What goes around...
 

On 6/26/2014 7:42 AM, D. Peter Maus wrote:
On 6/18/14 16:24 , Bill Davis wrote:
On 6/18/2014 2:47 PM, dxAce wrote:


Bill Davis wrote:

On 6/17/2014 2:52 PM, dxAce wrote:


Bill Davis wrote:

On 6/17/2014 3:36 AM, dxAce wrote:


Bill Davis wrote:

On 6/16/2014 9:23 AM, dave wrote:
On 06/14/2014 10:32 AM, wrote:
On Saturday, June 14, 2014 9:22:54 AM UTC-4, dave wrote:




Amendment 14 says we just have to be born here.
Are you an ex-slave ?


I am currently a slave.

To whom?

I think what he is trying to say is that he's a clown 'tard who just
keeps making bad choices.


Oh, iow a typical liberal who can't see the consequences of his
voting.

There's a lot of that going around.


It's about to change - oil is due to double in cost after Iraq falls.

Oh right, that would be Bush's fault too...

According to some, EVERYTHING is Bush's fault...


Including the boo boo on my knee, I'm sure of it ;-)



New Executive Order, in pursuit of Agenda 21: You're only permitted one
'boo.'


Hoo boy, this is going to ruin Honey Boo Boo's career too.

What goes around...
 

On 6/26/2014 9:36 AM, DhiaDuit wrote:
Google,,, Aquiess, Inc. Also at. www.stevequayle.com


Steve's research on the nefilim is an eye-opener.

What goes around...
 

On 6/26/2014 9:45 AM, wrote:
On Saturday, June 14, 2014 8:59:39 AM UTC-7, Bill Davis wrote:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natura...citizen_clause



Alexander Hamilton, a Convention delegate from New York, wrote in
Federalist No. 68 about the care that must be taken in selecting
the president: "Nothing was more to be desired than that every
practicable obstacle should be opposed to cabal, intrigue, and
corruption. These most deadly adversaries of republican government
might naturally have been expected to make their approaches from
more than one quarter, but chiefly from the desire in foreign powers
to gain an improper ascendant in our councils."[5

http://www.redstate.com/diary/ironch...ynch-v-clarke/

A quote from James Madison, popularly acknowledged as the
ï¿ 1/2 authorï¿ 1/2 of the Constitution, provides a clue as to what our
Founders meant. In one of his papers, dated the 22 May, 1789, he
wrote the following (emphasis mine):

It is an established maxim that birth is a criterion of allegiance.
Birth however derives its force sometimes from place and sometimes
from parentage, but in general place is the most certain criterion;
it is what applies in the United States; it will therefore be
unnecessary to investigate any other.

Maybe it is the 18th century Colonial English, but the quote from the Federalist Papers that you attribute to Alexander Hamilton seems like a justification for requiring natural-born citizenship. I do not see a definition of being a "natura- born citizen" in this quote.

The quote from James Madison is interesting, but he seems to be presenting it as his opinion, it covers some simple and uncontroversial situations, and he does not seem to be claiming the same authority to interpret the constitutions as John Marshall did in Marbury versus Madison. It does not appear to be a formal and legal definition that gives both the necessary requirements and describes any and all disqualifying conditions.

I still think the Rock Rat was wrong when he asserted that the definition could be found in the Constitution, and he was just bloviating when he claimed that it was in the Federalist Papers.


You find bits and pieces in the Federalist Papers, not a pure definition.

What goes around...
 

BREAKING! There may be enough...... www.libertypost.org

What goes around...
 

On 14-06-26 07:39 AM, D. Peter Maus wrote:

If you look at the Nixon-Kennedy election, the vote hinged on Daley
being able to deliver Chicago. Record numbers of decedents voted in that
election.


That is grossly unfair. The yet to be born have as much right to vote as
the deceased. So, if decedent implies post death, we could use the term
'precedent' for those too early for the ballot box.

"Record numbers of precedents voted in that election.".....make you feel
all warm and fuzzy inside...like a balmy Holland Michigan evening.




mike




--
It is hard enough to remember my opinions, without also remembering my
reasons for them!
--Friedrich Nietzsche

What goes around...
 

On 06/26/2014 02:49 PM, Bill Davis wrote:
On 6/26/2014 9:45 AM, wrote:


I still think the Rock Rat was wrong when he asserted that the
definition could be found in the Constitution, and he was just
bloviating when he claimed that it was in the Federalist Papers.


You find bits and pieces in the Federalist Papers, not a pure definition.

The Constitution is intentionally vague. This forces people to use their
own brains rather than pretending to know what words meant 220 years ago.

What goes around...
 

On 06/26/2014 05:07 PM, m II wrote:
On 14-06-26 07:39 AM, D. Peter Maus wrote:

If you look at the Nixon-Kennedy election, the vote hinged on Daley
being able to deliver Chicago. Record numbers of decedents voted in that
election.


That is grossly unfair. The yet to be born have as much right to vote as
the deceased. So, if decedent implies post death, we could use the term
'precedent' for those too early for the ballot box.

"Record numbers of precedents voted in that election.".....make you feel
all warm and fuzzy inside...like a balmy Holland Michigan evening.


These shenanigans pale in comparison to e-voting. Democracy is in chains.

What goes around...
 

On Thursday, June 26, 2014 2:49:33 PM UTC-7, Bill Davis wrote:
You find bits and pieces in the Federalist Papers, not a pure
definition.
Show me. I did not see it at all in the quote you provided.

What goes around...
 

www.clarionledger.com Tea Party Leader Mark Mayfield. Over there at. www.libertypost.org Twitter and True The Vote, couple of articles.

What goes around...
 

On 6/26/14 16:45 , Bill Davis wrote:
On 6/26/2014 7:36 AM, D. Peter Maus wrote:
On 6/16/14 06:04 , dxAce wrote:


Bill Davis wrote:

On 6/15/2014 4:40 AM, dxAce wrote:


Bill Davis wrote:

On 6/14/2014 7:26 AM, dxAce wrote:


dave wrote:

On 06/13/2014 09:17 AM, wrote:
On Friday, June 13, 2014 6:29:12 AM UTC-7, D. Peter Maus wrote:

Yes, the US Constitution. And the Federalist Papers.
What do the Federalist Papers opine about the qualifications to
be President? Was there unanimous agreement, or was this
another controversial issue?

AFAIK, the US Constitution says "natural born citizne", and the
US Supreme Court has not yet spoken ex cathedra on clarifying
the definition.


The Supreme Court has 2 blatantly corrupt Associate Justices and
is an
invalid body. In a perfect world Scalia and Thomas would be in
prison
licking their wounds.

In a perfect world Barack and Michelle would have already packed
the U-Haul and been gone...


I don't think you can drive a U-Haul all the way back to Kenya....

I have to wonder if Barack even knows HOW to drive...


He seems competent on the golf course ;-)

Sure hope he leaves the White House soon and joins the PGA Tour...




What's not widely known, is that he can't play golf at most of the
better courses in the Chicago area. All but two of the North Shore
courses are restricted.


I did not know that.

Can Rahm play them?

No.