On May 7, 8:43*pm, "Scout"
wrote:
"joeturn" wrote in message

...





On May 6, 2:14 pm, Jah Wobble wrote:
John Smith wrote:
On 5/6/2011 10:17 AM, Jah Wobble wrote:

* US * wrote:

On Fri, 6 May 2011 07:50:00 -0700 (PDT), harry k
idiotically
wrote:

The usual descriptions of sights and sounds of any building
undergoing
a collapse

When demolished ...

That's what happens when very large airliners filled with fuel crashes
into them at 500 Kts, you retard.
They get demolished.

The aircraft didn't cause the fall. *The plane hit the building, the
buildings stood. *The fuel was splashed about, burnt off in ~15 mins.
and the buildings stood. *Once the fuel was burnt off, all you were
left
with was a "normal" high-rise fire.

Right.. and NOTHING in the building was flamable and the sprinklers were
in perfect working order.
You retard.

I wonder who placed the demolitions in the building so precise and so
undercover, that the THOUSANDS of people that work there 24/7, never saw
anything going on. Any idear, you retard?

Burnt off in 15 minutes!
BWAAAAAHAHAHAHHAAAAAAA!- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

One plane load of diesel fuel could not have been enough to get all
the verticle support columns to give away simultaneously through out
the buildi to create a verticl collapse in the buildings footprints!

Really? Collapse into the building's footprint you say?

http://i28.photobucket.com/albums/c2...collapse2a.jpg

I don't think so.

Once you have any idea of the facts, then maybe you can try again.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Well just think they were put in the buildings in 1963 it a wonder
they all followed sequence the gavanic corrosion could have made dudes
out on them!