On Jul 19, 12:15*pm, John Smith wrote:
http://www.infowars.com/cern-gags-ph...ray-climate-ex...

Regards,
JS

In other words, some F'ing freakshow dufus will start making believe
that cosmic rays are causing global warming when the the overwhelming
evidence for easily explained ordinary sources are just too
inconvenient for his wealthy puppeteers to admit.

On 7/20/2011 11:47 PM, bpnjensen wrote:
On Jul 19, 12:15 pm, John wrote:
http://www.infowars.com/cern-gags-ph...ray-climate-ex...

Regards,
JS

In other words, some F'ing freakshow dufus will start making believe
that cosmic rays are causing global warming when the the overwhelming
evidence for easily explained ordinary sources are just too
inconvenient for his wealthy puppeteers to admit.

The global warming scam would only be believed by a dufus you mean?

That is pretty much it alright ... the warming we are experiencing is
"normal, at least in the sense it is nature and not us.

Regards,
JS

On Jul 21, 1:40*am, John Smith wrote:
On 7/20/2011 11:47 PM, bpnjensen wrote:

On Jul 19, 12:15 pm, John *wrote:
http://www.infowars.com/cern-gags-ph...ray-climate-ex....

Regards,
JS

In other words, some F'ing freakshow dufus will start making believe
that cosmic rays are causing global warming when the the overwhelming
evidence for easily explained ordinary sources are just too
inconvenient for his wealthy puppeteers to admit.

The global warming scam would only be believed by a dufus you mean?

That is pretty much it alright ... the warming we are experiencing is
"normal, at least in the sense it is nature and not us.

Regards,
JS

Sorry, wrong. You are a perfect example of why it is dangerous for
uneducated and ignorant morons under the influence of wealthy
puppeters to pretend they know something about science when they
literally know nothing.

Climate change has been predicted for well over a hundred years by
many scientists, irrespective of political affiliation, and has been a
point of concern for over 70 years by scientists across the spectrum.
It is only the last 30 years or so, since the oil companies have
become nervous about their giant profits and have been using their
usual propaganda methods to fool dupes like you, that there has been
any ill-conceived trumped-up pseudo-science of the type you parrot.

The denial information you peddle is swill, debunked and shredded
decades ago by people who actually understand the science. Wise up.

Bruce Jensen

"bpnjensen" wrote in message
...
On Jul 21, 1:40 am, John Smith wrote:
On 7/20/2011 11:47 PM, bpnjensen wrote:

On Jul 19, 12:15 pm, John wrote:
http://www.infowars.com/cern-gags-ph...ray-climate-ex...

Regards,
JS

In other words, some F'ing freakshow dufus will start making believe
that cosmic rays are causing global warming when the the overwhelming
evidence for easily explained ordinary sources are just too
inconvenient for his wealthy puppeteers to admit.

The global warming scam would only be believed by a dufus you mean?

That is pretty much it alright ... the warming we are experiencing is
"normal, at least in the sense it is nature and not us.

Regards,
JS

Sorry, wrong. You are a perfect example of why it is dangerous for
uneducated and ignorant morons under the influence of wealthy
puppeters to pretend they know something about science when they
literally know nothing.

-------------
And your credentials are? Thought so.


Climate change has been predicted for well over a hundred years by
many scientists, irrespective of political affiliation, and has been a
point of concern for over 70 years by scientists across the spectrum.

-----------------
In the 70's they predicted another ice age. That worked out well.

On 07/21/2011 08:54 AM, MNMikew wrote:

-----------------
In the 70's they predicted another ice age. That worked out well.



Who predicted an ice age in the 1970s? Time Magazine? The debate is over
because the weather has obviously gone to ****. Animals are migrating
through the Northwest Passage for the first time in half a million years
ferchrissakes! All you have to do is look. Open your eyes.

On 7/21/2011 10:02 AM, dave wrote:
On 07/21/2011 08:54 AM, MNMikew wrote:

-----------------
In the 70's they predicted another ice age. That worked out well.



Who predicted an ice age in the 1970s? Time Magazine? The debate is over
because the weather has obviously gone to ****. Animals are migrating
through the Northwest Passage for the first time in half a million years
ferchrissakes! All you have to do is look. Open your eyes.

The warming cycle is not in dispute, lay the joint down and step away,
long enough to clear your mind and participate in the discussion!

But, it is natural, or else, at least, some OTHER FACTOR than carbon
dioxide. If it was just carbon dioxide, we could just plant more plants ...

Regards,
JS

"dave" wrote in message
...
On 07/21/2011 08:54 AM, MNMikew wrote:

-----------------
In the 70's they predicted another ice age. That worked out well.



Who predicted an ice age in the 1970s? Time Magazine?

Umm, the scientists that Time Magazine interviewed. Duh.

Scientists have found other indications of global cooling. For one thing
there has been a noticeable expansion of the great belt of dry,
high-altitude polar winds - the so-called circumpolar vortex-that sweep from
west to east around the top and bottom of the world.

On Jul 21, 1:02*pm, dave wrote:
On 07/21/2011 08:54 AM, MNMikew wrote:

-----------------
In the 70's they predicted another ice age. That worked out well.

Who predicted an ice age in the 1970s? Time Magazine? The debate is over
because the weather has obviously gone to ****. Animals are migrating
through the Northwest Passage for the first time in half a million years
ferchrissakes! All you have to do is look. Open your eyes.

No . Another no. And no again and again . Wisconsin Glacial Period/
Event ended roughly 10K to 15K years ago . Which roughly corresponds
to similar climatic changes in the Eastern Hemisphere in Siberia .
The fearless Vikings occasionally navigated remote Northern waters
until it froze up for good in the 14th century . Oh, what type of
animals are migrating through the NW Passage ? Do they look like
humans ?

On 7/21/2011 8:54 AM, MNMikew wrote:
wrote in message
...
On Jul 21, 1:40 am, John wrote:
On 7/20/2011 11:47 PM, bpnjensen wrote:

On Jul 19, 12:15 pm, John wrote:
http://www.infowars.com/cern-gags-ph...ray-climate-ex...

Regards,
JS

In other words, some F'ing freakshow dufus will start making believe
that cosmic rays are causing global warming when the the overwhelming
evidence for easily explained ordinary sources are just too
inconvenient for his wealthy puppeteers to admit.

The global warming scam would only be believed by a dufus you mean?

That is pretty much it alright ... the warming we are experiencing is
"normal, at least in the sense it is nature and not us.

Regards,
JS

Sorry, wrong. You are a perfect example of why it is dangerous for
uneducated and ignorant morons under the influence of wealthy
puppeters to pretend they know something about science when they
literally know nothing.

-------------
And your credentials are? Thought so.


Climate change has been predicted for well over a hundred years by
many scientists, irrespective of political affiliation, and has been a
point of concern for over 70 years by scientists across the spectrum.

-----------------
In the 70's they predicted another ice age. That worked out well.



Scientists believe and are taken where the evidence points them.

Or, summed up, nutjobs only accept evidence, and proof for that matter,
when it agrees with their religious beliefs ...

Regards,
JS

bpnjensen wrote:

The denial information you peddle is swill, debunked and shredded
decades ago by people who actually understand the science. Wise up.

He does it on purpose, trying to get fights going. Ever wonder about his
uncontrollable need to spread these contentious postings over so many
different newsgroups?

Sure looks like a Government disinformation agent trying to bring down
the value of Internet communications. This type usually has multiple
personalities. They even bicker among themselves.

If you absolutely HAVE to respond to him, at least don't cross post. It
will help to keep the flies away from the proverbial Smith pile.


mike







-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux)

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJOKEzFAAoJECGtZwCbtgwXnr4H/362H/3nvBi8Xv+18kCs09is
tffPEKbzx6ip3PF7Uak8KaUkiE1SLYYiA+sJYVlYrr9osFWfAK wka+la22o7EhLA
guhCHhtqQuOwqmc+gHZ0ylHCIFnMiUEvf5ve6UgJ5iZ7zZtLtQ cqAYC/GN1wm7gY
khYXyYXde5sJkjMo935qBOb4Yx556vInPtEy2ALHZPYNKdUhoN YPK0Y/mKc4rYNc
IZ5k5yVGbzHLG2rj2Eu85WBgTmCISkQb022VCsdkRLM5wzKeHT R40GhVX93lOH7F
R3rwuxnkqVMvaxbb7fI++g1P9pJrIrT+Cmmndb9GOtJgRtFKgD TiM2RVWgrOcn4=
=z42Y
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----