LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #8   Report Post  
Old June 1st 11, 06:42 AM posted to alt.astronomy,alt.conspiracy,alt.atheism,sci.skeptic,rec.radio.shortwave
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jun 2011
Posts: 26
Default RADIO-WAVES cannot travel through the empty medium of Space --All audio and video from Apollo-11, ISS, The Shuttle, are FAKE FAKE FAKE

On 2011-06-01 01:32, John Smith wrote:
On 5/31/2011 10:26 PM, Olrik wrote:
On 2011-06-01 01:22, John Smith wrote:
On 5/31/2011 10:18 PM, Olrik wrote:
On 2011-06-01 01:13, John Smith wrote:
On 5/31/2011 10:12 PM, Olrik wrote:
On 2011-06-01 01:05, John Smith wrote:
On 5/31/2011 9:42 PM, Olrik wrote:

...
Huh?
...

Yeah, the particularly dense have a problem here,

That would what, 7 billions of us except two usenet kooks?

understanding this,
for some strange reason, and, like I said, it doesn't seem to be
taught
in schools, so, let me rephrase:

"Nothing can't hold something."

The logic of that statement is self-explanatory. You can NOT "put"
something into nothing because there would be no "space" to "put" it
into!

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electromagnetic_radiation


Think about it, you may, eventually, catch on ... or not ...

It doesn't matter what you or me "think about it".

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electromagnetic_radiation

Or try to explain how satellite TV is distributed.

Regards,
JS



That is off on a tangent of what post I originally comment to ...

We were talking about "empty" being an impossible concept ...
"impossible" in the fact that we simply have no physical examples of
such existing ... it is only a concept at this time.

So far as we know, there has always been "something", even before the
matter of what we can see, feel and hear existed ...


Have a nice life.

Regards,
JS



I warned you, the particularly dense have a great problem in the
comprehension of the reality of things ...


Indeed. Look, you seem to be a nice sport.

I don't know what you have against the propagation of EM waves in a
vacuum. Is it ideological? Philosophical? Religious?

Most kooks that espoused your views have the decency to invent the
"aether" (or ether, if you will), that explains waves propagation in a
"vacuum".

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Luminiferous_aether

(Hint: the way to convince is not to disparage a given theory, but to
actually, positively provide a working alternative theory!)

So: how do satellite TV receive their signals?

Good luck for that Nobel prize!
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Fake tubes? Antonio Vernucci Boatanchors 6 January 31st 07 06:15 PM
Ebay'er radio-mart Using "Fake" Photo's? patgkz Swap 8 February 7th 05 10:30 AM
Amateur radio is fake ! Brian Raab Homebrew 8 October 6th 04 05:30 AM
Hey fake N8 Citizens For A Keyclown-Free Newsgroup CB 0 October 13th 03 05:42 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:32 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017