What goes around...
 

On 06/28/2014 12:49 PM, Bill Davis wrote:
On 6/27/2014 8:43 AM, dave wrote:
On 06/26/2014 05:07 PM, m II wrote:
On 14-06-26 07:39 AM, D. Peter Maus wrote:

If you look at the Nixon-Kennedy election, the vote hinged on Daley
being able to deliver Chicago. Record numbers of decedents voted in
that
election.


That is grossly unfair. The yet to be born have as much right to vote as
the deceased. So, if decedent implies post death, we could use the term
'precedent' for those too early for the ballot box.

"Record numbers of precedents voted in that election.".....make you feel
all warm and fuzzy inside...like a balmy Holland Michigan evening.


These shenanigans pale in comparison to e-voting.

Yeah?

Proof?


You need proof that an election system built on Windows XP platforms,
with no paper records, can be hacked?

What goes around...
 

On 6/30/2014 9:10 AM, dave wrote:
On 06/28/2014 12:48 PM, Bill Davis wrote:
On 6/27/2014 8:41 AM, dave wrote:


The Constitution is intentionally vague.

To promote checks and balances, yes.

This forces people to use their
own brains rather than pretending to know what words meant 220 years
ago.

The core meaning is critical - read any SCOTUS ruling and stop being
cute.

I don't believe in Marbury v Madison. The current SCOTUS is the most
corrupt and dangerous entity in history. The People will burn that big
marble piggy bank to the muddy ground.

That sounds like a physical threat to the SCOTUS, is that what you intended?

What goes around...
 

On 06/28/2014 03:22 PM, wrote:
On Saturday, June 28, 2014 12:50:35 PM UTC-7, Bill Davis wrote:
On 6/27/2014 9:19 AM, wrote:
On Thursday, June 26, 2014 2:49:33 PM UTC-7, Bill Davis wrote:
You find bits and pieces in the Federalist Papers, not a pure
definition.
Show me. I did not see it at all in the quote you provided.

Read it again, I did show you.
I did re-read it. I only see a angument for preventing influence by foreign powers, and there is nothing here saying that this goal would be guaranteed by requiring natural-born citizenship, much less deifining what that would be.

The question posed by Joe from Kokomo was "Does anyone have a *definitive* answer? " and the answer from Rocky the Rat was "Yes, the US Constitution. And the Federalist Papers." You may have different expectations, but I think a definitive anwer should be direct, precise and concise, not scattered and inferential.


I found the R8B box.

What goes around...
 

On 6/30/2014 9:12 AM, dave wrote:
On 06/28/2014 12:49 PM, Bill Davis wrote:
On 6/27/2014 8:43 AM, dave wrote:
On 06/26/2014 05:07 PM, m II wrote:
On 14-06-26 07:39 AM, D. Peter Maus wrote:

If you look at the Nixon-Kennedy election, the vote hinged on Daley
being able to deliver Chicago. Record numbers of decedents voted in
that
election.


That is grossly unfair. The yet to be born have as much right to
vote as
the deceased. So, if decedent implies post death, we could use the term
'precedent' for those too early for the ballot box.

"Record numbers of precedents voted in that election.".....make you
feel
all warm and fuzzy inside...like a balmy Holland Michigan evening.


These shenanigans pale in comparison to e-voting.

Yeah?

Proof?


You need proof that an election system built on Windows XP platforms,
with no paper records, can be hacked?


I need proof that it WAS hacked, if you don't mind sharing an ACORN of
your "wisdom" with us.

You game?

What goes around...
 

On 06/29/2014 10:58 AM, DhiaDuit wrote:
Gaelic and Algonquin Similarities....... www.libertypost.org One of those posters said Redneck Riviera. HUMPH! He. Doesn't know sheet. I have been all along the Gulf Coast before, from Texas all the way to Florida's East Coast. There is no such place as the Redneck Riviera.


Bull****. My Dad was stationed at Eglin. I used to work in country dance
bands. From Gulfport to Panama City. Casinos. White sandy beaches. 2 ton
tarballs.

What goes around...
 

On 06/29/2014 01:18 PM, DhiaDuit wrote:
Google,,, Crusin The Coast Southwest Rod And Custom.
You know how to seat a tire bead that is hard to seat? Spray some
starting fluid or carburetor fluid in there and throw a lit match at
it and RUN! It works every time.


F'ing brilliant! Is that how the local Big O does it?

What goes around...
 

I wish I know the Irish Gaelic Language. Google,,, Irish Gaelic Language. I can listen to it on Irish internet streaming radio, but I don't know what they are. Saying. Google,,, Irish Gaelic Language Youtube. Google,,, C U Burn Youtube

What goes around...
 

On 06/30/2014 08:24 AM, Bill Davis wrote:
On 6/30/2014 9:12 AM, dave wrote:



These shenanigans pale in comparison to e-voting.

Yeah?

Proof?


You need proof that an election system built on Windows XP platforms,
with no paper records, can be hacked?


I need proof that it WAS hacked, if you don't mind sharing an ACORN of
your "wisdom" with us.

You game?
Take it up with Brad Friedman. Not my crusade.

What goes around...
 

On 7/6/2014 11:09 AM, dave wrote:
On 06/30/2014 08:24 AM, Bill Davis wrote:
On 6/30/2014 9:12 AM, dave wrote:



These shenanigans pale in comparison to e-voting.

Yeah?

Proof?


You need proof that an election system built on Windows XP platforms,
with no paper records, can be hacked?


I need proof that it WAS hacked, if you don't mind sharing an ACORN of
your "wisdom" with us.

You game?
Take it up with Brad Friedman. Not my crusade.

You brought it up, you prove it.

What goes around...
 

On 07/06/2014 08:35 PM, Bill Davis wrote:
On 7/6/2014 11:09 AM, dave wrote:
On 06/30/2014 08:24 AM, Bill Davis wrote:
On 6/30/2014 9:12 AM, dave wrote:



These shenanigans pale in comparison to e-voting.

Yeah?

Proof?


You need proof that an election system built on Windows XP platforms,
with no paper records, can be hacked?


I need proof that it WAS hacked, if you don't mind sharing an ACORN of
your "wisdom" with us.

You game?
Take it up with Brad Friedman. Not my crusade.

You brought it up, you prove it.


http://truth-out.org/news/item/12845...2-election-fix