RadioBanter

RadioBanter (https://www.radiobanter.com/)
-   Shortwave (https://www.radiobanter.com/shortwave/)
-   -   Why wasn't Bin Laden captured and tried for 911? (https://www.radiobanter.com/shortwave/165490-re-why-wasnt-bin-laden-captured-tried-911-a.html)

joeturn May 7th 11 03:16 PM

Why wasn't Bin Laden captured and tried for 911?
 
On May 6, 2:14*pm, Jah Wobble wrote:
John Smith wrote:
On 5/6/2011 10:17 AM, Jah Wobble wrote:


* US * wrote:


On Fri, 6 May 2011 07:50:00 -0700 (PDT), harry k
idiotically
wrote:


The usual descriptions of sights and sounds of any building undergoing
a collapse


When demolished ...


That's what happens when very large airliners filled with fuel crashes
into them at 500 Kts, you retard.
They get demolished.


The aircraft didn't cause the fall. *The plane hit the building, the
buildings stood. *The fuel was splashed about, burnt off in ~15 mins.
and the buildings stood. *Once the fuel was burnt off, all you were left
with was a "normal" high-rise fire.


Right.. and NOTHING in the building was flamable and the sprinklers were
in perfect working order.
You retard.

I wonder who placed the demolitions in the building so precise and so
undercover, that the THOUSANDS of people that work there 24/7, never saw
anything going on. Any idear, you retard?

Burnt off in 15 minutes!
BWAAAAAHAHAHAHHAAAAAAA!- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -


One plane load of diesel fuel could not have been enough to get all
the verticle support columns to give away simultaneously through out
the buildi to create a verticl collapse in the buildings footprints!

The explosives were built into all the towers during their
construction!

Listen to the architect's interview

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uV1mB...layer_embedded

Jah Wobble May 7th 11 03:42 PM

Why wasn't Bin Laden captured and tried for 911?
 
joeturn wrote:
On May 6, 2:14 pm, Jah Wobble wrote:

John Smith wrote:

On 5/6/2011 10:17 AM, Jah Wobble wrote:


* US * wrote:


On Fri, 6 May 2011 07:50:00 -0700 (PDT), harry k
idiotically
wrote:


The usual descriptions of sights and sounds of any building undergoing
a collapse


When demolished ...


That's what happens when very large airliners filled with fuel crashes
into them at 500 Kts, you retard.
They get demolished.


The aircraft didn't cause the fall. The plane hit the building, the
buildings stood. The fuel was splashed about, burnt off in ~15 mins.
and the buildings stood. Once the fuel was burnt off, all you were left
with was a "normal" high-rise fire.


Right.. and NOTHING in the building was flamable and the sprinklers were
in perfect working order.
You retard.

I wonder who placed the demolitions in the building so precise and so
undercover, that the THOUSANDS of people that work there 24/7, never saw
anything going on. Any idear, you retard?

Burnt off in 15 minutes!
BWAAAAAHAHAHAHHAAAAAAA!- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -



One plane load of diesel fuel could not have been enough to get all
the verticle support columns to give away simultaneously through out
the buildi to create a verticl collapse in the buildings footprints!

The explosives were built into all the towers during their
construction!

Listen to the architect's interview

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uV1mB...layer_embedded


Well, then it's gotta be true....even though that flaky retard had
nothing to do with it.

Krypsis[_2_] May 7th 11 04:17 PM

Why wasn't Bin Laden captured and tried for 911?
 
On 8/05/2011 12:16 AM, joeturn wrote:
On May 6, 2:14 pm, Jah wrote:
John Smith wrote:
On 5/6/2011 10:17 AM, Jah Wobble wrote:


* US * wrote:


On Fri, 6 May 2011 07:50:00 -0700 (PDT), harry k
idiotically
wrote:


The usual descriptions of sights and sounds of any building undergoing
a collapse


When demolished ...


That's what happens when very large airliners filled with fuel crashes
into them at 500 Kts, you retard.
They get demolished.


The aircraft didn't cause the fall. The plane hit the building, the
buildings stood. The fuel was splashed about, burnt off in ~15 mins.
and the buildings stood. Once the fuel was burnt off, all you were left
with was a "normal" high-rise fire.


Right.. and NOTHING in the building was flamable and the sprinklers were
in perfect working order.
You retard.

I wonder who placed the demolitions in the building so precise and so
undercover, that the THOUSANDS of people that work there 24/7, never saw
anything going on. Any idear, you retard?

Burnt off in 15 minutes!
BWAAAAAHAHAHAHHAAAAAAA!- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -


One plane load of diesel fuel could not have been enough to get all


Minor correction. jet aircraft do NOT use diesel fuel. They don't even
use gasoline or avgas. What do they use? Humble old kerosene.
Admittedly, it's power kerosene but it's still kerosene.

the verticle support columns to give away simultaneously through out
the buildi to create a verticl collapse in the buildings footprints!

The explosives were built into all the towers during their
construction!

Listen to the architect's interview

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uV1mB...layer_embedded


These jerks on the video look like they're trippin'. Actually, from your
comments, I'd say you're doing a bit of trippin' too!

Krypsis



John Smith[_7_] May 7th 11 04:31 PM

How do you expect bin ladens' death to affect your personal life,income, quality of living, etc.?
 
On 5/7/2011 8:17 AM, Krypsis wrote:

...
Minor correction. jet aircraft do NOT use diesel fuel. They don't even
use gasoline or avgas. What do they use? Humble old kerosene.
Admittedly, it's power kerosene but it's still kerosene.
...


For all intents and purposes: kerosene = No. 1 Diesel = Jet Fuel

There are minor differences, as an example:
http://www.combinedoil.com/pdf/MAP_N...20Kerosene.pdf

My grandfather used to use No. 1 Diesel in kerosene lamps and kerosene
heaters for barns and smudge pots to keep plants in the fields from
freezing ... in the home he only used kerosene, said it was because it
was "deodorized No. 1 Diesel."

Now-a-days? Who knows ...

Regards,
JS

Jah Wobble May 7th 11 04:40 PM

Why wasn't Bin Laden captured and tried for 911?
 
Krypsis wrote:

On 8/05/2011 12:16 AM, joeturn wrote:

On May 6, 2:14 pm, Jah wrote:

John Smith wrote:

On 5/6/2011 10:17 AM, Jah Wobble wrote:


* US * wrote:


On Fri, 6 May 2011 07:50:00 -0700 (PDT), harry k
idiotically
wrote:


The usual descriptions of sights and sounds of any building
undergoing
a collapse


When demolished ...


That's what happens when very large airliners filled with fuel crashes
into them at 500 Kts, you retard.
They get demolished.


The aircraft didn't cause the fall. The plane hit the building, the
buildings stood. The fuel was splashed about, burnt off in ~15 mins.
and the buildings stood. Once the fuel was burnt off, all you were
left
with was a "normal" high-rise fire.


Right.. and NOTHING in the building was flamable and the sprinklers were
in perfect working order.
You retard.

I wonder who placed the demolitions in the building so precise and so
undercover, that the THOUSANDS of people that work there 24/7, never saw
anything going on. Any idear, you retard?

Burnt off in 15 minutes!
BWAAAAAHAHAHAHHAAAAAAA!- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -



One plane load of diesel fuel could not have been enough to get all



Minor correction. jet aircraft do NOT use diesel fuel. They don't even
use gasoline or avgas. What do they use? Humble old kerosene.
Admittedly, it's power kerosene but it's still kerosene.

the verticle support columns to give away simultaneously through out
the buildi to create a verticl collapse in the buildings footprints!

The explosives were built into all the towers during their
construction!

Listen to the architect's interview

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uV1mB...layer_embedded



These jerks on the video look like they're trippin'. Actually, from your
comments, I'd say you're doing a bit of trippin' too!


It was supposed to be funny....and by golly, it was!

joeturn May 8th 11 01:18 AM

Why wasn't Bin Laden captured and tried for 911?
 
On May 7, 11:17*am, Krypsis wrote:
On 8/05/2011 12:16 AM, joeturn wrote:





On May 6, 2:14 pm, Jah *wrote:
John Smith wrote:
On 5/6/2011 10:17 AM, Jah Wobble wrote:


* US * wrote:


On Fri, 6 May 2011 07:50:00 -0700 (PDT), harry k
*idiotically
wrote:


The usual descriptions of sights and sounds of any building undergoing
a collapse


When demolished ...


That's what happens when very large airliners filled with fuel crashes
into them at 500 Kts, you retard.
They get demolished.


The aircraft didn't cause the fall. *The plane hit the building, the
buildings stood. *The fuel was splashed about, burnt off in ~15 mins.
and the buildings stood. *Once the fuel was burnt off, all you were left
with was a "normal" high-rise fire.


Right.. and NOTHING in the building was flamable and the sprinklers were
in perfect working order.
You retard.


I wonder who placed the demolitions in the building so precise and so
undercover, that the THOUSANDS of people that work there 24/7, never saw
anything going on. Any idear, you retard?


Burnt off in 15 minutes!
BWAAAAAHAHAHAHHAAAAAAA!- Hide quoted text -


- Show quoted text -


One plane load of diesel fuel could not have been enough to get all


Minor correction. jet aircraft do NOT use diesel fuel. They don't even
use gasoline or avgas. What do they use? Humble old kerosene.
Admittedly, it's power kerosene but it's still kerosene.

the verticle support columns to give away simultaneously through out
the buildi to create a verticl collapse in the buildings footprints!


The explosives were built into all the towers during their
construction!


Listen to the architect's interview


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uV1mB...layer_embedded


These jerks on the video look like they're trippin'. Actually, from your
comments, I'd say you're doing a bit of trippin' too!

Krypsis- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -


Please explain how my comments makes you think of tripping.How often
do you do this? Is it a problem or have you not sold your soul yet to
support your habbit?

Scout May 8th 11 01:43 AM

Why wasn't Bin Laden captured and tried for 911?
 


"joeturn" wrote in message
...
On May 6, 2:14 pm, Jah Wobble wrote:
John Smith wrote:
On 5/6/2011 10:17 AM, Jah Wobble wrote:


* US * wrote:


On Fri, 6 May 2011 07:50:00 -0700 (PDT), harry k
idiotically
wrote:


The usual descriptions of sights and sounds of any building
undergoing
a collapse


When demolished ...


That's what happens when very large airliners filled with fuel crashes
into them at 500 Kts, you retard.
They get demolished.


The aircraft didn't cause the fall. The plane hit the building, the
buildings stood. The fuel was splashed about, burnt off in ~15 mins.
and the buildings stood. Once the fuel was burnt off, all you were
left
with was a "normal" high-rise fire.


Right.. and NOTHING in the building was flamable and the sprinklers were
in perfect working order.
You retard.

I wonder who placed the demolitions in the building so precise and so
undercover, that the THOUSANDS of people that work there 24/7, never saw
anything going on. Any idear, you retard?

Burnt off in 15 minutes!
BWAAAAAHAHAHAHHAAAAAAA!- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -


One plane load of diesel fuel could not have been enough to get all
the verticle support columns to give away simultaneously through out
the buildi to create a verticl collapse in the buildings footprints!


Really? Collapse into the building's footprint you say?

http://i28.photobucket.com/albums/c2...collapse2a.jpg

I don't think so.

Once you have any idea of the facts, then maybe you can try again.




joeturn May 8th 11 03:20 AM

Why wasn't Bin Laden captured and tried for 911?
 
On May 7, 8:43*pm, "Scout"
wrote:
"joeturn" wrote in message

...





On May 6, 2:14 pm, Jah Wobble wrote:
John Smith wrote:
On 5/6/2011 10:17 AM, Jah Wobble wrote:


* US * wrote:


On Fri, 6 May 2011 07:50:00 -0700 (PDT), harry k
idiotically
wrote:


The usual descriptions of sights and sounds of any building
undergoing
a collapse


When demolished ...


That's what happens when very large airliners filled with fuel crashes
into them at 500 Kts, you retard.
They get demolished.


The aircraft didn't cause the fall. *The plane hit the building, the
buildings stood. *The fuel was splashed about, burnt off in ~15 mins.
and the buildings stood. *Once the fuel was burnt off, all you were
left
with was a "normal" high-rise fire.


Right.. and NOTHING in the building was flamable and the sprinklers were
in perfect working order.
You retard.


I wonder who placed the demolitions in the building so precise and so
undercover, that the THOUSANDS of people that work there 24/7, never saw
anything going on. Any idear, you retard?


Burnt off in 15 minutes!
BWAAAAAHAHAHAHHAAAAAAA!- Hide quoted text -


- Show quoted text -


One plane load of diesel fuel could not have been enough to get all
the verticle support columns to give away simultaneously through out
the buildi to create a verticl collapse in the buildings footprints!


Really? Collapse into the building's footprint you say?

http://i28.photobucket.com/albums/c2...collapse2a.jpg

I don't think so.

Once you have any idea of the facts, then maybe you can try again.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -


Well just think they were put in the buildings in 1963 it a wonder
they all followed sequence the gavanic corrosion could have made dudes
out on them!

joeturn May 8th 11 03:35 AM

Why wasn't Bin Laden captured and tried for 911?
 
On May 7, 8:43*pm, "Scout"
wrote:
"joeturn" wrote in message

...





On May 6, 2:14 pm, Jah Wobble wrote:
John Smith wrote:
On 5/6/2011 10:17 AM, Jah Wobble wrote:


* US * wrote:


On Fri, 6 May 2011 07:50:00 -0700 (PDT), harry k
idiotically
wrote:


The usual descriptions of sights and sounds of any building
undergoing
a collapse


When demolished ...


That's what happens when very large airliners filled with fuel crashes
into them at 500 Kts, you retard.
They get demolished.


The aircraft didn't cause the fall. *The plane hit the building, the
buildings stood. *The fuel was splashed about, burnt off in ~15 mins.
and the buildings stood. *Once the fuel was burnt off, all you were
left
with was a "normal" high-rise fire.


Right.. and NOTHING in the building was flamable and the sprinklers were
in perfect working order.
You retard.


I wonder who placed the demolitions in the building so precise and so
undercover, that the THOUSANDS of people that work there 24/7, never saw
anything going on. Any idear, you retard?


Burnt off in 15 minutes!
BWAAAAAHAHAHAHHAAAAAAA!- Hide quoted text -


- Show quoted text -


One plane load of diesel fuel could not have been enough to get all
the verticle support columns to give away simultaneously through out
the buildi to create a verticl collapse in the buildings footprints!


Really? Collapse into the building's footprint you say?

http://i28.photobucket.com/albums/c2...collapse2a.jpg

I don't think so.

Once you have any idea of the facts, then maybe you can try again.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -


Well just think they were put in the buildings in 1973 it's a wonder
they all followed sequence the gavanic corrosion could have made
dudes
out of all them!



joeturn May 8th 11 03:37 AM

Why wasn't Bin Laden captured and tried for 911?
 
On May 7, 8:43*pm, "Scout"
wrote:
"joeturn" wrote in message

...





On May 6, 2:14 pm, Jah Wobble wrote:
John Smith wrote:
On 5/6/2011 10:17 AM, Jah Wobble wrote:


* US * wrote:


On Fri, 6 May 2011 07:50:00 -0700 (PDT), harry k
idiotically
wrote:


The usual descriptions of sights and sounds of any building
undergoing
a collapse


When demolished ...


That's what happens when very large airliners filled with fuel crashes
into them at 500 Kts, you retard.
They get demolished.


The aircraft didn't cause the fall. *The plane hit the building, the
buildings stood. *The fuel was splashed about, burnt off in ~15 mins.
and the buildings stood. *Once the fuel was burnt off, all you were
left
with was a "normal" high-rise fire.


Right.. and NOTHING in the building was flamable and the sprinklers were
in perfect working order.
You retard.


I wonder who placed the demolitions in the building so precise and so
undercover, that the THOUSANDS of people that work there 24/7, never saw
anything going on. Any idear, you retard?


Burnt off in 15 minutes!
BWAAAAAHAHAHAHHAAAAAAA!- Hide quoted text -


- Show quoted text -


One plane load of diesel fuel could not have been enough to get all
the verticle support columns to give away simultaneously through out
the buildi to create a verticl collapse in the buildings footprints!


Really? Collapse into the building's footprint you say?

http://i28.photobucket.com/albums/c2...collapse2a.jpg

I don't think so.

Once you have any idea of the facts, then maybe you can try again.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -


Well just think they were put in the buildings in durring their
construction prior to 1968 it's a wonder they all followed sequence
the gavanic corrosion could have made dudes out of all them!




All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:13 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com