On 07/20/2011 11:47 PM, bpnjensen wrote:
On Jul 19, 12:15 pm, John wrote:
http://www.infowars.com/cern-gags-ph...ray-climate-ex...

Regards,
JS

In other words, some F'ing freakshow dufus will start making believe
that cosmic rays are causing global warming when the the overwhelming
evidence for easily explained ordinary sources are just too
inconvenient for his wealthy puppeteers to admit.

Cosmic Rays are causing CHEMTRAILS!

On 07/21/2011 08:54 AM, MNMikew wrote:

-----------------
In the 70's they predicted another ice age. That worked out well.



Who predicted an ice age in the 1970s? Time Magazine? The debate is over
because the weather has obviously gone to ****. Animals are migrating
through the Northwest Passage for the first time in half a million years
ferchrissakes! All you have to do is look. Open your eyes.

On 7/21/2011 10:02 AM, dave wrote:
On 07/21/2011 08:54 AM, MNMikew wrote:

-----------------
In the 70's they predicted another ice age. That worked out well.



Who predicted an ice age in the 1970s? Time Magazine? The debate is over
because the weather has obviously gone to ****. Animals are migrating
through the Northwest Passage for the first time in half a million years
ferchrissakes! All you have to do is look. Open your eyes.

The warming cycle is not in dispute, lay the joint down and step away,
long enough to clear your mind and participate in the discussion!

But, it is natural, or else, at least, some OTHER FACTOR than carbon
dioxide. If it was just carbon dioxide, we could just plant more plants ...

Regards,
JS

On 07/21/2011 08:59 AM, m II wrote:
bpnjensen wrote:

The denial information you peddle is swill, debunked and shredded
decades ago by people who actually understand the science. Wise up.

He does it on purpose, trying to get fights going. Ever wonder about his
uncontrollable need to spread these contentious postings over so many
different newsgroups?

Sure looks like a Government disinformation agent trying to bring down
the value of Internet communications. This type usually has multiple
personalities. They even bicker among themselves.

If you absolutely HAVE to respond to him, at least don't cross post. It
will help to keep the flies away from the proverbial Smith pile.


mike

The phone companies are going to turn it back into AOL and Compuserve
(with HD video)

On 07/21/2011 09:22 AM, Bill Smith wrote:
On Wed, 20 Jul 2011 23:47:05 -0700 (PDT), bpnjensen

There is considerable evidence to suggest that cosmic radiation has a
great deal to do with cloud formation. It is a legitimate field of
study and does not really have much to do with whether global warming
is caused by human activity, or not. The weather system of this planet
is a good deal more complicated than global warming political pundits,
for or against, can, in their tiny little brains, imagine.

Bill Smith

It's cold in L.A. Global warming is obviously a hoax.

On 7/21/2011 8:54 AM, MNMikew wrote:
wrote in message
...
On Jul 21, 1:40 am, John wrote:
On 7/20/2011 11:47 PM, bpnjensen wrote:

On Jul 19, 12:15 pm, John wrote:
http://www.infowars.com/cern-gags-ph...ray-climate-ex...

Regards,
JS

In other words, some F'ing freakshow dufus will start making believe
that cosmic rays are causing global warming when the the overwhelming
evidence for easily explained ordinary sources are just too
inconvenient for his wealthy puppeteers to admit.

The global warming scam would only be believed by a dufus you mean?

That is pretty much it alright ... the warming we are experiencing is
"normal, at least in the sense it is nature and not us.

Regards,
JS

Sorry, wrong. You are a perfect example of why it is dangerous for
uneducated and ignorant morons under the influence of wealthy
puppeters to pretend they know something about science when they
literally know nothing.

-------------
And your credentials are? Thought so.


Climate change has been predicted for well over a hundred years by
many scientists, irrespective of political affiliation, and has been a
point of concern for over 70 years by scientists across the spectrum.

-----------------
In the 70's they predicted another ice age. That worked out well.



Scientists believe and are taken where the evidence points them.

Or, summed up, nutjobs only accept evidence, and proof for that matter,
when it agrees with their religious beliefs ...

Regards,
JS

"dave" wrote in message
...
On 07/21/2011 08:54 AM, MNMikew wrote:

-----------------
In the 70's they predicted another ice age. That worked out well.



Who predicted an ice age in the 1970s? Time Magazine?

Umm, the scientists that Time Magazine interviewed. Duh.

Scientists have found other indications of global cooling. For one thing
there has been a noticeable expansion of the great belt of dry,
high-altitude polar winds - the so-called circumpolar vortex-that sweep from
west to east around the top and bottom of the world.

The whatever passes for the weather 'experts' in U K (there are NO
Weather Experts in America!, they are ALL FULL of SHEET!) have warned
the people to prepare for an extraaaaaa COLD Winter for 2011 - 2012.They
done told those people to order Winter Tires early.
cuhulin

New Yorkers warned to expect power outages.
Rolling power outages in Detroit.
http://www.drudgereport.com

Oh Boo Hoo, those Candy Asses can't handle a little bit of Warm Weather.

Meanwhile, Wayyyyyyyyy Down South in Dixieland, Jackson,Missy Sippy,
currently ONLY 86 Degrees inside my flower box (Cheney Instruments
thingy) on my front porch.86 Degrees isn't HOT Weather around here, it
is only moderately Warm Weather.I Love It! Screw that damn Wintertime!
Come back here with that Watermelon,boy!
cuhulin

On 7/21/2011 10:03 AM, dave wrote:
On 07/21/2011 08:59 AM, m II wrote:
bpnjensen wrote:

The denial information you peddle is swill, debunked and shredded
decades ago by people who actually understand the science. Wise up.

He does it on purpose, trying to get fights going. Ever wonder about his
uncontrollable need to spread these contentious postings over so many
different newsgroups?

Sure looks like a Government disinformation agent trying to bring down
the value of Internet communications. This type usually has multiple
personalities. They even bicker among themselves.

If you absolutely HAVE to respond to him, at least don't cross post. It
will help to keep the flies away from the proverbial Smith pile.


mike

The phone companies are going to turn it back into AOL and Compuserve
(with HD video)

I guess people with 56k dialup panic at todays downloads ... they worry
about text bytes. To view someone downloading multiple movies on a
gigabyte link probably gives 'em a heart attack!

Regards,
JS