Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Scout" wrote in message "joeturn" wrote in message .. .. On May 8, 4:24 am, "Scout" wrote: "joeturn" wrote in message . ... On May 7, 11:14 pm, John Smith wrote: On 5/7/2011 7:46 PM, joeturn wrote: ... Well just think they were put in the buildings in durring their construction from 1966 through 1973 it's a wonder they all followed sequence the gavanic corrosion could have made duds out of all them! Thanks to John Smith the spell checker! DUDE! They were dropped in during the computer/network upgrade ... security was lax, varoious employees remarked on this ... Part One - Tenantshttp://911review.com/articles/ryan/demolition_access_p1.html Part Two - Securityhttp://911review.com/articles/ryan/demolition_access_p2.html Part Three - Convergencehttp://911review.com/articles/ryan/carlyle_kissinger_saic_ha lliburton... Part Four - Cleanuphttp://911review.com/articles/ryan/demolition_access_p4.html Regards, JS No they were put in during construction for quick removal,maybe the detonaters were conected during that time! Then clearly the building plans, contract documents, inspectors, and so on would know ALL about them, right? Lofferley did not know and he was involved. Then it wasn't part of the design. QED. If anything was put in anywhere for Bush.. It was during the period when cousin Marvin Bush was director of security for the WTC - just months before its collapse. |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I takes my sweaty nasty stinking socks off, I drapes them on doggy's
head. Pheeeeeeeeuuuu,,, doggy says.WMD! cuhulin |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Uno Hu" wrote in message ... "Scout" wrote in message "joeturn" wrote in message .. . On May 8, 4:24 am, "Scout" wrote: "joeturn" wrote in message . .. On May 7, 11:14 pm, John Smith wrote: On 5/7/2011 7:46 PM, joeturn wrote: ... Well just think they were put in the buildings in durring their construction from 1966 through 1973 it's a wonder they all followed sequence the gavanic corrosion could have made duds out of all them! Thanks to John Smith the spell checker! DUDE! They were dropped in during the computer/network upgrade ... security was lax, varoious employees remarked on this ... Part One - Tenantshttp://911review.com/articles/ryan/demolition_access_p1.html Part Two - Securityhttp://911review.com/articles/ryan/demolition_access_p2.html Part Three - Convergencehttp://911review.com/articles/ryan/carlyle_kissinger_saic_ha lliburton... Part Four - Cleanuphttp://911review.com/articles/ryan/demolition_access_p4.html Regards, JS No they were put in during construction for quick removal,maybe the detonaters were conected during that time! Then clearly the building plans, contract documents, inspectors, and so on would know ALL about them, right? Lofferley did not know and he was involved. Then it wasn't part of the design. QED. If anything was put in anywhere for Bush.. It was during the period when cousin Marvin Bush was director of security for the WTC - just months before its collapse. Right, and as director he could naturally violate the terms of the contractual security without anyone noticing, or even employees coming forward later saying "Hey my boss ordered me to look the other way while all these guys with pallets of explosives came into the building". Sorry, but that's not going to hold water. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Why wasn't Bin Laden captured and tried for 911? | Shortwave | |||
Why wasn't Bin Laden captured and tried for 911? | Shortwave |