Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#41
|
|||
|
|||
A CASE OF WHODUNIT!
On May 9, 11:15*pm, John Smith wrote:
On 5/9/2011 10:05 PM, joeturn wrote: *... Those beams at Ground Zero were cut with torches AFTER the collapse by workers cleaning up the debris, kooker. There are PHOTOS and VIDEOS of them doing this. You are STUPID BEYOND BELIEF.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Like this one? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EO7SvhYI_0Y&NR=1 Best thing about that video, it was BEFORE the cleanup crew comes in to clean up! Actually it was after, but please keep you kook on, Johnny! BWAAAAAHAAAHAAAHAHAAAA!! Those are first responder firemen on the scene in that one! *NOT demolition employees ... BWAHAAHAHAAAHAAHAAA!!!! Johnny KQQK "thinks" firefighters all left at 9 pm on Sept. 11 and didn't ever come back. * plonk *!! |
#42
|
|||
|
|||
A CASE OF WHODUNIT!
On 5/10/2011 2:12 AM, joeturn wrote:
Using the FBI released five frames clearly shows a missile.They just simply did not do good enough a hachet job on it before they released it! Huh? Why would the FBI release something so carelessly? Why would they release something that would prove they were lying? Why would they shoot themselves in the foot? You are saying on the one hand that they are smart enough to realize the film needs doctoring, but on the other hand, they weren't smart enough to remove what they realized needed doctoring. Thanks for proving once again that the two most common things in the universe are hydrogen and stupidity...and I'll give you a clue: we ain't talkin' hydrogen. :-( |
#44
|
|||
|
|||
A CASE OF WHODUNIT!
|
#45
|
|||
|
|||
A CASE OF WHODUNIT!
In article 014e5b26-1c75-4d1f-be78-ed0626c06518
@r27g2000prr.googlegroups.com, says... On May 10, 12:18*am, BDK wrote: In article 7059f16f-5fe7-497d-8c34-4baae6a612d7 @k22g2000yqh.googlegroups.com, says... On May 9, wrote: On May 9, 6:17*pm, joeturn wrote: On May 9, 7:15*pm, "Scout" wrote: "joeturn" wrote in message ... On May 7, 3:57 pm, (Ray Fischer) wrote: John Smith wrote: On 5/6/2011 11:14 AM, Jah Wobble wrote: ... Right.. and NOTHING in the building was flamable and the sprinklers were in perfect working order. You retard. I wonder who placed the demolitions in the building so precise and so undercover, that the THOUSANDS of people that work there 24/7, never saw anything going on. Any idear, you retard? Burnt off in 15 minutes! BWAAAAAHAHAHAHHAAAAAAA! Normal high-rise fires containing all that NEVER melt iron nor leave nano thermite residue. The residues of thermite are iron and aluminum oxide. *THE most common metals used in high-rise construction. -- Ray Fischer * * * * | *Mendacracy (n.) government by lying *| *The new GOP ideal- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - but if they have been combined with barrium they form sphears which is a tale tell sign of thermate use. Really? I've got all sorts of metal slag spheres around our burning table, and oddly enough not only do we not use thermite, there is not barrium used in the cutting process. Just good old natural gas and oxygen. So please support your claim that spheres automatically mean barrium and thermite. Oh, that's right, you don't do proof for your assertions.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - You felled to connect the dots spheres that are made from iron and sulfer that do contain barrium is the tell tell sign that Thermate was used! It is a complete physical impossibility for thermite to do what happened to those buildings. It's not possible. FULL STOP! You cutting torch would take mega time to cut through vertical columns this is why natural gas and oxygen torches are not used for controlled demolition. Thermite is not used in controlled demolition, ever. During a controlled demolition the columns are fitted with a yoke that contains the thermite There is no thermite in controlled demolition, RockHead. and holds it on the targeted column on about a 45 degree angle. This angle cut allows the top part to slip off its base and drop straight down. You can see clear pictures of these angled cuts on the columns. You would never use your torch to cut an angled cut on a beam unless it was for a specific outcome. Those beams at Ground Zero were cut with torches AFTER the collapse by workers cleaning up the debris, kooker. There are PHOTOS and VIDEOS of them doing this. You are STUPID BEYOND BELIEF.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Like this one? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EO7SvhYI_0Y&NR=1 You really are stupid beyond belief. I love it. He IS pure Komedy Gold, innit he? He is MUCH more amusing than Johnny KQQK since WrongTurnJoe is too stupid to know he's stupid, more like an innocent child. Johnny, however, had grown dull and lost his comedic edge. Yeah, Joe is deep into the kookdumb, Johnny KQQK is just really stupid. He's not the comedian he used to be. -- BDK- Top of the government shill heap for over 10 years running! |
#46
|
|||
|
|||
A CASE OF WHODUNIT!
"John Smith" wrote in message ... On 5/9/2011 10:29 PM, joeturn wrote: ... I know for a fact an Ironworker wont cut a column on an angle rather than straight through because of the time it would take.Who would want to spend soo much time in all that heat and asbestos dust,when they could cut the shortest and quicker path and move on to the next cut,a junkyard man has better since that that! Ever fall a tree with a chainsaw? Same angled cut is used to control the direction of fall, else the worker cutting a long beam is likely to be endangered having to scramble out of its' way. No, people cutting beams with a torch would be just as likely to make angled cuts as demolition workers, and for the same reasons, to control the direction of movement. With the demolition expert, he is attempting to shift the building in a predetermined direction, in the case of the torch/cutter, he is attempting a fall in a predetermined direction ... neither adds nor subtracts from existing evidence and proof. But, like I said, those are first responders on the scene, those beams are cut at angles, and the cleanup crew hasn't gotten there yet ... Really? Please present your evidence they are first responders and NOT firemen who were regularly on the scene after the cleanup operations began. |
#47
|
|||
|
|||
A CASE OF WHODUNIT!
"Iarnrod" wrote in message ... On May 10, 12:33 am, joeturn wrote: On May 10, 1:07 am, "Scout" wrote: "joeturn" wrote in message ... On May 9, 7:15 pm, "Scout" wrote: "joeturn" wrote in message ... On May 7, 3:57 pm, (Ray Fischer) wrote: John Smith wrote: On 5/6/2011 11:14 AM, Jah Wobble wrote: ... Right.. and NOTHING in the building was flamable and the sprinklers were in perfect working order. You retard. I wonder who placed the demolitions in the building so precise and so undercover, that the THOUSANDS of people that work there 24/7, never saw anything going on. Any idear, you retard? Burnt off in 15 minutes! BWAAAAAHAHAHAHHAAAAAAA! Normal high-rise fires containing all that NEVER melt iron nor leave nano thermite residue. The residues of thermite are iron and aluminum oxide. THE most common metals used in high-rise construction. -- Ray Fischer | Mendacracy (n.) government by lying | The new GOP ideal- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - but if they have been combined with barrium they form sphears which is a tale tell sign of thermate use. Really? I've got all sorts of metal slag spheres around our burning table, and oddly enough not only do we not use thermite, there is not barrium used in the cutting process. Just good old natural gas and oxygen. So please support your claim that spheres automatically mean barrium and thermite. Oh, that's right, you don't do proof for your assertions.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - You felled to connect the dots spheres that are made from iron and sulfer that do contain barrium is the tell tell sign that Thermate was used! You cutting torch would take mega time to cut through vertical columns this is why natural gas and oxygen torches are not used for controlled demolition. Actually, they are. A LOT. In fact in most controlled demolition they are used. Even in explosive controlled demolition much of the prep work is done via these exact sort of cutting torches. This brings us to the B-thing buch (Israely Art Students)they stayed in there for a year and a half rent free gutting the building or do you think they(Bushes Security Employees) took out as much support as they could while doing their mantinance.There was very little office equiptment plumbing,wiring,carpet,cell phones,ect in the debree pile! Scott my audience needs to know these things,you cant do them justise your just a simple steel worker with no knowledge of controlled demolition except that which NIST taught you! Since you have no idea of who I am, much less my professional knowledge and experience, I can only assume this is your conspiracy theorist stupidity talking here. How loud does a linear cutting charge have to be to cut through a box column! Quite loud actually since you will require several cutting charges each one containing a rather large volume of high explosive. Not going to be very quiet when you detonate and you would probably be rattling windows in NJ from the concussion. Torches are used in prep work occasionally So when you said they weren't used, you are admitting you were dead wrong? but not for cutting the support columns Actually they will cut whatever needs to be cut. Which can even include support columns. and they certainly dont use nap gas. I've certainly not heard of them using "nap gas". I've seen them use propane, acetylene, LPG and even MAPP, but never heard or seen of "nap gas" being used. Please stop smoking crack, WrongTurnJoe. Your poor suffering momma can't take any more! |
#48
|
|||
|
|||
A CASE OF WHODUNIT!
On May 10, 8:48*am, Joe from Kokomo wrote:
On 5/10/2011 2:12 AM, joeturn wrote: Using the FBI released five frames clearly shows a missile.They just simply did not do good enough a hachet job on it before they released it! Huh? Why would the FBI release something so carelessly? Why would they release something that would prove they were lying? Why would they shoot themselves in the foot? You are saying on the one hand that they are smart enough to realize the film needs doctoring, but on the other hand, they weren't smart enough to remove what they realized needed doctoring. Thanks for proving once again that the two most common things in the universe are hydrogen and stupidity...and I'll give you a clue: we ain't talkin' hydrogen. * :-( Yes to bad for you you dont have any evidence of hydrogen in your DNA but plenty of stupidity. Good observation though! |
#49
|
|||
|
|||
A CASE OF WHODUNIT!
On May 10, 5:54*pm, "Scout"
wrote: "Iarnrod" wrote in message ... On May 10, 12:33 am, joeturn wrote: On May 10, 1:07 am, "Scout" wrote: "joeturn" wrote in message ... On May 9, 7:15 pm, "Scout" wrote: "joeturn" wrote in message ... On May 7, 3:57 pm, (Ray Fischer) wrote: John Smith wrote: On 5/6/2011 11:14 AM, Jah Wobble wrote: ... Right.. and NOTHING in the building was flamable and the sprinklers were in perfect working order. You retard. I wonder who placed the demolitions in the building so precise and so undercover, that the THOUSANDS of people that work there 24/7, never saw anything going on. Any idear, you retard? Burnt off in 15 minutes! BWAAAAAHAHAHAHHAAAAAAA! Normal high-rise fires containing all that NEVER melt iron nor leave nano thermite residue. The residues of thermite are iron and aluminum oxide. *THE most common metals used in high-rise construction. -- Ray Fischer * * * * | *Mendacracy (n.) government by lying *| *The new GOP ideal- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - but if they have been combined with barrium they form sphears which is a tale tell sign of thermate use. Really? I've got all sorts of metal slag spheres around our burning table, and oddly enough not only do we not use thermite, there is not barrium used in the cutting process. Just good old natural gas and oxygen. So please support your claim that spheres automatically mean barrium and thermite. Oh, that's right, you don't do proof for your assertions.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - You felled to connect the dots spheres that are made from iron and sulfer that do contain barrium is the tell tell sign that Thermate was used! You cutting torch would take mega time to cut through vertical columns this is why natural gas and oxygen torches are not used for controlled demolition. Actually, they are. A LOT. In fact in most controlled demolition they are used. Even in explosive controlled demolition much of the prep work is done via these exact sort of cutting torches. This brings us to the B-thing buch (Israely Art Students)they stayed in there for a year and a half rent free gutting the building or do you think they(Bushes Security Employees) took out as much support as they could while doing their mantinance.There was very little office equiptment plumbing,wiring,carpet,cell phones,ect in the debree pile! Scott my audience needs to know these things,you cant do them justise your just a simple steel worker with no knowledge of controlled demolition except that which NIST taught you! Since you have no idea of who I am, much less my professional knowledge and experience, I can only assume this is your conspiracy theorist stupidity talking here. How loud does a linear cutting charge have to be to cut through a box column! Quite loud actually since you will require several cutting charges each one containing a rather large volume of high explosive. Not going to be very quiet when you detonate and you would probably be rattling windows in NJ from the concussion. Torches are used in prep work occasionally So when you said they weren't used, you are admitting you were dead wrong? but not for cutting the support columns Actually they will cut whatever needs to be cut. Which can even include support columns. and they certainly dont use nap gas. I've certainly not heard of them using "nap gas". I've seen them use propane, acetylene, LPG and even MAPP, but never heard or seen of "nap gas" being used. Please stop smoking crack, WrongTurnJoe. Your poor suffering momma can't take any more!- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - nap gas is your natural in your cutting torch,funny with all your many many years of expertise you did not know that? I'm beging tho think your nothing but a grunt the one that sweeps the floor and have no knowlege what so ever of controlled demolition other than what NIST told you. Detonaters to set off the cutter charges of theremate are not loud at all they depend on their ability to ignite not there explosive quality. Compared to a roman candle/sparkler vrs dynamite/ect. |
#50
|
|||
|
|||
A CASE OF WHODUNIT!
On 5/10/2011 9:01 PM, joeturn wrote:
... NO! But, they will know about MAP Gas! If you wish to even fool the children as to your being "professional", get the name of the gas right! Regards, JS- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - So you have became a spell checker,well good I'll have youproffread my book before I release it! OK! I'll admit it, I was a bit anal about the "nap gas" thing ... just glad you corrected it ... thanks! :-) Regards, JS |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
A CASE OF WHODUNIT! | Shortwave | |||
A CASE OF WHODUNIT! | Shortwave | |||
K!MAN Has a Case ... | Antenna | |||
PRO-95 Case | Scanner |