwrote:

On May 3, 11:51 pm, George wrote:
On 5/3/2011 8:12 PM, Brenda Ann wrote:

"Iarnrod" wrote in message
...

None the less if there is no marriage Certifricate still means he was
fatherless,

And that, dearie, is what would make him a US natural born citizen
EVEN IF his mom had him in kenya, which it's been proven she did not.
If she was no legally married, then the location DOES NOT MATTER!!!

That's completely wrong. The McCarran Walter Act, aka the Immigration
and Naturalization Act of 1952, specified in Title III, Ch. 1, Sec. 301(a):

The following shall be citizens and nationals of the United State at birth:

(7) a person born outside the geographical limits of the United States
and its outlying possessions of parents one of whom is an alien,
and the other a citizen of the United States who, prior to the birth
of such person, was physically present in the United States or its
outlying possessions for a period or periods totaling not less than
ten years, at least five of which were after attaining the age
of fourteen years

The marital status of the parents is irrelevant.

Correct: it is irrelevant.

IF he had been born abroad, Hussein would not have been born a citizen,
under the law in effect in 1961.


So bigamy has become legal?

You have no proof, of course, that Barack Hussein Obama Sr. was married
to someone else while married to Stanley Ann Dunham.

And you still have none.



I win

You lose.

You lose.

Had Hussein been born abroad, he would not have been born a citizen
under the law in effect in 1961.

On May 7, 3:53*pm, George Blimpton wrote:

Had Hussein been born abroad, he would not have been born a citizen
under the law in effect in 1961.

Yes he would have. The US does not recognize bigamy, kooker. You lose.
I win.

On 5/7/2011 9:31 PM, Iarnrod wrote:
On May 7, 3:53 pm, George wrote:

Had Hussein been born abroad, he would not have been born a citizen
under the law in effect in 1961.

Yes he would have.

No. His mother was the only citizen parent. Whether she was married or
not, she didn't meet the residency requirement.

If you think you can cite something showing that an unmarried
18-year-old American citizen giving birth abroad in 1961 would have
begat an American citizen, then cite it. Otherwise, boy, shut the **** up.

On May 7, 9:41*pm, George Plimpton wrote:
On 5/7/2011 9:31 PM, Iarnrod wrote:

On May 7, 3:53 pm, George *wrote:

- - - Had Hussein been born abroad, he would
- - - not have been born a citizen under the law
- - - in effect in 1961.

- - Yes he would have.

- No. *His mother was the only citizen parent.
- Whether she was married or not, she didn't
- meet the residency requirement.
-
- If you think you can cite something showing
- that an unmarried 18-year-old American citizen
- giving birth abroad in 1961 would have begat an
- American citizen, then cite it.
-*Otherwise, boy, shut the **** up.

-read- An Illegitimate Child, an Illegitimate President
-by- Pamela Geller -source- World Net Daily
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=294981
....was... BHO #1 an INS Person of Interest . . . in 1961
-more-questions-many-more-questions-lots-of-questions-
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.r...d77549ce53d23b

On May 7, 10:41*pm, George Plimpton wrote:
On 5/7/2011 9:31 PM,Iarnrodwrote:

On May 7, 3:53 pm, George *wrote:

Had Hussein been born abroad, he would not have been born a citizen
under the law in effect in 1961.

Yes he would have.

No. *His mother was the only citizen parent. *Whether she was married or
not, she didn't meet the residency requirement.

Immaterial. You need to bone up on what we like to call "facts,"
Blimpie!

tee hee

On May 7, 9:31*pm, Iarnrod wrote:
On May 7, 3:53*pm, George Blimpton wrote:

Had Hussein been born abroad, he would not have been born a citizen
under the law in effect in 1961.

- Yes he would have.
- The US does not recognize bigamy, kooker.
- You lose.
- I win.

Larnrod,
Actually most US States {The USA] Do 'Recongnize'
"Bigamy" as a Crime.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bigamy

Larnrod,
What most US States {The USA] Does Not 'Recongnize'
"Polygamy" : Being In Multiple Marriage at the same time.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polygam..._United_States

Larnrod : So much for you many un-ending assertions
of : "You lose. & I win."

it is simply logical... ~ RHF
-and-you-are-simply-'larnrod'-

The snarky boy, who bizarrely likes to pretend he's a 60+ year old
woman, gets everything wrong. In particular, he is wrong about whether
or not Hussein Jr. would have been born a citizen had he been born abroad.

Given the citizenship of Hussein Jr.'s father and the age of his mother,
Hussein would not have been born a citizen had he been born abroad in
1961. The Immigration and Naturalization Act of 1952 (INA) specifies
who is born a citizen (including birth in the United States.) If birth
is abroad to parents of whom only one is a citizen, there is a US
residency requirement for the citizen parent. Hussein Jr.'s mother did
not meet that requirement in 1961, *irrespective* of her marital status.
If Stanley Ann Dunham Obama was not legally married to Hussein Sr., as
the snarky boy fatuously maintains without a shred of proof, that has no
bearing on whether or not she met the residency requirement. If she was
not legally married to Hussein Sr. but had met the residency
requirement, then that would make it *harder*, not easier, for Hussein
Jr. to have been born a citizen.

But the inability of the Maoist mother, Stanley Ann Dunham, to meet the
residency requirement, is all you need to know: had Hussein Jr. been
born abroad, he would not have been born a citizen.

On May 8, 10:22*am, George Plimpton wrote:
The snarky boy,

Is that you, Blimpton?

BWAHAAHAAHAAAA!!! You've probably never even SEEN a woman, Blimpie.
'cept your mom.

who bizarrely likes to pretend he's a 60+ year old
woman, gets everything wrong.

I of course have never been wrong. Not before. Not now. You are
wrong.

*In particular, he is wrong about whether
or not Hussein Jr. would have been born a citizen had he been born abroad..

Incorrect. you are.

FACT.