STUNNING.
 

On 10/15/2016 9:42 PM, DhiaDuit wrote:


Since this weekend started, 13 shot, 5 fatally in, you guessed it,
Chicago, probally 25 or 35 shot by now in Chicago.

So, just like Trump trying to garner black votes by quoting Chicago
crime statistics. Only problem is, Trump offers NO plan, zero solution.
Does he think all the Chicago villains are going to voluntarily turn in
their guns just because he is president? I don't think so.

Just another Trump con job...

---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

STUNNING.
 

DhiaDuit wrote:


Sabre rattling is Sabre rattling, but who do you believe will not most likely start a nuke war?

Clearly, anyone who says countries like Saudi Arabia CAN have nuclear
weapons, is OK with nuclear war.

And, if nukes are just laying around, why not use them?

http://www.politicususa.com/2016/08/...pons-them.html

STUNNING.
 

On Sunday, October 16, 2016 at 10:36:36 AM UTC-5, analogdial wrote:
DhiaDuit wrote:


Sabre rattling is Sabre rattling, but who do you believe will not most likely start a nuke war?

Clearly, anyone who says countries like Saudi Arabia CAN have nuclear
weapons, is OK with nuclear war.

And, if nukes are just laying around, why not use them?

http://www.politicususa.com/2016/08/...pons-them.html
hillary advisors admit she hates everyday Americans

STUNNING.
 

DhiaDuit wrote:


Sabre rattling is Sabre rattling, but who do you believe will not most likely start a nuke war?

Russia is actively campaigning for Trump and their nuke war scare is
part of that campaign.

Tony Schwartz, the real author of "The Art of the Deal" has some
comments on Trump's finger on the nuclear trigger:

"Now Schwartz, who got to know Trump better than anyone outside the
multi-millionaire’s family, is hoping the opinion polls are right and
the Republican loses – for the sake of the world’s survival."

""To be honest the most worrying prospect for me is Trump having his
hands on the nuclear codes,” says Schwartz."

"“He is extremely thick-skinned, very reactive and compulsive. He is
always wanting to prove he is the most powerful person in the room."

"“So you imagine him in some sort of confrontation with a person like
Putin – and he turns to the guy next to him carrying the nuclear codes
and says, ‘I’ll show him’."

"“And that’s the end of the world as we know it. It’s not a joke to me.
It’s very real."

""He does not have a sense of mental balance – and that is not a
person you want anywhere near the nuclear codes.”"

http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/world-n...writer-9054668

Understand, of course, that a REAL MAN such as TRUMP would HAVE to kill
billions of people if his VERY SENSITIVE feelings were hurt.

STUNNING.
 

On Sunday, October 16, 2016 at 10:59:13 AM UTC-5, analogdial wrote:
DhiaDuit wrote:


Sabre rattling is Sabre rattling, but who do you believe will not most likely start a nuke war?

Russia is actively campaigning for Trump and their nuke war scare is
part of that campaign.

Tony Schwartz, the real author of "The Art of the Deal" has some
comments on Trump's finger on the nuclear trigger:

"Now Schwartz, who got to know Trump better than anyone outside the
multi-millionaire’s family, is hoping the opinion polls are right and
the Republican loses – for the sake of the world’s survival."

""To be honest the most worrying prospect for me is Trump having his
hands on the nuclear codes,” says Schwartz."

"“He is extremely thick-skinned, very reactive and compulsive. He is
always wanting to prove he is the most powerful person in the room."

"“So you imagine him in some sort of confrontation with a person like
Putin – and he turns to the guy next to him carrying the nuclear codes
and says, ‘I’ll show him’."

"“And that’s the end of the world as we know it. It’s not a joke to me.
It’s very real."

""He does not have a sense of mental balance – and that is not a
person you want anywhere near the nuclear codes.”"

http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/world-n...writer-9054668

Understand, of course, that a REAL MAN such as TRUMP would HAVE to kill
billions of people if his VERY SENSITIVE feelings were hurt.
Putin wouldn't start a nuke war. He likes Trump. hillary would be most likely to start a nuke war, because she is bat **** crazy!

STUNNING.
 

DhiaDuit wrote:


hillary advisors admit she hates everyday Americans

I know. TRUMP the HUMANITARIAN only hates POWs, and colored people and
ugly women and Mexicans and Muslims and Liberals and crying babies
(himself excluded).

TRUMP loves women who don't fight back and bankers who don't check his
credit report.

STUNNING.
 

DhiaDuit wrote:


Understand, of course, that a REAL MAN such as TRUMP would HAVE to kill
billions of people if his VERY SENSITIVE feelings were hurt.
Putin wouldn't start a nuke war. He likes Trump. hillary would be most likely to start a nuke war, because she is bat **** crazy!

No, Putin would not start a nuclear war because, despite being a brutal
dicatator, he seems to have self-control. But what happens when "Mr.
Sensitive" needs to defend his MANHOOD in a really LOUD way?

And it would be about defending TRUMP not about defending AMERICA. This
whole Presidential campaign is ALL ABOUT TRUMP and, win or lose, that's
just how he likes it.

STUNNING.
 

On Sunday, October 16, 2016 at 11:19:17 AM UTC-5, analogdial wrote:
DhiaDuit wrote:


Understand, of course, that a REAL MAN such as TRUMP would HAVE to kill
billions of people if his VERY SENSITIVE feelings were hurt.
Putin wouldn't start a nuke war. He likes Trump. hillary would be most likely to start a nuke war, because she is bat **** crazy!

No, Putin would not start a nuclear war because, despite being a brutal
dicatator, he seems to have self-control. But what happens when "Mr.
Sensitive" needs to defend his MANHOOD in a really LOUD way?

And it would be about defending TRUMP not about defending AMERICA. This
whole Presidential campaign is ALL ABOUT TRUMP and, win or lose, that's
just how he likes it.

megan kelly's ratings TANK as Donald Trump supporters TUNE HER OUT. ...That's a GOOD thang too! [megan 'TANK' kelly]

STUNNING.
 

On 10/15/16 15:07 , analogdial wrote:
DhiaDuit wrote:



Trump Butler Calls media BULLSHEET www.drudgereport.com ...Trump's Butler is RIGHT.


Why hasn't the Donald filed a lawsuit over ANY of the supposed
media LIES?



Because First Amendment protections have been interpreted to include
virtually anything in the context of a public figure, which would
include a Presidential Candidate. In fact, Supreme Court has ruled that
virtually anything may be said about a candidate, in the context of the
campaign, with impugnity, even if, especially if, untrue.

The standard is whether or not they're doing it in the context of the
campaign, or a personal attack outside the realm of political speech.

Further, content of political speech may extend beyond the usual
'community standards' limitation of normal broadcast content. This may
include profanity. And, the stations must run even that content, without
comment, without edit, or without disclaimer.

If you'll recall when Barry Commoner was running for President in
1980, he began a series of spots with an emphatic "Bull****!" That
station I was working wanted to protect themselves from public outcry,
and were warned that we may not modify, or disclaim the spots under
penalty of law, which may include license jeopardy.

So, his political foes may say what they wish about Mr Trump, and Mr
Trump may do them no harm.

STUNNING.
 

On Monday, October 17, 2016 at 8:47:43 AM UTC-5, D. Peter Maus wrote:
On 10/15/16 15:07 , analogdial wrote:
DhiaDuit wrote:



Trump Butler Calls media BULLSHEET www.drudgereport.com ...Trump's Butler is RIGHT.
d
Why hasn't the Donald filed a lawsuit over ANY of the supposed
media LIES?



Because First Amendment protections have been interpreted to include
virtually anything in the context of a public figure, which would
include a Presidential Candidate. In fact, Supreme Court has ruled that
virtually anything may be said about a candidate, in the context of the
campaign, with impugnity, even if, especially if, untrue.

The standard is whether or not they're doing it in the context of the
campaign, or a personal attack outside the realm of political speech.

Further, content of political speech may extend beyond the usual
'community standards' limitation of normal broadcast content. This may
include profanity. And, the stations must run even that content, without
comment, without edit, or without disclaimer.

If you'll recall when Barry Commoner was running for President in
1980, he began a series of spots with an emphatic "Bull****!" That
station I was working wanted to protect themselves from public outcry,
and were warned that we may not modify, or disclaim the spots under
penalty of law, which may include license jeopardy.

So, his political foes may say what they wish about Mr Trump, and Mr
Trump may do them no harm.

Tricks and Frauds of U.S. Presidential Elections. yournewswire.com Rothschilds Caught Rigging The US Election ...WAKE UP!, WORLD!