Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 12/18/2011 5:28 PM, John wrote:
Hils wrote: On 2011-12-18 22:41, John Smith wrote: What candidate is most support, by actual monetary donations, from military personnel -- the people who are the boots on the ground, see what the criminals are doing, want real cures? And, this webpage might answer your questions: http://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews...tary-donations Interesting. It certainly runs counter to some perceptions of the US military on this side of the pond. Also interesting that Obama received more such donations than any of the other Republican candidates: perhaps a recognition of his withdrawal of troops from Iraq as promised. (One of the few things he's got right.) Just thinking ahead... how different would the rest of the world become if the US became strictly non-interventionist? The rest of the world would have been under a world dictatorship a long time ago. it would then have been us against the whole world and we would have probably fell and found ourselves also under the dictatorship. Korea would be a much better area to combat the type of thing you mention, however, they have no resources of value for the criminals to steal ... No, the puppet masters who own and run, illegally, our public servants have their agenda, they simply attempt to hide in under guises of national security and "helping" other nations ... the fact that these tactics of deceit and deception have worked so well, I just chalk up to easily fooled morons ... Another problem is our nanny role with Israel, a country who now needs to stand on its' own, or find a place where they are wanted ... or else you can pay for it ... Regards, JS |