Why wasn't Bin Laden captured and tried for 911?
 

In article
,
Iarnrod wrote:

On May 8, 2:44*pm, * US * wrote:

The bushkultie has no facts.

That is correct. YOU, the bushkultie, have no facts. Bush is not
getting his money's worth paying for your counter-disinfo shilling.
You simply have not presented anything even remotely physically
possible.



You're arguing with a fellow leftard (*US*), who's a stupid a you, and
you're too stupid to realize it.

snicker

Why wasn't Bin Laden captured and tried for 911?
 

On May 8, 9:40*pm, Harold Burton wrote:
In article
,

wrote:
On May 8, 2:44*pm, * US * wrote:
The bushkultie has no facts.

That is correct. YOU, the bushkultie, have no facts. Bush is not
getting his money's worth paying for your counter-disinfo shilling.
You simply have not presented anything even remotely physically
possible.

You're arguing with a fellow leftard (*US*),

Hey fuzznuts, * Hates US * is, like you, a rightard. 9/11 twoofers are
rightards

.who's a stupid a you,

BWAHAHAHHAHAHAAAA!!! Wanna try that again, dope??
BWAAHAAAHAAHAAAHAHAHA!!

Why wasn't Bin Laden captured and tried for 911?
 

On Sat, 07 May 2011 20:14:10 -0700, John Smith wrote:

They were dropped in during the computer/network upgrade ... security
was lax, varoious employees remarked on this ...

Part One - Tenants
http://911review.com/articles/ryan/d...access_p1.html

Part Two - Security
http://911review.com/articles/ryan/d...access_p2.html

Part Three - Convergence
http://911review.com/articles/ryan/c...lliburton.html

Part Four - Cleanup
http://911review.com/articles/ryan/d...access_p4.html

Regards,
JS

Excellent presentation of facts.

Not one contradictory fact has been presented.

The bushkultie has no facts.

The bushkultie has only lies.

Why wasn't Bin Laden captured and tried for 911?
 

On Sun, 08 May 2011 23:40:30 -0400, Harold Burton wrote:

... a stupid a ...
... too stupid to realize it.

You believe every lie Bush and Cheney told, don't you.

On Sat, 07 May 2011 20:14:10 -0700, John Smith wrote:

They were dropped in during the computer/network upgrade ... security
was lax, varoious employees remarked on this ...

Part One - Tenants
http://911review.com/articles/ryan/d...access_p1.html

Part Two - Security
http://911review.com/articles/ryan/d...access_p2.html

Part Three - Convergence
http://911review.com/articles/ryan/c...lliburton.html

Part Four - Cleanup
http://911review.com/articles/ryan/d...access_p4.html

Regards,
JS

Excellent presentation of facts.

Not one contradictory fact has been presented.

The bushkultie has no facts.

The bushkultie has only lies.

Why wasn't Bin Laden captured and tried for 911?
 

On Sat, 07 May 2011 20:14:10 -0700, John Smith wrote:

They were dropped in during the computer/network upgrade ... security
was lax, varoious employees remarked on this ...

Part One - Tenants
http://911review.com/articles/ryan/d...access_p1.html

Part Two - Security
http://911review.com/articles/ryan/d...access_p2.html

Part Three - Convergence
http://911review.com/articles/ryan/c...lliburton.html

Part Four - Cleanup
http://911review.com/articles/ryan/d...access_p4.html

Regards,
JS

Excellent presentation of facts.

Not one contradictory fact has been presented.

The bushkultie has no facts.

The bushkultie has only lies.

The bushkultie is a failure.

Why wasn't Bin Laden captured and tried for 911?
 

A few minutes ago, I was flipping through the TV channels.I landed on
World Harvest Television channel, DirecTV channel 367.I caught the last
minute of Darell Dumas talking just before the top of the 11:00 PM
hour.He said, You have the altered document, and now you know why Osama
Bin Laded just got killed.
cuhulin

Malloy is right, Bush is no different from Osama
 

On May 8, 4:15*pm, dave wrote:


- - - - On 05/08/2011 02:17 AM, RHF wrote:
- - - - The 'Liberal' Radio Talk Show Host "Mike Malloy"
- - - - Called for the US Navy Seals to "Take Bush Out"
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.r...29619837dd65e7

Why wasn't Bin Laden captured and tried for 911?
 

In article
,
Iarnrod wrote:

On May 8, 9:40*pm, Harold Burton wrote:
In article
,

wrote:
On May 8, 2:44*pm, * US * wrote:
The bushkultie has no facts.

That is correct. YOU, the bushkultie, have no facts. Bush is not
getting his money's worth paying for your counter-disinfo shilling.
You simply have not presented anything even remotely physically
possible.

You're arguing with a fellow leftard (*US*),

Hey fuzznuts, * Hates US * is, like you, a rightard.

Nope. Try again.


snicker

Why wasn't Bin Laden captured and tried for 911?
 

In article
,
Iarnrod wrote:

On May 11, 8:10*pm, Harold Burton wrote:
In article
,



wrote:
On May 8, 9:40*pm, Harold Burton wrote:
In article
,

wrote:
On May 8, 2:44*pm, * US * wrote:
The bushkultie has no facts.

That is correct. YOU, the bushkultie, have no facts. Bush is not
getting his money's worth paying for your counter-disinfo shilling.
You simply have not presented anything even remotely physically
possible.

You're arguing with a fellow leftard (*US*),

Hey fuzznuts, * Hates US * is, like you, a rightard.

Nope, try again.

Yep.


Nah, keep trying.


snicker

Why wasn't Bin Laden captured and tried for 911?
 

On May 12, 8:12*pm, Harold Burton wrote:
In article
,



wrote:
On May 11, 8:10*pm, Harold Burton wrote:
In article
,

wrote:
On May 8, 9:40*pm, Harold Burton wrote:
In article
,

wrote:
On May 8, 2:44*pm, * US * wrote:
The bushkultie has no facts.

That is correct. YOU, the bushkultie, have no facts. Bush is not
getting his money's worth paying for your counter-disinfo shilling.
You simply have not presented anything even remotely physically
possible.

You're arguing with a fellow leftard (*US*),

Hey fuzznuts, * Hates US * is, like you, a rightard.

Nope, try again.

Yep.

Nah, keep trying.

No need since I have already prevailed, Hairy Butt. FACT.

snicker