|
JFK Admits in secret OVal Office Recording...Moon landing wasFAKE
On 2011-06-05 00:55, John Smith wrote:
On 6/4/2011 9:30 PM, Olrik wrote: ... Yes, but it is there that any similarity between you and I ends ... You see, I actually read/understand them. What are the titles/authors of your books? And how do they describe the propagation of EM waves in a vacuum? Well, I would not even expect anything worthwhile from an exchange with you, you have already proven that ... your constant moves to move the subject off topic and then to baffle us with your bull****, while off on some tangent, is a prime example of this, and I have already pointed out. I think most would point to John D. Kraus, and James Clerk Maxwell. However, neither of these men truly understood the nature of the ether, since we simply don't know what it is, so obviously, they used "fudge factors" to work their way around that ... You however, should be back in college, Where they actually teach that EM waves do propagate in the vacuum of space. |
JFK Admits in secret OVal Office Recording...Moon landing wasFAKE
On 6/6/2011 8:07 AM, Olrik wrote:
... Where they actually teach that EM waves do propagate in the vacuum of space. Since both Kraus and Maxwell acknowledge an ether filling the vacuum, I must be reading your text improperly, else you are writing nonsense? Regards, JS “The Constitution is not an instrument for the government to restrain the people, it’s an instrument for the people to restrain the government.” -- Patrick Henry |
JFK Admits in secret OVal Office Recording...Moon landing wasFAKE
On 6/6/2011 8:07 AM, Olrik wrote:
... I think most would point to John D. Kraus, and James Clerk Maxwell. However, neither of these men truly understood the nature of the ether, since we simply don't know what it is, so obviously, they used "fudge factors" to work their way around that ... You however, should be back in college, Where they actually teach that EM waves do propagate in the vacuum of space. Although they didn't understand the true nature of Einsteins' ether, both Kraus and Maxwell acknowledge an ether filling the vacuum, I must be reading your text improperly, else you are writing nonsense, again? -- Regards, JS “The Constitution is not an instrument for the government to restrain the people, it’s an instrument for the people to restrain the government.” -- Patrick Henry |
JFK Admits in secret OVal Office Recording...Moon landing wasFAKE
On 2011-06-06 11:51, John Smith wrote:
On 6/6/2011 8:07 AM, Olrik wrote: ... I think most would point to John D. Kraus, and James Clerk Maxwell. However, neither of these men truly understood the nature of the ether, since we simply don't know what it is, so obviously, they used "fudge factors" to work their way around that ... You however, should be back in college, Where they actually teach that EM waves do propagate in the vacuum of space. Although they didn't understand the true nature of Einsteins' ether, both Kraus and Maxwell acknowledge an ether filling the vacuum, I must be reading your text improperly, else you are writing nonsense, again? I call Loki. |
JFK Admits in secret OVal Office Recording...Moon landing was FAKE
On Sun, 05 Jun 2011 09:58:31 -0700, the following appeared
in sci.skeptic, posted by John Smith : On 6/5/2011 9:43 AM, Bob Casanova wrote: ... Yeah; it's called "college". Maybe if you'd attended and taken a few physics classes you'd know what your quote meant. Einstein also said (regarding QM) "God doesn't play dice"; do you imagine that means he believed in an actual deity? Yes, I have noticed you use the same "Baffle With Bull****" tactics as the children you associate with ... your thinking being, "I'll take the topic away from hard physics into religion. Then, using strawman arguments, I will attempt to use a persons personal beliefs to attack their credibility. Now, once succeeding in that, I will "transfer" the fact I appear correct over to the hard science -- effectively winning the argument in hard science with less than truthful arguments." Gee, where have we seen that before? Below, in your avoidance of the question. God doesn't play dice, obviously the rules and laws over our portion of the universe are very fixed and rigid ... although in some far flung corner they may differ ... only God would know, at this time. But, as to Einstein, we have watched quacks hunt and attempt to interpret, expand, etc. his words to allow various "fudge factors" which he never intended ... usually with attempts to move discussions into religious areas and begin debate on such books as the bible ... most always the sign of the unethical and immature. Nice attempt to waffle (plus interesting snippage of the context). Do you agree that Einstein wasn't referring to an actual deity, or not? And do you agree that his use of the term "ether" (which was the context you snipped) referred to something other than the sort of physical "ether" refuted by Michaelson and Morley, or not? -- Bob C. "Evidence confirming an observation is evidence that the observation is wrong." - McNameless |
JFK Admits in secret OVal Office Recording...Moon landing wasFAKE
On 6/6/2011 9:07 AM, Olrik wrote:
On 2011-06-06 11:51, John Smith wrote: On 6/6/2011 8:07 AM, Olrik wrote: ... I think most would point to John D. Kraus, and James Clerk Maxwell. However, neither of these men truly understood the nature of the ether, since we simply don't know what it is, so obviously, they used "fudge factors" to work their way around that ... You however, should be back in college, Where they actually teach that EM waves do propagate in the vacuum of space. Although they didn't understand the true nature of Einsteins' ether, both Kraus and Maxwell acknowledge an ether filling the vacuum, I must be reading your text improperly, else you are writing nonsense, again? I call Loki. You go ahead, you have our permission ... -- Regards, JS “The Constitution is not an instrument for the government to restrain the people, it’s an instrument for the people to restrain the government.” -- Patrick Henry |
JFK Admits in secret OVal Office Recording...Moon landing was FAKE
On Sun, 05 Jun 2011 10:47:24 -0700, the following appeared
in sci.skeptic, posted by John Smith : On 6/5/2011 9:43 AM, Bob Casanova wrote: ... Yeah; it's called "college". Maybe if you'd attended and taken a few physics classes you'd know what your quote meant. Einstein also said (regarding QM) "God doesn't play dice"; do you imagine that means he believed in an actual deity? Your desire to constantly be in error is strong, young Skywalker ... Three (al least) replies to a single out-of context quote; must have struck a nerve. -- Bob C. "Evidence confirming an observation is evidence that the observation is wrong." - McNameless |
JFK Admits in secret OVal Office Recording...Moon landing wasFAKE
On 6/6/2011 9:57 AM, Bob Casanova wrote:
... Try re-reading the quotes you supplied; he did *not* believe in any sort of personal deity. Funny, all the real nuts usually appear to turn out atheists ... And funny, all the morons who think they know what beliefs I hold, since I never discuss them. "He disagrees with my beliefs, therefore he's an atheist." Your need to pick up most any comment/observation and point it directly at yourself is very helpful in diagnosing your mental condition, thanks. -- Regards, JS “The Constitution is not an instrument for the government to restrain the people, it’s an instrument for the people to restrain the government.” -- Patrick Henry |
JFK Admits in secret OVal Office Recording...Moon landing wasFAKE
On 6/6/2011 9:48 AM, Bob Casanova wrote:
On Sun, 05 Jun 2011 09:58:31 -0700, the following appeared in sci.skeptic, posted by John : On 6/5/2011 9:43 AM, Bob Casanova wrote: ... Yeah; it's called "college". Maybe if you'd attended and taken a few physics classes you'd know what your quote meant. Einstein also said (regarding QM) "God doesn't play dice"; do you imagine that means he believed in an actual deity? Yes, I have noticed you use the same "Baffle With Bull****" tactics as the children you associate with ... your thinking being, "I'll take the topic away from hard physics into religion. Then, using strawman arguments, I will attempt to use a persons personal beliefs to attack their credibility. Now, once succeeding in that, I will "transfer" the fact I appear correct over to the hard science -- effectively winning the argument in hard science with less than truthful arguments." Gee, where have we seen that before? Below, in your avoidance of the question. God doesn't play dice, obviously the rules and laws over our portion of the universe are very fixed and rigid ... although in some far flung corner they may differ ... only God would know, at this time. But, as to Einstein, we have watched quacks hunt and attempt to interpret, expand, etc. his words to allow various "fudge factors" which he never intended ... usually with attempts to move discussions into religious areas and begin debate on such books as the bible ... most always the sign of the unethical and immature. Nice attempt to waffle (plus interesting snippage of the context). Do you agree that Einstein wasn't referring to an actual deity, or not? And do you agree that his use of the term "ether" (which was the context you snipped) referred to something other than the sort of physical "ether" refuted by Michaelson and Morley, or not? I think Einstein, absolutely, considered a unbelievably intelligent creator a strong possibility! His very words define this ... but, everyone should read them, his words, for themselves, as the notion of "thinking for someone else" is hazardous, at best ... -- Regards, JS “The Constitution is not an instrument for the government to restrain the people, it’s an instrument for the people to restrain the government.” -- Patrick Henry |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:10 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com