Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old May 8th 11, 01:43 AM posted to alt.politics,talk.politics.misc,talk.politics.guns,rec.radio.shortwave,rec.sport.golf
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: May 2011
Posts: 207
Default Why wasn't Bin Laden captured and tried for 911?



"joeturn" wrote in message
...
On May 6, 2:14 pm, Jah Wobble wrote:
John Smith wrote:
On 5/6/2011 10:17 AM, Jah Wobble wrote:


* US * wrote:


On Fri, 6 May 2011 07:50:00 -0700 (PDT), harry k
idiotically
wrote:


The usual descriptions of sights and sounds of any building
undergoing
a collapse


When demolished ...


That's what happens when very large airliners filled with fuel crashes
into them at 500 Kts, you retard.
They get demolished.


The aircraft didn't cause the fall. The plane hit the building, the
buildings stood. The fuel was splashed about, burnt off in ~15 mins.
and the buildings stood. Once the fuel was burnt off, all you were
left
with was a "normal" high-rise fire.


Right.. and NOTHING in the building was flamable and the sprinklers were
in perfect working order.
You retard.

I wonder who placed the demolitions in the building so precise and so
undercover, that the THOUSANDS of people that work there 24/7, never saw
anything going on. Any idear, you retard?

Burnt off in 15 minutes!
BWAAAAAHAHAHAHHAAAAAAA!- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -


One plane load of diesel fuel could not have been enough to get all
the verticle support columns to give away simultaneously through out
the buildi to create a verticl collapse in the buildings footprints!


Really? Collapse into the building's footprint you say?

http://i28.photobucket.com/albums/c2...collapse2a.jpg

I don't think so.

Once you have any idea of the facts, then maybe you can try again.



  #2   Report Post  
Old May 8th 11, 03:20 AM posted to alt.politics,talk.politics.misc,talk.politics.guns,rec.radio.shortwave,rec.sport.golf
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Dec 2008
Posts: 206
Default Why wasn't Bin Laden captured and tried for 911?

On May 7, 8:43*pm, "Scout"
wrote:
"joeturn" wrote in message

...





On May 6, 2:14 pm, Jah Wobble wrote:
John Smith wrote:
On 5/6/2011 10:17 AM, Jah Wobble wrote:


* US * wrote:


On Fri, 6 May 2011 07:50:00 -0700 (PDT), harry k
idiotically
wrote:


The usual descriptions of sights and sounds of any building
undergoing
a collapse


When demolished ...


That's what happens when very large airliners filled with fuel crashes
into them at 500 Kts, you retard.
They get demolished.


The aircraft didn't cause the fall. *The plane hit the building, the
buildings stood. *The fuel was splashed about, burnt off in ~15 mins.
and the buildings stood. *Once the fuel was burnt off, all you were
left
with was a "normal" high-rise fire.


Right.. and NOTHING in the building was flamable and the sprinklers were
in perfect working order.
You retard.


I wonder who placed the demolitions in the building so precise and so
undercover, that the THOUSANDS of people that work there 24/7, never saw
anything going on. Any idear, you retard?


Burnt off in 15 minutes!
BWAAAAAHAHAHAHHAAAAAAA!- Hide quoted text -


- Show quoted text -


One plane load of diesel fuel could not have been enough to get all
the verticle support columns to give away simultaneously through out
the buildi to create a verticl collapse in the buildings footprints!


Really? Collapse into the building's footprint you say?

http://i28.photobucket.com/albums/c2...collapse2a.jpg

I don't think so.

Once you have any idea of the facts, then maybe you can try again.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -


Well just think they were put in the buildings in 1963 it a wonder
they all followed sequence the gavanic corrosion could have made dudes
out on them!
  #3   Report Post  
Old May 8th 11, 02:05 PM posted to alt.politics,talk.politics.misc,talk.politics.guns,rec.radio.shortwave,rec.sport.golf
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: May 2009
Posts: 952
Default Why wasn't Bin Laden captured and tried for 911?

On 5/7/2011 10:20 PM, joeturn wrote:

Well just think they were put in the buildings in 1963 it a wonder
they all followed sequence the gavanic corrosion could have made dudes
out on them!


"gavanic"? Do you mean "galvanic"?

"Dudes"? Do you mean "duds"?

Sorry dude, your [lack of] education is showing.
  #4   Report Post  
Old May 8th 11, 06:51 PM posted to alt.politics,talk.politics.misc,talk.politics.guns,rec.radio.shortwave,rec.sport.golf
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Dec 2008
Posts: 206
Default Why wasn't Bin Laden captured and tried for 911?

On May 8, 9:05*am, Joe from Kokomo wrote:
On 5/7/2011 10:20 PM, joeturn wrote:

Well just think they were put in the buildings in 1963 it a wonder
they all followed sequence the gavanic corrosion could have made dudes
out on them!


"gavanic"? Do you mean "galvanic"?

"Dudes"? Do you mean "duds"?

Sorry dude, your [lack of] education is showing.


Schools only teach people a specific path to follow and that path is
directed by the CIA/illuminati.Schools teach its pupils to have
grammer hang-ups and instead of understanding what is being said they
are programed to look for edicate.This type of programming has been
successful for the controling elite for ages.
  #5   Report Post  
Old May 8th 11, 03:35 AM posted to alt.politics,talk.politics.misc,talk.politics.guns,rec.radio.shortwave,rec.sport.golf
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Dec 2008
Posts: 206
Default Why wasn't Bin Laden captured and tried for 911?

On May 7, 8:43*pm, "Scout"
wrote:
"joeturn" wrote in message

...





On May 6, 2:14 pm, Jah Wobble wrote:
John Smith wrote:
On 5/6/2011 10:17 AM, Jah Wobble wrote:


* US * wrote:


On Fri, 6 May 2011 07:50:00 -0700 (PDT), harry k
idiotically
wrote:


The usual descriptions of sights and sounds of any building
undergoing
a collapse


When demolished ...


That's what happens when very large airliners filled with fuel crashes
into them at 500 Kts, you retard.
They get demolished.


The aircraft didn't cause the fall. *The plane hit the building, the
buildings stood. *The fuel was splashed about, burnt off in ~15 mins.
and the buildings stood. *Once the fuel was burnt off, all you were
left
with was a "normal" high-rise fire.


Right.. and NOTHING in the building was flamable and the sprinklers were
in perfect working order.
You retard.


I wonder who placed the demolitions in the building so precise and so
undercover, that the THOUSANDS of people that work there 24/7, never saw
anything going on. Any idear, you retard?


Burnt off in 15 minutes!
BWAAAAAHAHAHAHHAAAAAAA!- Hide quoted text -


- Show quoted text -


One plane load of diesel fuel could not have been enough to get all
the verticle support columns to give away simultaneously through out
the buildi to create a verticl collapse in the buildings footprints!


Really? Collapse into the building's footprint you say?

http://i28.photobucket.com/albums/c2...collapse2a.jpg

I don't think so.

Once you have any idea of the facts, then maybe you can try again.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -


Well just think they were put in the buildings in 1973 it's a wonder
they all followed sequence the gavanic corrosion could have made
dudes
out of all them!




  #6   Report Post  
Old May 8th 11, 03:37 AM posted to alt.politics,talk.politics.misc,talk.politics.guns,rec.radio.shortwave,rec.sport.golf
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Dec 2008
Posts: 206
Default Why wasn't Bin Laden captured and tried for 911?

On May 7, 8:43*pm, "Scout"
wrote:
"joeturn" wrote in message

...





On May 6, 2:14 pm, Jah Wobble wrote:
John Smith wrote:
On 5/6/2011 10:17 AM, Jah Wobble wrote:


* US * wrote:


On Fri, 6 May 2011 07:50:00 -0700 (PDT), harry k
idiotically
wrote:


The usual descriptions of sights and sounds of any building
undergoing
a collapse


When demolished ...


That's what happens when very large airliners filled with fuel crashes
into them at 500 Kts, you retard.
They get demolished.


The aircraft didn't cause the fall. *The plane hit the building, the
buildings stood. *The fuel was splashed about, burnt off in ~15 mins.
and the buildings stood. *Once the fuel was burnt off, all you were
left
with was a "normal" high-rise fire.


Right.. and NOTHING in the building was flamable and the sprinklers were
in perfect working order.
You retard.


I wonder who placed the demolitions in the building so precise and so
undercover, that the THOUSANDS of people that work there 24/7, never saw
anything going on. Any idear, you retard?


Burnt off in 15 minutes!
BWAAAAAHAHAHAHHAAAAAAA!- Hide quoted text -


- Show quoted text -


One plane load of diesel fuel could not have been enough to get all
the verticle support columns to give away simultaneously through out
the buildi to create a verticl collapse in the buildings footprints!


Really? Collapse into the building's footprint you say?

http://i28.photobucket.com/albums/c2...collapse2a.jpg

I don't think so.

Once you have any idea of the facts, then maybe you can try again.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -


Well just think they were put in the buildings in durring their
construction prior to 1968 it's a wonder they all followed sequence
the gavanic corrosion could have made dudes out of all them!


  #7   Report Post  
Old May 8th 11, 03:40 AM posted to alt.politics,talk.politics.misc,talk.politics.guns,rec.radio.shortwave,rec.sport.golf
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Dec 2008
Posts: 206
Default Why wasn't Bin Laden captured and tried for 911?

On May 7, 8:43*pm, "Scout"
wrote:
"joeturn" wrote in message

...





On May 6, 2:14 pm, Jah Wobble wrote:
John Smith wrote:
On 5/6/2011 10:17 AM, Jah Wobble wrote:


* US * wrote:


On Fri, 6 May 2011 07:50:00 -0700 (PDT), harry k
idiotically
wrote:


The usual descriptions of sights and sounds of any building
undergoing
a collapse


When demolished ...


That's what happens when very large airliners filled with fuel crashes
into them at 500 Kts, you retard.
They get demolished.


The aircraft didn't cause the fall. *The plane hit the building, the
buildings stood. *The fuel was splashed about, burnt off in ~15 mins.
and the buildings stood. *Once the fuel was burnt off, all you were
left
with was a "normal" high-rise fire.


Right.. and NOTHING in the building was flamable and the sprinklers were
in perfect working order.
You retard.


I wonder who placed the demolitions in the building so precise and so
undercover, that the THOUSANDS of people that work there 24/7, never saw
anything going on. Any idear, you retard?


Burnt off in 15 minutes!
BWAAAAAHAHAHAHHAAAAAAA!- Hide quoted text -


- Show quoted text -


One plane load of diesel fuel could not have been enough to get all
the verticle support columns to give away simultaneously through out
the buildi to create a verticl collapse in the buildings footprints!


Really? Collapse into the building's footprint you say?

http://i28.photobucket.com/albums/c2...collapse2a.jpg

I don't think so.

Once you have any idea of the facts, then maybe you can try again.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -


Well just think they were put in the buildings in durring their
construction from 1966 through 1973 it's a wonder they all followed
sequence the gavanic corrosion could have made dudes out of all them!


  #8   Report Post  
Old May 8th 11, 07:39 PM posted to alt.politics,talk.politics.misc,talk.politics.guns,rec.radio.shortwave,rec.sport.golf
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Oct 2010
Posts: 376
Default Why wasn't Bin Laden captured and tried for 911?

In article 8af96bde-7ac5-46e0-8c24-ba7d76be18b5
@x3g2000yqj.googlegroups.com, says...

On May 7, 8:43*pm, "Scout"
wrote:
"joeturn" wrote in message

...





On May 6, 2:14 pm, Jah Wobble wrote:
John Smith wrote:
On 5/6/2011 10:17 AM, Jah Wobble wrote:


* US * wrote:


On Fri, 6 May 2011 07:50:00 -0700 (PDT), harry k
idiotically
wrote:


The usual descriptions of sights and sounds of any building
undergoing
a collapse


When demolished ...


That's what happens when very large airliners filled with fuel crashes
into them at 500 Kts, you retard.
They get demolished.


The aircraft didn't cause the fall. *The plane hit the building, the
buildings stood. *The fuel was splashed about, burnt off in ~15 mins.
and the buildings stood. *Once the fuel was burnt off, all you were
left
with was a "normal" high-rise fire.


Right.. and NOTHING in the building was flamable and the sprinklers were
in perfect working order.
You retard.


I wonder who placed the demolitions in the building so precise and so
undercover, that the THOUSANDS of people that work there 24/7, never saw
anything going on. Any idear, you retard?


Burnt off in 15 minutes!
BWAAAAAHAHAHAHHAAAAAAA!- Hide quoted text -


- Show quoted text -


One plane load of diesel fuel could not have been enough to get all
the verticle support columns to give away simultaneously through out
the buildi to create a verticl collapse in the buildings footprints!


Really? Collapse into the building's footprint you say?

http://i28.photobucket.com/albums/c2...collapse2a.jpg

I don't think so.

Once you have any idea of the facts, then maybe you can try again.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -


Well just think they were put in the buildings in durring their
construction from 1966 through 1973 it's a wonder they all followed
sequence the gavanic corrosion could have made dudes out of all them!


You don't need to keep repeating the above, it was insane enough the
first time.

--
BDK- Top of the government shill heap for over 10 years running!
  #9   Report Post  
Old May 8th 11, 03:46 AM posted to alt.politics,talk.politics.misc,talk.politics.guns,rec.radio.shortwave,rec.sport.golf
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Dec 2008
Posts: 206
Default Why wasn't Bin Laden captured and tried for 911?

On May 7, 8:43*pm, "Scout"
wrote:
"joeturn" wrote in message

...





On May 6, 2:14 pm, Jah Wobble wrote:
John Smith wrote:
On 5/6/2011 10:17 AM, Jah Wobble wrote:


* US * wrote:


On Fri, 6 May 2011 07:50:00 -0700 (PDT), harry k
idiotically
wrote:


The usual descriptions of sights and sounds of any building
undergoing
a collapse


When demolished ...


That's what happens when very large airliners filled with fuel crashes
into them at 500 Kts, you retard.
They get demolished.


The aircraft didn't cause the fall. *The plane hit the building, the
buildings stood. *The fuel was splashed about, burnt off in ~15 mins.
and the buildings stood. *Once the fuel was burnt off, all you were
left
with was a "normal" high-rise fire.


Right.. and NOTHING in the building was flamable and the sprinklers were
in perfect working order.
You retard.


I wonder who placed the demolitions in the building so precise and so
undercover, that the THOUSANDS of people that work there 24/7, never saw
anything going on. Any idear, you retard?


Burnt off in 15 minutes!
BWAAAAAHAHAHAHHAAAAAAA!- Hide quoted text -


- Show quoted text -


One plane load of diesel fuel could not have been enough to get all
the verticle support columns to give away simultaneously through out
the buildi to create a verticl collapse in the buildings footprints!


Really? Collapse into the building's footprint you say?

http://i28.photobucket.com/albums/c2...collapse2a.jpg

I don't think so.

Once you have any idea of the facts, then maybe you can try again.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -


Well just think they were put in the buildings in durring their
construction from 1966 through 1973 it's a wonder they all followed
sequence the gavanic corrosion could have made duds out of all them!

Thanks to John Smith the spell checker!


  #10   Report Post  
Old May 8th 11, 04:14 AM posted to alt.politics,talk.politics.misc,talk.politics.guns,rec.radio.shortwave,rec.sport.golf
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Apr 2011
Posts: 987
Default Why wasn't George Bush captured and tried for 911?

On 5/7/2011 7:46 PM, joeturn wrote:

...
Well just think they were put in the buildings in durring their
construction from 1966 through 1973 it's a wonder they all followed
sequence the gavanic corrosion could have made duds out of all them!

Thanks to John Smith the spell checker!



DUDE!

They were dropped in during the computer/network upgrade ... security
was lax, varoious employees remarked on this ...

Part One - Tenants
http://911review.com/articles/ryan/d...access_p1.html

Part Two - Security
http://911review.com/articles/ryan/d...access_p2.html

Part Three - Convergence
http://911review.com/articles/ryan/c...lliburton.html

Part Four - Cleanup
http://911review.com/articles/ryan/d...access_p4.html

Regards,
JS


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Why wasn't Bin Laden captured and tried for 911? Red Cloud Shortwave 0 May 5th 11 06:42 PM
Why wasn't Bin Laden captured and tried for 911? Iarnrod Shortwave 0 May 5th 11 01:22 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:29 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017