Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old November 18th 11, 04:05 AM posted to rec.radio.shortwave,alt.news-media,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.politics.economics,alt.politics.liberalism
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2011
Posts: 38
Default Liberal Fascist "JackAss" Party Can't Ignore the Tea Party Debt Commission

As you know, the Senate has failed to pass a budget resolution for
three years running. Now they won't even let the American people do
the job for them.

This afternoon, 200 FreedomWorks members and representatives from tea
party groups across the country met in the Russell Senate Office
building to formally present our plan to balance the federal budget
and cut $9.7 trillion in spending over the next 10 years.
Unfortunately, it seems like the only thing Washington wants to hear
is excuses.

The Democrats who run the Senate Rules Committee were so afraid of the
tea party plan to balance the federal budget that they ordered
committee staff to remove the microphones we had set up for the event
while Capitol Police blocked the doors of our hearing room, which had
been reserved by Sen. Mike Lee (R-Utah) specifically for this event
more than two weeks ago. At the same time, a "suspicious package" was
reported in the room next door and all visitors and staff were barred
from the area.

Although Senator Lee courageously stood up for us, he ultimately
determined that the hearing should proceed without further
interruption or harassment. For that reason we moved to another
location off the Capitol grounds where our commission of 12 volunteer
tea party activists presented their recommendations to a fired-up
crowd.

Senator Lee was also joined there by Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY), Reps. Joe
Walsh (R-IL), Steve King (R-IA), Mike Pence (R-IN), Mick Mulvaney (R-
SC) and Paul Broun (R-GA). Rep. Broun received a standing ovation when
he offered to help draft and sponsor legislation that could eventually
allow our recommended cuts to become law.

Unfortunately, the unexpected location change disrupted live coverage
of our hearing on CSPAN, but please click link below to watch the
video, which provides highlights from this afternoon's events.

http://www.freedomworks.org/blog/tha...viction-of-the

For more information about the Tea Party Debt Commission, or to access
the full report presented today, visit http://www.freedomworks.org/the-tea-party-budget.

Sincerely,

Matt Kibbe
President and CEO, FreedomWorks

Obama health care more fascism than socialism...
http://www.washingtontimes.com/blog/...ism-socialism/

Surging: IOWA POLL CONFIRMS RON PAUL within the margin of error of the
lead.
http://www.ronpaul2012.com/2011/11/1...es-iowa-surge/

  #2   Report Post  
Old November 18th 11, 06:27 AM posted to rec.radio.shortwave
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Mar 2011
Posts: 3
Default Liberal Fascist "JackAss" Party Can't Ignore the Tea Party DebtCommission

On Thu, 17 Nov 2011 22:02:37 -0800, Nickname unavailable wrote:
(snip)
What Fascism Is & Isn't

(snip)

Whew! Too long; Didn't read. And too much cross-posting. Try this instead:

"Fascism should more properly be called corporatism, since it is the
merger of state and corporate power." --Mussolini
  #3   Report Post  
Old November 18th 11, 12:45 PM posted to rec.radio.shortwave, alt.news-media, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.politics.economics, alt.politics.liberalism
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jan 2009
Posts: 5,185
Default Press Release from (unfortunately named) Dick "Astroturf" Armey

On Thu, 17 Nov 2011 20:05:06 -0800, N∅ M∅ ∅baMa∅ wrote:

As you know, the Senate has failed to pass a budget resolution for three
years running. Now they won't even let the American people do the job
for them.

This afternoon, 200 FreedomWorks members and representatives from tea
party groups across the country met in the Russell Senate Office
building to formally present our plan to balance the federal budget and
cut $9.7 trillion in spending over the next 10 years. Unfortunately, it
seems like the only thing Washington wants to hear is excuses.

The Democrats who run the Senate Rules Committee were so afraid of the
tea party plan to balance the federal budget that they ordered committee
staff to remove the microphones we had set up for the event while
Capitol Police blocked the doors of our hearing room, which had been
reserved by Sen. Mike Lee (R-Utah) specifically for this event more than
two weeks ago. At the same time, a "suspicious package" was reported in
the room next door and all visitors and staff were barred from the area.

Although Senator Lee courageously stood up for us, he ultimately
determined that the hearing should proceed without further interruption
or harassment. For that reason we moved to another location off the
Capitol grounds where our commission of 12 volunteer tea party activists
presented their recommendations to a fired-up crowd.

Senator Lee was also joined there by Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY), Reps. Joe
Walsh (R-IL), Steve King (R-IA), Mike Pence (R-IN), Mick Mulvaney (R-
SC) and Paul Broun (R-GA). Rep. Broun received a standing ovation when
he offered to help draft and sponsor legislation that could eventually
allow our recommended cuts to become law.

Unfortunately, the unexpected location change disrupted live coverage of
our hearing on CSPAN, but please click link below to watch the video,
which provides highlights from this afternoon's events.

http://www.freedomworks.org/blog/tha...hers-react-to-

the-eviction-of-the

For more information about the Tea Party Debt Commission, or to access
the full report presented today, visit
http://www.freedomworks.org/the-tea-party-budget.

Sincerely,

Matt Kibbe
President and CEO, FreedomWorks

Obama health care more fascism than socialism...
http://www.washingtontimes.com/blog/...1/nov/16/paul-

obama-health-care-more-fascism-socialism/

Surging: IOWA POLL CONFIRMS RON PAUL within the margin of error of the
lead.
http://www.ronpaul2012.com/2011/11/1...es-iowa-surge/


  #4   Report Post  
Old November 18th 11, 12:46 PM posted to rec.radio.shortwave
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jan 2009
Posts: 5,185
Default Fascist Party Can't Ignore the Tea Party

On Fri, 18 Nov 2011 00:27:14 -0600, Chester A. Arthur wrote:

On Thu, 17 Nov 2011 22:02:37 -0800, Nickname unavailable wrote: (snip)
What Fascism Is & Isn't

(snip)

Whew! Too long; Didn't read. And too much cross-posting. Try this
instead:

"Fascism should more properly be called corporatism, since it is the
merger of state and corporate power." --Mussolini


  #5   Report Post  
Old November 18th 11, 12:52 PM posted to rec.radio.shortwave
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jun 2006
Posts: 7,243
Default Fascist Party Can't Ignore the Tea Party



dave wrote:

On Fri, 18 Nov 2011 00:27:14 -0600, Chester A. Arthur wrote:

On Thu, 17 Nov 2011 22:02:37 -0800, Nickname unavailable wrote: (snip)
What Fascism Is & Isn't

(snip)

Whew! Too long; Didn't read. And too much cross-posting. Try this
instead:

"Fascism should more properly be called corporatism, since it is the
merger of state and corporate power." --Mussolini


Rickmers, are you getting back into the medicine cabinet again?




  #6   Report Post  
Old November 18th 11, 01:11 PM posted to rec.radio.shortwave, alt.news-media, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.politics.economics, alt.politics.liberalism
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jan 2009
Posts: 5,185
Default 99% show true humanity of movement

On Thu, 17 Nov 2011 20:05:06 -0800, N∅ M∅ ∅baMa∅ wrote:

The Daily Caller's Michelle Fields faced abuse from the NYPD and help
from protesters.
The right-wing Daily Caller website has been anything but kind to Occupy
Wall Street, even going so far as to condemn the protest movement as
generating riots, murder, and arson.

But when a couple of Daily Caller employees were at Occupy Wall Street
this morning, it was the very protesters they had been demonizing who
ended up helping them out. Daily Caller reporter Michelle Fields — who
faced off with actor Matt Damon earlier this year over education policy —
and videographer Direna Cousins both claim they were attacked by the New
York Police Department (NYPD) while covering the raucous protests in the
Financial District today. Fields added that Occupy Wall Street protesters
immediately came up to her to offer their help:

“Direna had a camera in her hand and I had a microphone, and we were
being hit,” she said. “When I fell to the ground I said at one point,
‘I’m just covering this! I’m covering this!’ And the officer just said,
‘Come on, get up, get up,’ before pulling me up by my jacket.’” “The
protesters came up to me right away and asked if I needed any medical
assistance. They were actually very kind and helpful. It was the police
officers who were very aggressive,” Fields added.

Fields says that protesters right now are effectively “barricaded” in
Zuccotti Park, which was the spot from which they were ousted from on
Tuesday.
lead.

http://thinkprogress.org/special/201...ers-for-right-
wing-publication-daily-caller-beaten-by-nypd-helped-by-protesters/
  #7   Report Post  
Old November 18th 11, 01:23 PM posted to rec.radio.shortwave,alt.news-media,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.politics.economics,alt.politics.liberalism
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Nov 2011
Posts: 1
Default 99% show true humanity of movement

On Fri, 18 Nov 2011 07:11:48 -0600, dave wrote:

On Thu, 17 Nov 2011 20:05:06 -0800, N? M? ?baMa? wrote:

The Daily Caller's Michelle Fields faced abuse from the NYPD and help
from protesters.
The right-wing Daily Caller website has been anything but kind to Occupy
Wall Street, even going so far as to condemn the protest movement as
generating riots, murder, and arson.

But when a couple of Daily Caller employees were at Occupy Wall Street
this morning, it was the very protesters they had been demonizing who
ended up helping them out. Daily Caller reporter Michelle Fields who
faced off with actor Matt Damon earlier this year over education policy
and videographer Direna Cousins both claim they were attacked by the New
York Police Department (NYPD) while covering the raucous protests in the
Financial District today. Fields added that Occupy Wall Street protesters
immediately came up to her to offer their help:

Direna had a camera in her hand and I had a microphone, and we were
being hit, she said. When I fell to the ground I said at one point,
Im just covering this! Im covering this! And the officer just said,
Come on, get up, get up, before pulling me up by my jacket. The
protesters came up to me right away and asked if I needed any medical
assistance. They were actually very kind and helpful. It was the police
officers who were very aggressive, Fields added.

Fields says that protesters right now are effectively barricaded in
Zuccotti Park, which was the spot from which they were ousted from on
Tuesday.
lead.

http://thinkprogress.org/special/201...ers-for-right-
wing-publication-daily-caller-beaten-by-nypd-helped-by-protesters/


Meanwhile
http://newyork.cbslocal.com/2011/11/...n-wall-street/
  #8   Report Post  
Old November 18th 11, 01:54 PM posted to rec.radio.shortwave,alt.news-media,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.politics.economics,alt.politics.liberalism
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Apr 2011
Posts: 70
Default Liberal Fascist "JackAss" Party

On Nov 18, 12:02*am, Nickname unavailable wrote:

In various speeches made shortly after the March on Rome, Mussolini
stated, "We must take from state authority those functions for which
it is incompetent and which it performs badly... I believe the state
should renounce its economic functions, especially those carried out
through monopolies, because the state is incompetent in such
matters... We must put an end to state railways, state postal service
and state insurance."


Yet another Useful Liberal Fascist JackAss Idiot parroting twisted
Communist Party propaganda lies.

Quotes mean nothing when they are not backed up by facts, just as
quoting the White House's claim that it fights for freedom and
democracy tell us nothing about how much it abuses both principles.

Fascism is a form of government which centers all power [House, Senate
and Judiciary] in a single party [Liberal Fascist JackAss Democrats]
headed by an absolute dictater [0baMa0 Tse Dung].

You can't hide in your closet any longer.
We all know how Marxists like you must confuse the ignorant masses
with twisted lies in order to win them over.

Give it up! - Even your former handlers have seen the light:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cj0Id...eature=related

We now use the internet to turn the spot light on the likes of you:

http://AgendaDocumentary.com
http://BigGovernment.com/amarcus/201...chy-tea-party/

The Europeans have exposed your NAZI "teeth in gum" relationship with
the Communist Party:

http://www.SovietStory.com

Hitler learned from your kind very well and the result predictable.
Your murders continue to be counted and documented:

http://www.GlobalMuseumOnCommunism.org
Pt.1 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8DALeSSXXgI
Pt.2 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LIHQI8UVEug

Video: Death Threats Against Wis. Republicans (Content Warning)

http://moonbattracker.com/wordpress/?p=479
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hQg-fYwaoZM
http://www.americanthinker.com/2011/...nion_take.html
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U9NPPkK232k

Fascist Union Thug's Death Threats in Wisconsin

http://biggovernment.com/jjmnolte/20...-for-civility/
http://www.wausaudailyherald.com/art...-death-threats
http://www.nationalreview.com/articl...murdock?page=1

Fascist Union Activist to WI State Senators: "YOU WILL DIE!"

http://www.nrtwc.org/union-activist-...-you-will-die/
http://www.620wtmj.com/shows/charlie...63.html?blog=y

Fascism is a form of government which centers all power [House, Senate
and Judiciary] in a single party [Liberal Fascist JackAss Democrats]
headed by an absolute dictater [0baMa0 Tse Dung].

Union Violence Exposed
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RbY5K7Z4cB4

..........................sound..familiar?........ .................

Anyone who is NOT a public Union/Liberal/Progressive/Socialist/
Communist is a Fascist according to Useful Liberal JackAss Idiots.
Anyone who refutes a public Union/Liberal/Progressive/Socialist/
Communist is a moron according to Useful Liberal JackAss Idiots.

As socialistworker.org admits, http://socialistworker.org/2003-2/47..._Fascism.shtml
the left routinely applies the term "fascist" to any Republican
political leader. In Britain The Guardian, BBC, and other liberal
media pounced on purported links between the Bush family and
corporations that had dealings with Nazi Germany. The fact that
Prescott Bush, George W. Bush's grandfather, was a "director and
shareholder" with companies that had indirect financial dealings with
Germany in the 1930s would hardly seem damning, however. Much the
same could be said for many other affluent individuals in America or
Britain at the time. Every American today with mutual fund holdings
is invested, at least indirectly, in Hugo Chavez's Venezuela. Does
that make them Marxist revolutionaries?

Talk of Hitler became a lot more common during the Bush years, when it
was accepted wisdom on the left that George Bush was worse than
Hitler. Then there was Nancy Pelosi, who spent weeks back in 2010
complaining of the Tea Party's so-called "swastika signs" -- signs
that did not signal an alliance with fascism but opposition to it.
Pelosi was hardly alone in accusing the Tea Party of fascism. Marc
Rubin, writing for examiner.com, referred to Tea Party members as
"text book fascists." He went on to pin the neo-fascist label on Tom
Tancredo, presumably because of Tancredo's concerns over illegal
immigration. If those concerns make Tancredo a fascist, they would
make the majority of Americans who share those concerns fascists as
well. But that's pretty much how the left sees America.

The immediate response of liberals such as Chris Matthews
http://www.mrc.org/biasalert/2011/20110412110017.aspx to the Ryan
"Path to Prosperity" was to characterize it as a killer not just of
babies and old people but of "half the people who watch this show."
This attempt to portray the GOP plan as genocidal is just another
example of the fascist rhetoric. It appears that Matthews is
attempting to portray the Ryan plan as some sort of Final Solution.

It's not just loose cannons on MSNBC who resort to fascist innuendo.
Obama's speechwriters are good at crafting sinister suggestions even
without using the "F" word. Obama's budget speech of April 13
actually set the tone for the current debate. With Rep. Ryan sitting
on the front row, Obama lectured his audience that the GOP plan would
kick "someone's grandparents" out of nursing homes and cause children
with autism and Down's syndrome to "fend for themselves." It is well
known that Hitler sent legions of the disabled to concentration camps
to be gassed, but the suggestion that a plan to actually save Medicare
and Medicaid resembles the Holocaust, if that is what Obama intended,
is repellent. It was one more proof, as if we needed any more, of a
fatal weakness in the character of this President. He is a man whose
entire existence is devoted to gutter politics. For such a man,
statesmanship and dignified leadership are inconceivable.

The plan truth is that America can no longer afford this sort of
reckless partisanship on the part of the chief executive. The fact
that Obama disagrees with Rep. Ryan's budget plan does not justify
accusations of killing sick children or tossing old folks out on the
street. That kind of rhetoric may pass for wit in the sixth grade,
but it is juvenile coming from the President.

THIS IS LIBERAL FASCISM

Pt.1 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GsFoiVZDSRs
Pt.2 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3hdqjDIfyfo
Pt.3 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nqdf7Wz-Pe4
Pt.4 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SfJSub3CDJk
Pt.5 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vmAMVyNuVa0
Pt.6 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KE-4VDpwYwk
Pt.7 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DCJqnwZPc0Q
Pt.8 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jf39ZtLVa4A

If you haven't read the book, watched all of the above and understood
what was said, don't bother responding with your public UNION, LIBERAL
FASCIST, JackAss Idiot, Communist Party propaganda lies.

LIBERAL FASCIST Left-wing roots of the Nazis:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4758sBZLC5k

LIBERAL FASCISM, Marxism, National Socialism [NAZI] and Juche
[N.Korea] are left-wing brothers:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fa1sj0gwnuQ

NAZI Origins of LIBERAL FASCISTS Global Warming - While this may sound
odd to many who have bought into the Marxian propaganda over the years
that the Nazis were right wing capitalistic extremists, Greens who
signed up for the Nazi Party were actually very typical of the day.
Between 60% and 70% of the German Greens were NAZI Party members,
compared to only 10% of the population at large.

http://www.americanthinker.com/2011/...pocalypti.html
http://www.americanthinker.com/2010/...vironazis.html

LIBERAL FASCISTS and NAZIs ARE Allies:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D-URfx_k9uU
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R9XrscWjPYs

Why Nazism Was Socialism and Why Socialism Is Totalitarian:

Pt.1 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Uk9WQaAIbOg
Pt.2 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FmDXuA1-8FE
Pt.3 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1eeNB_rWqpk
Pt.4 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4maXhvSm4fQ

The LIBERAL FASCIST Path to Socialism:

Pt.1 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fPyoEbU_wc4
Pt.2 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dvuxr7v4xzk

"Just as the Left was drawn to the communist killing machines of
Lenin, Stalin, Mao, Pol Pot, and Castro, so too it is now attracted to
radical Islam."

"The contempt that German Hitlerytes had for "Bolshevism" or "marxist
Jews" generally should also not mislead us in assessing the similarity
between National Socialism and Communism. Leftist sects are very prone
to rivalry, dissension, schism and hatred of one-another. One has only
to think of the Bolsheviks versus the Mensheviks, Stalin versus
Trotsky, China versus the Soviet Union etc. Similarity does not
preclude rivalry. Hitler and Stalin were literally brothers in arms
BEFORE they became rivals. That socialist brothers sometimes fall out
should not prevent us from noting the brotherhood concerned."

[...]

"The fundamental dogma of all brands of socialism and communism is
that the market economy or capitalism is a system that hurts the vital
interests of the immense majority of people for the sole benefit of a
small minority of rugged individualists. It condemns the masses to
progressing impoverishment. It brings about misery, slavery,
oppression, degradation and exploitation of the working men, while it
enriches a class of idle and useless parasites."

"This doctrine was not the work of Karl Marx. It had been developed
long before Marx entered the scene. Its most successful propagators
were not the Marxian authors, but such men as Carlyle and Ruskin, the
British Fabians, the German professors and the American
Institutionalists. And it is a very significant fact that the
correctness of this dogma was contested only by a few economists who
were very soon silenced and barred from access to the universities,
the press, the leadership of political parties and, first of all,
public office. Public opinion by and large accepted the condemnation
of capitalism without any reservation."

[...]

Dr. Ludwig von Mises - http://mises.org/midroad.asp

[...]

"The term 'planning' is mostly used as a synonym for socialism,
communism, and authoritarian and totalitarian economic management.
Sometimes only the German pattern of socialism-Zwangswirtschaft-is
called planning, while the term socialism proper is reserved for the
Russian pattern of outright socialization and bureaucratic operation
of all plants, shops, and farms. At any rate, planning in this sense
means all-around planning by the government and enforcement of these
plans by the police power. Planning in this sense means full
government control of business. It is the antithesis of free
enterprise, private initiative, private ownership of the means of
production, market economy, and the price system. Planning and
capitalism are utterly incompatible. Within a system of planning
production is conducted according to the government's orders, not
according to the plans of capitalists and entrepreneurs eager to
profit by best filling the wants of the consumers.

"But the term planning is also used in a second sense. Lord Keynes,
Sir William Beveridge, Professor Hansen, and many other eminent men
assert that they do not want to substitute totalitarian slavery for
freedom. They declare that they are planing for a free society. They
recommend a third system, which, as they say, is as far from socialism
as it is from capitalism, which, as a third solution of the problem of
society's economic organization, stands midway between the two other
systems, and while retaining the advantages of both, avoids the
disadvantages inherent in each.

"These self-styled progressives are certainly mistaken when they
pretend that their proposals are new and unheard of. The idea of this
third solution is very old indeed, and the French have long since
baptized it with a pertinent name; they call it interventionism.
Hardly anybody can doubt that history will link the idea of social
security, more closely than with the American New Deal and with Sir
William Beveridge, with the memory of Bismarck whom our fathers did
not precisely describe as a liberal. All the essential ideas of
present-day interventionist progressivism were neatly expounded by the
supreme brain-trusters of imperial Germany, Professors Schmoller and
Wagner, who at the same time urged their Kaiser to invade and to
conquer the Americas. Far be it from me to condemn any idea only on
account of its not being new. But as the progressives slander all
their opponents as old-fashioned, orthodox, and reactionary, it is
expedient to observe that it would be more appropriate to speak of the
clash of two orthodoxies; the Bismarck orthodoxy versus the Jefferson
orthodoxy.

[...]

Dr. Ludwig von Mises - 1952 - http://mises.org/books/planningforfreedom_mises.pdf

The origins of the modern left can be traced back to the famous
passage in Rousseaus Discourse on the Origin and Foundations of
Inequality, in which he condemned the institution of private
property:

The first man, who after enclosing a piece of ground, took it into
his head to say, this is mine, and found people simple enough to
believe him, was the real founder of civil society.

Added Rousseau: How many crimes, how many wars, how many murders, how
many misfortunes and horrors, would that man have saved the human
species, who pulling up the stakes or filling up the ditches should
have cried to his fellows: Beware of listening to this impostor; you
are lost, if you forget that the fruits of the earth belong equally to
us all, and the earth itself to nobody!

Around the 1830s, a faction of French liberals gravitated toward
Romanticism and the philosophy of the late Rousseau, proclaiming that
capitalism, private property, and the increasing complexity of modern
society were agents of moral decay -- both for the individual and for
society at large. This is essentially the worldview that has made its
way, through history, into the collective mind of the modern left; it
is a worldview calling for a revolution that not only will topple the
existing capitalist order and punish its corrupt leaders, but that
also will replace that order with a socialist regime where the utopian
ideals of perfect justice and equality will reign. Such an ambition
can be put into effect only by a totalitarian state with the authority
to micromanage every facet of human life, precisely the end-point
toward which the policies and crusades of the modern left are
directed.

When the term liberalism (from the Latin word liberalis, meaning
pertaining to a free man) first emerged in the early 1800s, its
hallmarks were a belief in individual rights, the rule of law, limited
government, private property, and laissez faire economics. These would
remain the defining characteristics of liberalism throughout the
liberal epoch (generally identified as the period of 1815-1914). Yet
the modern left, which portrays itself as the agent of enlightened
commitment to liberal causes, in fact stands for the antithesis of
each of the foregoing liberal ideals. Contrary to its self-definition,
the left is neither liberal nor progressive, but rather a
reactionary force that seeks to resurrect the traditions that
characterized the epoch which preceded the rise of classical
liberalism.

http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/v...ry.asp?id=1217

The following is from The World Book Encyclopedia, 1947 edition:
The chief characteristics of Fascism are as follows:

*THE CULTIVATION OF IGNORANCE*

Fascism, like all forms of government, rests firmly on the sincere
consent of a large part of the population... To maintain this consent,
the Fascist leadership must cut off the people from any information
which might cause them to doubt the complete correctness of the fixed
Fascist principles... All forms of communication are carefully
censored, so that the public will receive only those facts that the
dictators want known... Travel to other countries must be controlled,
and freedom of speech and assembly must be rigorously suppressed...

http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/...for_rahms.html
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sce0TLA5UYE
http://bigjournalism.com/dloesch/201...m-questioning/

The Racist Propaganda Conference for Teachers
http://us1.campaign-archive1.com/?u=...e=3609f e9ad7
http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/..._conferen.html

Unions and Communists March Side By Side at May Day Rally
http://www.ringospictures.com/index.php?page=20110501

May Day rally in Los Angeles, co-sponsored by the SEIU and various
communist groups
http://pajamasmedia.com/zombie/2011/...s-full-commie/

George Soros Media Matters' war against Fox
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0311/51949.html

If you have not yet seen "The Cartel" you owe it to yourself and the
children of the U.S.A. to do so:

http://www.TheCartelMovie.com

*SUPPRESSION OF LABOR AND INDUSTRY*

Fascism in Italy and Germany at first won the support of the wealthy
classes, both landed and industrial...

http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/i....asp?indid=977
http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/v...ory.asp?id=589
http://www.keywiki.org/index.php/George_Soros

These people saw in Fascism a protection against the demands of
farmers and other workers... Both regimes at first upheld the rights
of private property... They subjected the working classes to a
rigorous discipline... As soon as they were firmly established, the
dictators began to limit profit, impose capital levies, and regulate
business in great detail...

Employment Rates under Liberal Fascism
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9ssIhiD8kKM

..........................sound..familiar?........ .................

*THE POLICE STATE*

Fascism depends upon the police to crush all opposition or dissent.
Secret police spy on the whole population, and any casual remark
against the regime leads to swift and severe punishment... Opposition
parties are dissolved. Intellectual, athletic and recreational
organizations are usually brought under the control of the Fascist
authority... The ruthlessness of the police gradually becomes less
noticeable... This is because within a year or so after a Fascist
government takes power, vigorous opponents of the regime have either
left the country, been killed or jailed...

LIBERAL FASCIST union thugs trying to upend the results of Wisconsin
elections by force.
http://www.jsonline.com/news/opinion/116355379.html

Read mo
http://www.chicagonow.com/blogs/publ...#ixzz1EGR2iKwW

Vice President Joe Bidens staff lock journalist in a closet for
hours
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...ng-guests.html

(Both Fascist and Communist leaders make use of the police state...
Every absolute government has used the police state to some degree...
It was highly developed among the ancient Assyrians...)

..........................sound..familiar?........ .................

*EXTREME NATIONALISM*

Fascism is highly nationalistic... It tries to identify its principles
with the country, so that disagreement will look like treason... Some
other country, or some group within the country, is chosen to serve as
the "enemy" and made to appear as the cause of all evils or
misfortunes... For example, the Nazis in Germany represented their
movement first as a crusade against the Jews, then as a fight against
Communism and later as a struggle against the "attacks" from whatever
neighboring country they wished to subdue or occupy... Extreme
nationalism often becomes a kind of racial fanaticism... Sometimes it
combines racial and religious bigotry...

When you hear the Liberal Fascist JackAss propaganda that THEY are the
true patriots then you know the time is near. Look for it from the
socialist Labor Unions such as the SEIU!
http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/g...asp?grpid=6535

*MILITARISM*

Fascism maintains among the people a permanently warlike frame of
mind... Every citizen feels that he is mobilized against enemies of
the regime from within, and against possible foreign foes... The
dictator usually comes to power during a period of economic crisis or
depression... He relieves the depression partly by employing many
people in the making of armaments... To justify this procedure, he
must convince the people that the country is threatened, and must
point toward some of the enemies against whom the armaments may be
needed...

Listen to 0baMa0's rhetoric and his fascistic support from the
Liberals

Billionaire George Soros is a primary funder and key proponent of the
global organization that promotes the military doctrine used by the
Obama administration to justify the recent airstrikes targeting the
regime of Moammar Gadhafi in Libya.

http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=278685#ixzz1Hq5yFxrp

..........................sound..familiar?........ .................

Here are the Three (3) Phases of Liberal Decay into Fascism:

1. Liberalism (Well Meaning, Nice Sounding, "Do-Gooder" Policies
Always Doomed to Fail)

2. Liberal-Progressivism (The Drive for Social Improvement through
Change and Promising Hope;
More Draconian Liberal Polices are Implemented to Transform The People
into a New Society that
Is Guided by 'The Party') The Party Elite Have Complete Power and Rule
Un-Checked.

3. Liberal-Fascism (The Rise of the Party Leader over 'The Party'
Ensuring the Unity and Uniformaty of 'The Party' and Enforcing The
Will of 'The Party' Over the People.) The Party Leader will Cleanse
'The Party' of All those Who Are NOT of 'The Party'; and 'The Party'
Will Cleanse the People of All Those Who Do NOT Support 'The Party'
and The Party Leader. The Party Leader Now Has Complete and Total
Power and Rules by the Force of His Iron Will.

Brother/Sister Are You "OF" 'The Party' ?

Does The Teaching Of 'The Party' Abide Within You ?

Does The Thoughts Of 'The Party' "Leader" Guide Your Thoughts ?

Let 'The Party' Change Your Life and Transform You !

Let 'The Party' Give You Hope and Renew You !
__________________________________________________ ___________
When you vote cut them off at the knees from your Tax Dollars.
Vote with your wallet.

================================================== ===========
World Book encyclopedia gives some presidents more love than others

By Aleksandra Kulczuga

The venerable publishing company World Book, which produces a variety
of popular reference materials, has released an online childrens
encyclopedia that is drawing fire from experts who charge that it lets
politics get in the way of objective facts.

The information contained in the World Book Kids edition on U.S.
presidents appears to negatively portray Republican executives while
glossing over controversies surrounding Democratic ones, a review by
The Daily Caller has found.

The encyclopedias entry on former President Bill Clinton, for
example, includes effusive commentary on his college days. Clinton
read a lot, joined clubs and played the saxophone in band, the entry
states. The comments on Clintons upbringing also include anecdotes
about his childhood growing up in a troubled home, which the entry
says taught him to be a peacemaker and helped him develop skills
that would help him be a good leader.

The encyclopedia calls Clinton a hard-working student who paid
attention to fights for justice for African Americans. But World
Book makes no mention of George W. Bushs push for aid to Africa, or
Ronald Reagans fight to end the oppression of people living under
Communism.

There is also no mention of President Clintons impeachment, though
the entry does state that some people questioned his familys money
deals and his morals.

By contrast, Richard Nixons entry mentions his resignation in the
very first line. And Ronald Reagans entry concludes that many
people felt that the Iran-Contra scandal was wrong. It also focuses
extensively on what World Book perceives as his policy failures while
in office:

Reagan met with Mikhail Gorbachev, the leader of the Soviet Union.
They signed an agreement to get rid of some kinds of nuclear weapons.
But a government group secretly sold weapons to Iran and gave the
money to political groups in Nicaragua. Many people felt it was wrong.

During his first term, Reagan wanted lower taxes and more money for
defense. Congress adopted most of his programs. But in 1981, companies
failed and people lost their jobs. The government spent far more than
it took in. In March 1981, a man tried to kill Ragan [sic].

The World Books entry on President Obama is the longest of all the
recent presidents and goes into the details of his move to Chicago to
work for a church group that helped people in poor, inner-city
neighborhoods.

But the encyclopedias commentary on George W. Bush contains only one
paragraph related to his presidency, and George H.W. Bushs entry sums
up his term in office on a sobering note:

The United States also had trouble at home. Many people did not have
jobs. A growing number of people were homeless. Americans worried
about crime and drug abuse. Many people blamed Bush for not solving
these problems. Bush wanted to win another term as president, but he
lost the election in 1992.

These entries, which are geared towards children from the 1st through
5th grades, are raising concerns among experts who think they are too
opinionated to be featured in the World Book, which calls itself the
number #1 selling print encyclopedia in the world.

Jimmy Wales, the founder of the popular user-generated online
encyclopedia Wikipedia, said that the World Book Kids edition injects
too much subjectivity into its entries.

Wikipedia, while by no means perfect, does have a strong policy that
the encyclopedia itself should never take a stand on any controversial
issue but should present all the major viewpoints accurately, Wales
told The Daily Caller. The proper goal of an encyclopedia is to give
people the information they need to think about an issue for
themselves not to guide them to a conclusion. These entries you
have shown me left me looking for the edit link to tone down the
bias.

Others more sharply condemned the World Books contents.

I find these entries outrageously unobjective in their accounts of
the achievements and failures of the presidents, said Marsha Familaro
Enright, an educator for over 25 years who founded a Montessori school
in Chicago in 1990 and recently started a foundation, The Reason,
Individualism, Freedom Institute, to build a new liberal arts college.

Furthermore, these entries present a very limited amount of
information to children, in a very poorly reasoned fashion shocking
for an encyclopedia which, one would presume, is meant to convey well-
researched, well-presented, and well-reasoned material to children as
a trusted source and an example of how to think and write, said
Enright.

Enright added that biased reference materials regularly pose a
challenge for her staff and students.

This is the kind of material or worse that we face daily in choosing
texts for grade school children material which makes a pretense at
quality and objectivity, yet teaches poor reasoning and biased
information to its audience, Enright said. Its no wonder students
arrive at college freshman year with poor cognitive skills, ripe for
the collectivist chanting that indoctrinates them more.

Calls and emails to Chicago-based World Book, Inc., which is owned by
Berkshire Hathaway, went unanswered.

http://dailycaller.com/2010/04/05/ch...tionable-bias/
  #9   Report Post  
Old November 18th 11, 02:20 PM posted to rec.radio.shortwave
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jan 2009
Posts: 5,185
Default Fascist Party Can't Ignore the Tea Party

On Fri, 18 Nov 2011 07:52:34 -0500, dxAce wrote:

dave wrote:

On Fri, 18 Nov 2011 00:27:14 -0600, Chester A. Arthur wrote:

On Thu, 17 Nov 2011 22:02:37 -0800, Nickname unavailable wrote:
(snip)
What Fascism Is & Isn't
(snip)

Whew! Too long; Didn't read. And too much cross-posting. Try this
instead:

"Fascism should more properly be called corporatism, since it is the
merger of state and corporate power." --Mussolini


Rickmers, are you getting back into the medicine cabinet again?


I'm way too big. You must have me confused with Jerry, your pet monkey.
  #10   Report Post  
Old November 18th 11, 02:54 PM posted to rec.radio.shortwave, alt.news-media, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.politics.economics, alt.politics.liberalism
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jan 2009
Posts: 5,185
Default Liberal Fascist "JackAss" Party "Right" and "Left" aremeaningless, it's Us v Them

On Fri, 18 Nov 2011 05:54:28 -0800, Chas.Chan wrote:

On Nov 18, 12:02*am, Nickname unavailable wrote:

In various speeches made shortly after the March on Rome, Mussolini
stated, "We must take from state authority those functions for which it
is incompetent and which it performs badly... I believe the state
should renounce its economic functions, especially those carried out
through monopolies, because the state is incompetent in such matters...
We must put an end to state railways, state postal service and state
insurance."


Yet another Useful Liberal Fascist JackAss Idiot parroting twisted
Communist Party propaganda lies.

Quotes mean nothing when they are not backed up by facts, just as
quoting the White House's claim that it fights for freedom and democracy
tell us nothing about how much it abuses both principles.

Fascism is a form of government which centers all power [House, Senate
and Judiciary] in a single party [Liberal Fascist JackAss Democrats]
headed by an absolute dictater [0baMa0 Tse Dung].

You can't hide in your closet any longer. We all know how Marxists like
you must confuse the ignorant masses with twisted lies in order to win
them over.

Give it up! - Even your former handlers have seen the light:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cj0Id...eature=related

We now use the internet to turn the spot light on the likes of you:

http://AgendaDocumentary.com
http://BigGovernment.com/amarcus/201...s-Progressive-

Anarchy-tea-party/

The Europeans have exposed your NAZI "teeth in gum" relationship with
the Communist Party:

http://www.SovietStory.com

Hitler learned from your kind very well and the result predictable. Your
murders continue to be counted and documented:

http://www.GlobalMuseumOnCommunism.org Pt.1
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8DALeSSXXgI Pt.2
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LIHQI8UVEug

Video: Death Threats Against Wis. Republicans (Content Warning)

http://moonbattracker.com/wordpress/?p=479
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hQg-fYwaoZM
http://www.americanthinker.com/2011/03/

wisconsin_after_the_union_take.html
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U9NPPkK232k

Fascist Union Thug's Death Threats in Wisconsin

http://biggovernment.com/jjmnolte/20...-of-left-wing-

thuggery-in-wisconsin-when-will-obama-democrats-and-msm-call-for-civility/
http://www.wausaudailyherald.com/art...101/303110067/

Multimedia-18-GOP-senators-report-getting-death-threats
http://www.nationalreview.com/articl...threats-dozen-

wisconsin-deroy-murdock?page=1

Fascist Union Activist to WI State Senators: "YOU WILL DIE!"

http://www.nrtwc.org/union-activist-...-you-will-die/
http://www.620wtmj.com/shows/charlie...63.html?blog=y

Fascism is a form of government which centers all power [House, Senate
and Judiciary] in a single party [Liberal Fascist JackAss Democrats]
headed by an absolute dictater [0baMa0 Tse Dung].

Union Violence Exposed
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RbY5K7Z4cB4

.........................sound..familiar?......... ................

Anyone who is NOT a public Union/Liberal/Progressive/Socialist/
Communist is a Fascist according to Useful Liberal JackAss Idiots.
Anyone who refutes a public Union/Liberal/Progressive/Socialist/
Communist is a moron according to Useful Liberal JackAss Idiots.

As socialistworker.org admits,
http://socialistworker.org/2003-2/47..._Fascism.shtml the left
routinely applies the term "fascist" to any Republican political leader.
In Britain The Guardian, BBC, and other liberal media pounced on
purported links between the Bush family and corporations that had
dealings with Nazi Germany. The fact that Prescott Bush, George W.
Bush's grandfather, was a "director and shareholder" with companies that
had indirect financial dealings with Germany in the 1930s would hardly
seem damning, however. Much the same could be said for many other
affluent individuals in America or Britain at the time. Every American
today with mutual fund holdings is invested, at least indirectly, in
Hugo Chavez's Venezuela. Does that make them Marxist revolutionaries?

Talk of Hitler became a lot more common during the Bush years, when it
was accepted wisdom on the left that George Bush was worse than Hitler.
Then there was Nancy Pelosi, who spent weeks back in 2010 complaining of
the Tea Party's so-called "swastika signs" -- signs that did not signal
an alliance with fascism but opposition to it. Pelosi was hardly alone
in accusing the Tea Party of fascism. Marc Rubin, writing for
examiner.com, referred to Tea Party members as "text book fascists." He
went on to pin the neo-fascist label on Tom Tancredo, presumably because
of Tancredo's concerns over illegal immigration. If those concerns make
Tancredo a fascist, they would make the majority of Americans who share
those concerns fascists as well. But that's pretty much how the left
sees America.

The immediate response of liberals such as Chris Matthews
http://www.mrc.org/biasalert/2011/20110412110017.aspx to the Ryan "Path
to Prosperity" was to characterize it as a killer not just of babies and
old people but of "half the people who watch this show." This attempt to
portray the GOP plan as genocidal is just another example of the fascist
rhetoric. It appears that Matthews is attempting to portray the Ryan
plan as some sort of Final Solution.

It's not just loose cannons on MSNBC who resort to fascist innuendo.
Obama's speechwriters are good at crafting sinister suggestions even
without using the "F" word. Obama's budget speech of April 13 actually
set the tone for the current debate. With Rep. Ryan sitting on the
front row, Obama lectured his audience that the GOP plan would kick
"someone's grandparents" out of nursing homes and cause children with
autism and Down's syndrome to "fend for themselves." It is well known
that Hitler sent legions of the disabled to concentration camps to be
gassed, but the suggestion that a plan to actually save Medicare and
Medicaid resembles the Holocaust, if that is what Obama intended, is
repellent. It was one more proof, as if we needed any more, of a fatal
weakness in the character of this President. He is a man whose entire
existence is devoted to gutter politics. For such a man, statesmanship
and dignified leadership are inconceivable.

The plan truth is that America can no longer afford this sort of
reckless partisanship on the part of the chief executive. The fact that
Obama disagrees with Rep. Ryan's budget plan does not justify
accusations of killing sick children or tossing old folks out on the
street. That kind of rhetoric may pass for wit in the sixth grade, but
it is juvenile coming from the President.

THIS IS LIBERAL FASCISM

Pt.1 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GsFoiVZDSRs Pt.2
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3hdqjDIfyfo Pt.3
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nqdf7Wz-Pe4 Pt.4
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SfJSub3CDJk Pt.5
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vmAMVyNuVa0 Pt.6
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KE-4VDpwYwk Pt.7
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DCJqnwZPc0Q Pt.8
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jf39ZtLVa4A

If you haven't read the book, watched all of the above and understood
what was said, don't bother responding with your public UNION, LIBERAL
FASCIST, JackAss Idiot, Communist Party propaganda lies.

LIBERAL FASCIST Left-wing roots of the Nazis:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4758sBZLC5k

LIBERAL FASCISM, Marxism, National Socialism [NAZI] and Juche [N.Korea]
are left-wing brothers:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fa1sj0gwnuQ

NAZI Origins of LIBERAL FASCISTS Global Warming - While this may sound
odd to many who have bought into the Marxian propaganda over the years
that the Nazis were right wing capitalistic extremists, Greens who
signed up for the Nazi Party were actually very typical of the day.
Between 60% and 70% of the German Greens were NAZI Party members,
compared to only 10% of the population at large.

http://www.americanthinker.com/2011/02/

the_nazi_origins_of_apocalypti.html
http://www.americanthinker.com/2010/...vironazis.html

LIBERAL FASCISTS and NAZIs ARE Allies:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D-URfx_k9uU
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R9XrscWjPYs

Why Nazism Was Socialism and Why Socialism Is Totalitarian:

Pt.1 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Uk9WQaAIbOg Pt.2
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FmDXuA1-8FE Pt.3
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1eeNB_rWqpk Pt.4
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4maXhvSm4fQ

The LIBERAL FASCIST Path to Socialism:

Pt.1 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fPyoEbU_wc4 Pt.2
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dvuxr7v4xzk

"Just as the Left was drawn to the communist killing machines of Lenin,
Stalin, Mao, Pol Pot, and Castro, so too it is now attracted to radical
Islam."

"The contempt that German Hitlerytes had for "Bolshevism" or "marxist
Jews" generally should also not mislead us in assessing the similarity
between National Socialism and Communism. Leftist sects are very prone
to rivalry, dissension, schism and hatred of one-another. One has only
to think of the Bolsheviks versus the Mensheviks, Stalin versus Trotsky,
China versus the Soviet Union etc. Similarity does not preclude rivalry.
Hitler and Stalin were literally brothers in arms BEFORE they became
rivals. That socialist brothers sometimes fall out should not prevent us
from noting the brotherhood concerned."

[...]

"The fundamental dogma of all brands of socialism and communism is that
the market economy or capitalism is a system that hurts the vital
interests of the immense majority of people for the sole benefit of a
small minority of rugged individualists. It condemns the masses to
progressing impoverishment. It brings about misery, slavery, oppression,
degradation and exploitation of the working men, while it enriches a
class of idle and useless parasites."

"This doctrine was not the work of Karl Marx. It had been developed long
before Marx entered the scene. Its most successful propagators were not
the Marxian authors, but such men as Carlyle and Ruskin, the British
Fabians, the German professors and the American Institutionalists. And
it is a very significant fact that the correctness of this dogma was
contested only by a few economists who were very soon silenced and
barred from access to the universities, the press, the leadership of
political parties and, first of all, public office. Public opinion by
and large accepted the condemnation of capitalism without any
reservation."

[...]

Dr. Ludwig von Mises - http://mises.org/midroad.asp

[...]

"The term 'planning' is mostly used as a synonym for socialism,
communism, and authoritarian and totalitarian economic management.
Sometimes only the German pattern of socialism-Zwangswirtschaft-is
called planning, while the term socialism proper is reserved for the
Russian pattern of outright socialization and bureaucratic operation of
all plants, shops, and farms. At any rate, planning in this sense means
all-around planning by the government and enforcement of these plans by
the police power. Planning in this sense means full government control
of business. It is the antithesis of free enterprise, private
initiative, private ownership of the means of production, market
economy, and the price system. Planning and capitalism are utterly
incompatible. Within a system of planning production is conducted
according to the government's orders, not according to the plans of
capitalists and entrepreneurs eager to profit by best filling the wants
of the consumers.

"But the term planning is also used in a second sense. Lord Keynes, Sir
William Beveridge, Professor Hansen, and many other eminent men assert
that they do not want to substitute totalitarian slavery for freedom.
They declare that they are planing for a free society. They recommend a
third system, which, as they say, is as far from socialism as it is from
capitalism, which, as a third solution of the problem of society's
economic organization, stands midway between the two other systems, and
while retaining the advantages of both, avoids the disadvantages
inherent in each.

"These self-styled progressives are certainly mistaken when they pretend
that their proposals are new and unheard of. The idea of this third
solution is very old indeed, and the French have long since baptized it
with a pertinent name; they call it interventionism. Hardly anybody can
doubt that history will link the idea of social security, more closely
than with the American New Deal and with Sir William Beveridge, with the
memory of Bismarck whom our fathers did not precisely describe as a
liberal. All the essential ideas of present-day interventionist
progressivism were neatly expounded by the supreme brain-trusters of
imperial Germany, Professors Schmoller and Wagner, who at the same time
urged their Kaiser to invade and to conquer the Americas. Far be it from
me to condemn any idea only on account of its not being new. But as the
progressives slander all their opponents as old-fashioned, orthodox, and
reactionary, it is expedient to observe that it would be more
appropriate to speak of the clash of two orthodoxies; the Bismarck
orthodoxy versus the Jefferson orthodoxy.

[...]

Dr. Ludwig von Mises - 1952 -
http://mises.org/books/planningforfreedom_mises.pdf

The origins of the modern left can be traced back to the famous passage
in Rousseau’s Discourse on the Origin and Foundations of Inequality, in
which he condemned the institution of private property:

“The first man, who after enclosing a piece of ground, took it into his
head to say, ‘this is mine,’ and found people simple enough to believe
him, was the real founder of civil society.”

Added Rousseau: “How many crimes, how many wars, how many murders, how
many misfortunes and horrors, would that man have saved the human
species, who pulling up the stakes or filling up the ditches should have
cried to his fellows: Beware of listening to this impostor; you are
lost, if you forget that the fruits of the earth belong equally to us
all, and the earth itself to nobody!”

Around the 1830s, a faction of French liberals gravitated toward
Romanticism and the philosophy of the late Rousseau, proclaiming that
capitalism, private property, and the increasing complexity of modern
society were agents of moral decay -- both for the individual and for
society at large. This is essentially the worldview that has made its
way, through history, into the collective mind of the modern left; it is
a worldview calling for a revolution that not only will topple the
existing capitalist order and punish its corrupt leaders, but that also
will replace that order with a socialist regime where the utopian ideals
of perfect justice and equality will reign. Such an ambition can be put
into effect only by a totalitarian state with the authority to
micromanage every facet of human life, precisely the end-point toward
which the policies and crusades of the modern left are directed.

When the term “liberalism” (from the Latin word liberalis, meaning
“pertaining to a free man”) first emerged in the early 1800s, its
hallmarks were a belief in individual rights, the rule of law, limited
government, private property, and laissez faire economics. These would
remain the defining characteristics of liberalism throughout the liberal
epoch (generally identified as the period of 1815-1914). Yet the modern
left, which portrays itself as the agent of enlightened commitment to
“liberal” causes, in fact stands for the antithesis of each of the
foregoing liberal ideals. Contrary to its self-definition, the left is
neither “liberal” nor “progressive,” but rather a reactionary force that
seeks to resurrect the traditions that characterized the epoch which
preceded the rise of classical liberalism.

http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/v...ry.asp?id=1217

The following is from The World Book Encyclopedia, 1947 edition: The
chief characteristics of Fascism are as follows:

*THE CULTIVATION OF IGNORANCE*

Fascism, like all forms of government, rests firmly on the sincere
consent of a large part of the population... To maintain this consent,
the Fascist leadership must cut off the people from any information
which might cause them to doubt the complete correctness of the fixed
Fascist principles... All forms of communication are carefully censored,
so that the public will receive only those facts that the dictators want
known... Travel to other countries must be controlled, and freedom of
speech and assembly must be rigorously suppressed...

http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2010/10/

arrest_warrant_filed_for_rahms.html
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sce0TLA5UYE
http://bigjournalism.com/dloesch/201...cbs2-reporter-

threatens-journalist-over-rahm-questioning/

The Racist Propaganda Conference for Teachers
http://us1.campaign-archive1.com/?

u=4dfbda3b6fdf050b39f73d09a&id=ad2ae12d38&e=3609fe 9ad7
http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2011/04/

the_racist_propaganda_conferen.html

Unions and Communists March Side By Side at May Day Rally
http://www.ringospictures.com/index.php?page=20110501

May Day rally in Los Angeles, co-sponsored by the SEIU and various
communist groups
http://pajamasmedia.com/zombie/2011/...ask-goes-full-

commie/

George Soros Media Matters' war against Fox
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0311/51949.html

If you have not yet seen "The Cartel" you owe it to yourself and the
children of the U.S.A. to do so:

http://www.TheCartelMovie.com

*SUPPRESSION OF LABOR AND INDUSTRY*

Fascism in Italy and Germany at first won the support of the wealthy
classes, both landed and industrial...

http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/i....asp?indid=977
http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/v...ory.asp?id=589
http://www.keywiki.org/index.php/George_Soros

These people saw in Fascism a protection against the demands of farmers
and other workers... Both regimes at first upheld the rights of private
property... They subjected the working classes to a rigorous
discipline... As soon as they were firmly established, the dictators
began to limit profit, impose capital levies, and regulate business in
great detail...

Employment Rates under Liberal Fascism
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9ssIhiD8kKM

.........................sound..familiar?......... ................

*THE POLICE STATE*

Fascism depends upon the police to crush all opposition or dissent.
Secret police spy on the whole population, and any casual remark against
the regime leads to swift and severe punishment... Opposition parties
are dissolved. Intellectual, athletic and recreational organizations are
usually brought under the control of the Fascist authority... The
ruthlessness of the police gradually becomes less noticeable... This is
because within a year or so after a Fascist government takes power,
vigorous opponents of the regime have either left the country, been
killed or jailed...

LIBERAL FASCIST union thugs trying to upend the results of Wisconsin
elections by force.
http://www.jsonline.com/news/opinion/116355379.html

Read mo
http://www.chicagonow.com/blogs/publ...eachers-union-

thugs-comparing-people-to-hitler-shutting-down-schools-losing-their-
argument.html#ixzz1EGR2iKwW

Vice President Joe Biden’s staff lock journalist in a closet for hours
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...President-Joe-

Bidens-staff-lock-journalist-closet-stop-talking-guests.html

(Both Fascist and Communist leaders make use of the police state...
Every absolute government has used the police state to some degree... It
was highly developed among the ancient Assyrians...)

.........................sound..familiar?......... ................

*EXTREME NATIONALISM*

Fascism is highly nationalistic... It tries to identify its principles
with the country, so that disagreement will look like treason... Some
other country, or some group within the country, is chosen to serve as
the "enemy" and made to appear as the cause of all evils or
misfortunes... For example, the Nazis in Germany represented their
movement first as a crusade against the Jews, then as a fight against
Communism and later as a struggle against the "attacks" from whatever
neighboring country they wished to subdue or occupy... Extreme
nationalism often becomes a kind of racial fanaticism... Sometimes it
combines racial and religious bigotry...

When you hear the Liberal Fascist JackAss propaganda that THEY are the
true patriots then you know the time is near. Look for it from the
socialist Labor Unions such as the SEIU!
http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/g...asp?grpid=6535

*MILITARISM*

Fascism maintains among the people a permanently warlike frame of
mind... Every citizen feels that he is mobilized against enemies of the
regime from within, and against possible foreign foes... The dictator
usually comes to power during a period of economic crisis or
depression... He relieves the depression partly by employing many people
in the making of armaments... To justify this procedure, he must
convince the people that the country is threatened, and must point
toward some of the enemies against whom the armaments may be needed...

Listen to 0baMa0's rhetoric and his fascistic support from the Liberals

Billionaire George Soros is a primary funder and key proponent of the
global organization that promotes the military doctrine used by the
Obama administration to justify the recent airstrikes targeting the
regime of Moammar Gadhafi in Libya.

http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=278685#ixzz1Hq5yFxrp

.........................sound..familiar?......... ................

Here are the Three (3) Phases of Liberal Decay into Fascism:

1. Liberalism (Well Meaning, Nice Sounding, "Do-Gooder" Policies Always
Doomed to Fail)

2. Liberal-Progressivism (The Drive for Social Improvement through
Change and Promising Hope;
More Draconian Liberal Polices are Implemented to Transform The People
into a New Society that
Is Guided by 'The Party') The Party Elite Have Complete Power and Rule
Un-Checked.

3. Liberal-Fascism (The Rise of the Party Leader over 'The Party'
Ensuring the Unity and Uniformaty of 'The Party' and Enforcing The Will
of 'The Party' Over the People.) The Party Leader will Cleanse 'The
Party' of All those Who Are NOT of 'The Party'; and 'The Party' Will
Cleanse the People of All Those Who Do NOT Support 'The Party' and The
Party Leader. The Party Leader Now Has Complete and Total Power and
Rules by the Force of His Iron Will.

Brother/Sister Are You "OF" 'The Party' ?

Does The Teaching Of 'The Party' Abide Within You ?

Does The Thoughts Of 'The Party' "Leader" Guide Your Thoughts ?

Let 'The Party' Change Your Life and Transform You !

Let 'The Party' Give You Hope and Renew You !
__________________________________________________ ___________ When you
vote cut them off at the knees from your Tax Dollars. Vote with your
wallet.

================================================== =========== World Book
encyclopedia gives some presidents more love than others

By Aleksandra Kulczuga

The venerable publishing company World Book, which produces a variety of
popular reference materials, has released an online children’s
encyclopedia that is drawing fire from experts who charge that it lets
politics get in the way of objective facts.

The information contained in the World Book Kids edition on U.S.
presidents appears to negatively portray Republican executives while
glossing over controversies surrounding Democratic ones, a review by The
Daily Caller has found.

The encyclopedia’s entry on former President Bill Clinton, for example,
includes effusive commentary on his college days. Clinton “read a lot,
joined clubs and played the saxophone in band,” the entry states. The
comments on Clinton’s upbringing also include anecdotes about his
childhood growing up in a troubled home, which the entry says taught him
to be a “peacemaker” and helped him develop “skills that would help him
be a good leader.”

The encyclopedia calls Clinton “a hard-working student” who paid
attention to “fights for justice for African Americans.” But World Book
makes no mention of George W. Bush’s push for aid to Africa, or Ronald
Reagan’s fight to end the oppression of people living under Communism.

There is also no mention of President Clinton’s impeachment, though the
entry does state that “some people questioned his family’s money deals
and his morals.”

By contrast, Richard Nixon’s entry mentions his resignation in the very
first line. And Ronald Reagan’s entry concludes that “many people” felt
that the Iran-Contra scandal was wrong. It also focuses extensively on
what World Book perceives as his policy failures while in office:

Reagan met with Mikhail Gorbachev, the leader of the Soviet Union. They
signed an agreement to get rid of some kinds of nuclear weapons. But a
government group secretly sold weapons to Iran and gave the money to
political groups in Nicaragua. Many people felt it was wrong.

During his first term, Reagan wanted lower taxes and more money for
defense. Congress adopted most of his programs. But in 1981, companies
failed and people lost their jobs. The government spent far more than it
took in. In March 1981, a man tried to kill Ragan [sic].

The World Book’s entry on President Obama is the longest of all the
recent presidents’ and goes into the details of his move to Chicago to
“work for a church group that helped people in poor, inner-city
neighborhoods.”

But the encyclopedia’s commentary on George W. Bush contains only one
paragraph related to his presidency, and George H.W. Bush’s entry sums
up his term in office on a sobering note:

The United States also had trouble at home. Many people did not have
jobs. A growing number of people were homeless. Americans worried about
crime and drug abuse. Many people blamed Bush for not solving these
problems. Bush wanted to win another term as president, but he lost the
election in 1992.

These entries, which are geared towards children from the 1st through
5th grades, are raising concerns among experts who think they are too
opinionated to be featured in the World Book, which calls itself the
“number #1 selling print encyclopedia in the world.”

Jimmy Wales, the founder of the popular user-generated online
encyclopedia Wikipedia, said that the World Book Kids edition injects
too much subjectivity into its entries.

“Wikipedia, while by no means perfect, does have a strong policy that
the encyclopedia itself should never take a stand on any controversial
issue – but should present all the major viewpoints accurately,” Wales
told The Daily Caller. “The proper goal of an encyclopedia is to give
people the information they need to think about an issue for themselves
– not to guide them to a conclusion. These entries you have shown me
left me looking for the ‘edit’ link to tone down the bias.”

Others more sharply condemned the World Book’s contents.

“I find these entries outrageously unobjective in their accounts of the
achievements and failures of the presidents,” said Marsha Familaro
Enright, an educator for over 25 years who founded a Montessori school
in Chicago in 1990 and recently started a foundation, The Reason,
Individualism, Freedom Institute, to build a new liberal arts college.

“Furthermore, these entries present a very limited amount of information
to children, in a very poorly reasoned fashion – shocking for an
encyclopedia which, one would presume, is meant to convey well-
researched, well-presented, and well-reasoned material to children as a
trusted source and an example of how to think and write,” said Enright.

Enright added that biased reference materials regularly pose a challenge
for her staff and students.

“This is the kind of material or worse that we face daily in choosing
texts for grade school children — material which makes a pretense at
quality and objectivity, yet teaches poor reasoning and biased
information to its audience,” Enright said. “It’s no wonder students
arrive at college freshman year with poor cognitive skills, ripe for the
collectivist chanting that indoctrinates them more.”

Calls and emails to Chicago-based World Book, Inc., which is owned by
Berkshire Hathaway, went unanswered.

http://dailycaller.com/2010/04/05/ch...edia-owned-by-

berkshire-hathaway-shows-questionable-bias/



Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Communist Party Liberal Fascists to "Occupy Wall Street" ∅baMa∅ Tse Dung Shortwave 53 September 29th 11 10:33 PM
Communist Party Liberal Fascists to "Occupy Wall Street" J R Shortwave 0 September 22nd 11 03:51 PM
Joe from Kokomo : Save Your Liberal-Fascist "Zeig Heil" For Pre... dave Shortwave 0 March 17th 11 12:15 PM
Liberal Fascist Barney "Rubble" Frank walks off Barry[_3_] Shortwave 2 June 12th 09 06:19 PM
Neo-Communist Liberal Fascist propaganda lies about "VP" Palin [email protected] Shortwave 0 September 10th 08 01:22 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:16 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2020, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2004-2020 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017