Why wasn't George Bush captured and tried for 911?
 

On 8/05/2011 6:24 PM, Scout wrote:


"joeturn" wrote in message
...
On May 7, 11:14 pm, John Smith wrote:
On 5/7/2011 7:46 PM, joeturn wrote:

...
Well just think they were put in the buildings in durring their
construction from 1966 through 1973 it's a wonder they all followed
sequence the gavanic corrosion could have made duds out of all them!

Thanks to John Smith the spell checker!

DUDE!

They were dropped in during the computer/network upgrade ... security
was lax, varoious employees remarked on this ...

Part One -
Tenantshttp://911review.com/articles/ryan/demolition_access_p1.html

Part Two -
Securityhttp://911review.com/articles/ryan/demolition_access_p2.html

Part Three -
Convergencehttp://911review.com/articles/ryan/carlyle_kissinger_saic_halliburton...


Part Four -
Cleanuphttp://911review.com/articles/ryan/demolition_access_p4.html

Regards,
JS

No they were put in during construction for quick removal,maybe the
detonaters were conected during that time!

Then clearly the building plans, contract documents, inspectors, and so
on would know ALL about them, right?

Interesting that absolutely NO ONE recalls such devices, no plans exist
of their inclusion in the building, nor the fact that no other building
build during this time has been shown to include such devices in their
construction.

Really, you need to talk to someone, your mental health is seriously in
doubt.


Well, the reality is that his mental health or, more correctly, his lack
of mental health has never been in doubt. His scribblings are quite
effective in removing all doubt

Krypsis

Why wasn't Bin Laden captured and tried for 911?
 

On 5/7/2011 10:20 PM, joeturn wrote:

Well just think they were put in the buildings in 1963 it a wonder
they all followed sequence the gavanic corrosion could have made dudes
out on them!

"gavanic"? Do you mean "galvanic"?

"Dudes"? Do you mean "duds"?

Sorry dude, your [lack of] education is showing.

Malloy is right, Bush is no different from Osama
 

On 05/08/2011 02:17 AM, RHF wrote:


The 'Liberal' Radio Talk Show Host "Mike Malloy"
Called for the US Navy Seals to "Take Bush Out"
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/vid...ge_bu sh.html


If we can use Navy SEALs to execute one guy for war crimes, why not another?

Malloy is right, Bush is no different from Osama
 

dave wrote:

On 05/08/2011 02:17 AM, RHF wrote:


The 'Liberal' Radio Talk Show Host "Mike Malloy"
Called for the US Navy Seals to "Take Bush Out"
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/vid...ge_bu sh.html


If we can use Navy SEALs to execute one guy for war crimes, why not another?

Do ya think your pal Obama should be afraid? After all, he sure looked scared in that Situation Room photo. He
was the smallest guy in the room and even Hillary was bigger than that runt.

Malloy is right, Bush is no different from Osama
 

It is all so 'Fuzzy',,, Fuzzy St.John (old Cowboy movie actor) would
say, What the Hell!?!
cuhulin

Why wasn't Bin Laden captured and tried for 911?
 

On May 8, 6:08*am, * US * wrote:
On Sat, 07 May 2011 20:14:10 -0700, John Smith wrote:
They were dropped in during the computer/network upgrade ... security
was lax, varoious employees remarked on this ...

Part One - Tenants
http://911review.com/articles/ryan/d...access_p1.html

Part Two - Security
http://911review.com/articles/ryan/d...access_p2.html

Part Three - Convergence
http://911review.com/articles/ryan/c...ic_halliburton...

Part Four - Cleanup
http://911review.com/articles/ryan/d...access_p4.html

Regards,
JS

Excellent presentation of facts.

Not one contradictory fact has been presented.

Not one SUPPORTING fact has been presented, you Bush-loving defender
of the right.

Why wasn't George Bush captured and tried for 911?
 

On May 8, 4:24*am, "Scout"
wrote:
"joeturn" wrote in message

...





On May 7, 11:14 pm, John Smith wrote:
On 5/7/2011 7:46 PM, joeturn wrote:

...
Well just think they were put in the buildings in durring their
construction from 1966 through 1973 it's a wonder they all followed
sequence the gavanic corrosion could have made duds out of all them!

Thanks to John Smith the spell checker!

DUDE!

They were dropped in during the computer/network upgrade ... security
was lax, varoious employees remarked on this ...

Part One -
Tenantshttp://911review.com/articles/ryan/demolition_access_p1.html

Part Two -
Securityhttp://911review.com/articles/ryan/demolition_access_p2.html

Part Three -
Convergencehttp://911review.com/articles/ryan/carlyle_kissinger_saic_halliburton...

Part Four -
Cleanuphttp://911review.com/articles/ryan/demolition_access_p4.html

Regards,
JS

No they were put in during construction for quick removal,maybe the
detonaters were conected during that time!

Then clearly the building plans, contract documents, inspectors, and so on
would know ALL about them, right?

Lofferley did not know and he was involved.


Interesting that absolutely NO ONE recalls such devices, no plans exist of
their inclusion in the building, nor the fact that no other building build
during this time has been shown to include such devices in their
construction.

People would think the built in explosives could accidentally be set
off and would not go into an astablishment loaded with preset
demolictions .Would you?

Really, you need to talk to someone, your mental health is seriously in
doubt

This type of projected thoiught is part of your programming,you have
been brainwashed by your controling elite you are a mear slave that
they take humor in watching try to explain away reality


..- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Why wasn't Bin Laden captured and tried for 911?
 

On May 8, 9:05*am, Joe from Kokomo wrote:
On 5/7/2011 10:20 PM, joeturn wrote:

Well just think they were put in the buildings in 1963 it a wonder
they all followed sequence the gavanic corrosion could have made dudes
out on them!

"gavanic"? Do you mean "galvanic"?

"Dudes"? Do you mean "duds"?

Sorry dude, your [lack of] education is showing.

Schools only teach people a specific path to follow and that path is
directed by the CIA/illuminati.Schools teach its pupils to have
grammer hang-ups and instead of understanding what is being said they
are programed to look for edicate.This type of programming has been
successful for the controling elite for ages.

Why wasn't Bin Laden captured and tried for 911?
 

In article 8af96bde-7ac5-46e0-8c24-ba7d76be18b5
@x3g2000yqj.googlegroups.com, says...

On May 7, 8:43*pm, "Scout"
wrote:
"joeturn" wrote in message

...





On May 6, 2:14 pm, Jah Wobble wrote:
John Smith wrote:
On 5/6/2011 10:17 AM, Jah Wobble wrote:

* US * wrote:

On Fri, 6 May 2011 07:50:00 -0700 (PDT), harry k
idiotically
wrote:

The usual descriptions of sights and sounds of any building
undergoing
a collapse

When demolished ...

That's what happens when very large airliners filled with fuel crashes
into them at 500 Kts, you retard.
They get demolished.

The aircraft didn't cause the fall. *The plane hit the building, the
buildings stood. *The fuel was splashed about, burnt off in ~15 mins.
and the buildings stood. *Once the fuel was burnt off, all you were
left
with was a "normal" high-rise fire.

Right.. and NOTHING in the building was flamable and the sprinklers were
in perfect working order.
You retard.

I wonder who placed the demolitions in the building so precise and so
undercover, that the THOUSANDS of people that work there 24/7, never saw
anything going on. Any idear, you retard?

Burnt off in 15 minutes!
BWAAAAAHAHAHAHHAAAAAAA!- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

One plane load of diesel fuel could not have been enough to get all
the verticle support columns to give away simultaneously through out
the buildi to create a verticl collapse in the buildings footprints!

Really? Collapse into the building's footprint you say?

http://i28.photobucket.com/albums/c2...collapse2a.jpg

I don't think so.

Once you have any idea of the facts, then maybe you can try again.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Well just think they were put in the buildings in durring their
construction from 1966 through 1973 it's a wonder they all followed
sequence the gavanic corrosion could have made dudes out of all them!

You don't need to keep repeating the above, it was insane enough the
first time.

--
BDK- Top of the government shill heap for over 10 years running!

Why wasn't George Bush captured and tried for 911?
 

In article ,
says...

"joeturn" wrote in message
...
On May 7, 11:14 pm, John Smith wrote:
On 5/7/2011 7:46 PM, joeturn wrote:

...
Well just think they were put in the buildings in durring their
construction from 1966 through 1973 it's a wonder they all followed
sequence the gavanic corrosion could have made duds out of all them!

Thanks to John Smith the spell checker!

DUDE!

They were dropped in during the computer/network upgrade ... security
was lax, varoious employees remarked on this ...

Part One -
Tenantshttp://911review.com/articles/ryan/demolition_access_p1.html

Part Two -
Securityhttp://911review.com/articles/ryan/demolition_access_p2.html

Part Three -
Convergencehttp://911review.com/articles/ryan/carlyle_kissinger_saic_halliburton...

Part Four -
Cleanuphttp://911review.com/articles/ryan/demolition_access_p4.html

Regards,
JS

No they were put in during construction for quick removal,maybe the
detonaters were conected during that time!

Then clearly the building plans, contract documents, inspectors, and so on
would know ALL about them, right?

Interesting that absolutely NO ONE recalls such devices, no plans exist of
their inclusion in the building, nor the fact that no other building build
during this time has been shown to include such devices in their
construction.

Really, you need to talk to someone, your mental health is seriously in
doubt.


Aw come on! There's no doubt about WrongTurnJoe.

--
BDK- Top of the government shill heap for over 10 years running!