On Jun 1, 10:22*pm, John Smith wrote:
On 6/1/2011 8:48 PM, Brad Guth wrote:

...
You need to make something really big out of nothing is noted.

*http://www.wanttoknow.info/
*http://translate.google.com/#
* Brad Guth, Brad_Guth, Brad.Guth, BradGuth, BG / “Guth Usenet”

That is your problem, you dismiss the really basic and necessary rules
and laws of science and jump, then, to subjects you are unable to
discuss in a logical and reasoning manner.

Since this now allows you to rant on subjects you know nothing about,
you can make insane guesses, hold insane beliefs, and propose impossible
situations which obey none of the real laws of science and math ... and,
doing all with no sense of how insane it sounds to those who have a
knowledge of all this. *Since you don't know any better, you think none
do -- gee, akin to winos giving PhD dissertations on complex matters of
importance!

But hey, if it works for you ... *ROFLOL

Regards,
JS

There's nothing sane about Google Groups or much less Usenet/
newsgroups that are 99.9% populated with rusemasters or FUD-masters of
the mainstream status quo.

At times you need a really good battery of loose cannons in order to
return the favor, along with a good sense of humor and sadistic
zingers that'll help define those trying to make your existence as
insignificant or nonexistent as possible.

Giving a topic or one of its replies a reasonable swag is fair game.
Otherwise I like to stick within the regular laws of physics and
interpret from the best available science, whereas others here seem to
prefer to topic/author stalk and to use those highly social/political
and even faith-based conditional laws of physics, plus they usually
exclude/banish or obfuscate on behalf of any science that doesn't
happen to agree with their closed mindset that is usually based upon
worshiping all things Einstein.

http://www.wanttoknow.info/
http://translate.google.com/#
Brad Guth, Brad_Guth, Brad.Guth, BradGuth, BG / “Guth Usenet”