Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Saturday, November 12, 2016 at 5:54:15 PM UTC-6, analogdial wrote:
DhiaDuit wrote: www.strategic-culture.org The clintons and soros launce America's purple revolution Their more immediate goal is to flip votes in the Electoral College. Putin Issues International Arrest Warrant For george soros... Dead or Alive. www.stevequayle.com ...george soros is 81 Years Old. Either way, looks like he HAS TO GO! |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
DhiaDuit wrote:
Putin Issues International Arrest Warrant For george soros... Dead or Alive. www.stevequayle.com ...george soros is 81 Years Old. Either way, looks like he HAS TO GO! Howcum Steve Quayle isn't on the radio anymore? I click on the radio shows button on his website and he hasn't had the Q files on broadcast radio since ancient times and he only chatted with Alex Jones over a couple of years ago. Is George Soros jamming Steve Quayle or something? |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Saturday, November 12, 2016 at 9:05:14 PM UTC-6, analogdial wrote:
DhiaDuit wrote: Putin Issues International Arrest Warrant For george soros... Dead or Alive. www.stevequayle.com ...george soros is 81 Years Old. Either way, looks like he HAS TO GO! Howcum Steve Quayle isn't on the radio anymore? I click on the radio shows button on his website and he hasn't had the Q files on broadcast radio since ancient times and he only chatted with Alex Jones over a couple of years ago. Is George Soros jamming Steve Quayle or something? No, liberals...hillary Did NOT Win the popular vote, So Stop With the Bullsh*t Petitions! www.viralliberty.com |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Saturday, November 12, 2016 at 9:59:12 PM UTC-6, DhiaDuit wrote:
On Saturday, November 12, 2016 at 9:05:14 PM UTC-6, analogdial wrote: DhiaDuit wrote: Putin Issues International Arrest Warrant For george soros... Dead or Alive. www.stevequayle.com ...george soros is 81 Years Old. Either way, looks like he HAS TO GO! Howcum Steve Quayle isn't on the radio anymore? I click on the radio shows button on his website and he hasn't had the Q files on broadcast radio since ancient times and he only chatted with Alex Jones over a couple of years ago. Is George Soros jamming Steve Quayle or something? No, liberals...hillary Did NOT Win the popular vote, So Stop With the Bullsh*t Petitions! www.viralliberty.com Steve Quayle radio. 6-7 PM Central Standard Time Zone, check out the Time Zones. |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
DhiaDuit wrote:
No, liberals...hillary Did NOT Win the popular vote, So Stop With the Bullsh*t Petitions! www.viralliberty.com Hey Larry, some of these humor sites you bring up are MORONIC. The nit-wit who wrote that article says: "From American Thinker:" "First of all, she˘s probably not going to win the actual number of votes cast. She may win the number of votes counted, but not the votes cast." "States don˘t count their absentee ballots unless the number of outstanding absentee ballots is larger than the state margin of difference. If there is a margin of 1,000 votes counted and there are 1,300 absentee ballots outstanding, then the state tabulates those. If the number of outstanding absentee ballots wouldn˘t influence the election results, then the absentee ballots aren˘t counted." Does that actually make any sense at all? Votes are still being counted. Couldn't the doofus author take a second to wonder just WHAT votes are still being counted? Here's what vote.org has to say: Yes, all votes are counted, whether they're cast in-person or by absentee ballot. It is a common misconception that absentee ballots are only counted during very tight races. This misconception stems from two things: one, absentee ballots are often counted for days after the election since many are coming from abroad; two, absentee ballots are often a small percentage of all voted ballots. Many elections have a clear winner, so the absentee ballots that are still being counted after election night don't affect the results as predicted right after the polls close. As absentee voting becomes more popular, however, an increasing number of elections are decided by absentee ballots. http://help.vote.org/article/8-are-a...allots-counted |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sunday, November 13, 2016 at 6:22:28 AM UTC-6, analogdial wrote:
DhiaDuit wrote: No, liberals...hillary Did NOT Win the popular vote, So Stop With the Bullsh*t Petitions! www.viralliberty.com Hey Larry, some of these humor sites you bring up are MORONIC. The nit-wit who wrote that article says: "From American Thinker:" "First of all, she’s probably not going to win the actual number of votes cast. She may win the number of votes counted, but not the votes cast." "States don’t count their absentee ballots unless the number of outstanding absentee ballots is larger than the state margin of difference. If there is a margin of 1,000 votes counted and there are 1,300 absentee ballots outstanding, then the state tabulates those. If the number of outstanding absentee ballots wouldn’t influence the election results, then the absentee ballots aren’t counted." Does that actually make any sense at all? Votes are still being counted. Couldn't the doofus author take a second to wonder just WHAT votes are still being counted? Here's what vote.org has to say: Yes, all votes are counted, whether they're cast in-person or by absentee ballot. It is a common misconception that absentee ballots are only counted during very tight races. This misconception stems from two things: one, absentee ballots are often counted for days after the election since many are coming from abroad; two, absentee ballots are often a small percentage of all voted ballots. Many elections have a clear winner, so the absentee ballots that are still being counted after election night don't affect the results as predicted right after the polls close. As absentee voting becomes more popular, however, an increasing number of elections are decided by absentee ballots. http://help.vote.org/article/8-are-a...allots-counted Youtube hillary crying uncontrollably all night protest and what democrat stands for |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sunday, November 13, 2016 at 7:27:04 AM UTC-6, DhiaDuit wrote:
On Sunday, November 13, 2016 at 6:22:28 AM UTC-6, analogdial wrote: DhiaDuit wrote: No, liberals...hillary Did NOT Win the popular vote, So Stop With the Bullsh*t Petitions! www.viralliberty.com Hey Larry, some of these humor sites you bring up are MORONIC. The nit-wit who wrote that article says: "From American Thinker:" "First of all, she’s probably not going to win the actual number of votes cast. She may win the number of votes counted, but not the votes cast." "States don’t count their absentee ballots unless the number of outstanding absentee ballots is larger than the state margin of difference. If there is a margin of 1,000 votes counted and there are 1,300 absentee ballots outstanding, then the state tabulates those. If the number of outstanding absentee ballots wouldn’t influence the election results, then the absentee ballots aren’t counted." Does that actually make any sense at all? Votes are still being counted. Couldn't the doofus author take a second to wonder just WHAT votes are still being counted? Here's what vote.org has to say: Yes, all votes are counted, whether they're cast in-person or by absentee ballot. It is a common misconception that absentee ballots are only counted during very tight races. This misconception stems from two things: one, absentee ballots are often counted for days after the election since many are coming from abroad; two, absentee ballots are often a small percentage of all voted ballots. Many elections have a clear winner, so the absentee ballots that are still being counted after election night don't affect the results as predicted right after the polls close. As absentee voting becomes more popular, however, an increasing number of elections are decided by absentee ballots. http://help.vote.org/article/8-are-a...allots-counted Youtube hillary crying uncontrollably all night protest and what democrat stands for www.stevequayle.com and, www.nydailynews.com Magnitude 7.9 Earthquake near South Island, New Zealand ...Yeah, you got to watch out for those tudes! |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() DhiaDuit wrote: No, liberals...hillary Did NOT Win the popular vote, So Stop With the Bullsh*t Petitions! On 11/13/2016 7:21 AM, analogdial wrote: Hey Larry, some of these humor sites you bring up are MORONIC. Larry reading, quoting and believing moronic sites? Gee, who'd a thunk it? --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Joe from Kokomo wrote:
DhiaDuit wrote: No, liberals...hillary Did NOT Win the popular vote, So Stop With the Bullsh*t Petitions! On 11/13/2016 7:21 AM, analogdial wrote: Hey Larry, some of these humor sites you bring up are MORONIC. Larry reading, quoting and believing moronic sites? Gee, who'd a thunk it? Believing it? Who knows? There's no evidence that Larry actually reads any of it beyond the headlines. |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sunday, November 13, 2016 at 8:23:48 AM UTC-6, analogdial wrote:
Joe from Kokomo wrote: DhiaDuit wrote: No, liberals...hillary Did NOT Win the popular vote, So Stop With the Bullsh*t Petitions! On 11/13/2016 7:21 AM, analogdial wrote: Hey Larry, some of these humor sites you bring up are MORONIC. Larry reading, quoting and believing moronic sites? Gee, who'd a thunk it? Believing it? Who knows? There's no evidence that Larry actually reads any of it beyond the headlines. You don't believed that Earthquake happened? |