On Tue, 21 Jun 2011 07:33:00 +0900, "Brenda Ann"
wrote:

Not only that, but the average person will look at your shiny metal and ask
WTF am I supposed to do with THAT? It's big time unlikely at this point that
it will ever become a currency again, to be used by the common person to
trade for goods. I think it much more likely the world would return to
serfdom, where the rich own everything and the rest of us work for them and
are allowed to stay on THEIR property in exchange for that work.


Historically, gold was accepted as a constant value item - until the
age of exploration changed this. Adjusting a currency to a single
commodity can be dangerous. Think of what would happen if we got
transmutation or some other way to cheaply increase the supply.

We kind of have that with backless currency as well - except the
powers are in more control - with different risks.

--
"In no part of the constitution is more wisdom to be found,
than in the clause which confides the question of war or peace
to the legislature, and not to the executive department."

- James Madison

On Mon, 20 Jun 2011 16:44:10 -0600, Howard Brazee
wrote:

On Tue, 21 Jun 2011 07:33:00 +0900, "Brenda Ann"
wrote:

Not only that, but the average person will look at your shiny metal and ask
WTF am I supposed to do with THAT? It's big time unlikely at this point that
it will ever become a currency again, to be used by the common person to
trade for goods. I think it much more likely the world would return to
serfdom, where the rich own everything and the rest of us work for them and
are allowed to stay on THEIR property in exchange for that work.


Historically, gold was accepted as a constant value item - until the
age of exploration changed this. Adjusting a currency to a single
commodity can be dangerous. Think of what would happen if we got
transmutation or some other way to cheaply increase the supply.

We kind of have that with backless currency as well - except the
powers are in more control - with different risks.

Why do you insist on responding to these cross posters Howard?
It only adds to the noise on our NG.


___,
\o
|
/ \

On 6/20/2011 3:56 PM, wrote:

...

___,
\o
|
/ \
.
“SMOKE POT AND SHUT UP UNTIL I TELL YOU DIFFERENTLY!”
bk

On 6/20/2011 3:44 PM, Howard Brazee wrote:

...
Historically, gold was accepted as a constant value item - until the
age of exploration changed this. Adjusting a currency to a single
commodity can be dangerous. Think of what would happen if we got
transmutation or some other way to cheaply increase the supply.

We kind of have that with backless currency as well - except the
powers are in more control - with different risks.


Actually, I am looking forward to them criminalizing forms of gold
exchange, selling, buying, possessing, etc.

Anything on the black market doubles in price the first day it becomes
illegal ... there is a steep upward climb, then a dip and a level off ...

If people didn't sell gold, I couldn't buy any ... already more gold has
been sold than has ever been produced in the whole wide world ... the
"paper gold" is really worthless, but you have to see people show up
with the papers and demand the gold (a type of "run on the bank"), and
then those with the gold (supposedly) default, go bankrupt, disappear, etc.

But, this could just all straighten itself out, an abundance of GOOD
PAYING jobs be created, everyone go back to work, have the trillions now
missing suddenly show up, etc. ... I mean it could happen! ROFLOL

Regards,
JS