On 05/12/2011 08:06 PM, John Smith wrote:
Whatever intelligence that/would has/have "emerged out of primordial
chaos" is God, DUH. Unless God has a mate, which he, she, or anyone
else, for that matter, has not mentioned, any application of he/she
would be meaningless, at least to myself.
The original Aryan cosmology had it that Chaos was primordial. But
eventually, inevitably, what we call a 'self replicating sequence', Gaia
emerged. But because replication is not perfect, She evolved to the
point of reaching sentience and then differentiating Herself from Chaos
and Maya (the physical universe).

Life forms that give birth without male fertilization are parthenogenic
mothers. Which is why Gaia is female. And why Athena was in the Parthenon.

Accidents only happen when humans are involved ... undoubtedly, the
universe is unfolding just as it should in a way of "proper and good"
which is above our judgment, intervention and manipulation.
That it is, is one thing, that it should, is another. I dunno.

I don't believe "evolution", in the grand scheme of things, is a stand
alone item, rather just a designed function of the grand design.

Whenever you see a pile of rocks, it is impossible to determine if
nature or man has piled those rocks.

However, when you see a pile of rocks which look like, and serves all
the functions of a castle, you can damn well be certain it is man made
... so does God leave such signatures ...
What passes for reality is made up of Fractal algorithms, a combination of
the laws of Mother Nature and random chaotic input.

On 5/13/2011 11:48 AM, Day Brown wrote:
On 05/12/2011 08:06 PM, John Smith wrote:
Whatever intelligence that/would has/have "emerged out of primordial
chaos" is God, DUH. Unless God has a mate, which he, she, or anyone
else, for that matter, has not mentioned, any application of he/she
would be meaningless, at least to myself.
The original Aryan cosmology had it that Chaos was primordial. But
eventually, inevitably, what we call a 'self replicating sequence', Gaia
emerged. But because replication is not perfect, She evolved to the
point of reaching sentience and then differentiating Herself from Chaos
and Maya (the physical universe).

Life forms that give birth without male fertilization are parthenogenic
mothers. Which is why Gaia is female. And why Athena was in the Parthenon.

Accidents only happen when humans are involved ... undoubtedly, the
universe is unfolding just as it should in a way of "proper and good"
which is above our judgment, intervention and manipulation.
That it is, is one thing, that it should, is another. I dunno.

I don't believe "evolution", in the grand scheme of things, is a stand
alone item, rather just a designed function of the grand design.

Whenever you see a pile of rocks, it is impossible to determine if
nature or man has piled those rocks.

However, when you see a pile of rocks which look like, and serves all
the functions of a castle, you can damn well be certain it is man made
... so does God leave such signatures ...
What passes for reality is made up of Fractal algorithms, a combination of
the laws of Mother Nature and random chaotic input.


I don't subscribe to newage mags, thanks anyway ...

.... plonk ...

Regards,
JS

On 5/13/2011 2:48 PM, Day Brown wrote:
[...]
The original Aryan cosmology had it that Chaos was primordial. But
eventually, inevitably, what we call a 'self replicating sequence',
Gaia emerged. But because replication is not perfect, She evolved to
the point of reaching sentience and then differentiating Herself
from Chaos and Maya (the physical universe).

Life forms that give birth without male fertilization are
parthenogenic mothers. Which is why Gaia is female. And why Athena
was in the Parthenon.




George Bernard Shaw looked at evolutionary history and the evolution
of sex, and said that the female obviously invented the male for her
own purposes.

I am not so sure that's literally true, but there is an insight
there for those who can grasp it.



[...]
What passes for reality is made up of Fractal algorithms, a
combination of
the laws of Mother Nature and random chaotic input.




I think the way it happens is that below a certain size and below a
certain minuscule time interval, space and time are not continuous.
They are granular. In other words, there are irreducible steps with
nothing in between them.

Therefore particles behave very differently in very small dimensions
than they do otherwise. Their behavior cannot be individually
predicted, just statistically.

Apply a force precisely calculated to move a particle from position
1 to position 2.5 -- but if there's _no such thing_ as position 2.5,
and positions 2 and 3 are the only possibilities, what do you get?
Particles that go to position 2 half of the time and position 3 the
other half. (That's wildly simplified, but you get the idea.)

That _seems_ chaotic, and on those small scales perhaps it is.


With every good wish,


Kevin Alfred Strom.
--
http://nationalvanguard.org/
http://kevinalfredstrom.com/