Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 11/27/2011 6:46 PM, Brenda Ann wrote:
"DEFCON 88" wrote in message ... On Nov 26, 2:54 pm, John Smith wrote: [...] True, the cell phone is a much more usable piece of equipment, and in most cases, much more powerful equipment than your average ham station, but good point, it doesn't require anymore effort than the ham equipment [...] At least most ham stations don't have that ****ty "gurgle gurgle" cell phone audio. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Nor do they require a vast infrastructure without which they would be useless. A reason a person would keep their backup dusted off, their gun lubricated, their gold safe, their food supplies secured, and their safe house safe, etc! Regards, JS |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
losing licenses | CB | |||
How many licenses should there be, why and what privileges? | Policy | |||
We need no Licenses anymore. | Policy | |||
Oil prices soar | Shortwave | |||
Double Licenses? | Policy |